The China Mail - Princess Diana's former butler paid damages over phone hacking

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.503991
ALL 79.180391
AMD 364.204132
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1499.052487
AUD 1.396258
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.673269
BBD 2.016426
BDT 122.342473
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.377465
BIF 2979.42422
BMD 1
BND 1.270394
BOB 11.563503
BRL 5.139504
BSD 1.001155
BTN 95.810412
BWP 13.414895
BYN 2.994995
BYR 19600
BZD 2.013518
CAD 1.37725
CDF 2275.000362
CHF 0.801408
CLF 0.023248
CLP 924.387218
CNY 6.72125
CNH 6.721155
COP 3075.416007
CRC 455.575993
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.336313
CZK 20.648604
DJF 178.277794
DKK 6.40104
DOP 58.655944
DZD 132.82204
EGP 50.864525
ERN 15
ETB 161.91513
EUR 0.855604
FJD 2.191604
FKP 0.733046
GBP 0.733084
GEL 2.60504
GGP 0.733046
GHS 11.137443
GIP 0.733046
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8796.680498
GTQ 7.639988
GYD 209.453737
HKD 7.84135
HNL 26.847756
HRK 6.452604
HTG 130.97489
HUF 310.49504
IDR 17649.8
ILS 2.987204
IMP 0.733046
INR 95.700504
IQD 1311.545536
IRR 1374600.000352
ISK 121.250386
JEP 0.733046
JMD 158.891218
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.97504
KES 129.6488
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4041.57933
KMF 422.00035
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1386.00035
KWD 0.30843
KYD 0.834324
KZT 460.94024
LAK 22551.225564
LBP 89657.013304
LKR 329.580357
LRD 181.708517
LSL 16.053899
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.362664
MAD 9.24661
MDL 17.234889
MGA 4281.131026
MKD 52.637208
MMK 2099.408357
MNT 3597.717458
MOP 8.084613
MRU 39.893913
MUR 46.603741
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1735.979809
MXN 16.917404
MYR 4.038504
MZN 63.880377
NAD 16.053899
NGN 1345.503725
NIO 36.839629
NOK 9.303975
NPR 153.29683
NZD 1.672241
OMR 0.384386
PAB 1.001155
PEN 3.356461
PGK 4.43684
PHP 61.665038
PKR 277.79544
PLN 3.69265
PYG 6030.71395
QAR 3.639475
RON 4.49875
RSD 100.406382
RUB 82.677332
RWF 1475.210677
SAR 3.761427
SBD 8.032258
SCR 13.734782
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.462504
SGD 1.269504
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.603667
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 572.186337
SRD 37.77037
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.960773
SVC 8.759892
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.043119
THB 33.045038
TJS 9.235659
TMT 3.5
TND 2.911836
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.042504
TTD 6.790435
TWD 31.845038
TZS 2653.206143
UAH 44.735424
UGX 3724.173333
UYU 40.270351
UZS 11868.931001
VES 778.98225
VND 26125
VUV 118.516952
WST 2.715975
XAF 561.198614
XAG 0.014494
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804338
XDR 0.707052
XOF 561.198614
XPF 102.031912
YER 237.075037
ZAR 16.01902
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.997305
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.1780

    21.102

    -0.84%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    68.56

    0%

  • BCC

    0.7000

    82.47

    +0.85%

  • RELX

    0.5300

    35.91

    +1.48%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    23.71

    -0.3%

  • AZN

    1.4900

    165.98

    +0.9%

  • RIO

    3.1300

    105.3

    +2.97%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    20.98

    -0.67%

  • NGG

    -0.8600

    79.76

    -1.08%

  • GSK

    0.4500

    52.41

    +0.86%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.38

    -0.24%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    15.96

    -0.31%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2500

    20.25

    -1.23%

  • BTI

    -0.4900

    56.21

    -0.87%

  • BP

    -0.3800

    44.76

    -0.85%

Princess Diana's former butler paid damages over phone hacking
Princess Diana's former butler paid damages over phone hacking / Photo: © AFP

Princess Diana's former butler paid damages over phone hacking

Princess Diana's former butler was on Tuesday given a public apology and paid substantial damages by the publisher of the Daily Mirror newspaper over phone hacking and the "repeated invasion of his privacy".

Text size:

Paul Burrell's successful legal action against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) is the latest in a series of similar claims brought by public figures and celebrities against British tabloids.

Burrell took MGN to court after being targeted by private investigators instructed by the publisher and had his voicemails intercepted.

"I am pleased to announce that the defendant has now accepted responsibility for its unlawful actions, admitted liability and has agreed to apologise to the claimant for the repeated invasion of his privacy," said Burrell's lawyer Francis Leonard.

Leonard said that MGN had targeted Burrell's voicemail messages and also instructed private investigators at least three times between 2001 and 2002.

This led to the publication of "numerous articles concerning the claimant arising from unlawfully obtained information which severely impacted his reputation", he added.

"Between 1995 and 2008 the claimant was targeted by the defendant because he was a close friend and trusted confidante to Princess Diana and then subsequently because of his role within the public sphere following his departure from the royal household," Leonard said.

"During Diana's lifetime, the activities of the defendant caused his relationship with her to deteriorate as she wrongly thought that her highly sensitive personal information was being leaked to the press."

- 'Great psychological harm' -

MGN -- which publishes the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and The People -- had agreed to pay substantial damages plus his legal costs and accept liability for the unlawful acts, Leonard said.

The use of the unlawfully obtained information in the press undermined Burrell's relationship with his legal team as he prepared for his criminal trial over accusations that he stole hundreds of items from Diana's estate.

Burrell was cleared of the charges in 2002 after it emerged that he had informed Queen Elizabeth II shortly after the princess's death in August 1997 that he had taken some items for safekeeping.

"In relation to his criminal trial, the intense negative daily press coverage led to a disintegration of the claimant's relationship with his wife and children, causing great psychological harm," Leonard said.

Alexander Vakil, for MGN, apologised on behalf of his client.

"The defendant is here today through me to offer its sincere apologies to the claimant for the damage, as well as the distress caused to him by the obtaining of his private information and the accessing of his voicemail messages," he said.

"It has undertaken never to repeat these actions.

"The defendant acknowledges this information should never have been obtained or used in the manner it was and that it is liable for the misuse of private information."

Q.Moore--ThChM