The China Mail - 50 years on, the enduring myth of Stockholm Syndrome

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.216919
AMD 362.051328
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1515.25437
AUD 1.435956
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.739803
BBD 2.01708
BDT 123.195303
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378775
BIF 2997.464751
BMD 1
BND 1.281146
BOB 11.69239
BRL 5.065104
BSD 1.001468
BTN 95.050483
BWP 13.720589
BYN 3.015879
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014233
CAD 1.41575
CDF 2313.50392
CHF 0.825932
CLF 0.024881
CLP 979.255437
CNY 6.691204
CNH 6.686704
COP 3173.953654
CRC 455.099408
CUC 1
CUP 24.035938
CVE 98.087444
CZK 21.645304
DJF 178.33919
DKK 6.651204
DOP 61.433083
DZD 133.824668
EGP 53.529689
ERN 15
ETB 163.585998
EUR 0.889904
FJD 2.26765
FKP 0.750253
GBP 0.752078
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.750253
GHS 11.695058
GIP 0.750253
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8810.21216
GTQ 7.652004
GYD 209.527198
HKD 7.84815
HNL 26.885202
HRK 6.703804
HTG 131.147978
HUF 323.310388
IDR 18053
ILS 3.09465
IMP 0.750253
INR 94.965504
IQD 1518.213762
IRR 1795877.503816
ISK 121.180386
JEP 0.750253
JMD 159.195837
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.01504
KES 130.098296
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4070.631144
KMF 440.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1334.740383
KWD 0.31082
KYD 0.834586
KZT 453.195748
LAK 22534.359294
LBP 89683.40524
LKR 331.690611
LRD 170.751234
LSL 16.462394
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.431526
MAD 9.729662
MDL 17.966464
MGA 4507.405595
MKD 54.836988
MMK 2100.071343
MNT 3596.488264
MOP 8.096339
MRU 40.037362
MUR 47.230378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1736.600987
MXN 18.492904
MYR 4.083204
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.462394
NGN 1331.210377
NIO 36.854512
NOK 9.427704
NPR 152.081128
NZD 1.767253
OMR 0.382413
PAB 1.001468
PEN 3.444825
PGK 4.547436
PHP 62.986038
PKR 277.237468
PLN 3.88825
PYG 5719.877241
QAR 3.660721
RON 4.730604
RSD 104.461148
RUB 84.13468
RWF 1478.183516
SAR 3.752837
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.905529
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.912404
SGD 1.282104
SHP 0.754745
SLE 24.680371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.343548
SRD 37.794504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.794245
SVC 8.763065
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.455989
THB 33.445038
TJS 9.228751
TMT 3.51
TND 2.98768
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.513804
TTD 6.798915
TWD 32.453604
TZS 2646.44398
UAH 44.920874
UGX 4136.458658
UYU 40.314905
UZS 12073.121914
VES 878.910604
VND 25894.5
VUV 119.385856
WST 2.787824
XAF 583.738825
XAG 0.017551
XAU 0.000240063761
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804919
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.738825
XPF 106.089045
YER 236.150363
ZAR 16.494037
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.049815
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5750.775019
MXV 2.088032
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

50 years on, the enduring myth of Stockholm Syndrome
50 years on, the enduring myth of Stockholm Syndrome / Photo: © TT NEWS AGENCY/AFP/File

50 years on, the enduring myth of Stockholm Syndrome

"Get down to the floor! The party begins!" Shouting in English, Jan-Erik Olsson walked into a Stockholm bank on August 23, 1973, high on drugs, agitated and waving a submachine gun.

Text size:

So began a hostage drama that would go on to last six days, and birth the term "Stockholm Syndrome" -- a concept now known around the world whereby captives develop an emotional bond with their captors.

Olsson, known by his nickname "Janne", took four employees hostage -- three women and one man.

Police and media quickly swarmed the square outside Kreditbanken, with snipers perched in surrounding buildings, their weapons pointed at the bank.

Olsson used two hostages as human shields and threatened to kill them.

"Afterwards, I've often thought of the absurd situation we found ourselves in," recalled hostage Kristin Enmark, then 23, in her book "I Became the Stockholm Syndrome".

"Terrified and stuck between two death threats, on one side the police and on the other the robber."

- 'Feared for my life' -

Olsson made several demands, asking for three million kronor (almost $700,000 at the time), and that Clark Olofsson, one of the country's most notorious bank robbers in prison at the time, be brought to the bank.

To calm things down, the Swedish government agreed.

The entire country was mesmerised by the unfolding drama, one of the first major news events broadcast live on Swedish television.

"When Clark Olofsson arrived, he took control of the situation, he was the one who did the talking with the police," recalled now 73-year-old Bertil Ericsson, a news photographer who covered the crisis, in an interview with AFP.

"He had a lot of charisma. He was a good speaker."

Olsson calmed down as soon as Olofsson arrived. And Kristin Enmark quickly saw in Olofsson a saviour.

"He promised that he would make sure nothing happened to me and I decided to believe him," she wrote.

"I was 23 years old and feared for my life."

She spoke on the phone to authorities several times during the hostage drama, shocking the world when she came out in defence of her captors.

"I'm not the least bit afraid of Clark and the other guy, I'm afraid of the police. Do you understand? I trust them completely," she told then prime minister Olof Palme in one phone call.

"Believe it or not but we've had a really nice time here," she said, adding that they were "telling stories" and "playing checkers".

"You know what I'm afraid of? That the police will do something to us, storm the bank or something."

The crisis ended on the sixth day when police sprayed gas into the bank, forcing Olsson and Olofsson to surrender, and freeing the hostages.

- 'Not a psychiatric diagnosis' -

Psychiatrist Nils Bejerot was a member of the negotiating team.

His job was to analyse the robbers' and hostages' behaviour, and he ultimately coined the term "Stockholm Syndrome".

At the time, the women were believed to be behaving as if under a spell, similar to being brainwashed.

Psychiatrists have since dismissed that notion.

Stockholm Syndrome is "not a psychiatric diagnosis", says Christoffer Rahm, a psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute and author of the scientific article "Stockholm Syndrome: Psychiatric Diagnosis or Urban Myth?".

Rather, the term is used to describe a "defence mechanism that helps the victim" cope with a traumatic situation, he told AFP.

Cecilia Ase, gender studies professor at Stockholm University, said the statements by Enmark and the other women during the drama were interpreted by authorities "in a very sexualised dimension, as if they had fallen under the spell of a syndrome" and had lost all agency or ability to reason for themselves.

This perception was fuelled by rumours of a relationship between Enmark and Olofsson.

While the two did go on to have a love affair years later, there is nothing to suggest the two had a relationship in the bank vault.

"There was no love or physical attraction from my side. He was my chance for survival and he protected me from Janne," wrote Enmark, the inspiration for the character "Kicki" in the Netflix series "Clark".

Ase argues that Stockholm Syndrome is a "constructed concept" used to explain how hostages behave when authorities and states fail to protect them.

The Stockholm hostages in fact "acted incredibly rationally", she told AFP.

"They called journalists, they fought (with police and politicians) to let the criminals take them out of the bank."

"We represented a real threat to the hostages," acknowledged police superintendent Eric Ronnegard in a book published years later.

"With so many police officers surrounding the bank, there was a risk that one of the hostages could take a bullet."

In a sign of their bitterness toward police, the hostages later refused to testify against their captors.

Most people can identify with the concept on a psychological level, Rahm said, noting that emotional bonds with someone posing a threat are also common in abusive relationships.

Understanding a victim's psychological reaction also helps relieve them of their guilt, he said.

J.Liv--ThChM