The China Mail - Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda

USD -
AED 3.67302
AFN 68.328423
ALL 83.506912
AMD 383.77791
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000202
ARS 1325.573201
AUD 1.536629
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.705683
BAM 1.679887
BBD 2.019988
BDT 121.546582
BGN 1.6797
BHD 0.377
BIF 2983.211864
BMD 1
BND 1.285415
BOB 6.937722
BRL 5.446401
BSD 1.000404
BTN 87.682152
BWP 13.460572
BYN 3.294495
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009594
CAD 1.378475
CDF 2889.999737
CHF 0.811265
CLF 0.024713
CLP 969.479833
CNY 7.181503
CNH 7.192795
COP 4050.91
CRC 505.91378
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.712294
CZK 21.062982
DJF 178.154379
DKK 6.42083
DOP 61.105552
DZD 129.970435
EGP 48.49103
ERN 15
ETB 139.476128
EUR 0.86032
FJD 2.256397
FKP 0.743585
GBP 0.744685
GEL 2.69594
GGP 0.743585
GHS 10.554751
GIP 0.743585
GMD 72.511502
GNF 8675.14999
GTQ 7.675558
GYD 209.256881
HKD 7.84998
HNL 26.240181
HRK 6.479901
HTG 131.005042
HUF 340.459949
IDR 16309.5
ILS 3.41767
IMP 0.743585
INR 87.731303
IQD 1310.582667
IRR 42124.99974
ISK 123.030239
JEP 0.743585
JMD 160.172472
JOD 0.708984
JPY 147.869498
KES 129.199154
KGS 87.428302
KHR 4006.132888
KMF 422.149787
KPW 900.000346
KRW 1391.698708
KWD 0.305703
KYD 0.833695
KZT 543.546884
LAK 21640.332756
LBP 89638.254103
LKR 300.876974
LRD 200.581508
LSL 17.734525
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.424116
MAD 9.041825
MDL 16.77697
MGA 4414.133128
MKD 52.85829
MMK 2099.278286
MNT 3593.667467
MOP 8.089228
MRU 39.885935
MUR 45.380172
MVR 15.406089
MWK 1734.731128
MXN 18.62078
MYR 4.233503
MZN 63.959931
NAD 17.734068
NGN 1533.939706
NIO 36.813557
NOK 10.242685
NPR 140.288431
NZD 1.68624
OMR 0.38449
PAB 1.000417
PEN 3.52443
PGK 4.220011
PHP 57.042028
PKR 283.992682
PLN 3.659983
PYG 7493.26817
QAR 3.647944
RON 4.356598
RSD 100.784968
RUB 79.625717
RWF 1447.584853
SAR 3.752887
SBD 8.217066
SCR 14.742101
SDG 600.502857
SEK 9.620203
SGD 1.286405
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.101353
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 571.715705
SRD 37.279016
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.043952
SVC 8.75335
SYP 13001.771596
SZL 17.738285
THB 32.426503
TJS 9.318983
TMT 3.51
TND 2.932287
TOP 2.342099
TRY 40.703802
TTD 6.789983
TWD 29.915994
TZS 2514.999777
UAH 41.483906
UGX 3564.541828
UYU 40.068886
UZS 12677.743946
VES 128.74775
VND 26233
VUV 119.401149
WST 2.653917
XAF 563.432871
XAG 0.026448
XAU 0.000298
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803033
XDR 0.700441
XOF 563.435291
XPF 102.435484
YER 240.450274
ZAR 17.767199
ZMK 9001.20435
ZMW 23.260308
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    1.2400

    73.08

    +1.7%

  • SCS

    -0.1200

    15.88

    -0.76%

  • AZN

    -0.5200

    73.535

    -0.71%

  • CMSC

    0.0900

    23.05

    +0.39%

  • GSK

    0.2200

    37.8

    +0.58%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.1000

    82.09

    -1.34%

  • NGG

    -1.0700

    71.01

    -1.51%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    23.58

    +0.25%

  • BTI

    0.5500

    57.24

    +0.96%

  • RIO

    1.0900

    61.86

    +1.76%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0200

    14.42

    -0.14%

  • JRI

    0.0250

    13.435

    +0.19%

  • BP

    -0.0500

    34.14

    -0.15%

  • BCE

    0.5700

    24.35

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.1000

    11.36

    +0.88%

  • RELX

    -1.0566

    48

    -2.2%

Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda
Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda / Photo: © AFP/File

Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda

Britain's controversial deal to send migrants and asylum-seekers to Rwanda has attracted a flood of criticism in the UK, with opposition politicians, campaigners and the UN refugee agency calling for the multi-million-dollar agreement to be scrapped.

Text size:

But little has been said about the view from Rwanda -- a tiny nation of 13 million people in Africa's Great Lakes region that has drawn praise for its modern infrastructure but sparked unease over its record on human rights.

Here is a look at Kigali's reasons for signing the deal and the challenges ahead:

- Why is Rwanda doing this? -

The deal will be funded by the UK to the tune of up to £120 million ($157 million, 144 million euros), but observers say cash may not be Kigali's main motivation.

President Paul Kagame has sought to position Rwanda as a Western ally and firefighter for conflicts across Africa, sending thousands of troops to battle Islamic State-linked jihadists in Mozambique last year.

The deal is aimed at bolstering Rwanda's international prestige and deflect concern over its handling of human rights, Kigali-based lawyer and analyst Louis Gitinywa told AFP.

"President Kagame is eyeing to leverage this agreement as a vote of confidence (in) his human rights record," Gitinywa said.

It will burnish the profile of Kagame, who has kept tight control over Rwanda since the 1994 genocide, "as a key African leader -- a kind of Mister-Fix-it" for the continent, Gitinywa added.

"This also probably ensures that President Kagame (has) secured the diplomatic backing of the UK when resolutions against Rwanda are submitted and discussed at the UN Security Council."

- How will this affect Rwanda's human rights record? -

In January last year, the British government took Kigali to task over "continued restrictions to civil and political rights and media freedom".

But last week, Prime Minister Boris Johnson appeared to have reversed course, hailing Rwanda as "one of the safest countries in the world, globally recognised for its record of welcoming and integrating migrants".

The contradictory comments offered a glimpse of how the deal might help Kigali rewrite the public narrative around its treatment of dissidents, including those who have fled abroad.

"Rwanda has routinely demonstrated how it holds protections afforded refugees under international law in low regard," said Lewis Mudge, Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch.

"There are credible allegations that Rwandan agents carried out assassinations of Rwandan refugees abroad and many refugees fear the Rwandan government's long arm as far afield as Europe, Canada or Australia," he told AFP.

Last September, "Hotel Rwanda" hero and Kagame critic Paul Rusesabagina was sentenced to 25 years in jail on terrorism charges, following his arrest in August 2020 when a plane he believed was bound for Burundi landed instead in Kigali in what his family called a kidnapping.

The country was ranked 156th out of 180 countries in the 2021 World Press Freedom Index compiled by Reporters Without Borders (RSF), a fall of one place over with 2020.

- How do Rwandans feel about the deal? -

Rwandans have largely stayed tight-lipped about the agreement, although some have praised it.

One positive voice is that of Tom Mulisa, lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Rwanda.

"It is a good thing that Rwanda has positioned itself in this way, as a way of contributing to solve the immigration crisis that is affecting the whole world," he told AFP.

Local journalist John Williams Ntwali is among the few willing to make his unease public, saying the agreement "violates the rights of refugees and asylum seekers."

"It is an immoral deal that forces people to go to a country that they did not choose," he added.

- What challenges will Rwanda face? -

Frank Habineza, president of the opposition Democratic Green Party of Rwanda, said the deal was not sustainable, pointing to already fierce competition for land and other resources.

"Taking on migrants from the UK will increase the land burden and survival challenges for the limited natural resources available," he said in a statement last week.

Opposition leader Victoire Ingabire, a fierce critic of Kagame, also highlighted the economic pressures facing the country following the Covid-19 pandemic.

"It is uncertain how Rwanda would support relocated migrants with their personal development and employment," she said.

"The Rwandan government (should) focus on solving its political and social internal issues that make its citizens... refugees in other countries before it offers to host refugees/migrants."

Rwanda has previously taken in African refugees stranded in Libya under an agreement with the African Union and the UN refugee agency. Last year it offered temporary asylum to Afghans fleeing a Taliban takeover.

Few details have been released about how the UK deal would be implemented. The accord is also widely expected to face a legal challenge that may force its architects to abandon it.

M.Chau--ThChM