The China Mail - UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 64.497478
ALL 80.734582
AMD 360.878684
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.999885
ARS 1524.759297
AUD 1.42365
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.701071
BAM 1.741872
BBD 2.010322
BDT 123.466466
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.376821
BIF 2996.486509
BMD 1
BND 1.276346
BOB 11.673339
BRL 5.028102
BSD 0.998116
BTN 94.783201
BWP 13.703949
BYN 2.976965
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007472
CAD 1.40533
CDF 2315.999929
CHF 0.824575
CLF 0.02478
CLP 975.260114
CNY 6.67805
CNH 6.675965
COP 3180.08
CRC 453.324902
CUC 1
CUP 23.955861
CVE 98.204067
CZK 21.6566
DJF 177.749674
DKK 6.66442
DOP 61.408157
DZD 134.67101
EGP 54.378197
ERN 15
ETB 163.042175
EUR 0.89164
FJD 2.253802
FKP 0.747587
GBP 0.746755
GEL 2.589959
GGP 0.747587
GHS 11.633261
GIP 0.747587
GMD 73.497576
GNF 8834.937189
GTQ 7.628149
GYD 208.769922
HKD 7.84713
HNL 26.791591
HRK 6.715797
HTG 130.707196
HUF 325.626502
IDR 18056.25
ILS 3.092745
IMP 0.747587
INR 94.600801
IQD 1513.250179
IRR 1832375.000226
ISK 121.429949
JEP 0.747587
JMD 158.414343
JOD 0.709022
JPY 158.119501
KES 129.92033
KGS 87.449864
KHR 4059.43989
KMF 439.510149
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1325.119986
KWD 0.31001
KYD 0.831838
KZT 449.121182
LAK 22457.930899
LBP 89472.254266
LKR 331.042959
LRD 170.188321
LSL 16.442016
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.402658
MAD 9.782021
MDL 17.906141
MGA 4542.155208
MKD 54.902188
MMK 2099.21541
MNT 3597.533576
MOP 8.069361
MRU 40.034198
MUR 47.31015
MVR 15.460015
MWK 1730.82832
MXN 18.529275
MYR 4.080203
MZN 63.882634
NAD 16.442602
NGN 1331.392783
NIO 36.729114
NOK 9.381095
NPR 151.652766
NZD 1.758845
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.998205
PEN 3.441974
PGK 4.465916
PHP 63.471987
PKR 276.265992
PLN 3.89059
PYG 5729.145794
QAR 3.628291
RON 4.751496
RSD 104.700985
RUB 82.098496
RWF 1473.795772
SAR 3.751186
SBD 8.07458
SCR 13.842733
SDG 601.498782
SEK 9.90856
SGD 1.278185
SHP 0.7473
SLE 23.92025
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 570.441257
SRD 37.661498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.820157
SVC 8.734297
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.439039
THB 33.643997
TJS 9.217992
TMT 3.51
TND 2.978051
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.6029
TTD 6.774936
TWD 32.40703
TZS 2648.673015
UAH 44.986841
UGX 4162.751655
UYU 40.042215
UZS 12022.461403
VES 879.788896
VND 25868.5
VUV 119.136032
WST 2.774679
XAF 584.877602
XAG 0.017471
XAU 0.000242675154
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798961
XDR 0.707052
XOF 584.877602
XPF 106.215182
YER 236.089175
ZAR 16.432235
ZMK 9001.199676
ZMW 19.987443
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5787.554334
MXV 2.091518
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land
UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land / Photo: © ANP/AFP

UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land

The UN's top court will on Friday hand down its view on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967, amid growing international pressure over the war in Gaza.

Text size:

Any opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would be non-binding, but it comes amid mounting concern over Israel's war against Hamas sparked by the group's brutal October 7 attacks.

A separate high-profile case brought before the court by South Africa alleges that Israel has committed genocidal acts during its Gaza offensive.

Judges will read their findings at 1300 GMT at the opulent Peace Palace in The Hague, the home of the ICJ.

The UN's General Assembly asked the ICJ in late 2022 to give an "advisory opinion" on the "legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem".

The ICJ held a week-long session in February to hear submissions from countries following the request -- supported by most countries within the Assembly.

Most speakers too during the hearings called on Israel to end its 57-year occupation. They warned a prolonged occupation posed an "extreme danger" to stability in the Middle East and beyond.

But the United States said Israel should not be legally obliged to withdraw without taking its "very real security needs" into account.

Israel did not take part in the oral hearings.

Instead, it submitted a written contribution in which it described the questions the court had been asked as "prejudicial" and "tendentious".

- 'Ongoing violation' -

The General Assembly has asked the ICJ to consider two questions.

Firstly, the court should examine the legal consequences of what the UN called "the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination".

This relates to the "prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967" and "measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem".

In June 1967, Israel crushed some of its Arab neighbours in a six-day war, seizing the West Bank including east Jerusalem from Jordan, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.

Israel then began to settle the 70,000 square kilometres (27,000 square miles) of seized Arab territory.

The UN later declared the occupation of Palestinian territory illegal, and Cairo regained Sinai under its 1979 peace deal with Israel.

The ICJ has also been asked to look into the consequences of what it described as Israel's "adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures".

Secondly, the ICJ should advise on how Israel's actions "affect the legal status of the occupation" and what are the consequences for the UN and other countries.

The ICJ rules in disputes between states. Normally, its judgements are binding although it has little means to enforce them.

In this case however, the opinion it issues will be non-binding, although most advisory opinions are in fact acted upon.

B.Clarke--ThChM