The China Mail - UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 63.498607
ALL 82.78735
AMD 368.501999
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000233
ARS 1470.935397
AUD 1.448551
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.694136
BAM 1.718856
BBD 2.018008
BDT 123.091796
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.376982
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.297974
BOB 6.938524
BRL 5.200103
BSD 1.001973
BTN 94.864877
BWP 13.624819
BYN 2.814079
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015116
CAD 1.42222
CDF 2269.000131
CHF 0.810875
CLF 0.023222
CLP 913.970582
CNY 6.790496
CNH 6.802015
COP 3430.81
CRC 454.535468
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.375044
CZK 21.317505
DJF 177.719531
DKK 6.57855
DOP 58.550417
DZD 133.670989
EGP 49.723596
ERN 15
ETB 161.535521
EUR 0.88006
FJD 2.24575
FKP 0.754878
GBP 0.758185
GEL 2.645039
GGP 0.754878
GHS 11.22497
GIP 0.754878
GMD 72.50203
GNF 8774.99996
GTQ 7.644241
GYD 209.623413
HKD 7.840915
HNL 26.807458
HRK 6.626024
HTG 131.00145
HUF 313.018979
IDR 17955.45
ILS 2.99632
IMP 0.754878
INR 94.90525
IQD 1312.563167
IRR 1375050.000192
ISK 126.699631
JEP 0.754878
JMD 157.717811
JOD 0.709021
JPY 161.572007
KES 129.398478
KGS 87.449913
KHR 4010.000075
KMF 430.999912
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1537.540179
KWD 0.30898
KYD 0.834996
KZT 487.384102
LAK 22188.337654
LBP 89725.095575
LKR 335.228721
LRD 182.352683
LSL 16.522564
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.429642
MAD 9.377774
MDL 17.639408
MGA 4185.964758
MKD 54.189119
MMK 2099.387374
MNT 3579.000015
MOP 8.091488
MRU 39.79664
MUR 47.960034
MVR 15.460373
MWK 1737.391847
MXN 17.582298
MYR 4.144989
MZN 63.898816
NAD 16.522564
NGN 1370.503286
NIO 36.867777
NOK 9.82313
NPR 151.78296
NZD 1.769295
OMR 0.384528
PAB 1.001977
PEN 3.39166
PGK 4.394272
PHP 61.597039
PKR 278.668893
PLN 3.76925
PYG 6107.983882
QAR 3.652503
RON 4.615502
RSD 103.302995
RUB 74.501377
RWF 1469.343633
SAR 3.755291
SBD 8.065041
SCR 14.865013
SDG 600.500677
SEK 9.75682
SGD 1.29776
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.749832
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 572.656446
SRD 37.482985
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.530796
SVC 8.767412
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.517116
THB 33.385497
TJS 9.293141
TMT 3.51
TND 2.965857
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.489702
TTD 6.803181
TWD 31.711016
TZS 2625.007993
UAH 44.976754
UGX 3667.442985
UYU 40.189832
UZS 12038.49365
VES 616.865275
VND 26331.5
VUV 118.758526
WST 2.756325
XAF 576.48558
XAG 0.016346
XAU 0.000246
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.805774
XDR 0.716966
XOF 576.48558
XPF 104.811706
YER 238.649628
ZAR 16.591502
ZMK 9001.205488
ZMW 17.97425
ZWL 321.999592
  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.63

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    21.96

    -0.55%

  • BCC

    -0.7400

    71.8

    -1.03%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.11

    -0.23%

  • RIO

    -3.7800

    95.58

    -3.95%

  • RBGPF

    0.9600

    61.3

    +1.57%

  • BCE

    0.3900

    23.04

    +1.69%

  • NGG

    0.6000

    81.57

    +0.74%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4700

    18.16

    -2.59%

  • GSK

    1.3300

    52.07

    +2.55%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    14.05

    -0.5%

  • BP

    -0.4500

    39.33

    -1.14%

  • RELX

    0.3800

    31.21

    +1.22%

  • BTI

    1.8400

    60.74

    +3.03%

  • AZN

    4.5900

    181.02

    +2.54%

UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth
UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth / Photo: © AFP

UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth

Britain's Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the legal definition of a "woman" is based on a person's sex at birth, a landmark decision with far-reaching implications for the bitter debate over trans rights.

Text size:

In a win for Scottish gender-critical campaigners who brought the case to the UK's highest court, five London judges unanimously ruled that "the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman, and biological sex".

However, the act also "gives transgender people protection" against discrimination in their acquired gender, Justice Patrick Hodge said in handing down the verdict.

The UK government welcomed the ruling for bringing "clarity" to the debate.

It is the culmination of a years-long battle between the Scottish government and the campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) -- which launched an appeal to the Supreme Court after losing pleas in Scottish courts over an obscure legislation aimed at hiring more women in public-sector bodies.

Dozens of FWS and other gender-critical campaigners, who argue that biological sex cannot be changed, cheered the ruling, hugging and crying outside the court.

"This has been a really, really long ride," said Susan Smith, co-director of For Women Scotland, adding that the campaigners were "enormously grateful for this ruling".

"Today, the judges have said what we always believed to be the case: that women are protected by their biological sex," she said. "Women can now feel safe that services and spaces designated for women are for women".

Ahead of the verdict, trans rights activists raised concerns that a ruling in favour of FWS could risk discrimination against trans people in their chosen gender.

"The court is well aware of the strength of feeling on all sides which lies behind this appeal," Hodge said, recognising the fight of women against sex discrimination as well as a "vulnerable" position of the trans community.

- Single-sex spaces -

Scottish Greens activist and trans woman Ellie Gomersall, 25, told Sky News the ruling was "yet another attack on the rights of trans people to live our lives in peace".

She called on the Labour government "to step up, and defend one of the most vulnerable minorities in the country".

At the heart of the legal battle were clashing interpretations of the Equality Act.

While the Scottish government argued that the Equality Act (EA) gave trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) the same protections as a biological female, FWS disagreed.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court ruled that the devolved Scottish government's "interpretation is not correct" and that the Equality Act was inconsistent with the 2004 Gender Recognition Act that introduced GRC certificates.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which is responsible for enforcing the Equality Act, said it was "pleased" the ruling addressed complicated issues of maintaining single-sex spaces.

Single-sex spaces and services including changing rooms, hostels and medical services "will function properly only if sex is interpreted as biological sex", the judgement said.

The Labour government said the ruling brought "clarity and confidence for women and service providers such as hospitals, refuges, and sports clubs".

"We have always supported the protection of single-sex spaces based on biological sex," a government spokesperson said.

Opposition Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch hailed the "victory" for FWS.

"Saying 'trans women are women' was never true in fact, and now isn't true in law either," Badenoch said.

- Online discourse -

The ruling will be a blow for transgender women and their ability to access single-sex spaces, a significant point of contention.

LGBTQ charity Stonewall said the ruling was "incredibly worrying for the trans community".

"Stonewall shares the deep concern at the widespread implications for today's ruling," its chief executive Simon Blake said.

The debate has been particularly vicious in the UK, pitting gender-critical activists against trans rights campaigners.

One of the most prominent supporters of gender-critical campaigns is "Harry Potter" author JK Rowling, who has been the target of hate and accused of transphobia.

The ruling also comes at a time when transgender rights are under threat in the United States under President Donald Trump.

Since retaking office, Trump has declared the federal government will recognise only two sexes, male and female; sought to bar trans athletes from women's sports; and curbed treatments for trans children.

The latest UK ruling could pile pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has remained largely silent on trans issues since coming into power last July, to further clarify legislation.

P.Ho--ThChM