The China Mail - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 66.344071
ALL 83.58702
AMD 382.869053
ANG 1.789982
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1405.057166
AUD 1.540832
AWG 1.805
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.691481
BBD 2.013336
BDT 122.007014
BGN 1.69079
BHD 0.374011
BIF 2943.839757
BMD 1
BND 1.3018
BOB 6.91701
BRL 5.332404
BSD 0.999615
BTN 88.59887
BWP 13.420625
BYN 3.406804
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010326
CAD 1.40485
CDF 2150.000362
CHF 0.80538
CLF 0.024066
CLP 944.120396
CNY 7.11935
CNH 7.12515
COP 3780
CRC 501.883251
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.363087
CZK 21.009504
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.457204
DOP 64.223754
DZD 129.411663
EGP 46.950698
ERN 15
ETB 154.306137
EUR 0.86435
FJD 2.28425
FKP 0.759642
GBP 0.759936
GEL 2.70504
GGP 0.759642
GHS 10.930743
GIP 0.759642
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8677.076622
GTQ 7.659909
GYD 209.133877
HKD 7.77703
HNL 26.282902
HRK 6.514104
HTG 133.048509
HUF 332.660388
IDR 16685.5
ILS 3.24758
IMP 0.759642
INR 88.639504
IQD 1309.474904
IRR 42100.000352
ISK 126.580386
JEP 0.759642
JMD 160.439
JOD 0.70904
JPY 153.43504
KES 129.203801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4023.264362
KMF 421.00035
KPW 899.998686
KRW 1455.990383
KWD 0.306904
KYD 0.83302
KZT 524.767675
LAK 21703.220673
LBP 89512.834262
LKR 304.684561
LRD 182.526573
LSL 17.315523
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.458091
MAD 9.265955
MDL 17.042585
MGA 4492.856402
MKD 53.206947
MMK 2099.464216
MNT 3582.836755
MOP 8.007472
MRU 39.595594
MUR 45.910378
MVR 15.405039
MWK 1733.369658
MXN 18.44605
MYR 4.176039
MZN 63.950377
NAD 17.315148
NGN 1436.000344
NIO 36.782862
NOK 10.153804
NPR 141.758018
NZD 1.777162
OMR 0.38142
PAB 0.999671
PEN 3.37342
PGK 4.220486
PHP 58.805504
PKR 282.656184
PLN 3.665615
PYG 7072.77311
QAR 3.643196
RON 4.398804
RSD 102.170373
RUB 80.869377
RWF 1452.42265
SAR 3.750713
SBD 8.230592
SCR 13.652393
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.528504
SGD 1.301038
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.203667
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.228422
SRD 38.599038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.189281
SVC 8.746265
SYP 11056.879504
SZL 17.321588
THB 32.395038
TJS 9.226139
TMT 3.51
TND 2.954772
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.211304
TTD 6.77604
TWD 30.981804
TZS 2455.000335
UAH 41.915651
UGX 3498.408635
UYU 39.809213
UZS 12055.19496
VES 228.194038
VND 26310
VUV 122.189231
WST 2.820904
XAF 567.301896
XAG 0.020684
XAU 0.00025
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801521
XDR 0.707015
XOF 567.306803
XPF 103.14423
YER 238.503589
ZAR 17.29905
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 22.615629
ZWL 321.999592
  • GSK

    -0.4700

    46.63

    -1.01%

  • NGG

    1.4600

    77.75

    +1.88%

  • RELX

    -1.1200

    42.27

    -2.65%

  • RIO

    0.0600

    69.33

    +0.09%

  • SCS

    0.0000

    15.76

    0%

  • BTI

    0.3800

    54.59

    +0.7%

  • CMSC

    0.0700

    23.85

    +0.29%

  • AZN

    0.8100

    84.58

    +0.96%

  • BP

    0.7600

    36.58

    +2.08%

  • RBGPF

    -0.7800

    75.22

    -1.04%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    24.1

    +0.37%

  • VOD

    0.2400

    11.58

    +2.07%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.74

    -0.07%

  • RYCEF

    0.0800

    14.88

    +0.54%

  • BCC

    -0.0900

    70.64

    -0.13%

  • BCE

    0.0200

    23.19

    +0.09%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: © AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

B.Clarke--ThChM