The China Mail - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 63.503991
ALL 81.175041
AMD 376.940403
ANG 1.789731
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1399.273604
AUD 1.413527
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.64926
BBD 2.014277
BDT 122.307345
BGN 1.647646
BHD 0.377044
BIF 2965
BMD 1
BND 1.264067
BOB 6.911004
BRL 5.224604
BSD 1.000055
BTN 90.587789
BWP 13.189806
BYN 2.866094
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011317
CAD 1.360455
CDF 2255.000362
CHF 0.768041
CLF 0.021856
CLP 863.010396
CNY 6.90865
CNH 6.90166
COP 3666.71
CRC 485.052916
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.303894
CZK 20.43705
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.29257
DOP 62.27504
DZD 129.602405
EGP 46.855504
ERN 15
ETB 155.303874
EUR 0.842204
FJD 2.209504
FKP 0.733683
GBP 0.732695
GEL 2.690391
GGP 0.733683
GHS 11.01504
GIP 0.733683
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8780.000355
GTQ 7.67035
GYD 209.236037
HKD 7.81755
HNL 26.503838
HRK 6.343704
HTG 131.126252
HUF 319.54204
IDR 16845
ILS 3.09073
IMP 0.733683
INR 90.57735
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.120386
JEP 0.733683
JMD 156.510227
JOD 0.70904
JPY 152.822504
KES 129.000351
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4022.00035
KMF 415.00035
KPW 899.945229
KRW 1442.810383
KWD 0.30662
KYD 0.833418
KZT 494.893958
LAK 21445.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 309.225755
LRD 186.403772
LSL 15.945039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.305039
MAD 9.147039
MDL 16.981212
MGA 4405.000347
MKD 51.92021
MMK 2099.574581
MNT 3581.569872
MOP 8.053972
MRU 39.903743
MUR 45.910378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1736.503736
MXN 17.166385
MYR 3.907504
MZN 63.903729
NAD 15.960377
NGN 1352.980377
NIO 36.703722
NOK 9.49682
NPR 144.93218
NZD 1.654715
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.000148
PEN 3.354504
PGK 4.29275
PHP 57.903704
PKR 279.550374
PLN 3.54652
PYG 6558.925341
QAR 3.64125
RON 4.290604
RSD 98.876038
RUB 76.652547
RWF 1456
SAR 3.750021
SBD 8.038668
SCR 13.579971
SDG 601.503676
SEK 8.925104
SGD 1.262045
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.450371
SLL 20969.49935
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.754038
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.8
SVC 8.750574
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.940369
THB 31.070369
TJS 9.435908
TMT 3.5
TND 2.840368
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.729404
TTD 6.78838
TWD 31.377304
TZS 2600.000335
UAH 43.128434
UGX 3540.03196
UYU 38.554298
UZS 12295.000334
VES 392.73007
VND 25970
VUV 119.325081
WST 2.701986
XAF 553.151102
XAG 0.012818
XAU 0.000199
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802336
XDR 0.687473
XOF 552.503593
XPF 100.950363
YER 238.350363
ZAR 15.946037
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.176912
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    -0.2900

    97.62

    -0.3%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.75

    +0.21%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    25.81

    -0.08%

  • NGG

    0.9200

    92.14

    +1%

  • CMSD

    0.0547

    23.63

    +0.23%

  • RYCEF

    0.6300

    17.5

    +3.6%

  • BCC

    -1.3800

    86.68

    -1.59%

  • JRI

    0.1835

    13.21

    +1.39%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • GSK

    0.3600

    58.9

    +0.61%

  • BP

    0.3750

    37.565

    +1%

  • VOD

    -0.0890

    15.531

    -0.57%

  • AZN

    0.6450

    205.165

    +0.31%

  • RELX

    2.1000

    30.91

    +6.79%

  • BTI

    -1.0000

    59.61

    -1.68%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: © AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

B.Clarke--ThChM