The China Mail - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 65.501616
ALL 83.072963
AMD 376.98007
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000089
ARS 1386.420042
AUD 1.448436
AWG 1.80025
AZN 1.701055
BAM 1.695072
BBD 2.009612
BDT 122.428639
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.378163
BIF 2970
BMD 1
BND 1.2851
BOB 6.894519
BRL 5.160602
BSD 0.997742
BTN 92.939509
BWP 13.688562
BYN 2.956504
BYR 19600
BZD 2.006665
CAD 1.39475
CDF 2304.999756
CHF 0.79876
CLF 0.023281
CLP 919.250163
CNY 6.88265
CNH 6.886225
COP 3668.42
CRC 464.279833
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.000296
CZK 21.288297
DJF 177.719861
DKK 6.487802
DOP 60.849861
DZD 133.256954
EGP 54.334939
ERN 15
ETB 155.800822
EUR 0.868022
FJD 2.253797
FKP 0.757512
GBP 0.756401
GEL 2.684954
GGP 0.757512
GHS 11.005003
GIP 0.757512
GMD 73.99985
GNF 8780.000206
GTQ 7.632939
GYD 208.828972
HKD 7.83775
HNL 26.504427
HRK 6.5391
HTG 130.952897
HUF 333.929817
IDR 16994.6
ILS 3.130375
IMP 0.757512
INR 92.73995
IQD 1307.141959
IRR 1319175.000237
ISK 125.379824
JEP 0.757512
JMD 157.303566
JOD 0.709008
JPY 159.653967
KES 129.801691
KGS 87.449951
KHR 3990.137323
KMF 427.00004
KPW 899.995741
KRW 1511.260111
KWD 0.30934
KYD 0.831502
KZT 472.805432
LAK 21970.392969
LBP 89502.03926
LKR 314.804623
LRD 183.088277
LSL 16.955078
LTL 2.952739
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.380628
MAD 9.374033
MDL 17.55613
MGA 4171.343141
MKD 53.495639
MMK 2099.82872
MNT 3572.765779
MOP 8.055104
MRU 39.637211
MUR 46.94976
MVR 15.459915
MWK 1730.071718
MXN 17.891702
MYR 4.03099
MZN 63.949968
NAD 16.954711
NGN 1378.130367
NIO 36.712196
NOK 9.77265
NPR 148.701282
NZD 1.750854
OMR 0.385097
PAB 0.997734
PEN 3.45194
PGK 4.316042
PHP 60.409499
PKR 278.39991
PLN 3.71375
PYG 6454.29687
QAR 3.638018
RON 4.416604
RSD 101.901662
RUB 80.325739
RWF 1457.240049
SAR 3.754558
SBD 8.038772
SCR 14.446904
SDG 600.99971
SEK 9.483103
SGD 1.286701
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.649686
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 570.192924
SRD 37.350967
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.233539
SVC 8.730169
SYP 110.63796
SZL 16.948198
THB 32.634978
TJS 9.563492
TMT 3.51
TND 2.941459
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.520498
TTD 6.768937
TWD 31.994993
TZS 2600.000375
UAH 43.698134
UGX 3743.234401
UYU 40.405091
UZS 12122.393971
VES 473.390494
VND 26340
VUV 119.00311
WST 2.766273
XAF 568.506489
XAG 0.013693
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798209
XDR 0.708068
XOF 568.516344
XPF 103.361457
YER 238.650074
ZAR 16.972865
ZMK 9001.18207
ZMW 19.281421
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • NGG

    1.1500

    87.99

    +1.31%

  • BCE

    -0.9300

    24.45

    -3.8%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.61

    +0.71%

  • BCC

    -1.8800

    73.2

    -2.57%

  • CMSD

    0.1100

    22.26

    +0.49%

  • RELX

    0.3600

    33.59

    +1.07%

  • RYCEF

    0.9000

    15.99

    +5.63%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    15.21

    +0.53%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.04

    +0.23%

  • RIO

    -0.3600

    94.45

    -0.38%

  • GSK

    0.7000

    56.69

    +1.23%

  • AZN

    2.7600

    203.49

    +1.36%

  • BTI

    0.3900

    58.28

    +0.67%

  • BP

    0.9500

    47.12

    +2.02%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: © AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

B.Clarke--ThChM