The China Mail - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.999537
ALL 81.33886
AMD 361.122502
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000035
ARS 1513.022501
AUD 1.444398
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.67226
BAM 1.743487
BBD 2.013327
BDT 122.956921
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377591
BIF 2991.825564
BMD 1
BND 1.281969
BOB 11.720763
BRL 5.097599
BSD 0.999599
BTN 94.969134
BWP 13.742479
BYN 3.017272
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010474
CAD 1.419315
CDF 2313.52571
CHF 0.827897
CLF 0.024941
CLP 981.589897
CNY 6.691203
CNH 6.690261
COP 3177.34
CRC 454.962785
CUC 1
CUP 23.991442
CVE 98.294675
CZK 21.704698
DJF 178.000624
DKK 6.66792
DOP 61.282703
DZD 134.428038
EGP 53.431406
ERN 15
ETB 163.27156
EUR 0.89201
FJD 2.26765
FKP 0.76043
GBP 0.753555
GEL 2.58989
GGP 0.76043
GHS 11.630623
GIP 0.76043
GMD 73.500612
GNF 8794.098638
GTQ 7.63697
GYD 209.078429
HKD 7.847255
HNL 26.837813
HRK 6.719798
HTG 130.89794
HUF 324.396504
IDR 18028
ILS 3.103975
IMP 0.76043
INR 94.52505
IQD 1514.474828
IRR 1795877.500108
ISK 121.490159
JEP 0.76043
JMD 158.942818
JOD 0.708971
JPY 158.149499
KES 129.839569
KGS 87.450398
KHR 4059.583344
KMF 440.000176
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1340.749682
KWD 0.31096
KYD 0.833055
KZT 453.04094
LAK 22484.901161
LBP 89517.060016
LKR 330.904147
LRD 170.435248
LSL 16.519088
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.421536
MAD 9.796395
MDL 17.963495
MGA 4502.384454
MKD 54.953088
MMK 2099.444361
MNT 3596.720368
MOP 8.080141
MRU 40.052592
MUR 47.307153
MVR 15.460232
MWK 1732.941124
MXN 18.435973
MYR 4.082099
MZN 63.908288
NAD 16.519088
NGN 1330.897808
NIO 36.789417
NOK 9.479897
NPR 151.940099
NZD 1.77843
OMR 0.384489
PAB 0.999666
PEN 3.438747
PGK 4.537452
PHP 63.044004
PKR 276.704729
PLN 3.89635
PYG 5692.383117
QAR 3.643852
RON 4.757698
RSD 104.727545
RUB 83.866756
RWF 1474.885234
SAR 3.753076
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.951933
SDG 601.498751
SEK 9.958299
SGD 1.28212
SHP 0.754745
SLE 24.679893
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.288497
SRD 37.641502
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.840387
SVC 8.746852
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.512011
THB 33.519867
TJS 9.211651
TMT 3.51
TND 3.001747
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.509597
TTD 6.784783
TWD 32.34196
TZS 2639.984999
UAH 44.838258
UGX 4023.070477
UYU 40.203962
UZS 11956.051793
VES 878.023604
VND 25873
VUV 119.689611
WST 2.781623
XAF 585.120197
XAG 0.017491
XAU 0.000240685762
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801609
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.120197
XPF 106.313655
YER 236.150455
ZAR 16.518805
ZMK 9001.194926
ZMW 19.917541
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5773.824733
MXV 2.08173
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: © AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

B.Clarke--ThChM