The China Mail - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 63.503991
ALL 82.403989
AMD 368.150403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1465.449815
AUD 1.42575
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.705709
BBD 2.013483
BDT 122.708482
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37702
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.290663
BOB 6.90816
BRL 5.152304
BSD 0.999721
BTN 94.239742
BWP 13.585663
BYN 2.777729
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010527
CAD 1.415225
CDF 2280.000362
CHF 0.807055
CLF 0.02293
CLP 902.460396
CNY 6.769604
CNH 6.783725
COP 3452.68
CRC 453.506829
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.403894
CZK 21.091104
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.516504
DOP 58.403884
DZD 133.34504
EGP 49.986489
ERN 15
ETB 158.37504
EUR 0.871881
FJD 2.235504
FKP 0.756415
GBP 0.755512
GEL 2.650391
GGP 0.756415
GHS 11.22504
GIP 0.756415
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8775.000355
GTQ 7.625892
GYD 209.119888
HKD 7.83685
HNL 26.68504
HRK 6.568104
HTG 130.583803
HUF 306.820388
IDR 17826.3
ILS 2.95976
IMP 0.756415
INR 94.330504
IQD 1310
IRR 1375000.000352
ISK 125.530386
JEP 0.756415
JMD 157.959917
JOD 0.70904
JPY 161.30504
KES 129.403801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4010.00035
KMF 429.503794
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1527.650383
KWD 0.30793
KYD 0.833035
KZT 487.855928
LAK 22055.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 333.641485
LRD 182.150382
LSL 16.405039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.375039
MAD 9.225039
MDL 17.654036
MGA 4200.000347
MKD 53.732839
MMK 2099.727916
MNT 3581.295381
MOP 8.070939
MRU 40.060379
MUR 47.850378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.326504
MYR 4.137904
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.403727
NGN 1360.440377
NIO 36.610377
NOK 9.680204
NPR 150.787532
NZD 1.741735
OMR 0.384983
PAB 0.999725
PEN 3.384039
PGK 4.38775
PHP 60.716504
PKR 278.325038
PLN 3.71375
PYG 6138.96617
QAR 3.640504
RON 4.568104
RSD 102.170373
RUB 73.103247
RWF 1464
SAR 3.74824
SBD 8.061424
SCR 13.683262
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.57882
SGD 1.292404
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.750371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.402504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.747449
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.403649
THB 32.890369
TJS 9.272075
TMT 3.5
TND 2.91175
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.438204
TTD 6.779085
TWD 31.715038
TZS 2630.985038
UAH 44.909735
UGX 3638.520172
UYU 39.96965
UZS 12005.000334
VES 606.63266
VND 26310
VUV 118.773512
WST 2.751708
XAF 572.078806
XAG 0.015419
XAU 0.00024
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801643
XDR 0.703697
XOF 565.000332
XPF 104.250363
YER 238.603589
ZAR 16.458037
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 17.919703
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.37

    +0.22%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    18.4

    -0.16%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    60.61

    -0.87%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    79.44

    -1.56%

  • GSK

    -1.4800

    50.67

    -2.92%

  • BCC

    3.8500

    74.66

    +5.16%

  • AZN

    -2.9600

    174.93

    -1.69%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • RIO

    -2.5900

    100.08

    -2.59%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.29

    0%

  • VOD

    -0.2300

    14.3

    -1.61%

  • RELX

    -0.8300

    31.18

    -2.66%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.67

    +0.39%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    58.91

    -0.98%

  • BP

    -1.0400

    39.1

    -2.66%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: © AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

B.Clarke--ThChM