The China Mail - Trump says court halt of tariffs would cause 'Great Depression'

If a "Radical Left Court" strikes down the tariffs, "it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor," he wrote on his Truth Social platform.

"It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION!" he said.

Trump's hyperbolic statements come as a US appeals court weighs the legality of his broad use of emergency powers to enact sweeping tariffs on trading partners.

A lower court ruled against Trump in May, but the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit put the ruling on hold as it considers the case.

Trump on Friday touted billions of dollars in tariff revenue "pouring" into the Treasury -- paid by US importers -- and recent stock market records, as proof his levies had created "the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the U.S.A. has ever seen."

Many economists meanwhile worry the tariffs are stoking inflation and see trade policy uncertainty as slowing investment.

Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has announced a slew of new tariffs, seeking to force a reordering of global trade that he has long claimed is biased against the United States.

In addition to sweeping tariffs invoked under declarations of economic emergencies, he has also instituted sectoral tariffs of between 25 percent and 50 percent on steel and other items.

Those levies have generally followed government investigations and are not at issue in the pending litigation.

At a July 31 hearing, members of the appeals court appeared skeptical of the Trump administration's arguments that it had broad discretion to declare national economic emergencies and invoke tariffs as a remedy.

To invoke his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on many US trade partners, Trump declared a national emergency over "large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits."

Opponents to the White House policy have argued that such a reason does not qualify under the law Trump has cited for the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

They also argue that levying blanket tariffs on imports requires the consent of Congress under the US Constitution.

The case is likely to end up in the Supreme Court, where conservatives enjoy a 6-3 majority, though analysts say the outcome is uncertain.

D.Wang--ThChM