The China Mail - Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 65.493685
ALL 80.542786
AMD 365.404028
AOA 918.000234
ARS 1490.980601
AUD 1.416651
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.698275
BAM 1.694742
BBD 2.013422
BDT 123.409934
BHD 0.376932
BIF 2988.332445
BMD 1
BND 1.280355
BOB 11.871288
BRL 5.157901
BSD 0.999614
BTN 95.355034
BWP 13.493408
BYN 2.963637
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010476
CAD 1.392985
CDF 2275.000074
CHF 0.812215
CLF 0.023224
CLP 914.019752
CNY 6.745305
CNH 6.748225
COP 3137.03
CRC 453.271291
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.544878
CZK 21.03355
DJF 178.017322
DKK 6.48155
DOP 58.290116
DZD 133.018618
EGP 50.279301
ERN 15
ETB 161.696178
EUR 0.86702
FJD 2.21245
FKP 0.740048
GBP 0.740495
GEL 2.614971
GGP 0.740048
GHS 11.761444
GIP 0.740048
GMD 73.509878
GNF 8778.535005
GTQ 7.626087
GYD 209.359254
HKD 7.846798
HNL 26.793985
HRK 6.532601
HTG 130.704343
HUF 316.510964
IDR 17876
ILS 3.000085
IMP 0.740048
INR 95.41225
IQD 1309.573325
IRR 1374700.000016
ISK 123.110096
JEP 0.740048
JMD 158.156744
JOD 0.709023
JPY 159.413499
KES 129.310035
KGS 87.449696
KHR 4050.066938
KMF 426.999969
KRW 1415.17035
KWD 0.309098
KYD 0.832994
KZT 466.161244
LAK 22554.384323
LBP 89518.610465
LKR 334.287955
LRD 180.434905
LSL 16.22219
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.374968
MAD 9.261597
MDL 17.36399
MGA 4301.39206
MKD 53.312479
MMK 2099.936813
MNT 3596.665371
MOP 8.079183
MRU 39.955635
MUR 47.06971
MVR 15.449566
MWK 1733.381281
MXN 17.06241
MYR 4.090597
MZN 63.39594
NAD 16.220855
NGN 1362.401814
NIO 36.783342
NOK 9.495355
NPR 152.566385
NZD 1.704315
OMR 0.384507
PAB 0.999614
PEN 3.379519
PGK 4.485921
PHP 61.249002
PKR 277.479994
PLN 3.72915
PYG 5952.056011
QAR 3.644076
RON 4.5432
RSD 101.748034
RUB 82.453907
RWF 1472.472911
SAR 3.747756
SBD 8.065041
SCR 13.805839
SDG 600.521989
SEK 9.529299
SGD 1.28065
SLE 24.496816
SOS 571.29488
SRD 37.945986
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.229307
SVC 8.746664
SZL 16.212539
THB 33.118969
TJS 9.211859
TMT 3.51
TND 2.935103
TRY 47.75642
TTD 6.769484
TWD 32.214988
TZS 2649.983
UAH 44.852497
UGX 3719.156864
UYU 40.24973
UZS 11886.069807
VES 760.265197
VND 26125.5
VUV 118.442804
WST 2.72999
XAF 568.398113
XAG 0.015343
XAU 0.000228
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801671
XDR 0.706905
XOF 568.398113
XPF 103.341305
YER 237.199143
ZAR 16.18852
ZMK 9001.197365
ZMW 18.743474
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.1300

    21.44

    -0.61%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0200

    20.55

    -0.1%

  • RELX

    -0.2500

    35.37

    -0.71%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    21.63

    -0.28%

  • RBGPF

    2.2800

    72.16

    +3.16%

  • RIO

    -0.9200

    100.99

    -0.91%

  • GSK

    -1.2600

    50.9

    -2.48%

  • BCE

    0.8300

    23.37

    +3.55%

  • NGG

    0.7900

    80.27

    +0.98%

  • VOD

    0.1500

    15.9

    +0.94%

  • BCC

    0.7800

    85.53

    +0.91%

  • AZN

    -3.1600

    158.75

    -1.99%

  • BTI

    -0.2400

    56.81

    -0.42%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    12.73

    0%

  • BP

    0.2800

    43.16

    +0.65%

Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married
Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married

Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married

Brad Pitt is suing Angelina Jolie for selling her share of the French vineyard where they got married.

Text size:

Superstars Pitt and Jolie, who were once Hollywood's highest profile couple, bought a controlling stake of Chateau Miraval in southern France in 2008, and tied the knot there six years later.

But they filed to dissolve their marriage in 2016 and have remained locked in court battles since, including over custody rights for their six children.

According to a lawsuit filed by Pitt in California on Thursday, the couple had "agreed they would never sell their respective interests in Miraval without the other's consent."

But last October, Jolie sold her stake to a "a Luxembourg-based spirits manufacturer controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler," the legal document obtained by AFP says.

Pitt's filing alleges that Jolie broke the terms of their original agreement by not offering him first refusal for her share, and that she is seeking to "recover unearned windfall profits for herself while inflicting gratuitous harm on Pitt."

"Jolie long ago stopped contributing to Miraval -- while Pitt poured money and sweat equity into the wine business, building it into the ascendant company it is today," it states.

Pitt's lawsuit requests a trial by jury.

It describes the vineyard as a "small, unprofitable wine business" that was "in need of renovation" prior to the couple's purchase in 2008.

The pair paid "approximately 25 million euros," with Pitt contributing 60 per cent and Jolie the remaining 40 per cent.

But Pitt went on to pay for renovations "in a manner far disproportionate to his relative ownership share" on the understanding Jolie would not pull out of the investment without his consent, the suit says.

Pitt brought in Marc Perrin, one of France's top winemakers, to help transform the business into a leading rose wine producer, but "Jolie had no involvement in these efforts," it continues.

Revenues reportedly grew from approximately $3 million in 2013 to more than $50 million last year.

Jolie's representatives did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment.

The A-listers first became a couple after co-starring as married assassins in 2004 film "Mr. and Mrs. Smith." Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston at the time.

Pitt, now 58, was accused of striking one of his children during a flight from France to Los Angeles shortly before Jolie filed for divorce, but was later cleared by the FBI and social workers.

The pair announced in 2018 they had reached an amicable settlement over the children -- three biological and three adopted.

But last July, Jolie scored a win in their custody battle as the private judge overseeing their divorce and custody matters was disqualified from the case.

Judge John Ouderkirk -- who had also officiated their wedding at the vineyard -- was found to have financially benefited from separate work with Pitt's attorneys, and disqualified from the case by a California appeals court.

The ruling means the custody case essentially had to be restarted before a new judge.

C.Smith--ThChM