The China Mail - Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 66.000233
ALL 83.308119
AMD 382.089898
ANG 1.789987
AOA 917.000247
ARS 1408.493989
AUD 1.524855
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.704121
BAM 1.68937
BBD 2.014244
BDT 122.111228
BGN 1.68758
BHD 0.377005
BIF 2950
BMD 1
BND 1.30343
BOB 6.910223
BRL 5.292798
BSD 1.000082
BTN 88.671219
BWP 14.25758
BYN 3.410338
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011289
CAD 1.400895
CDF 2137.496913
CHF 0.799105
CLF 0.023707
CLP 930.019805
CNY 7.11275
CNH 7.10437
COP 3706.75
CRC 502.36889
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.374988
CZK 20.917201
DJF 177.719855
DKK 6.44632
DOP 64.402674
DZD 130.367595
EGP 47.259196
ERN 15
ETB 153.603383
EUR 0.86323
FJD 2.27645
FKP 0.75922
GBP 0.76213
GEL 2.701353
GGP 0.75922
GHS 10.964938
GIP 0.75922
GMD 73.495038
GNF 8685.000162
GTQ 7.664334
GYD 209.232018
HKD 7.76945
HNL 26.309782
HRK 6.505103
HTG 130.904411
HUF 331.985038
IDR 16731
ILS 3.19205
IMP 0.75922
INR 88.707501
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.502627
ISK 126.90212
JEP 0.75922
JMD 160.817476
JOD 0.709034
JPY 154.937016
KES 129.202078
KGS 87.450176
KHR 4020.000113
KMF 427.49884
KPW 899.988373
KRW 1469.000148
KWD 0.30714
KYD 0.833377
KZT 524.809647
LAK 21695.000006
LBP 89572.717427
LKR 304.582734
LRD 181.999871
LSL 17.244991
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.460068
MAD 9.282498
MDL 16.941349
MGA 4500.000328
MKD 53.084556
MMK 2099.257186
MNT 3579.013865
MOP 8.005511
MRU 39.850078
MUR 45.829695
MVR 15.40497
MWK 1736.000109
MXN 18.303605
MYR 4.130308
MZN 63.959903
NAD 17.244969
NGN 1440.08049
NIO 36.770447
NOK 10.08494
NPR 141.874295
NZD 1.770395
OMR 0.384499
PAB 1.000073
PEN 3.368978
PGK 4.12006
PHP 59.109932
PKR 280.749795
PLN 3.655692
PYG 7057.035009
QAR 3.6409
RON 4.388498
RSD 101.135998
RUB 81.275692
RWF 1450
SAR 3.751996
SBD 8.237372
SCR 14.46958
SDG 600.500902
SEK 9.453013
SGD 1.30162
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.374972
SLL 20969.494034
SOS 571.497557
SRD 38.556499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.45
SVC 8.750858
SYP 11056.952587
SZL 17.244961
THB 32.339642
TJS 9.260569
TMT 3.5
TND 2.952502
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.24946
TTD 6.781462
TWD 31.104954
TZS 2439.999713
UAH 42.073999
UGX 3625.244555
UYU 39.767991
UZS 12005.000329
VES 233.26555
VND 26330
VUV 122.202554
WST 2.815308
XAF 566.596269
XAG 0.018523
XAU 0.000238
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802343
XDR 0.704774
XOF 565.000123
XPF 103.25013
YER 238.522666
ZAR 17.07786
ZMK 9001.190753
ZMW 22.426266
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.1100

    24.08

    +0.46%

  • SCS

    0.0000

    15.75

    0%

  • RIO

    0.7900

    71.11

    +1.11%

  • CMSD

    0.2300

    24.55

    +0.94%

  • NGG

    0.7200

    78.03

    +0.92%

  • GSK

    -0.3400

    48.07

    -0.71%

  • BTI

    0.0600

    55.82

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    -0.0500

    78.47

    -0.06%

  • BP

    -0.4900

    36.86

    -1.33%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0700

    14.96

    -0.47%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    13.87

    +0.36%

  • RELX

    -1.1200

    41.36

    -2.71%

  • BCE

    -0.6400

    22.77

    -2.81%

  • AZN

    -1.4100

    87.68

    -1.61%

  • VOD

    -0.3000

    12.37

    -2.43%

  • BCC

    0.6500

    70.28

    +0.92%

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China
Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

Chomping peacefully on a fruitsicle cake in her grassy Washington zoo enclosure Mei Xiang is blissfully unaware that she and a handful of other cute pandas are at the center of a ferocious misinformation campaign driving anti-US sentiment in China.

Text size:

Evidence-free claims that pandas have been abused at US zoos have ricocheted across Chinese social media in recent months, fanning anti-American perceptions amid already fraught ties between Washington and Beijing.

The falsehoods, which researchers say were amplified by clout-chasing influencers, have cast a shadow on Beijing's "panda diplomacy," the decades-old practice of gifting or loaning the bears to other countries as a token of friendship.

In multiple posts on Chinese platforms including Weibo and Douyin, a video fuelled the narrative that Mei Xiang was abused by the Smithsonian's National Zoo in Washington DC and made to undergo a painful artificial insemination procedure dozens of times.

The posts triggered impassioned pleas for the panda to be rescued and returned to China, with the hashtag "Save Mei Xiang" viewed on Weibo hundreds of millions of times.

But according to AFP factcheckers, the video actually shows a different male panda in Singapore undergoing a health check-up in 2015, a story widely reported by local media at the time.

In other posts on the same platforms, an image purported to show Mei Xiang's mate, Tian Tian, sedated and restrained during an examination.

But the photo actually depicts a panda in China's Fujian province undergoing an examination in 2005, according to the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab).

- 'Rooted in nationalism' -

"Amid increased competition between the US and China, the deterioration of US-China relations is now echoed in Chinese narratives" alleging the mistreatment of pandas, the DFRLab said in a report last month.

"The narratives are deeply rooted in Chinese nationalism and mistrust of the West and have been amplified across Chinese media and social media."

Last week, AFP journalists in Washington saw Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, seemingly healthy and devouring frozen treats in their enclosures as the zoo hosted a nine-day "Panda Palooza" celebration with panda-themed refreshments, film screenings and music concerts.

The zoo, which declined to comment on the online misinformation, held the party to bid farewell to the bears and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji, who will be returning to China in December as its contract with the Chinese government expires.

Another panda named Ya Ya was returned to China by the Memphis zoo in April after its loan agreement ended. This followed uproar from Chinese activists and social media users who accused the zoo of abusing her.

Many also blamed the zoo for the death of Ya Ya's mate, Le Le, with accusations swirling online -- despite no evidence -- that zookeepers had stabbed the bear and sold his eyeball.

The zoo vigorously rejected what it said was "misinformation." The Chinese Association of Zoological Gardens also backed the zookeepers, saying in a joint statement that the bears at the Memphis zoo had received "excellent care."

But that did little to quell the nationalist outrage.

- 'Fan those flames' -

China's state-linked Global Times, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, linked the controversy over Ya Ya to US-China geopolitical tensions.

"If this had not happened during a period when Washington is intensifying its containment and suppression of China, this matter would not have caused such a stir," it said in an editorial in March.

Amid tense relations between the two biggest economies over issues such as Taiwan, US observers say the Chinese government appears keen to condone and encourage anti-American sentiment.

"Misinformation around panda treatment is an example of a convenient way to fan those flames," Isaac Stone Fish, chief executive of China-focused data company Strategy Risks, told AFP.

The misinformation not only bred mistrust about the United States in China but also sparked fervent calls to suspend the panda exchange, potentially closing what DFRLab called one of the few avenues of cooperation between the two countries.

Aside from Washington and Memphis, the zoos in San Diego and Atlanta have either returned or are set to return their pandas to China by next year. Without China's extension of the loan agreement, US zoos face the prospect of having no pandas for the first time in 50 years.

"This (misinformation) campaign is particularly sad given the ways in which 'panda diplomacy' previously played such a crucial role in helping to foster positive relations between China and the West," Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University, told AFP.

It is, he added, "an unfortunate sign of the current state of relations between powers."

burs-ac/sms

P.Deng--ThChM