The China Mail - Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 63.49947
ALL 81.244999
AMD 376.110854
ANG 1.789731
AOA 917.000162
ARS 1399.250192
AUD 1.414027
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.686874
BAM 1.647475
BBD 2.012046
BDT 122.174957
BGN 1.647646
BHD 0.3751
BIF 2946.973845
BMD 1
BND 1.262688
BOB 6.903087
BRL 5.219402
BSD 0.998947
BTN 90.484774
BWP 13.175252
BYN 2.862991
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009097
CAD 1.361505
CDF 2254.99986
CHF 0.768495
CLF 0.021854
CLP 862.887821
CNY 6.90865
CNH 6.90302
COP 3660.44729
CRC 484.521754
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 92.882113
CZK 20.446299
DJF 177.88822
DKK 6.295945
DOP 62.233079
DZD 128.996336
EGP 46.640006
ERN 15
ETB 155.576128
EUR 0.84278
FJD 2.19355
FKP 0.732487
GBP 0.732755
GEL 2.675015
GGP 0.732487
GHS 10.993556
GIP 0.732487
GMD 73.499001
GNF 8768.057954
GTQ 7.662048
GYD 208.996336
HKD 7.816805
HNL 26.394306
HRK 6.350499
HTG 130.985975
HUF 319.342498
IDR 16832.8
ILS 3.09073
IMP 0.732487
INR 90.560993
IQD 1308.680453
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.169699
JEP 0.732487
JMD 156.340816
JOD 0.709037
JPY 152.919909
KES 128.812703
KGS 87.449527
KHR 4018.026366
KMF 415.000003
KPW 900.035341
KRW 1440.860289
KWD 0.30661
KYD 0.832498
KZT 494.35202
LAK 21437.897486
LBP 89457.103146
LKR 308.891042
LRD 186.25279
LSL 16.033104
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604889
LYD 6.298277
MAD 9.134566
MDL 16.962473
MGA 4370.130144
MKD 51.922672
MMK 2099.386751
MNT 3566.581342
MOP 8.044813
MRU 39.81384
MUR 45.898647
MVR 15.404993
MWK 1732.215811
MXN 17.159839
MYR 3.907499
MZN 63.910042
NAD 16.033104
NGN 1353.400987
NIO 36.760308
NOK 9.50436
NPR 144.775302
NZD 1.657675
OMR 0.38258
PAB 0.999031
PEN 3.351556
PGK 4.288422
PHP 57.848498
PKR 279.396706
PLN 3.54867
PYG 6551.825801
QAR 3.640736
RON 4.291401
RSD 98.909152
RUB 77.226488
RWF 1458.450912
SAR 3.749258
SBD 8.045182
SCR 13.47513
SDG 601.489062
SEK 8.937225
SGD 1.262845
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.449694
SLL 20969.49935
SOS 570.441814
SRD 37.754017
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.637662
SVC 8.741103
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.029988
THB 31.079791
TJS 9.425178
TMT 3.5
TND 2.880259
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.718755
TTD 6.780946
TWD 31.383993
TZS 2607.252664
UAH 43.08175
UGX 3536.200143
UYU 38.512404
UZS 12277.302784
VES 392.73007
VND 25970
VUV 119.056861
WST 2.712216
XAF 552.547698
XAG 0.013065
XAU 0.000199
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800362
XDR 0.687192
XOF 552.547698
XPF 100.459083
YER 238.350401
ZAR 15.93125
ZMK 9001.197201
ZMW 18.156088
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCE

    -0.1200

    25.71

    -0.47%

  • JRI

    0.2135

    13.24

    +1.61%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    86.5

    -1.8%

  • CMSD

    0.0647

    23.64

    +0.27%

  • GSK

    0.3900

    58.93

    +0.66%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • BTI

    -1.1100

    59.5

    -1.87%

  • RIO

    0.1600

    98.07

    +0.16%

  • NGG

    1.1800

    92.4

    +1.28%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.75

    +0.21%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    15.57

    -0.32%

  • AZN

    1.0300

    205.55

    +0.5%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    17.1

    +1.35%

  • BP

    0.4700

    37.66

    +1.25%

  • RELX

    2.2500

    31.06

    +7.24%

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China
Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

Chomping peacefully on a fruitsicle cake in her grassy Washington zoo enclosure Mei Xiang is blissfully unaware that she and a handful of other cute pandas are at the center of a ferocious misinformation campaign driving anti-US sentiment in China.

Text size:

Evidence-free claims that pandas have been abused at US zoos have ricocheted across Chinese social media in recent months, fanning anti-American perceptions amid already fraught ties between Washington and Beijing.

The falsehoods, which researchers say were amplified by clout-chasing influencers, have cast a shadow on Beijing's "panda diplomacy," the decades-old practice of gifting or loaning the bears to other countries as a token of friendship.

In multiple posts on Chinese platforms including Weibo and Douyin, a video fuelled the narrative that Mei Xiang was abused by the Smithsonian's National Zoo in Washington DC and made to undergo a painful artificial insemination procedure dozens of times.

The posts triggered impassioned pleas for the panda to be rescued and returned to China, with the hashtag "Save Mei Xiang" viewed on Weibo hundreds of millions of times.

But according to AFP factcheckers, the video actually shows a different male panda in Singapore undergoing a health check-up in 2015, a story widely reported by local media at the time.

In other posts on the same platforms, an image purported to show Mei Xiang's mate, Tian Tian, sedated and restrained during an examination.

But the photo actually depicts a panda in China's Fujian province undergoing an examination in 2005, according to the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab).

- 'Rooted in nationalism' -

"Amid increased competition between the US and China, the deterioration of US-China relations is now echoed in Chinese narratives" alleging the mistreatment of pandas, the DFRLab said in a report last month.

"The narratives are deeply rooted in Chinese nationalism and mistrust of the West and have been amplified across Chinese media and social media."

Last week, AFP journalists in Washington saw Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, seemingly healthy and devouring frozen treats in their enclosures as the zoo hosted a nine-day "Panda Palooza" celebration with panda-themed refreshments, film screenings and music concerts.

The zoo, which declined to comment on the online misinformation, held the party to bid farewell to the bears and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji, who will be returning to China in December as its contract with the Chinese government expires.

Another panda named Ya Ya was returned to China by the Memphis zoo in April after its loan agreement ended. This followed uproar from Chinese activists and social media users who accused the zoo of abusing her.

Many also blamed the zoo for the death of Ya Ya's mate, Le Le, with accusations swirling online -- despite no evidence -- that zookeepers had stabbed the bear and sold his eyeball.

The zoo vigorously rejected what it said was "misinformation." The Chinese Association of Zoological Gardens also backed the zookeepers, saying in a joint statement that the bears at the Memphis zoo had received "excellent care."

But that did little to quell the nationalist outrage.

- 'Fan those flames' -

China's state-linked Global Times, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, linked the controversy over Ya Ya to US-China geopolitical tensions.

"If this had not happened during a period when Washington is intensifying its containment and suppression of China, this matter would not have caused such a stir," it said in an editorial in March.

Amid tense relations between the two biggest economies over issues such as Taiwan, US observers say the Chinese government appears keen to condone and encourage anti-American sentiment.

"Misinformation around panda treatment is an example of a convenient way to fan those flames," Isaac Stone Fish, chief executive of China-focused data company Strategy Risks, told AFP.

The misinformation not only bred mistrust about the United States in China but also sparked fervent calls to suspend the panda exchange, potentially closing what DFRLab called one of the few avenues of cooperation between the two countries.

Aside from Washington and Memphis, the zoos in San Diego and Atlanta have either returned or are set to return their pandas to China by next year. Without China's extension of the loan agreement, US zoos face the prospect of having no pandas for the first time in 50 years.

"This (misinformation) campaign is particularly sad given the ways in which 'panda diplomacy' previously played such a crucial role in helping to foster positive relations between China and the West," Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University, told AFP.

It is, he added, "an unfortunate sign of the current state of relations between powers."

burs-ac/sms

P.Deng--ThChM