The China Mail - Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

USD -
AED 3.672503
AFN 63.000102
ALL 81.719319
AMD 368.120099
ANG 1.790403
AOA 913.116038
ARS 1429.508704
AUD 1.414197
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.703759
BAM 1.684662
BBD 2.014307
BDT 122.763646
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37711
BIF 2991
BMD 1
BND 1.282253
BOB 6.910839
BRL 5.075897
BSD 1.000134
BTN 94.672782
BWP 13.41861
BYN 2.768827
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011413
CAD 1.399251
CDF 2320.999982
CHF 0.794475
CLF 0.022625
CLP 890.469848
CNY 6.76055
CNH 6.75866
COP 3491.45
CRC 454.982019
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.978251
CZK 20.830949
DJF 177.719764
DKK 6.448185
DOP 58.780714
DZD 132.879862
EGP 50.353703
ERN 15
ETB 161.237628
EUR 0.86271
FJD 2.21345
FKP 0.746148
GBP 0.745545
GEL 2.655033
GGP 0.746148
GHS 11.101445
GIP 0.746148
GMD 72.999944
GNF 8761.079479
GTQ 7.62406
GYD 209.236521
HKD 7.83465
HNL 26.744076
HRK 6.501102
HTG 130.714732
HUF 302.308004
IDR 17710
ILS 2.902595
IMP 0.746148
INR 94.74205
IQD 1310.156512
IRR 1375877.486468
ISK 124.590029
JEP 0.746148
JMD 158.526028
JOD 0.708998
JPY 160.260982
KES 129.419943
KGS 87.449787
KHR 4019.208821
KMF 425.99974
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1516.644991
KWD 0.30817
KYD 0.833473
KZT 489.555787
LAK 22021.999604
LBP 89562.850473
LKR 332.536555
LRD 182.018649
LSL 16.177014
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.359584
MAD 9.24575
MDL 17.396473
MGA 4155.30719
MKD 53.193004
MMK 2099.090156
MNT 3576.689019
MOP 8.070461
MRU 39.92506
MUR 47.119885
MVR 15.460112
MWK 1734.220557
MXN 17.21575
MYR 4.050982
MZN 63.891881
NAD 16.176944
NGN 1358.259637
NIO 36.806698
NOK 9.53335
NPR 151.476624
NZD 1.716398
OMR 0.384505
PAB 1.00006
PEN 3.401239
PGK 4.380015
PHP 60.419743
PKR 278.247736
PLN 3.667135
PYG 6123.407023
QAR 3.646058
RON 4.516101
RSD 101.239805
RUB 72.447504
RWF 1469.173289
SAR 3.752094
SBD 8.045573
SCR 13.116748
SDG 600.496166
SEK 9.402701
SGD 1.28289
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.650007
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.527015
SRD 37.517951
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.103498
SVC 8.750743
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.174171
THB 32.569599
TJS 9.270929
TMT 3.51
TND 2.926901
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.290986
TTD 6.788552
TWD 31.533031
TZS 2629.998019
UAH 44.83735
UGX 3715.140944
UYU 40.562483
UZS 11980.705457
VES 581.95784
VND 26290
VUV 119.50104
WST 2.743493
XAF 565.02961
XAG 0.014299
XAU 0.000232
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802434
XDR 0.703376
XOF 565.02961
XPF 102.727985
YER 238.598182
ZAR 16.210095
ZMK 9001.184438
ZMW 17.580733
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0100

    22.34

    +0.04%

  • RBGPF

    2.1500

    62.87

    +3.42%

  • RYCEF

    1.0700

    18.11

    +5.91%

  • NGG

    -0.2700

    81.57

    -0.33%

  • BCC

    0.4500

    71.59

    +0.63%

  • BCE

    -0.2369

    24.04

    -0.99%

  • RELX

    -0.9000

    32.84

    -2.74%

  • GSK

    -0.8100

    52.23

    -1.55%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    22.32

    +0.27%

  • RIO

    0.5400

    105.89

    +0.51%

  • JRI

    0.1135

    12.78

    +0.89%

  • VOD

    -0.5300

    15

    -3.53%

  • BTI

    -1.2600

    61.06

    -2.06%

  • AZN

    -1.4800

    177.27

    -0.83%

  • BP

    -1.1900

    41.59

    -2.86%

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China
Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

Chomping peacefully on a fruitsicle cake in her grassy Washington zoo enclosure Mei Xiang is blissfully unaware that she and a handful of other cute pandas are at the center of a ferocious misinformation campaign driving anti-US sentiment in China.

Text size:

Evidence-free claims that pandas have been abused at US zoos have ricocheted across Chinese social media in recent months, fanning anti-American perceptions amid already fraught ties between Washington and Beijing.

The falsehoods, which researchers say were amplified by clout-chasing influencers, have cast a shadow on Beijing's "panda diplomacy," the decades-old practice of gifting or loaning the bears to other countries as a token of friendship.

In multiple posts on Chinese platforms including Weibo and Douyin, a video fuelled the narrative that Mei Xiang was abused by the Smithsonian's National Zoo in Washington DC and made to undergo a painful artificial insemination procedure dozens of times.

The posts triggered impassioned pleas for the panda to be rescued and returned to China, with the hashtag "Save Mei Xiang" viewed on Weibo hundreds of millions of times.

But according to AFP factcheckers, the video actually shows a different male panda in Singapore undergoing a health check-up in 2015, a story widely reported by local media at the time.

In other posts on the same platforms, an image purported to show Mei Xiang's mate, Tian Tian, sedated and restrained during an examination.

But the photo actually depicts a panda in China's Fujian province undergoing an examination in 2005, according to the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab).

- 'Rooted in nationalism' -

"Amid increased competition between the US and China, the deterioration of US-China relations is now echoed in Chinese narratives" alleging the mistreatment of pandas, the DFRLab said in a report last month.

"The narratives are deeply rooted in Chinese nationalism and mistrust of the West and have been amplified across Chinese media and social media."

Last week, AFP journalists in Washington saw Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, seemingly healthy and devouring frozen treats in their enclosures as the zoo hosted a nine-day "Panda Palooza" celebration with panda-themed refreshments, film screenings and music concerts.

The zoo, which declined to comment on the online misinformation, held the party to bid farewell to the bears and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji, who will be returning to China in December as its contract with the Chinese government expires.

Another panda named Ya Ya was returned to China by the Memphis zoo in April after its loan agreement ended. This followed uproar from Chinese activists and social media users who accused the zoo of abusing her.

Many also blamed the zoo for the death of Ya Ya's mate, Le Le, with accusations swirling online -- despite no evidence -- that zookeepers had stabbed the bear and sold his eyeball.

The zoo vigorously rejected what it said was "misinformation." The Chinese Association of Zoological Gardens also backed the zookeepers, saying in a joint statement that the bears at the Memphis zoo had received "excellent care."

But that did little to quell the nationalist outrage.

- 'Fan those flames' -

China's state-linked Global Times, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, linked the controversy over Ya Ya to US-China geopolitical tensions.

"If this had not happened during a period when Washington is intensifying its containment and suppression of China, this matter would not have caused such a stir," it said in an editorial in March.

Amid tense relations between the two biggest economies over issues such as Taiwan, US observers say the Chinese government appears keen to condone and encourage anti-American sentiment.

"Misinformation around panda treatment is an example of a convenient way to fan those flames," Isaac Stone Fish, chief executive of China-focused data company Strategy Risks, told AFP.

The misinformation not only bred mistrust about the United States in China but also sparked fervent calls to suspend the panda exchange, potentially closing what DFRLab called one of the few avenues of cooperation between the two countries.

Aside from Washington and Memphis, the zoos in San Diego and Atlanta have either returned or are set to return their pandas to China by next year. Without China's extension of the loan agreement, US zoos face the prospect of having no pandas for the first time in 50 years.

"This (misinformation) campaign is particularly sad given the ways in which 'panda diplomacy' previously played such a crucial role in helping to foster positive relations between China and the West," Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University, told AFP.

It is, he added, "an unfortunate sign of the current state of relations between powers."

burs-ac/sms

P.Deng--ThChM