The China Mail - US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 64.503778
ALL 81.338497
AMD 361.09675
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.999706
ARS 1513.236465
AUD 1.447188
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.704172
BAM 1.743363
BBD 2.013184
BDT 122.946509
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377586
BIF 2991.638885
BMD 1
BND 1.281883
BOB 11.71977
BRL 5.0581
BSD 0.999594
BTN 94.961938
BWP 13.742418
BYN 3.017057
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010313
CAD 1.420705
CDF 2312.497903
CHF 0.830245
CLF 0.02503
CLP 985.13026
CNY 6.69275
CNH 6.691765
COP 3194.05
CRC 454.960757
CUC 1
CUP 23.989731
CVE 98.287665
CZK 21.727901
DJF 177.999037
DKK 6.669495
DOP 61.28243
DZD 134.609897
EGP 53.488596
ERN 15
ETB 163.269377
EUR 0.891991
FJD 2.262985
FKP 0.76043
GBP 0.754905
GEL 2.59004
GGP 0.76043
GHS 11.629742
GIP 0.76043
GMD 73.999893
GNF 8793.432336
GTQ 7.636425
GYD 209.06352
HKD 7.847315
HNL 26.837693
HRK 6.721404
HTG 130.889189
HUF 324.420995
IDR 17948.8
ILS 3.102398
IMP 0.76043
INR 94.91635
IQD 1514.36683
IRR 1790499.999886
ISK 121.679853
JEP 0.76043
JMD 158.941401
JOD 0.708953
JPY 157.993498
KES 129.849764
KGS 87.450241
KHR 4059.311949
KMF 441.999892
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1346.264987
KWD 0.31098
KYD 0.832995
KZT 453.004595
LAK 22483.097342
LBP 89509.87864
LKR 330.880551
LRD 170.423094
LSL 16.517836
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.421479
MAD 9.795696
MDL 17.962214
MGA 4502.324255
MKD 54.950394
MMK 2099.444361
MNT 3596.720368
MOP 8.079529
MRU 40.052235
MUR 47.241137
MVR 15.450065
MWK 1732.925677
MXN 18.523375
MYR 4.082603
MZN 63.910338
NAD 16.51791
NGN 1329.99989
NIO 36.787121
NOK 9.505505
NPR 151.938745
NZD 1.78582
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.999586
PEN 3.438455
PGK 4.537108
PHP 63.080975
PKR 276.703496
PLN 3.899005
PYG 5692.357747
QAR 3.643608
RON 4.758995
RSD 104.739601
RUB 83.748846
RWF 1474.878661
SAR 3.783194
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.861837
SDG 601.501324
SEK 9.972765
SGD 1.28298
SHP 0.754745
SLE 24.679745
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.283404
SRD 37.711975
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.838829
SVC 8.746189
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.511864
THB 33.543503
TJS 9.210912
TMT 3.51
TND 3.001547
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.417598
TTD 6.784239
TWD 32.442499
TZS 2640.140335
UAH 44.837859
UGX 4022.801521
UYU 40.200736
UZS 11955.039354
VES 878.023596
VND 25873
VUV 119.689611
WST 2.781623
XAF 585.107973
XAG 0.017637
XAU 0.000241118694
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801465
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.107973
XPF 106.304652
YER 236.150526
ZAR 16.55695
ZMK 9001.201832
ZMW 19.915944
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5773.824733
MXV 2.091596
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws
US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws / Photo: © AFP

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws

The US Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review a pair of Republican-backed laws that imposed restrictions on social media content moderation, in a decision welcomed by the tech industry.

Text size:

Tech industry trade groups had challenged the laws passed by conservative Republican lawmakers in Florida and Texas in a bid to stem what they claimed was political bias by major platforms.

The Supreme Court declined to rule on whether it was constitutional for states to pass legislation that limit the powers of social media companies to moderate their content, leaving the two laws in limbo as the lower courts conduct their review.

Florida's measure bars social media platforms from pulling content from politicians, a law that was passed after former president Donald Trump was suspended from Twitter and Facebook in the wake of the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.

In Texas, the law stops sites from pulling content based on a "viewpoint" and is also intended to thwart what conservatives see as censorship by tech platforms such as Facebook and YouTube against right-wing ideas.

Neither law has gone into effect due to the litigation.

The challenge was brought by associations representing big tech companies, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice, who argue that the First Amendment allows platforms to have the freedom to handle content as they see fit.

"We are encouraged that a majority of the Court has made clear that the government cannot tilt public debate in its favored direction," CCIA president Matt Schruers said in a statement.

"There is nothing more Orwellian than government attempting to dictate what speech should be carried, whether it is a newspaper or a social media site."

The decision was also welcomed by tech advocacy groups.

"The government does not have the right to impose rules on how companies like Meta and Google should accomplish" content moderation, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at the watchdog Free Press.

"These laws would have further ratcheted up the amount of hate and disinformation online while undermining both the meaning and the intent of the First Amendment," she added.

Monday's decision comes after the Supreme Court last week rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content.

The decision handed a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms including Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.

R.Lin--ThChM