The China Mail - US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 65.500282
ALL 80.118822
AMD 365.101228
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.999952
ARS 1473.822201
AUD 1.40989
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.677673
BAM 1.689027
BBD 2.009905
BDT 122.501501
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.376353
BIF 2983.311384
BMD 1
BND 1.276452
BOB 11.630749
BRL 5.218395
BSD 0.997902
BTN 95.172426
BWP 13.444507
BYN 3.035115
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007055
CAD 1.38684
CDF 2273.000285
CHF 0.811885
CLF 0.023213
CLP 913.597632
CNY 6.743198
CNH 6.742026
COP 3131.8
CRC 448.981178
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.223908
CZK 20.918973
DJF 177.708307
DKK 6.455725
DOP 58.413323
DZD 131.548585
EGP 49.808802
ERN 15
ETB 161.425894
EUR 0.863597
FJD 2.2342
FKP 0.739036
GBP 0.738065
GEL 2.610503
GGP 0.739036
GHS 10.927886
GIP 0.739036
GMD 73.502352
GNF 8766.165073
GTQ 7.61376
GYD 208.747317
HKD 7.846631
HNL 26.751064
HRK 6.506601
HTG 130.529588
HUF 313.659503
IDR 17799.55
ILS 2.955105
IMP 0.739036
INR 95.60255
IQD 1307.282109
IRR 1374587.49143
ISK 122.795489
JEP 0.739036
JMD 158.0345
JOD 0.709018
JPY 159.073009
KES 129.290338
KGS 87.450231
KHR 4038.118596
KMF 426.999733
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1415.439659
KWD 0.308679
KYD 0.831624
KZT 463.058356
LAK 22523.133255
LBP 89358.962735
LKR 332.07394
LRD 181.117151
LSL 16.144443
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.354251
MAD 9.255973
MDL 17.3033
MGA 4296.404406
MKD 53.12925
MMK 2099.791609
MNT 3596.010349
MOP 8.065977
MRU 40.077551
MUR 47.110234
MVR 15.450075
MWK 1730.479427
MXN 17.011241
MYR 4.079597
MZN 63.910141
NAD 16.144304
NGN 1358.37955
NIO 36.728702
NOK 9.432505
NPR 152.279341
NZD 1.693435
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.997958
PEN 3.365905
PGK 4.482884
PHP 61.591011
PKR 277.181559
PLN 3.71955
PYG 5989.818345
QAR 3.637965
RON 4.527602
RSD 101.332942
RUB 83.92164
RWF 1467.47555
SAR 3.746487
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.870251
SDG 600.500592
SEK 9.512315
SGD 1.27795
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.498611
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 570.305922
SRD 37.974503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.157898
SVC 8.731622
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.14239
THB 33.084502
TJS 9.215989
TMT 3.51
TND 2.925732
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.899701
TTD 6.760999
TWD 31.900897
TZS 2649.949627
UAH 44.643485
UGX 3707.397956
UYU 39.984283
UZS 11880.324535
VES 770.109102
VND 26076.5
VUV 117.940389
WST 2.73449
XAF 566.469052
XAG 0.015267
XAU 0.000228
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798484
XDR 0.707052
XOF 566.473944
XPF 102.991023
YER 237.196067
ZAR 16.18029
ZMK 9001.180041
ZMW 18.860674
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    21.58

    -0.05%

  • CMSC

    -0.0250

    21.45

    -0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    71.34

    0%

  • RIO

    -0.4100

    95.68

    -0.43%

  • AZN

    -0.7900

    156.45

    -0.5%

  • BCC

    -0.8900

    83.24

    -1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.2400

    34.43

    -0.7%

  • GSK

    -0.4785

    49.52

    -0.97%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    23.47

    +0.64%

  • JRI

    0.0635

    12.61

    +0.5%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    81.05

    -0.19%

  • VOD

    0.2000

    16.42

    +1.22%

  • RYCEF

    0.1300

    20.84

    +0.62%

  • BTI

    -0.2900

    57.06

    -0.51%

  • BP

    0.2196

    42.53

    +0.52%

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws
US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws / Photo: © AFP

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws

The US Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review a pair of Republican-backed laws that imposed restrictions on social media content moderation, in a decision welcomed by the tech industry.

Text size:

Tech industry trade groups had challenged the laws passed by conservative Republican lawmakers in Florida and Texas in a bid to stem what they claimed was political bias by major platforms.

The Supreme Court declined to rule on whether it was constitutional for states to pass legislation that limit the powers of social media companies to moderate their content, leaving the two laws in limbo as the lower courts conduct their review.

Florida's measure bars social media platforms from pulling content from politicians, a law that was passed after former president Donald Trump was suspended from Twitter and Facebook in the wake of the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.

In Texas, the law stops sites from pulling content based on a "viewpoint" and is also intended to thwart what conservatives see as censorship by tech platforms such as Facebook and YouTube against right-wing ideas.

Neither law has gone into effect due to the litigation.

The challenge was brought by associations representing big tech companies, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice, who argue that the First Amendment allows platforms to have the freedom to handle content as they see fit.

"We are encouraged that a majority of the Court has made clear that the government cannot tilt public debate in its favored direction," CCIA president Matt Schruers said in a statement.

"There is nothing more Orwellian than government attempting to dictate what speech should be carried, whether it is a newspaper or a social media site."

The decision was also welcomed by tech advocacy groups.

"The government does not have the right to impose rules on how companies like Meta and Google should accomplish" content moderation, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at the watchdog Free Press.

"These laws would have further ratcheted up the amount of hate and disinformation online while undermining both the meaning and the intent of the First Amendment," she added.

Monday's decision comes after the Supreme Court last week rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content.

The decision handed a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms including Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.

R.Lin--ThChM