The China Mail - In volatile election season, US companies battle 'brand disinformation'

USD -
AED 3.672982
AFN 62.000124
ALL 81.530268
AMD 377.689919
ANG 1.789731
AOA 917.000145
ARS 1397.0355
AUD 1.41615
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.695747
BAM 1.652012
BBD 2.013363
BDT 122.156619
BGN 1.647646
BHD 0.376943
BIF 2965
BMD 1
BND 1.263546
BOB 6.907736
BRL 5.234008
BSD 0.999671
BTN 90.597099
BWP 13.166764
BYN 2.856093
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010491
CAD 1.36845
CDF 2275.000182
CHF 0.772745
CLF 0.021833
CLP 862.119793
CNY 6.908498
CNH 6.889745
COP 3682.22
CRC 481.717051
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.749927
CZK 20.53915
DJF 177.720193
DKK 6.330297
DOP 61.499446
DZD 129.910097
EGP 46.904797
ERN 15
ETB 155.375034
EUR 0.8473
FJD 2.210504
FKP 0.73862
GBP 0.739515
GEL 2.669848
GGP 0.73862
GHS 10.999971
GIP 0.73862
GMD 73.999867
GNF 8775.00028
GTQ 7.667097
GYD 209.141052
HKD 7.81445
HNL 26.53033
HRK 6.382903
HTG 131.034133
HUF 320.387499
IDR 16905
ILS 3.096605
IMP 0.73862
INR 90.73765
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.719891
JEP 0.73862
JMD 155.656353
JOD 0.709019
JPY 154.604974
KES 128.999741
KGS 87.450161
KHR 4021.999374
KMF 417.000292
KPW 899.96705
KRW 1444.969994
KWD 0.30673
KYD 0.833017
KZT 488.871432
LAK 21425.000207
LBP 89549.999937
LKR 309.20947
LRD 185.601353
LSL 16.040275
LTL 2.952739
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.304999
MAD 9.158503
MDL 17.048881
MGA 4344.999852
MKD 52.220947
MMK 2099.648509
MNT 3578.335527
MOP 8.048467
MRU 39.960409
MUR 46.010155
MVR 15.404964
MWK 1737.000082
MXN 17.18609
MYR 3.915223
MZN 63.900677
NAD 16.04004
NGN 1340.839975
NIO 36.709952
NOK 9.51831
NPR 144.95519
NZD 1.67167
OMR 0.384503
PAB 0.999671
PEN 3.353498
PGK 4.29725
PHP 57.933496
PKR 279.606089
PLN 3.57025
PYG 6533.546191
QAR 3.641298
RON 4.316498
RSD 99.485941
RUB 76.750026
RWF 1455
SAR 3.750429
SBD 8.045182
SCR 14.694971
SDG 601.499139
SEK 9.00663
SGD 1.266485
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.501949
SLL 20969.49935
SOS 571.499293
SRD 37.701016
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.925
SVC 8.74659
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.040264
THB 31.229807
TJS 9.426636
TMT 3.5
TND 2.856499
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.760016
TTD 6.773433
TWD 31.496019
TZS 2583.402984
UAH 43.294901
UGX 3538.335487
UYU 38.838068
UZS 12150.000215
VES 395.87199
VND 25970
VUV 118.946968
WST 2.704181
XAF 554.069213
XAG 0.01279
XAU 0.0002
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801603
XDR 0.689186
XOF 553.999931
XPF 101.47497
YER 238.425006
ZAR 16.057968
ZMK 9001.199323
ZMW 18.698528
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0750

    23.935

    +0.31%

  • RIO

    2.2400

    99.12

    +2.26%

  • NGG

    -1.2300

    91.19

    -1.35%

  • BCE

    -0.0450

    25.745

    -0.17%

  • BCC

    -0.0800

    85.99

    -0.09%

  • RYCEF

    0.4500

    18

    +2.5%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • CMSD

    0.1150

    23.835

    +0.48%

  • BTI

    0.0100

    58.92

    +0.02%

  • RELX

    0.0020

    30.452

    +0.01%

  • GSK

    0.1900

    61.06

    +0.31%

  • BP

    0.8800

    38.44

    +2.29%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.21

    -0.08%

  • VOD

    0.0250

    15.685

    +0.16%

  • AZN

    -1.8100

    207.67

    -0.87%

In volatile election season, US companies battle 'brand disinformation'
In volatile election season, US companies battle 'brand disinformation' / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

In volatile election season, US companies battle 'brand disinformation'

From Google to Netflix, prominent US companies are battling internet boycott calls over their perceived political leanings in a polarizing election season that has exposed them to what researchers call "brand disinformation."

Text size:

The online campaigns, which falsely claim both Netflix and Google are funding or favoring Democratic nominee Kamala Harris ahead of the November election, illustrate how brands are vulnerable to political falsehoods that can expose them to financial perils.

Those calling for a boycott, researchers say, include fake accounts on the platform X. The site is owned by Elon Musk, who has endorsed Donald Trump and appears to exert an outsized influence on voters through the platform, which has become a hotbed of disinformation.

The recent boycott calls targeting Netflix, which also spread on other platforms such as TikTok and Instagram, were triggered by false claims of a $7 million donation from the streaming service to Harris's campaign, AFP fact-checkers reported.

Reed Hastings, the service's co-founder and executive chairman, made a contribution to Vice President Harris's campaign but the company said it was a "personal donation" and had "no connection to Netflix."

Still, calls to "cancel Netflix" flooded social media sites, with many users falsely claiming the company was indirectly funding the Harris campaign. Some shared screenshots of their canceled subscriptions.

Nearly a quarter of the boycott calls on X were traced to fake profiles, which have consistently expressed support for Trump through the past year, according to the disinformation security company Cyabra.

"Brand disinformation campaigns in today's polarized climate have far-reaching impacts beyond just corporate reputation," Dan Brahmy, Cyabra's chief executive, told AFP.

"The Netflix case demonstrates how rapidly these campaigns spread, potentially reaching hundreds of millions" and shows how "disinformation can manipulate public opinion and consumer behavior," he said.

- 'Delicate balancing act' -

As the hotly contested election nears, Brahmy cautioned, "brands must be vigilant."

Similar boycott calls recently targeted Google after unfounded claims that the company censors election-related content and manipulates search engine results in favor of Harris.

Cyabra identified hundreds of fake profiles on X –- many with a recent history of pro-Trump content -– which called for a boycott of the tech giant while promoting another search engine.

Musk, who has repeatedly criticized Google, played a "significant role in amplifying negative content" against the company, Cyabra said in a report.

In one evidence-free tweet in late July, Musk wrote: "Wow, Google has a search ban on President Donald Trump! Election interference?"

Google did not respond when AFP asked about the allegations, or about the impact of the boycott calls.

Earlier this month, a survey by the portal Sitejabber showed 30 percent of respondents had boycotted a brand over political reasons in the past 12 months, while 41 percent said they prefer that companies keep their "political positions private."

"Brands face a delicate balancing act this election year," Michael Lai, chief executive of Sitejabber, told AFP.

"While staying apolitical may seem safe, it's important for businesses to understand that even neutrality can be interpreted as a position."

- 'Chaos and distrust' -

Another survey by market research firm Certus Insights showed that consumers were divided over whether corporations should engage in partisan politics, with more than half the respondents saying companies should refrain from doing so.

Other surveys suggest consumers consider it the brand's fault if its advertising appears next to polarizing, false or defamatory content.

Such concerns have prompted many advertisers to abandon X, which has scaled back content moderation and restored once-banned accounts known to peddle disinformation or hate following Musk's 2022 acquisition of the platform.

Some also left in light of Musk's own controversial musings on the site.

Earlier this month, X sued an advertising group and several large corporations, accusing them of causing billions of dollars of losses by "illegally" boycotting his site.

"Disinformation creates chaos and distrust. Brands normally benefit from a well-informed society," Claire Atkin, co-founder and chief executive of the anti-disinformation watchdog Check My Ads, told AFP.

"On the internet, advertisers have let tech companies take their ads away from the news and straight into the arms of bad actors. Now, unfortunately, we are all experiencing the consequences."

Y.Parker--ThChM