The China Mail - Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 65.000286
ALL 81.757752
AMD 363.060451
ANG 1.790365
AOA 918.000102
ARS 1517.748898
AUD 1.431188
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702749
BAM 1.745081
BBD 2.014187
BDT 123.310283
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377783
BIF 2992.192728
BMD 1
BND 1.280571
BOB 11.845639
BRL 4.987899
BSD 1.000045
BTN 96.679902
BWP 13.757752
BYN 3.042248
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011332
CAD 1.42559
CDF 2309.999687
CHF 0.829899
CLF 0.024814
CLP 976.610074
CNY 6.692149
CNH 6.69232
COP 3204.5
CRC 456.301584
CUC 1
CUP 24.001785
CVE 98.38501
CZK 21.757899
DJF 178.086103
DKK 6.668902
DOP 60.611198
DZD 134.724069
EGP 52.403901
ERN 15
ETB 162.480749
EUR 0.89223
FJD 2.24725
FKP 0.755711
GBP 0.75505
GEL 2.590118
GGP 0.755711
GHS 11.755521
GIP 0.755711
GMD 73.497265
GNF 8797.680125
GTQ 7.645773
GYD 209.172429
HKD 7.84765
HNL 26.843631
HRK 6.7248
HTG 130.956948
HUF 325.530503
IDR 17917
ILS 3.06346
IMP 0.755711
INR 96.77555
IQD 1515.056882
IRR 1779470.000144
ISK 122.059881
JEP 0.755711
JMD 158.724069
JOD 0.709001
JPY 158.142965
KES 129.798196
KGS 87.450055
KHR 4060.673656
KMF 439.99992
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1338.090003
KWD 0.31096
KYD 0.833371
KZT 454.436761
LAK 22426.053982
LBP 89555.476244
LKR 330.885568
LRD 171.010484
LSL 16.545706
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.430515
MAD 9.82021
MDL 17.93085
MGA 4459.513718
MKD 54.940888
MMK 2099.813295
MNT 3595.111531
MOP 8.083426
MRU 39.963417
MUR 47.470253
MVR 15.45013
MWK 1734.106625
MXN 18.41655
MYR 4.084599
MZN 63.910293
NAD 16.545706
NGN 1331.000149
NIO 36.80571
NOK 9.555395
NPR 154.687486
NZD 1.78115
OMR 0.384742
PAB 1.000045
PEN 3.429668
PGK 4.534464
PHP 62.806042
PKR 276.931162
PLN 3.91335
PYG 5688.155253
QAR 3.65532
RON 4.760897
RSD 104.733437
RUB 85.158061
RWF 1474.102164
SAR 3.75677
SBD 8.078071
SCR 14.675002
SDG 601.502618
SEK 9.99165
SGD 1.280025
SHP 0.755572
SLE 24.669809
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.492304
SRD 37.692505
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.860361
SVC 8.75039
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.542494
THB 33.520253
TJS 9.200535
TMT 3.51
TND 2.984609
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.340899
TTD 6.793665
TWD 31.931044
TZS 2640.301624
UAH 44.916529
UGX 4089.225965
UYU 40.169529
UZS 11900.959179
VES 875.701602
VND 25899.5
VUV 119.371348
WST 2.785507
XAF 585.264638
XAG 0.016379
XAU 0.000238292681
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802364
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.264638
XPF 106.410886
YER 236.198801
ZAR 16.49715
ZMK 9001.202391
ZMW 19.875976
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5757.531856
MXV 2.080607
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam / Photo: © AFP

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.

Text size:

As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.

While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.

AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.

One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.

"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.

Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.

- 'Scams' -

AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.

"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.

"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."

JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."

It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."

Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."

AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.

The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.

JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.

"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.

- 'Liar's dividend' -

Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.

To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.

The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.

Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."

"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.

"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."

Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.

However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.

The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.

"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.

"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."

burs-ac/dw

B.Chan--ThChM