The China Mail - Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 65.999763
ALL 81.979405
AMD 364.662394
AOA 918.000182
ARS 1482.62499
AUD 1.42794
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.688272
BAM 1.711149
BBD 2.009537
BDT 123.143551
BHD 0.376294
BIF 2979.667186
BMD 1
BND 1.288474
BOB 10.849756
BRL 5.057801
BSD 0.997765
BTN 96.40109
BWP 13.596157
BYN 2.875978
BYR 19600
BZD 2.006649
CAD 1.407625
CDF 2260.000358
CHF 0.814505
CLF 0.023768
CLP 935.449798
CNY 6.772979
CNH 6.770095
COP 3217.74
CRC 452.672377
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.471926
CZK 21.19975
DJF 177.671037
DKK 6.54976
DOP 58.075749
DZD 133.235984
EGP 51.29735
ERN 15
ETB 161.034305
EUR 0.87617
FJD 2.244201
FKP 0.747613
GBP 0.747895
GEL 2.630112
GGP 0.747613
GHS 11.58818
GIP 0.747613
GMD 73.501987
GNF 8754.23232
GTQ 7.61084
GYD 208.735974
HKD 7.840845
HNL 26.718519
HRK 6.602899
HTG 130.450759
HUF 318.872502
IDR 17936
ILS 3.06969
IMP 0.747613
INR 96.5408
IQD 1307.056302
IRR 1375250.00015
ISK 125.65054
JEP 0.747613
JMD 158.347842
JOD 0.709024
JPY 163.335022
KES 129.510162
KGS 87.449747
KHR 4030.762231
KMF 432.000286
KRW 1470.56015
KWD 0.30972
KYD 0.831445
KZT 466.468349
LAK 22568.975096
LBP 89344.567077
LKR 335.55121
LRD 180.588547
LSL 16.442735
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.402702
MAD 9.366784
MDL 17.544412
MGA 4257.292341
MKD 53.872569
MMK 2099.232333
MNT 3591.167689
MOP 8.057658
MRU 39.857742
MUR 47.189933
MVR 15.459831
MWK 1730.039021
MXN 17.439285
MYR 4.08805
MZN 63.909691
NAD 16.443239
NGN 1371.479952
NIO 36.719481
NOK 9.586705
NPR 154.241069
NZD 1.724695
OMR 0.384488
PAB 0.997747
PEN 3.394212
PGK 4.463731
PHP 61.7415
PKR 277.191177
PLN 3.79303
PYG 6047.455729
QAR 3.63735
RON 4.5874
RSD 102.882975
RUB 78.423663
RWF 1468.079336
SAR 3.751718
SBD 8.077882
SCR 14.066657
SDG 600.505954
SEK 9.702103
SGD 1.29053
SLE 24.249742
SOS 570.171218
SRD 37.735503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.435008
SVC 8.730041
SZL 16.427378
THB 33.794011
TJS 9.2291
TMT 3.51
TND 2.95352
TRY 47.234299
TTD 6.7702
TWD 32.280958
TZS 2639.998023
UAH 44.678297
UGX 3731.49019
UYU 40.035871
UZS 12023.885037
VES 736.959249
VND 26311.5
VUV 119.024075
WST 2.742768
XAF 573.89566
XAG 0.016971
XAU 0.000244
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798154
XDR 0.713755
XOF 573.913234
XPF 104.34174
YER 238.599973
ZAR 16.42055
ZMK 9001.202057
ZMW 18.33326
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.4200

    67.77

    +0.62%

  • CMSC

    -0.0850

    21.91

    -0.39%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0800

    18.17

    -0.44%

  • CMSD

    -0.0500

    22.15

    -0.23%

  • VOD

    0.2400

    15.51

    +1.55%

  • BCE

    -0.1700

    21.48

    -0.79%

  • RIO

    1.7300

    92.28

    +1.87%

  • RELX

    0.0100

    32.74

    +0.03%

  • GSK

    -0.0200

    50.76

    -0.04%

  • NGG

    1.8200

    83.87

    +2.17%

  • BCC

    3.3000

    77.7

    +4.25%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.92

    -0.08%

  • BTI

    0.6400

    62.06

    +1.03%

  • AZN

    0.3900

    169.73

    +0.23%

  • BP

    0.5600

    43.32

    +1.29%

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam / Photo: © AFP

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.

Text size:

As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.

While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.

AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.

One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.

"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.

Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.

- 'Scams' -

AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.

"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.

"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."

JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."

It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."

Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."

AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.

The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.

JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.

"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.

- 'Liar's dividend' -

Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.

To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.

The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.

Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."

"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.

"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."

Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.

However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.

The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.

"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.

"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."

burs-ac/dw

B.Chan--ThChM