The China Mail - Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 65.000259
ALL 81.533073
AMD 358.401722
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000175
ARS 1541.608602
AUD 1.42109
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.706766
BAM 1.754262
BBD 2.010754
BDT 123.994851
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.376995
BIF 2999.094065
BMD 1
BND 1.280239
BOB 12.025456
BRL 5.346298
BSD 0.998309
BTN 95.006951
BWP 13.810517
BYN 2.942546
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007794
CAD 1.399695
CDF 2314.499647
CHF 0.827995
CLF 0.02501
CLP 987.54033
CNY 6.66605
CNH 6.65875
COP 3168.62
CRC 453.954273
CUC 1
CUP 23.960319
CVE 98.902577
CZK 21.845649
DJF 177.776183
DKK 6.70951
DOP 61.334505
DZD 135.317337
EGP 56.037016
ERN 15
ETB 163.677738
EUR 0.89773
FJD 2.243202
FKP 0.751792
GBP 0.751345
GEL 2.567495
GGP 0.751792
GHS 11.635281
GIP 0.751792
GMD 73.497916
GNF 8835.888903
GTQ 7.629042
GYD 209.205434
HKD 7.846495
HNL 26.802228
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.803902
HUF 328.862502
IDR 18145
ILS 3.11655
IMP 0.751792
INR 95.15685
IQD 1513.526119
IRR 1864650.000464
ISK 121.889937
JEP 0.751792
JMD 158.350301
JOD 0.708942
JPY 157.880501
KES 129.950292
KGS 87.448604
KHR 4079.381097
KMF 441.999671
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1337.18005
KWD 0.31091
KYD 0.832018
KZT 454.497345
LAK 22469.582065
LBP 89401.597474
LKR 331.94455
LRD 169.711646
LSL 16.642972
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.423981
MAD 9.821192
MDL 17.970463
MGA 4535.934522
MKD 55.229912
MMK 2099.638249
MNT 3597.631144
MOP 8.067326
MRU 40.444177
MUR 47.470126
MVR 15.460134
MWK 1731.104723
MXN 18.717469
MYR 4.060396
MZN 63.894926
NAD 16.643047
NGN 1346.920068
NIO 36.73971
NOK 9.30349
NPR 152.022209
NZD 1.77947
OMR 0.384542
PAB 0.998309
PEN 3.443763
PGK 4.475938
PHP 63.798499
PKR 276.21656
PLN 3.948285
PYG 5843.547208
QAR 3.639535
RON 4.800699
RSD 105.512998
RUB 80.574614
RWF 1478.109555
SAR 3.750664
SBD 8.064705
SCR 13.969602
SDG 601.502199
SEK 9.893595
SGD 1.28088
SHP 0.750582
SLE 22.950031
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 570.559796
SRD 37.6155
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.976051
SVC 8.735469
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.638487
THB 33.761987
TJS 9.194224
TMT 3.51
TND 2.995112
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.837199
TTD 6.776484
TWD 32.548989
TZS 2648.657993
UAH 45.526629
UGX 4347.533602
UYU 40.163236
UZS 11994.959121
VES 887.00815
VND 25826
VUV 119.133003
WST 2.76699
XAF 588.872304
XAG 0.018882
XAU 0.000247829939
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799297
XDR 0.707052
XOF 588.872304
XPF 106.970674
YER 236.175034
ZAR 16.6305
ZMK 9001.203101
ZMW 20.141626
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.303054
MXV 2.110101
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia
Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

As a growing list of US multinational businesses -- from Apple to Levi's -- suspend activities in Russia, some companies choose to stay in the country despite the risks to their reputation.

Text size:

But they face mounting pressure: calls for repercussions are appearing on social media under hashtags such as #BoycottMcDonalds and #BoycottPepsi -- two companies that received letters from New York state's pension fund chief.

These companies "need to consider whether doing business in Russia is worth the risk during this extraordinarily volatile time," Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement.

DiNapoli has also sent letters to snack manufacturer Mondelez; cosmetics groups Estee Lauder and Coty; and brokerage firm Bunge.

A team from Yale University that keeps a list of companies with a significant presence in Russia said about 250 have announced withdrawal from the country since it invaded Ukraine.

The group said the withdrawals call to mind "the large-scale corporate boycott of Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s."

Many US companies still in Russia remain silent. Brands including McDonald's, Bunge, Mondelez, Estee Lauder, Kimberly-Clark and Coty did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

- Legitimate reasons -

Starbucks said that its 130 coffee shops in Russia are owned by a Kuwaiti conglomerate. The coffee giant has pledged to donate any profit from its business in Russia to humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

Yum Brands said its approximately 1,000 KFC and 50 Pizza Hut restaurants in Russia are nearly all operated by independent owners under license or franchise agreements.

It announced Monday that it "has suspended all investment and restaurant development in Russia."

Some businesses may have legitimate reasons to stay, several experts in ethics and communications strategy told AFP.

Companies may be hesitant to leave because they make essential products such as pharmaceutical ingredients, said Tim Fort, a professor of business ethics at Indiana University.

"This is a time when (you've) got to pick your side, and it doesn't strike me as this being very difficult to pick," he said.

"Any one company leaving the country isn't going to tip the balance... but there's a cumulative effect," Fort added.

- 'What's going on?' -

A company as well-known as McDonald's can have influence in Russia at a time when the general population has almost no access to sources of information other than the official messaging on the invasion.

"Russians (will) be able to survive without the Big Mac, but (ask) why is McDonald's closed? What's going on? It's a more powerful signal in that sense," Fort said.

Richard Painter, a professor at the University of Minnesota, warned of "serious risks for American and Western Europeans who are currently in Russia.

"These companies should do everything they can to bring their people home," he said.

Painter said companies "should think about the message that needs to be emphasized: that Russia cannot do this to Ukraine... while at the same time participating in the international economy."

The economic sanctions imposed on Russia with broad consensus by Western governments "is really the best way to deal with Russia, as opposed to a military confrontation," the former White House ethics lawyer said.

Some companies may be betting the criticism will rain down in the short term but ultimately subside, said Brian Berkey, who specializes in corporate ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Other crisis situations, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, led to calls for boycotts against certain companies -- but without much effect.

Support for such initiatives is not always unanimous, but "mostly people in the United States and in Europe are unified in thinking that what Russia is doing is clearly unacceptable," he said.

Mark Hass, a communications specialist at Arizona State University, said the economic interest of companies that have chosen to stay in Russia "outweighs the reputational one."

McDonald's, for instance, gets nine percent of its revenue and three percent of its operating profits from Russia.

But "if social media starts identifying you as a company that's willing to do business with an autocratic aggressor, who's slaughtering thousands of people in the Ukraine, you're in big trouble," Hass said.

"And it will hurt business more broadly than just in Russia."

L.Johnson--ThChM