The China Mail - Top US court weighs major curbs to power of federal regulators

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 65.000033
ALL 80.761235
AMD 360.982284
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.999796
ARS 1547.435951
AUD 1.426218
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.711502
BAM 1.737655
BBD 2.013789
BDT 124.482471
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377511
BIF 2987.543757
BMD 1
BND 1.278142
BOB 12.12307
BRL 5.452597
BSD 0.999876
BTN 94.576825
BWP 13.727633
BYN 2.983457
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010946
CAD 1.396295
CDF 2315.000375
CHF 0.817865
CLF 0.024527
CLP 965.319821
CNY 6.669803
CNH 6.66649
COP 3229.13
CRC 454.196116
CUC 1
CUP 23.996482
CVE 97.96631
CZK 21.640991
DJF 178.04787
DKK 6.66219
DOP 60.044158
DZD 136.137727
EGP 53.944098
ERN 15
ETB 164.108289
EUR 0.89128
FJD 2.243203
FKP 0.743037
GBP 0.742305
GEL 2.604999
GGP 0.743037
GHS 11.633527
GIP 0.743037
GMD 74.488904
GNF 8859.999556
GTQ 7.640777
GYD 209.490556
HKD 7.844815
HNL 26.874159
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.993736
HUF 323.475987
IDR 18051.6
ILS 3.16671
IMP 0.743037
INR 94.45525
IQD 1515.805747
IRR 1883408.498647
ISK 121.740028
JEP 0.743037
JMD 158.490264
JOD 0.708991
JPY 158.394499
KES 129.88984
KGS 87.449305
KHR 4065.567945
KMF 440.999862
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1344.009825
KWD 0.31085
KYD 0.8332
KZT 451.907529
LAK 22510.972511
LBP 89536.844537
LKR 332.702525
LRD 169.971747
LSL 16.458322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411145
MAD 9.767223
MDL 17.932726
MGA 4516.054516
MKD 54.86112
MMK 2099.845134
MNT 3601.453525
MOP 8.0795
MRU 40.672394
MUR 46.750138
MVR 15.454973
MWK 1733.74558
MXN 18.57415
MYR 4.046102
MZN 63.910608
NAD 16.458322
NGN 1344.919545
NIO 36.791229
NOK 9.282715
NPR 151.327626
NZD 1.77647
OMR 0.384469
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.451055
PGK 4.486835
PHP 63.009499
PKR 276.584484
PLN 3.913615
PYG 6062.867601
QAR 3.645272
RON 4.758805
RSD 104.821031
RUB 81.626861
RWF 1471.300315
SAR 3.756339
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.753827
SDG 601.494926
SEK 9.77764
SGD 1.276798
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.910108
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.481881
SRD 37.564026
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.767813
SVC 8.74869
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.449882
THB 33.409965
TJS 9.223662
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979992
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.0464
TTD 6.77808
TWD 32.916898
TZS 2647.377987
UAH 45.533522
UGX 4104.696412
UYU 40.202925
UZS 11888.515735
VES 893.768974
VND 25682.5
VUV 119.655093
WST 2.783161
XAF 584.641244
XAG 0.018961
XAU 0.000242230458
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801979
XDR 0.707052
XOF 584.641244
XPF 105.958029
YER 236.174989
ZAR 16.3842
ZMK 9001.198566
ZMW 20.278266
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.516508
MXV 2.090199
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Top US court weighs major curbs to power of federal regulators
Top US court weighs major curbs to power of federal regulators / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES/AFP

Top US court weighs major curbs to power of federal regulators

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday began hearing a series of cases that could result in a generational contraction in the power of federal agencies to regulate businesses and corporate fraud.

Text size:

The first case before the conservative-dominated court seeks to eliminate one agency completely, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was created by Congress in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis.

If the justices side with the plaintiffs -- payday lending groups -- it could throw into doubt a raft of regulations enforced by the watchdog agency in the past 12 years on issues ranging from mortgages to credit cards to student loans.

The CFPB receives its funding, currently around $600 million a year, from the US Federal Reserve instead of through annual appropriations from Congress.

The case ended up in the nation's highest court after a conservative-controlled appeals court ruled the funding mechanism was unconstitutional, violating the appropriations clause of the Constitution which gives the power of the purse to Congress.

"Congress has not determined the amount that this agency should be spending," said Noel Francisco, representing the Community Financial Services Association of America which brought the case. "Instead, it has delegated to the director, the authority to pick his own appropriation."

Francisco's arguments appeared to be met with skepticism by a majority of the nine justices on the court, where conservatives outnumber liberals by six to three.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal, expressed concern about the courts meddling in what is traditionally Congress's turf.

"I'm a little worried I think about a separation of powers problem that may occur if the judiciary gets involved with telling Congress when and under what circumstances it can exercise its own prerogatives concerning funding," Jackson said.

"How do we avoid the judiciary becoming suddenly a super legislator, just telling Congress, agency by agency, whether it's a thumbs up or thumbs down?"

- 'Rounding error' -

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, another liberal, said that at $600 million the annual budget of the CFPB is just a "rounding error in the federal budget."

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, said it was Congress itself that set up how the CFPB is funded and the legislature can always "change it tomorrow."

Senator Elizabeth Warren, the architect of the CFPB, said the case could have far-reaching consequences for other agencies and welfare programs that are similarly funded.

"The future of Social Security, Medicare, and every federal banking regulator is under grave threat if payday lenders and Wall Street banks get the Supreme Court to undermine the CFPB," the Democrat from Massachusetts said in a statement.

"The CFPB is under attack because it's an effective watchdog, returning over $17 billion back into the pockets of hard working Americans who were cheated," she said.

- Herring fishermen -

The CFPB case is one of three the court will hear during the current term that challenge the regulatory authority of federal agencies when it comes to banking, business, industry or the environment.

The conservative-majority court has previously ruled that the government's key environmental agency cannot issue broad limits on greenhouse gases, sharply curtailing the power of President Joe Biden's administration to battle climate change.

One of the upcoming cases stems from a requirement that herring fishermen in New England provide space onboard their vessels for observers from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).

Several fishing companies complained that they are being effectively forced to pay for the federal observers who are monitoring their operations.

A split appellate court ruled that the NMFS program was authorized under a 1984 ruling by the Supreme Court known as the "Chevron Doctrine" that says courts should defer to government agencies' interpretation of ambiguous federal laws.

The other case on the docket would curtail the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to adjudicate violations of federal securities laws.

The Supreme Court will issue its rulings in the cases by the end of June.

D.Pan--ThChM