The China Mail - EU court rejects Brussels appeal over Amazon tax ruling

USD -
AED 3.672977
AFN 65.000285
ALL 80.973319
AMD 360.400479
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.999739
ARS 1545.048113
AUD 1.439108
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.696981
BAM 1.742632
BBD 2.013837
BDT 124.53501
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377434
BIF 2988.029527
BMD 1
BND 1.276378
BOB 12.072829
BRL 5.483201
BSD 0.99988
BTN 94.413878
BWP 13.698105
BYN 2.983174
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010897
CAD 1.398525
CDF 2315.000188
CHF 0.814535
CLF 0.024744
CLP 973.869549
CNY 6.669803
CNH 6.66461
COP 3235.61
CRC 453.42968
CUC 1
CUP 23.9964
CVE 98.242128
CZK 21.650296
DJF 177.720238
DKK 6.650475
DOP 60.044461
DZD 136.053841
EGP 53.907005
ERN 15
ETB 164.103855
EUR 0.88975
FJD 2.244697
FKP 0.743037
GBP 0.74185
GEL 2.604971
GGP 0.743037
GHS 11.662561
GIP 0.743037
GMD 74.487821
GNF 8856.535705
GTQ 7.641212
GYD 209.491818
HKD 7.84326
HNL 26.873438
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.039306
HUF 324.26698
IDR 18089
ILS 3.20125
IMP 0.743037
INR 94.52295
IQD 1515.768465
IRR 1891353.000122
ISK 121.739696
JEP 0.743037
JMD 158.589013
JOD 0.708961
JPY 157.645505
KES 129.90203
KGS 87.449302
KHR 4068.086547
KMF 440.999677
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1355.974975
KWD 0.31055
KYD 0.833278
KZT 449.579663
LAK 22503.085086
LBP 89535.66385
LKR 332.405209
LRD 169.973716
LSL 16.385571
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.400941
MAD 9.743884
MDL 17.877334
MGA 4533.405801
MKD 54.751198
MMK 2099.845134
MNT 3601.453525
MOP 8.079209
MRU 40.394356
MUR 46.749852
MVR 15.45498
MWK 1733.772887
MXN 18.731265
MYR 4.047199
MZN 63.90966
NAD 16.385571
NGN 1345.149739
NIO 36.798282
NOK 9.28885
NPR 151.060503
NZD 1.78194
OMR 0.384497
PAB 0.99988
PEN 3.443981
PGK 4.554749
PHP 63.054501
PKR 276.535615
PLN 3.91405
PYG 6160.371012
QAR 3.654913
RON 4.747797
RSD 104.572977
RUB 81.499606
RWF 1472.802602
SAR 3.756339
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.830161
SDG 601.532138
SEK 9.782402
SGD 1.27751
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.909643
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.392932
SRD 37.557024
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.829489
SVC 8.748374
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.379099
THB 33.429848
TJS 9.223717
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979413
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.048014
TTD 6.771597
TWD 33.078898
TZS 2642.498241
UAH 45.418655
UGX 4044.247039
UYU 40.27318
UZS 11931.375213
VES 893.76901
VND 25682.5
VUV 119.655093
WST 2.783161
XAF 583.63788
XAG 0.019096
XAU 0.000243802837
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80199
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.63788
XPF 106.260608
YER 236.175022
ZAR 16.466705
ZMK 9001.19982
ZMW 20.27148
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.516508
MXV 2.10788
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

EU court rejects Brussels appeal over Amazon tax ruling
EU court rejects Brussels appeal over Amazon tax ruling / Photo: © AFP

EU court rejects Brussels appeal over Amazon tax ruling

A top EU court rejected Thursday Brussels' appeal against a ruling blocking its bid to force Luxembourg to recover 25 million euros ($272-million) in back taxes from Amazon.

Text size:

The ruling, the final word in the case, was a blow not just to the European Commission but to the EU's competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager.

"The Court of Justice confirms that the Commission has not established that the tax ruling given to Amazon by Luxembourg was a State aid that was incompatible with the internal market," the court said in a statement.

"In its judgment handed down today, the Court of Justice rejects the appeal brought by the Commission," it added.

Amazon welcomed the ruling, but it was denounced by campaigners.

Vestager returned to her post as commissioner this week after an unsuccessful run for the EU's lender, the European Investment Bank (EIB). Spanish economy minister, Nadia Calvino, was appointed to that post.

It was Vestager who in 2017 accused Luxembourg of handing tax privileges to the internet retail giant that amounted to illegal state aid.

The case hinged on the belief that a tax deal between Luxembourg and Amazon in 2003 constituted illegal "state aid", giving the company an unfair advantage over competitors.

But in May 2021, the EU General Court had found "no selective advantage" had been given to the firm by the small EU Duchy.

The commission, the EU's powerful anti-trust authority, then appealed in July 2021 to the European Union's highest legal body.

An Amazon spokesperson welcomed the court ruling "which confirms that Amazon followed all applicable laws and received no special treatment".

- Call for tax reforms -

Anti-poverty campaigners Oxfam, however, hit out at the court's decision.

"Amazon got an early Christmas present this year," said Oxfam's EU tax expert, Chiara Putaturo, calling on the EU to work on "real" tax reforms.

"It can start by not looking the other way when it comes to tax havens within its borders allowing companies to sidestep their tax bills through empty offices."

Luxembourg has historically been used as a hub for multinationals seeking lower tax bills.

The EU has had trouble defending its tax decisions in the past, losing cases against Apple and Starbucks.

But Brussels might yet win a reprieve in the long-running legal saga with Apple.

The ECJ's top legal advisor last month recommended scrapping a previous Apple victory against Brussels in a 13-billion-euro tax case.

One of the landmark battles between the commission and big tech, it dates back to 2016 when the EU accused Ireland of allowing Apple to escape billions of euros in taxes.

A final decision by the ECJ is expected within a few months, but the judges are not bound by the advisor's opinion.

K.Lam--ThChM