The China Mail - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 64.000263
ALL 81.504871
AMD 360.297673
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000218
ARS 1538.500896
AUD 1.423386
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.697903
BAM 1.755348
BBD 2.014118
BDT 124.150744
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3000
BMD 1
BND 1.281553
BOB 11.995315
BRL 5.386897
BSD 1.000013
BTN 95.207367
BWP 13.822349
BYN 2.947868
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01121
CAD 1.39821
CDF 2315.000211
CHF 0.823385
CLF 0.025031
CLP 988.369712
CNY 6.661104
CNH 6.65636
COP 3176.35
CRC 454.76167
CUC 1
CUP 24.000287
CVE 99.19859
CZK 21.769952
DJF 177.719843
DKK 6.68323
DOP 60.650272
DZD 135.268994
EGP 55.998698
ERN 15
ETB 161.150131
EUR 0.89421
FJD 2.24175
FKP 0.751792
GBP 0.747425
GEL 2.597222
GGP 0.751792
GHS 11.649568
GIP 0.751792
GMD 73.999682
GNF 8799.999729
GTQ 7.645879
GYD 209.614159
HKD 7.84575
HNL 26.999638
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.054259
HUF 326.922502
IDR 18137.25
ILS 3.109045
IMP 0.751792
INR 95.152651
IQD 1514
IRR 1868414.999687
ISK 121.430084
JEP 0.751792
JMD 158.760361
JOD 0.709032
JPY 157.775012
KES 129.860282
KGS 87.447968
KHR 4072.999802
KMF 440.999732
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1338.588949
KWD 0.31087
KYD 0.833326
KZT 453.3167
LAK 22534.999988
LBP 89549.999742
LKR 332.450795
LRD 170.449831
LSL 16.629541
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.424994
MAD 9.833504
MDL 18.045072
MGA 4594.999847
MKD 55.021155
MMK 2099.638249
MNT 3597.631144
MOP 8.082337
MRU 40.240023
MUR 47.480231
MVR 15.450146
MWK 1736.00013
MXN 18.86803
MYR 4.057801
MZN 63.910036
NAD 16.630245
NGN 1346.710188
NIO 36.809967
NOK 9.247885
NPR 152.332146
NZD 1.77622
OMR 0.384515
PAB 1.000013
PEN 3.459991
PGK 4.49025
PHP 63.793035
PKR 276.596222
PLN 3.9247
PYG 5858.938516
QAR 3.645501
RON 4.771795
RSD 105.079789
RUB 81.244584
RWF 1475
SAR 3.7541
SBD 8.058206
SCR 13.814101
SDG 601.502571
SEK 9.84487
SGD 1.279775
SHP 0.748335
SLE 22.901
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.504172
SRD 37.644502
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.3
SVC 8.749697
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.630119
THB 33.720149
TJS 9.190174
TMT 3.5
TND 3.020698
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.929201
TTD 6.779691
TWD 32.582301
TZS 2642.007972
UAH 45.55389
UGX 4360.137679
UYU 40.22581
UZS 11995.000078
VES 887.479798
VND 25814
VUV 119.133003
WST 2.76699
XAF 586.563116
XAG 0.019271
XAU 0.00024965828
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802288
XDR 0.707052
XOF 586.563116
XPF 107.300318
YER 236.20406
ZAR 16.62169
ZMK 9001.198139
ZMW 20.200416
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.303054
MXV 2.127074
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

A.Zhang--ThChM