The China Mail - Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study

USD -
AED 3.672494
AFN 64.999743
ALL 80.761235
AMD 360.982284
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000094
ARS 1547.506848
AUD 1.426544
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697068
BAM 1.737655
BBD 2.013789
BDT 124.482471
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377511
BIF 2987.543757
BMD 1
BND 1.278142
BOB 12.12307
BRL 5.460698
BSD 0.999876
BTN 94.576825
BWP 13.727633
BYN 2.983457
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010946
CAD 1.39503
CDF 2314.999866
CHF 0.81448
CLF 0.024532
CLP 965.479702
CNY 6.669799
CNH 6.66659
COP 3229.75
CRC 454.196116
CUC 1
CUP 23.996482
CVE 97.96631
CZK 21.56415
DJF 178.04787
DKK 6.637502
DOP 60.044158
DZD 135.825634
EGP 54.653305
ERN 15
ETB 164.108289
EUR 0.88795
FJD 2.24175
FKP 0.743037
GBP 0.741195
GEL 2.605024
GGP 0.743037
GHS 11.633527
GIP 0.743037
GMD 74.503195
GNF 8859.999896
GTQ 7.640777
GYD 209.490556
HKD 7.844265
HNL 26.874159
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.993736
HUF 321.798964
IDR 18102
ILS 3.15995
IMP 0.743037
INR 94.510797
IQD 1515.805747
IRR 1883408.498647
ISK 121.310194
JEP 0.743037
JMD 158.490264
JOD 0.709012
JPY 157.938497
KES 129.95052
KGS 87.449977
KHR 4065.567945
KMF 441.000169
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1343.175028
KWD 0.31068
KYD 0.8332
KZT 451.907529
LAK 22510.972511
LBP 89536.844537
LKR 332.702525
LRD 169.971747
LSL 16.458322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411145
MAD 9.767223
MDL 17.932726
MGA 4516.054516
MKD 54.652015
MMK 2099.845134
MNT 3601.453525
MOP 8.0795
MRU 40.672394
MUR 47.009856
MVR 15.455007
MWK 1733.74558
MXN 18.570715
MYR 4.048101
MZN 63.910382
NAD 16.458322
NGN 1346.410288
NIO 36.791229
NOK 9.297399
NPR 151.327626
NZD 1.771905
OMR 0.384504
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.451055
PGK 4.486835
PHP 63.100501
PKR 276.584484
PLN 3.89515
PYG 6062.867601
QAR 3.645272
RON 4.742802
RSD 104.472028
RUB 81.802231
RWF 1471.300315
SAR 3.756339
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.835724
SDG 601.506428
SEK 9.703815
SGD 1.276498
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.909899
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.481881
SRD 37.563991
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.767813
SVC 8.74869
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.449882
THB 33.434032
TJS 9.223662
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979992
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.043497
TTD 6.77808
TWD 33.008496
TZS 2647.034973
UAH 45.533522
UGX 4104.696412
UYU 40.202925
UZS 11888.515735
VES 893.768982
VND 25682.5
VUV 119.655093
WST 2.783161
XAF 582.45706
XAG 0.019006
XAU 0.000242506548
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801979
XDR 0.707052
XOF 582.45706
XPF 105.958029
YER 236.175026
ZAR 16.354298
ZMK 9001.195056
ZMW 20.278266
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.516508
MXV 2.089813
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study
Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study / Photo: © AFP

Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study

The amount of plastic being recycled around the world is stagnant at less than 10 percent with most new plastic still made from fossil fuels, a new study said Thursday.

Text size:

Researchers from Tsinghua University in China said the rate of recycling had barely budged even as plastic production had exploded, presenting a "pressing global environmental challenge".

Their findings, published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, come as nations prepare to battle again over a treaty to address plastic pollution after the last round of negotiations failed to broker an agreement.

Plastic has been found in the depths of the remotest oceans and in snow atop the highest mountains, and tiny particles have been detected in blood and breast milk.

Yet despite growing international concern, there has been "a notable lack of comprehensive analysis of plastics along their supply chain", wrote Quanyin Tan and colleagues.

To address this, they drew on national statistics, industry reports, and international databases to create the first detailed global analysis of the plastics sector in 2022 from manufacture to disposal.

They found that just 9.5 percent of the 400 million tonnes of new plastic in 2022 was produced from recycled materials.

"The global recycling rate remained stagnant... reflecting little improvement from previous years," wrote the authors.

The rest was produced from fossil fuels, predominantly oil and gas, demonstrating "little progress" in addressing environmental concerns related to plastics production.

"The high reliance on fossil-fuel feedstocks for plastics production will further compromise the global efforts to mitigate climate change," the authors wrote.

- Recycling roadblocks -

Contamination with food and labels made some plastics more difficult to recycle, while the diversity and complexity of additives in materials posed another obstacle.

But another hindrance is purely economic: it is often cheaper to make new or "virgin" plastic than it is to recycle it.

"This economic barrier discourages investment in recycling infrastructure and technology, perpetuating the cycle of low recycling rates," the authors wrote.

They identified the United States, the largest consumer of plastic per capita, as having one of the lowest recycling rates with just five percent reused.

They also noted a "significant shift" in global waste disposal, with landfill in decline and around one-third of plastic waste being incinerated.

Landfill remained the main destination for most plastic waste, accounting for 40 percent of the global total.

But burning was "emerging as the most practiced method for managing plastic waste" with the European Union, China and Japan having among the highest incineration rates.

However the study did not account for "the significant role" of informal waste disposal schemes, which could affect the overall recycling rate, the authors noted.

In September, a separate study in Nature by researchers from the University of Leeds found that burning plastic in dumps and open fires was as big a problem for the planet as littering.

That study said burning plastic informally, mostly in poorer countries where no alternatives exist, spread plastic in the environment, worsened air quality, and exposed workers to toxic chemicals.

The authors of the more recent study said they hoped their research would "support the treaty negotiations" for a world-first plastic treaty which resume in August in Geneva after the last round collapsed.

A.Zhang--ThChM