The China Mail - Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 65.476658
ALL 83.300435
AMD 382.280324
ANG 1.790055
AOA 917.000338
ARS 1407.957703
AUD 1.535898
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.703248
BAM 1.684198
BBD 2.013055
BDT 122.136156
BGN 1.683695
BHD 0.377061
BIF 2944.440385
BMD 1
BND 1.298153
BOB 6.931234
BRL 5.3143
BSD 0.999466
BTN 88.614561
BWP 14.187976
BYN 3.409862
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010135
CAD 1.40392
CDF 2137.500188
CHF 0.790715
CLF 0.023702
CLP 929.830194
CNY 7.11275
CNH 7.09782
COP 3745.98
CRC 502.05818
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.374983
CZK 20.805503
DJF 177.719815
DKK 6.42426
DOP 64.394136
DZD 130.265967
EGP 47.190897
ERN 15
ETB 153.599323
EUR 0.86023
FJD 2.278983
FKP 0.757017
GBP 0.760755
GEL 2.700507
GGP 0.757017
GHS 10.949779
GIP 0.757017
GMD 72.999716
GNF 8684.99959
GTQ 7.66177
GYD 209.09956
HKD 7.77325
HNL 26.310228
HRK 6.482902
HTG 130.597544
HUF 330.946018
IDR 16726.8
ILS 3.247105
IMP 0.757017
INR 88.71155
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.486604
ISK 126.29938
JEP 0.757017
JMD 160.37683
JOD 0.709013
JPY 154.542982
KES 129.350205
KGS 87.450162
KHR 3998.813765
KMF 425.000127
KPW 900.02171
KRW 1458.309872
KWD 0.30674
KYD 0.832885
KZT 522.657205
LAK 21694.99964
LBP 89171.810368
LKR 305.549336
LRD 182.000099
LSL 17.080069
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.460109
MAD 9.282499
MDL 16.821311
MGA 4499.99986
MKD 52.861525
MMK 2099.568332
MNT 3578.06314
MOP 8.000499
MRU 39.849864
MUR 45.649881
MVR 15.40497
MWK 1735.999932
MXN 18.37284
MYR 4.132501
MZN 63.959778
NAD 17.079803
NGN 1442.029986
NIO 36.770365
NOK 10.098797
NPR 141.783641
NZD 1.760365
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999427
PEN 3.369051
PGK 4.119604
PHP 59.120054
PKR 280.749991
PLN 3.642037
PYG 7040.597969
QAR 3.640903
RON 4.374695
RSD 100.796969
RUB 80.925379
RWF 1450
SAR 3.750043
SBD 8.237372
SCR 13.886917
SDG 601.499001
SEK 9.463005
SGD 1.30179
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.375025
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 571.497823
SRD 38.589012
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.45
SVC 8.745635
SYP 11058.869089
SZL 17.079909
THB 32.450972
TJS 9.254993
TMT 3.5
TND 2.952498
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.329902
TTD 6.757548
TWD 31.181985
TZS 2449.999921
UAH 42.0333
UGX 3658.079766
UYU 39.741144
UZS 12004.999839
VES 233.26555
VND 26350
VUV 121.860911
WST 2.809778
XAF 564.864178
XAG 0.019279
XAU 0.000242
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801381
XDR 0.704774
XOF 564.999617
XPF 103.250166
YER 238.483762
ZAR 17.1366
ZMK 9001.188498
ZMW 22.412628
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -2.8200

    75.65

    -3.73%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    14.91

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.2500

    23.83

    -1.05%

  • NGG

    0.0600

    78.09

    +0.08%

  • RIO

    -0.0700

    71.04

    -0.1%

  • GSK

    0.0700

    48.14

    +0.15%

  • SCS

    -0.1300

    15.62

    -0.83%

  • VOD

    0.0400

    12.41

    +0.32%

  • AZN

    0.9300

    88.61

    +1.05%

  • BTI

    -1.3400

    54.48

    -2.46%

  • BCC

    -1.1000

    69.18

    -1.59%

  • CMSD

    -0.3400

    24.21

    -1.4%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    23.11

    +1.47%

  • RELX

    0.0600

    41.42

    +0.14%

  • JRI

    -0.1000

    13.77

    -0.73%

  • BP

    -0.3700

    36.49

    -1.01%

Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study
Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study / Photo: © AFP

Global plastic recycling rates 'stagnant' at under 10%: study

The amount of plastic being recycled around the world is stagnant at less than 10 percent with most new plastic still made from fossil fuels, a new study said Thursday.

Text size:

Researchers from Tsinghua University in China said the rate of recycling had barely budged even as plastic production had exploded, presenting a "pressing global environmental challenge".

Their findings, published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, come as nations prepare to battle again over a treaty to address plastic pollution after the last round of negotiations failed to broker an agreement.

Plastic has been found in the depths of the remotest oceans and in snow atop the highest mountains, and tiny particles have been detected in blood and breast milk.

Yet despite growing international concern, there has been "a notable lack of comprehensive analysis of plastics along their supply chain", wrote Quanyin Tan and colleagues.

To address this, they drew on national statistics, industry reports, and international databases to create the first detailed global analysis of the plastics sector in 2022 from manufacture to disposal.

They found that just 9.5 percent of the 400 million tonnes of new plastic in 2022 was produced from recycled materials.

"The global recycling rate remained stagnant... reflecting little improvement from previous years," wrote the authors.

The rest was produced from fossil fuels, predominantly oil and gas, demonstrating "little progress" in addressing environmental concerns related to plastics production.

"The high reliance on fossil-fuel feedstocks for plastics production will further compromise the global efforts to mitigate climate change," the authors wrote.

- Recycling roadblocks -

Contamination with food and labels made some plastics more difficult to recycle, while the diversity and complexity of additives in materials posed another obstacle.

But another hindrance is purely economic: it is often cheaper to make new or "virgin" plastic than it is to recycle it.

"This economic barrier discourages investment in recycling infrastructure and technology, perpetuating the cycle of low recycling rates," the authors wrote.

They identified the United States, the largest consumer of plastic per capita, as having one of the lowest recycling rates with just five percent reused.

They also noted a "significant shift" in global waste disposal, with landfill in decline and around one-third of plastic waste being incinerated.

Landfill remained the main destination for most plastic waste, accounting for 40 percent of the global total.

But burning was "emerging as the most practiced method for managing plastic waste" with the European Union, China and Japan having among the highest incineration rates.

However the study did not account for "the significant role" of informal waste disposal schemes, which could affect the overall recycling rate, the authors noted.

In September, a separate study in Nature by researchers from the University of Leeds found that burning plastic in dumps and open fires was as big a problem for the planet as littering.

That study said burning plastic informally, mostly in poorer countries where no alternatives exist, spread plastic in the environment, worsened air quality, and exposed workers to toxic chemicals.

The authors of the more recent study said they hoped their research would "support the treaty negotiations" for a world-first plastic treaty which resume in August in Geneva after the last round collapsed.

A.Zhang--ThChM