The China Mail - ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 69.530447
ALL 83.802932
AMD 383.269344
ANG 1.789783
AOA 916.999989
ARS 1292.817595
AUD 1.542543
AWG 1.8005
AZN 1.698948
BAM 1.673777
BBD 2.018408
BDT 121.455376
BGN 1.678026
BHD 0.376988
BIF 2960
BMD 1
BND 1.281889
BOB 6.922521
BRL 5.437203
BSD 0.999649
BTN 87.28295
BWP 13.40305
BYN 3.345371
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007942
CAD 1.38103
CDF 2894.999901
CHF 0.80726
CLF 0.024577
CLP 964.159873
CNY 7.184899
CNH 7.18608
COP 4015
CRC 505.173255
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.749739
CZK 20.98195
DJF 177.720278
DKK 6.40328
DOP 61.875008
DZD 129.852004
EGP 48.397798
ERN 15
ETB 141.150194
EUR 0.85788
FJD 2.25945
FKP 0.739708
GBP 0.740655
GEL 2.690282
GGP 0.739708
GHS 10.650217
GIP 0.739708
GMD 72.000052
GNF 8677.506151
GTQ 7.667127
GYD 209.133659
HKD 7.796105
HNL 26.291204
HRK 6.463298
HTG 130.799052
HUF 338.894046
IDR 16235.85
ILS 3.37868
IMP 0.739708
INR 87.212502
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.503007
ISK 123.040148
JEP 0.739708
JMD 160.101326
JOD 0.709011
JPY 147.700497
KES 129.149909
KGS 87.378799
KHR 4005.000179
KMF 420.502255
KPW 899.979822
KRW 1390.270483
KWD 0.30569
KYD 0.833009
KZT 538.737366
LAK 21602.501933
LBP 89552.50052
LKR 300.964476
LRD 201.509086
LSL 17.589507
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.414972
MAD 9.009497
MDL 16.663529
MGA 4439.999917
MKD 52.774443
MMK 2098.533403
MNT 3597.063411
MOP 8.049548
MRU 39.94952
MUR 45.679733
MVR 15.410086
MWK 1735.0002
MXN 18.808455
MYR 4.226029
MZN 63.950068
NAD 17.589982
NGN 1532.889949
NIO 36.760127
NOK 10.219645
NPR 139.65366
NZD 1.68956
OMR 0.384512
PAB 0.999649
PEN 3.559517
PGK 4.139733
PHP 57.089501
PKR 282.000068
PLN 3.642245
PYG 7320.465039
QAR 3.64075
RON 4.341198
RSD 100.516011
RUB 80.499676
RWF 1445
SAR 3.752541
SBD 8.223773
SCR 14.743191
SDG 600.497333
SEK 9.57144
SGD 1.284095
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.299395
SLL 20969.49797
SOS 571.493685
SRD 37.719934
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.3
SVC 8.747037
SYP 13001.624023
SZL 17.590261
THB 32.496504
TJS 9.281451
TMT 3.51
TND 2.88425
TOP 2.342098
TRY 40.90619
TTD 6.775324
TWD 30.093023
TZS 2599.999789
UAH 41.223011
UGX 3556.711839
UYU 40.059563
UZS 12522.496875
VES 135.47035
VND 26299
VUV 119.390828
WST 2.678368
XAF 561.364307
XAG 0.026382
XAU 0.0003
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801611
XDR 0.697125
XOF 561.000499
XPF 102.374998
YER 240.275007
ZAR 17.646075
ZMK 9001.200085
ZMW 23.272472
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    75.92

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    14.76

    +0.34%

  • RELX

    -0.1400

    47.82

    -0.29%

  • VOD

    0.0300

    11.7

    +0.26%

  • SCS

    -0.1000

    16.05

    -0.62%

  • BTI

    0.5700

    57.72

    +0.99%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    23.15

    +0.13%

  • GSK

    -0.2900

    39.07

    -0.74%

  • RIO

    -0.8800

    60.36

    -1.46%

  • NGG

    -0.7300

    70.7

    -1.03%

  • BP

    -0.2800

    34.05

    -0.82%

  • BCC

    -1.3500

    84.64

    -1.59%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    23.35

    +0.04%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    13.31

    -0.38%

  • BCE

    -0.0400

    25.57

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.0500

    79.12

    -0.06%

ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands
ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands / Photo: © AFP

ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands

The top United Nations court on Monday sided with Equatorial Guinea in a decades-long dispute with Gabon over three tiny islands in potentially oil-rich waters.

Text size:

The two west African nations have been squabbling over the 30-hectare (74-acre) island of Mbanie and two smaller low-lying islets, Cocotiers and Conga, since the early 1970s.

The islands themselves are tiny and virtually uninhabited but lie in an area potentially rich in oil and gas.

The dispute dates all the way back to 1900, when then colonial powers France and Spain signed a treaty in Paris setting out the borders between the two countries.

But Gabon argued that a later treaty, the 1974 Bata Convention, then fixed the islands' sovereignty in their favour.

However, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bata Convention "invoked by the Gabonese Republic is not a treaty having the force of law... and does not constitute a legal title."

It said that the legal title to the islands was held by Spain, which then passed to Equatorial Guinea upon independence in 1968.

Unlike most countries appearing before the ICJ in The Hague, which rules in disputes between states, Guinea and Equatorial Guinea agreed to ask judges for a ruling in an effort to find an amical solution.

The two countries asked the court to decide which legal texts are valid -- the Paris Treaty of 1900 or the Bata Convention of 1974.

In hearings in October, Equatorial Guinea argued that Gabon invaded the islands in 1972 and had occupied them illegally ever since.

Lawyers for the country rubbished the Bata Convention in the October hearings, saying Gabon suddenly produced the document in 2003, surprising everyone.

"No one had seen or heard of this supposed convention," Domingo Mba Esono, Vice-Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons from Equatorial Guinea, told ICJ judges.

"Moreover, the document presented was not an original but was only an unauthenticated photocopy," said Esono.

Philippe Sands, a lawyer representing Equatorial Guinea, dismissed the Bata Convention as "scraps of paper".

"You are being asked to rule that a state can rely on a photocopy of a photocopy of a purported document, the original of which cannot be found and of which no mention was made or any reliance placed for three decades," said Sands.

Equatorial Guinea has been asking for an original copy of the Bata Convention since 2003, so far in vain.

- 'Badly managed' -

But Marie-Madeleine Mborantsuo, honorary president of Gabon's constitutional court, argued that the Bata Convention "resolves all sovereignty issues regarding the islands and border delimitation".

She admitted that "sadly, neither of the two parties can find the original document", noting it was drawn up in an era before computers and databases.

"Archives were badly managed because of a number of things -- unfavourable climate, a lack of trained personnel and lack of technology," said Mborantsuo.

The court ruled that neither country seemed to regard the Bata Convention as binding upon them, meaning the court did not consider it the correct title in force.

Q.Yam--ThChM