The China Mail - EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.503991
ALL 83.072963
AMD 376.980403
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1386.420402
AUD 1.448436
AWG 1.80025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.695072
BBD 2.009612
BDT 122.428639
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.378163
BIF 2970
BMD 1
BND 1.2851
BOB 6.894519
BRL 5.160604
BSD 0.997742
BTN 92.939509
BWP 13.688562
BYN 2.956504
BYR 19600
BZD 2.006665
CAD 1.39475
CDF 2305.000362
CHF 0.79876
CLF 0.023281
CLP 919.250396
CNY 6.88265
CNH 6.886225
COP 3668.42
CRC 464.279833
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.000359
CZK 21.288304
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.487804
DOP 60.850393
DZD 133.256954
EGP 54.334939
ERN 15
ETB 155.800822
EUR 0.86804
FJD 2.253804
FKP 0.757614
GBP 0.756401
GEL 2.68504
GGP 0.757614
GHS 11.00504
GIP 0.757614
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8780.000355
GTQ 7.632939
GYD 208.828972
HKD 7.83775
HNL 26.504427
HRK 6.539104
HTG 130.952897
HUF 333.930388
IDR 16994.6
ILS 3.130375
IMP 0.757614
INR 92.73995
IQD 1307.141959
IRR 1319175.000352
ISK 125.380386
JEP 0.757614
JMD 157.303566
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.65404
KES 129.803801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 3990.137323
KMF 427.00035
KPW 899.985922
KRW 1511.260383
KWD 0.30934
KYD 0.831502
KZT 472.805432
LAK 21970.392969
LBP 89502.03926
LKR 314.804623
LRD 183.088277
LSL 16.955078
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.380628
MAD 9.374033
MDL 17.55613
MGA 4171.343141
MKD 53.495639
MMK 2099.969769
MNT 3573.217716
MOP 8.055104
MRU 39.637211
MUR 46.950378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1730.071718
MXN 17.891704
MYR 4.031039
MZN 63.950377
NAD 16.954711
NGN 1378.130377
NIO 36.712196
NOK 9.77265
NPR 148.701282
NZD 1.750854
OMR 0.385097
PAB 0.997734
PEN 3.45194
PGK 4.316042
PHP 60.409504
PKR 278.39991
PLN 3.71375
PYG 6454.29687
QAR 3.638018
RON 4.416604
RSD 101.901662
RUB 80.325739
RWF 1457.240049
SAR 3.754558
SBD 8.038772
SCR 14.424038
SDG 601.000339
SEK 9.483104
SGD 1.286704
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.650371
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 570.192924
SRD 37.351038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.233539
SVC 8.730169
SYP 110.556627
SZL 16.948198
THB 32.635038
TJS 9.563492
TMT 3.51
TND 2.941459
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.520504
TTD 6.768937
TWD 31.995038
TZS 2600.000335
UAH 43.698134
UGX 3743.234401
UYU 40.405091
UZS 12122.393971
VES 473.390504
VND 26340
VUV 119.346905
WST 2.766243
XAF 568.506489
XAG 0.013693
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798209
XDR 0.708068
XOF 568.516344
XPF 103.361457
YER 238.650363
ZAR 16.972865
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 19.281421
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    15.21

    +0.53%

  • NGG

    1.1500

    87.99

    +1.31%

  • AZN

    2.7600

    203.49

    +1.36%

  • BTI

    0.3900

    58.28

    +0.67%

  • BCE

    -0.9300

    24.45

    -3.8%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.04

    +0.23%

  • GSK

    0.7000

    56.69

    +1.23%

  • RYCEF

    0.9000

    15.99

    +5.63%

  • RELX

    0.3600

    33.59

    +1.07%

  • RIO

    -0.3600

    94.45

    -0.38%

  • BCC

    -1.8800

    73.2

    -2.57%

  • CMSD

    0.1100

    22.26

    +0.49%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.61

    +0.71%

  • BP

    0.9500

    47.12

    +2.02%

EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws
EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws / Photo: © AFP

EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws

The first EU-wide cryptocurrency regulation was meant to impose some harmony, but disparities in implementation by member countries has allowed companies to exploit a flaw in the system.

Text size:

Launched in December, Markets in Crypto-Asset (MiCA) insists on service providers obtaining a licence to operate legally in the European Union.

It is issued once specific criteria on anti-money laundering, prevention of terror group financing, IT security and financial soundness have been implemented.

Such a framework aims to protect investors and provide credibility to a sector deemed to be poorly regulated.

Once obtained, a licence grants access to the entire EU market, which encourages some companies to seek authorisation in the most "accommodating" member state.

Crypto experts, speaking to AFP, do not question the integrity of regulatory authorities in, for example, Germany and the Netherlands -- two EU members which account for the majority of the roughly 30 MiCA licences issued so far.

Other bloc nations, including Malta, are in the crosshairs, however, according to these same experts, who preferred to remain anonymous.

They point to, for example, the Mediterranean island hastily issuing licences before the formal implementation of collective standards.

- Rapid approvals -

"From time to time we see arriving on our market, via the (MiCA) passport, products approved by some of our colleagues with, let's say, a rather quick signing off," lamented the president of the financial markets authority in France, Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani, as she addressed the country's Senate in March.

Barbat-Layani noted that EU markets regulator ESMA had launched a "peer review" of an unnamed regulator that is potentially too lax.

When contacted by AFP, the watchdog declined to comment. The Maltese regulator, MFSA, neither confirmed nor denied that it was involved.

An official working under her, Stephane Pontoizeau, added: "There is always the risk of someone trying to find the least demanding entry point into Europe."

Crypto platform OKX, which had planned to hire about 100 staff in France making the country its "anchor" in Europe, ultimately opted for Malta.

Peer Gemini followed the same strategy, having targeted Ireland before changing its mind, citing the "proactive engagement" of the Maltese authorities.

"Malta began welcoming applications several months earlier than other regulators, which meant that we could start the application process earlier, build the teams and infrastructure required to operate under MiCA," noted Gemini's head of Europe, Mark Jennings.

Other countries have been slow to grant approvals, with France having only just issued its first MiCA licence -- to French fintech firm Deblock -- amid accusations that its process is long and complex.

France, however, sees it as granting companies greater time to prepare their application, with the country implementing a transition period through to June 2026.

Pontoizeau insisted the French financial regulator is "determined not to add national requirements to European rules".

According to lawyer Anne Marechal, former legal director at the regulator, there have been "cut-price approvals".

She told AFP that "believing one can save a few weeks and a little money" puts companies' credibility at risk with investors.

- Economic sovereignty -

Obtaining the necessary certification can also require considerable outlay, whether for a MiCA or national licence.

Tangi Le Calvez, founder of the crypto investment firm GOin, has invested about one million euros on obtaining a French licence, which inspired MiCA.

He believes that many players will not be able to complete all the necessary steps.

Already in 2017, EU member Estonia introduced its own mandatory licences for the crypto sector, which resulted in 75 percent of industry participants ceasing operations there, according to the Cointelegraph publication.

While it remains to be seen if a similar outcome will occur in the wake of MiCA, Claire Balva, strategy director at Deblock, highlighted the risk of European crypto firms being replaced by rivals from places with more flexible rules, such as the United States and Dubai.

Given their financial resources, such non-European companies would have no difficulty complying with EU rules, she insisted.

Should "a significant portion of cryptocurrencies held by Europeans" be hosted "on American infrastructure", this also raises "questions of economic sovereignty", added Balva.

R.Lin--ThChM