The China Mail - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

USD -
AED 3.67295
AFN 65.99985
ALL 78.935033
AMD 365.260032
ANG 1.789783
AOA 916.999694
ARS 1497.169098
AUD 1.405709
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.715223
BAM 1.673104
BBD 2.01539
BDT 122.281202
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.37701
BIF 2982.5
BMD 1
BND 1.271932
BOB 11.542986
BRL 5.194605
BSD 1.000659
BTN 95.718306
BWP 13.434508
BYN 3.043612
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012524
CAD 1.378935
CDF 2274.999825
CHF 0.80058
CLF 0.023435
CLP 922.340282
CNY 6.72325
CNH 6.72503
COP 3077.25
CRC 453.402228
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.824984
CZK 20.660799
DJF 177.719809
DKK 6.401104
DOP 59.010175
DZD 132.807055
EGP 50.8814
ERN 15
ETB 163.449465
EUR 0.856199
FJD 2.199799
FKP 0.735015
GBP 0.73375
GEL 2.604987
GGP 0.735015
GHS 11.125012
GIP 0.735015
GMD 72.999788
GNF 8777.513983
GTQ 7.635945
GYD 209.26741
HKD 7.843497
HNL 26.831146
HRK 6.4515
HTG 130.914597
HUF 312.325013
IDR 17696
ILS 2.99765
IMP 0.735015
INR 95.772029
IQD 1310.845723
IRR 1374575.000404
ISK 121.587652
JEP 0.735015
JMD 158.313693
JOD 0.709004
JPY 159.077004
KES 129.460129
KGS 87.449095
KHR 4044.999921
KMF 422.000203
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1394.510081
KWD 0.30826
KYD 0.833925
KZT 456.002874
LAK 22475.00018
LBP 89550.000055
LKR 330.163782
LRD 181.625015
LSL 16.139929
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.354969
MAD 9.25375
MDL 17.181525
MGA 4276.542323
MKD 52.628652
MMK 2099.608389
MNT 3598.398104
MOP 8.084231
MRU 40.130274
MUR 46.649689
MVR 15.460516
MWK 1737.000229
MXN 16.966029
MYR 4.045701
MZN 63.905009
NAD 16.139666
NGN 1348.23965
NIO 36.828238
NOK 9.35149
NPR 153.148806
NZD 1.681803
OMR 0.384494
PAB 1.000654
PEN 3.354024
PGK 4.498929
PHP 61.815005
PKR 277.575006
PLN 3.69546
PYG 6025.116772
QAR 3.647726
RON 4.496299
RSD 100.488984
RUB 82.778025
RWF 1470.917848
SAR 3.756633
SBD 8.032258
SCR 13.889698
SDG 601.500285
SEK 9.486403
SGD 1.272098
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.612585
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.883194
SRD 37.689612
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.959339
SVC 8.755908
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.142113
THB 32.869861
TJS 9.246023
TMT 3.5
TND 2.9105
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.024026
TTD 6.781357
TWD 31.874802
TZS 2645.502976
UAH 44.634778
UGX 3722.127883
UYU 40.105225
UZS 11847.637787
VES 776.44435
VND 26102
VUV 118.216132
WST 2.729275
XAF 561.160206
XAG 0.014681
XAU 0.000221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803429
XDR 0.707052
XOF 561.165007
XPF 102.02362
YER 237.074978
ZAR 16.127496
ZMK 9001.201595
ZMW 18.886955
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    69.35

    +0.5%

  • CMSC

    -0.0799

    21.28

    -0.38%

  • NGG

    -0.0400

    80.62

    -0.05%

  • GSK

    -0.9200

    51.96

    -1.77%

  • BCC

    -1.3600

    81.77

    -1.66%

  • BTI

    0.7200

    56.7

    +1.27%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    23.78

    +0.34%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    21.12

    -0.14%

  • RIO

    1.7300

    102.17

    +1.69%

  • AZN

    -0.4600

    164.49

    -0.28%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1800

    20.42

    -0.88%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    35.38

    +0.79%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.41

    +0.24%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    16.01

    -1%

  • BP

    1.4100

    45.14

    +3.12%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: © AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

R.Lin--ThChM