The China Mail - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 64.99979
ALL 80.742224
AMD 360.119907
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000449
ARS 1547.512201
AUD 1.427114
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695151
BAM 1.737338
BBD 2.013458
BDT 124.459802
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3010
BMD 1
BND 1.277909
BOB 12.120755
BRL 5.460101
BSD 0.999711
BTN 94.558763
BWP 13.724402
BYN 2.982914
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010562
CAD 1.39706
CDF 2315.000267
CHF 0.816503
CLF 0.02453
CLP 965.430226
CNY 6.67355
CNH 6.67376
COP 3229.36
CRC 454.091218
CUC 1
CUP 23.992112
CVE 98.896657
CZK 21.61525
DJF 177.720122
DKK 6.65239
DOP 60.604398
DZD 135.956026
EGP 54.717302
ERN 15
ETB 164.071845
EUR 0.88999
FJD 2.244198
FKP 0.745268
GBP 0.741965
GEL 2.600226
GGP 0.745268
GHS 11.631305
GIP 0.745268
GMD 74.000096
GNF 8855.000058
GTQ 7.639521
GYD 209.448686
HKD 7.84505
HNL 26.868429
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.971046
HUF 322.693501
IDR 18110.4
ILS 3.153899
IMP 0.745268
INR 94.51575
IQD 1515.529716
IRR 1883408.502243
ISK 121.579569
JEP 0.745268
JMD 158.455068
JOD 0.709015
JPY 158.401996
KES 129.920112
KGS 87.450166
KHR 4064.827605
KMF 440.999835
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1341.484997
KWD 0.310805
KYD 0.833041
KZT 451.807175
LAK 22506.673299
LBP 89519.744527
LKR 332.641939
LRD 169.939285
LSL 16.455617
LTL 2.952739
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.409977
MAD 9.765444
MDL 17.929301
MGA 4515.192027
MKD 54.78946
MMK 2099.52083
MNT 3598.087189
MOP 8.077598
MRU 40.663904
MUR 47.090014
MVR 15.455015
MWK 1733.399066
MXN 18.60899
MYR 4.071298
MZN 63.910474
NAD 16.455325
NGN 1346.42026
NIO 36.784529
NOK 9.29659
NPR 151.29402
NZD 1.778304
OMR 0.384501
PAB 0.999773
PEN 3.450426
PGK 4.485918
PHP 63.345497
PKR 276.534117
PLN 3.904405
PYG 6061.763543
QAR 3.644609
RON 4.754098
RSD 104.67979
RUB 81.801499
RWF 1471.012787
SAR 3.756339
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.701544
SDG 601.500853
SEK 9.731575
SGD 1.27865
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.909978
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.349894
SRD 37.563974
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.763752
SVC 8.747096
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.44674
THB 33.593497
TJS 9.221818
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979449
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.043203
TTD 6.776725
TWD 32.836099
TZS 2649.998018
UAH 45.52523
UGX 4104.021853
UYU 40.19489
UZS 11886.139647
VES 890.0366
VND 25704.5
VUV 119.472328
WST 2.779309
XAF 583.794901
XAG 0.019139
XAU 0.000246069955
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801579
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.794901
XPF 105.938734
YER 236.175008
ZAR 16.39546
ZMK 9001.202271
ZMW 20.274394
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.96484
MXV 2.094656
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: © AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

R.Lin--ThChM