The China Mail - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

USD -
AED 3.672503
AFN 66.848784
ALL 83.025276
AMD 383.048434
ANG 1.790403
AOA 916.999876
ARS 1429.756198
AUD 1.523647
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702308
BAM 1.677488
BBD 2.016708
BDT 121.904778
BGN 1.6831
BHD 0.376936
BIF 2950.056179
BMD 1
BND 1.29444
BOB 6.93364
BRL 5.356412
BSD 1.001278
BTN 88.82418
BWP 13.320068
BYN 3.404465
BYR 19600
BZD 2.013792
CAD 1.396835
CDF 2480.000114
CHF 0.801103
CLF 0.024461
CLP 959.610082
CNY 7.11955
CNH 7.14729
COP 3876.5
CRC 503.810312
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.574195
CZK 20.998014
DJF 178.307073
DKK 6.42635
DOP 62.688961
DZD 129.875574
EGP 47.555698
ERN 15
ETB 145.565757
EUR 0.86077
FJD 2.26715
FKP 0.742135
GBP 0.746765
GEL 2.714957
GGP 0.742135
GHS 12.516403
GIP 0.742135
GMD 71.999879
GNF 8684.203755
GTQ 7.672119
GYD 209.450129
HKD 7.78336
HNL 26.289223
HRK 6.485603
HTG 131.02212
HUF 338.570018
IDR 16612
ILS 3.28839
IMP 0.742135
INR 88.7905
IQD 1310
IRR 42060.00029
ISK 121.889614
JEP 0.742135
JMD 160.268973
JOD 0.708968
JPY 152.396969
KES 129.20203
KGS 87.450106
KHR 4020.035852
KMF 422.999971
KPW 899.996543
KRW 1420.999718
KWD 0.306602
KYD 0.834455
KZT 541.242463
LAK 21714.369034
LBP 89960.259899
LKR 302.862142
LRD 182.732801
LSL 17.240196
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.428378
MAD 9.133638
MDL 16.701118
MGA 4460.035509
MKD 53.037052
MMK 2099.538145
MNT 3596.885222
MOP 8.026863
MRU 39.941162
MUR 45.769831
MVR 15.302109
MWK 1735.897282
MXN 18.41356
MYR 4.219498
MZN 63.902446
NAD 17.239553
NGN 1467.540232
NIO 36.846755
NOK 9.99705
NPR 142.118422
NZD 1.74072
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.001278
PEN 3.465791
PGK 4.20185
PHP 58.068
PKR 283.63004
PLN 3.661605
PYG 7003.113448
QAR 3.659802
RON 4.388299
RSD 100.834977
RUB 82.078513
RWF 1448
SAR 3.751044
SBD 8.230542
SCR 14.84762
SDG 601.499608
SEK 9.442505
SGD 1.295525
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.320375
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.497294
SRD 38.063024
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.43
SVC 8.761397
SYP 13001.86484
SZL 17.239804
THB 32.497498
TJS 9.286995
TMT 3.5
TND 2.920499
TOP 2.342101
TRY 41.71156
TTD 6.800696
TWD 30.576048
TZS 2456.577995
UAH 41.379609
UGX 3443.662032
UYU 39.96878
UZS 12039.522776
VES 189.012825
VND 26360
VUV 120.931773
WST 2.778532
XAF 562.61134
XAG 0.020527
XAU 0.000248
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804599
XDR 0.699711
XOF 562.613752
XPF 102.850155
YER 239.040039
ZAR 17.24344
ZMK 9001.200572
ZMW 23.755693
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    23.74

    -0.25%

  • SCS

    -0.1200

    16.86

    -0.71%

  • RIO

    -0.7300

    66.25

    -1.1%

  • AZN

    0.3800

    85.87

    +0.44%

  • RELX

    -0.9700

    45.44

    -2.13%

  • RBGPF

    -1.0800

    77.14

    -1.4%

  • GSK

    0.0500

    43.5

    +0.11%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    15.39

    -1.23%

  • NGG

    -0.0200

    73.88

    -0.03%

  • BTI

    0.8000

    51.98

    +1.54%

  • JRI

    -0.1100

    14.07

    -0.78%

  • BCC

    -0.6600

    74.52

    -0.89%

  • BP

    0.1400

    34.97

    +0.4%

  • BCE

    0.1000

    23.29

    +0.43%

  • VOD

    -0.0200

    11.27

    -0.18%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.4

    -0.16%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: © AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

R.Lin--ThChM