The China Mail - UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 64.999906
ALL 79.173956
AMD 365.259984
ANG 1.789783
AOA 918.000328
ARS 1497.752097
AUD 1.404011
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.703533
BAM 1.673104
BBD 2.01539
BDT 122.281202
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.377268
BIF 2973.916317
BMD 1
BND 1.271932
BOB 11.542986
BRL 5.188397
BSD 1.000659
BTN 95.718306
BWP 13.434508
BYN 3.043612
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012524
CAD 1.37833
CDF 2272.999794
CHF 0.799101
CLF 0.023435
CLP 922.570392
CNY 6.72975
CNH 6.72438
COP 3063.16
CRC 453.402228
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.330261
CZK 20.647002
DJF 178.187838
DKK 6.400185
DOP 58.471778
DZD 132.807972
EGP 50.870472
ERN 15
ETB 163.449465
EUR 0.85613
FJD 2.19785
FKP 0.735015
GBP 0.73345
GEL 2.594452
GGP 0.735015
GHS 11.132356
GIP 0.735015
GMD 73.50124
GNF 8792.543704
GTQ 7.635945
GYD 209.26741
HKD 7.84308
HNL 26.831146
HRK 6.450699
HTG 130.914597
HUF 311.878498
IDR 17766.35
ILS 2.997651
IMP 0.735015
INR 95.71825
IQD 1310.845723
IRR 1374600.000041
ISK 121.590074
JEP 0.735015
JMD 158.313693
JOD 0.709034
JPY 158.750263
KES 129.410004
KGS 87.449104
KHR 4023.337582
KMF 421.999995
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1393.250241
KWD 0.30823
KYD 0.833925
KZT 456.002874
LAK 22541.886418
LBP 89608.575327
LKR 330.163782
LRD 181.619088
LSL 16.146032
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.337338
MAD 9.252116
MDL 17.181525
MGA 4276.542323
MKD 52.628652
MMK 2099.608389
MNT 3598.398104
MOP 8.084231
MRU 39.988023
MUR 46.810304
MVR 15.450516
MWK 1735.176615
MXN 16.955031
MYR 4.0452
MZN 63.89499
NAD 16.145824
NGN 1347.639951
NIO 36.828238
NOK 9.34833
NPR 153.148806
NZD 1.68046
OMR 0.384493
PAB 1.000654
PEN 3.350814
PGK 4.498929
PHP 61.737018
PKR 277.656585
PLN 3.695565
PYG 6025.116772
QAR 3.647726
RON 4.495499
RSD 100.427023
RUB 83.263534
RWF 1470.917848
SAR 3.756633
SBD 8.032258
SCR 13.808986
SDG 601.500427
SEK 9.48745
SGD 1.27179
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.596888
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.883194
SRD 37.689735
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.959339
SVC 8.755908
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.142113
THB 32.847504
TJS 9.246023
TMT 3.5
TND 2.9105
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.95449
TTD 6.781357
TWD 31.910499
TZS 2645.50298
UAH 44.634778
UGX 3722.127883
UYU 40.105225
UZS 11847.637787
VES 776.44435
VND 26102
VUV 118.216132
WST 2.729275
XAF 561.160206
XAG 0.014614
XAU 0.000221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803429
XDR 0.707052
XOF 561.165007
XPF 102.02362
YER 237.075011
ZAR 16.118645
ZMK 9001.20062
ZMW 18.886955
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0799

    21.2185

    -0.38%

  • NGG

    -0.0100

    80.65

    -0.01%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1800

    20.42

    -0.88%

  • RELX

    0.3750

    35.475

    +1.06%

  • BCE

    0.0700

    23.77

    +0.29%

  • GSK

    -1.0150

    51.865

    -1.96%

  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    69.35

    +0.5%

  • VOD

    -0.1550

    16.015

    -0.97%

  • CMSD

    -0.0200

    21.13

    -0.09%

  • BCC

    -1.1750

    81.955

    -1.43%

  • RIO

    1.6700

    102.11

    +1.64%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.43

    +0.4%

  • AZN

    -0.2850

    164.665

    -0.17%

  • BTI

    0.8100

    56.79

    +1.43%

  • BP

    1.4850

    45.215

    +3.28%

UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance / Photo: © AFP/File

UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance

Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.

Text size:

The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.

Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.

The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.

Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.

In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."

They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."

At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.

Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."

E.Lau--ThChM