The China Mail - Jury told that Meta, Google 'engineered addiction' at landmark US trial

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 62.000326
ALL 81.399019
AMD 371.251866
ANG 1.789884
AOA 917.999693
ARS 1398.464223
AUD 1.396687
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698797
BAM 1.668415
BBD 2.010834
BDT 122.499467
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.37755
BIF 2969.673704
BMD 1
BND 1.275325
BOB 6.898699
BRL 4.9893
BSD 0.998337
BTN 94.041373
BWP 13.522713
BYN 2.828151
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007933
CAD 1.36632
CDF 2314.999682
CHF 0.785405
CLF 0.022781
CLP 896.610013
CNY 6.836302
CNH 6.83067
COP 3554.88
CRC 454.339945
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.0627
CZK 20.785596
DJF 177.786308
DKK 6.376301
DOP 59.475368
DZD 132.484478
EGP 52.702132
ERN 15
ETB 154.33875
EUR 0.853204
FJD 2.19785
FKP 0.738979
GBP 0.73935
GEL 2.680219
GGP 0.738979
GHS 11.083813
GIP 0.738979
GMD 73.496121
GNF 8763.489017
GTQ 7.632331
GYD 208.871828
HKD 7.836245
HNL 26.529324
HRK 6.429597
HTG 130.705907
HUF 310.938993
IDR 17234
ILS 2.99141
IMP 0.738979
INR 94.239501
IQD 1307.826829
IRR 1316999.999861
ISK 122.695167
JEP 0.738979
JMD 157.551717
JOD 0.709053
JPY 159.438986
KES 129.34973
KGS 87.4032
KHR 3999.999935
KMF 419.999699
KPW 899.999962
KRW 1472.069979
KWD 0.30777
KYD 0.83199
KZT 463.757731
LAK 21876.732779
LBP 89402.943058
LKR 318.234165
LRD 183.194711
LSL 16.601322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.334826
MAD 9.236938
MDL 17.361484
MGA 4148.432502
MKD 52.564485
MMK 2100.209098
MNT 3577.130302
MOP 8.056729
MRU 39.846449
MUR 46.70089
MVR 15.450163
MWK 1731.200682
MXN 17.394602
MYR 3.953499
MZN 63.910244
NAD 16.601322
NGN 1352.249973
NIO 36.741309
NOK 9.30333
NPR 150.466197
NZD 1.700405
OMR 0.384484
PAB 0.998337
PEN 3.461463
PGK 4.333547
PHP 60.724974
PKR 278.317253
PLN 3.62175
PYG 6330.560887
QAR 3.639411
RON 4.343503
RSD 100.162024
RUB 75.252889
RWF 1459.245042
SAR 3.749668
SBD 8.045307
SCR 14.884463
SDG 600.503643
SEK 9.22495
SGD 1.275225
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.624989
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 570.526765
SRD 37.463496
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.899979
SVC 8.735338
SYP 110.524988
SZL 16.594583
THB 32.349882
TJS 9.384602
TMT 3.505
TND 2.915334
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.033725
TTD 6.780124
TWD 31.431497
TZS 2619.999974
UAH 43.992664
UGX 3714.224781
UYU 39.547878
UZS 11994.881638
VES 483.16466
VND 26359
VUV 117.558638
WST 2.728507
XAF 559.570911
XAG 0.013191
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799275
XDR 0.695927
XOF 559.570911
XPF 101.735978
YER 238.649883
ZAR 16.54855
ZMK 9001.198376
ZMW 18.893581
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    64.0000

    64

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1200

    15.3

    -0.78%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    15.63

    +0.06%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.95

    +0.17%

  • NGG

    0.4600

    87.42

    +0.53%

  • GSK

    -1.1900

    54.44

    -2.19%

  • BTI

    0.8100

    58.09

    +1.39%

  • RIO

    0.7600

    99.61

    +0.76%

  • BP

    -0.1000

    46.25

    -0.22%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    36.53

    +1.09%

  • BCC

    0.3300

    84.15

    +0.39%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    23.88

    -0.92%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    23.32

    +0.39%

  • AZN

    -2.5500

    189.75

    -1.34%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    12.89

    +0.08%

Jury told that Meta, Google 'engineered addiction' at landmark US trial

Jury told that Meta, Google 'engineered addiction' at landmark US trial

Meta and Google-owned YouTube were accused Monday of pushing highly addictive apps on children as a landmark social media trial began in earnest in a California court.

Text size:

The blockbuster trial in front of a Los Angeles jury could establish a legal precedent on whether the social media juggernauts deliberately designed their platforms to lead to addiction in children.

The proceedings are expected to see Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg on the stand next week and Instagram boss Adam Mosseri in the courtroom as early as Wednesday. In addition to Instagram, Meta's platforms include Facebook and WhatsApp.

"This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," plaintiffs' attorney Mark Lanier told the jury in his opening statement.

"This case is as easy as A-B-C," Lanier said as he stacked children's toy blocks bearing the letters.

He contended the A was for addicting, the B for brains and the C for children.

"They don't only build apps; they build traps," Lanier said, saying Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design," making his arguments using props like a toy Ferrari and a mini slot machine.

Meta attorney Paul Schmidt countered in opening remarks to the jury that evidence will show problems with the plaintiff's family and real-world bullying took a toll on her self-esteem, body image and happiness rather than Instagram.

"If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Schmidt asked, pointing out an Instagram addiction is never mentioned in medical records included in the evidence.

The trial before Judge Carolyn Kuhl focuses on allegations that a 20-year-old woman identified as Kaley G.M. suffered severe mental harm because she became addicted to social media as a child.

The case is being treated as a bellwether proceeding because its outcome could set the tone, and the level of payouts to successful plaintiffs, for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States.

Social media firms are accused in hundreds of lawsuits of leading young users to become addicted to content and suffer from depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalization and even suicide.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs are borrowing strategies used in the 1990s and 2000s against the tobacco industry, which faced a similar onslaught of lawsuits arguing that companies knowingly sold a harmful product.

Lanier told the jurors that Kaley began watching YouTube at six years old because the company never told her mother "the goal was viewer addiction," or that toddlers as young as two were being targeted despite "critical" risk of addiction.

"This is the first time that a social media company has ever had to face a jury for harming kids," Social Media Victims Law Center founder Matthew Bergman, whose team is involved in more than 1,000 such cases, told AFP.

- 'Strongly disagree' -

Internet titans have argued that they are shielded by Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which frees them from responsibility for what social media users post.

However, this case argues that those firms are culpable for business models designed to hold people's attention and to promote content that can harm their mental health.

The plaintiffs said they would call expert witnesses that will argue that young people's brains are not yet developed to withstand the powers of the algorithms being flung at them on Instagram and YouTube.

The company pointed to recent efforts to provide more safeguards for young people, adding that "we're always working to do better."

Jose Castaneda, a YouTube spokesperson, said "the allegations in these complaints are simply not true."

Lawyers for YouTube are to present opening remarks to the jury on Tuesday.

Snapchat and TikTok were named as defendants in the suit, but struck settlement deals before the start of the trial. The terms were not disclosed.

Lawsuits, including some brought by school districts, accusing social media platforms of practices endangering young users are making their way through federal court in northern California and state courts across the country.

A separate lawsuit accusing Meta of putting profit over the wellbeing of young users was also getting under way in New Mexico on Monday.

M.Chau--ThChM