The China Mail - AI 'agent' fever comes with lurking security threats

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 63.000105
ALL 81.708441
AMD 368.691786
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.500883
ARS 1429.508702
AUD 1.415508
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.696166
BAM 1.685177
BBD 2.015096
BDT 122.817901
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.377305
BIF 2994.054799
BMD 1
BND 1.281762
BOB 6.938712
BRL 5.059302
BSD 1.000526
BTN 94.560525
BWP 13.406112
BYN 2.76997
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012252
CAD 1.40145
CDF 2320.999695
CHF 0.79551
CLF 0.022636
CLP 891.019667
CNY 6.76055
CNH 6.757905
COP 3491.5
CRC 455.716489
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.00853
CZK 20.82745
DJF 178.168001
DKK 6.446935
DOP 58.694285
DZD 132.878995
EGP 50.179896
ERN 15
ETB 161.303992
EUR 0.862498
FJD 2.21395
FKP 0.744874
GBP 0.745775
GEL 2.645026
GGP 0.744874
GHS 11.255482
GIP 0.744874
GMD 72.514434
GNF 8763.721587
GTQ 7.626359
GYD 209.290102
HKD 7.833435
HNL 26.754265
HRK 6.495301
HTG 130.666299
HUF 301.458501
IDR 17723
ILS 2.91185
IMP 0.744874
INR 94.5141
IQD 1310.701361
IRR 1375752.498518
ISK 124.550101
JEP 0.744874
JMD 158.238482
JOD 0.709044
JPY 160.370496
KES 129.420474
KGS 87.450279
KHR 4017.784058
KMF 424.999929
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1508.509782
KWD 0.30835
KYD 0.8338
KZT 487.920041
LAK 22016.388216
LBP 89596.067517
LKR 335.185855
LRD 182.097037
LSL 16.148994
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.374399
MAD 9.250461
MDL 17.459223
MGA 4157.368235
MKD 53.150489
MMK 2099.401411
MNT 3576.563972
MOP 8.072446
MRU 39.93262
MUR 47.240234
MVR 15.449995
MWK 1734.893459
MXN 17.202655
MYR 4.068105
MZN 63.910263
NAD 16.148855
NGN 1358.20232
NIO 36.817798
NOK 9.527085
NPR 151.295881
NZD 1.71681
OMR 0.384503
PAB 1.000526
PEN 3.408382
PGK 4.383153
PHP 60.309034
PKR 278.370642
PLN 3.65949
PYG 6105.515298
QAR 3.657654
RON 4.512297
RSD 101.210472
RUB 72.178713
RWF 1483.728104
SAR 3.752094
SBD 8.065041
SCR 13.834905
SDG 600.501759
SEK 9.39849
SGD 1.28225
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.750378
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.773221
SRD 37.518027
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.109953
SVC 8.754244
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.145959
THB 32.509815
TJS 9.274765
TMT 3.5
TND 2.928683
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.299296
TTD 6.796543
TWD 31.512396
TZS 2620.003012
UAH 44.808889
UGX 3701.565583
UYU 40.393596
UZS 12016.40559
VES 591.77565
VND 26300
VUV 118.866954
WST 2.741216
XAF 565.192704
XAG 0.01415
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803205
XDR 0.703697
XOF 565.197574
XPF 102.758965
YER 238.601218
ZAR 16.18979
ZMK 9001.202842
ZMW 17.684109
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0100

    22.34

    +0.04%

  • RBGPF

    2.1500

    62.87

    +3.42%

  • GSK

    -0.8100

    52.23

    -1.55%

  • VOD

    -0.5300

    15

    -3.53%

  • NGG

    -0.2700

    81.57

    -0.33%

  • RIO

    0.5400

    105.89

    +0.51%

  • BCE

    -0.2369

    24.04

    -0.99%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    22.32

    +0.27%

  • RYCEF

    1.0700

    18.11

    +5.91%

  • BTI

    -1.2600

    61.06

    -2.06%

  • BP

    -1.1900

    41.59

    -2.86%

  • BCC

    0.4500

    71.59

    +0.63%

  • AZN

    -1.4800

    177.27

    -0.83%

  • RELX

    -0.9000

    32.84

    -2.74%

  • JRI

    0.1135

    12.78

    +0.89%

AI 'agent' fever comes with lurking security threats
AI 'agent' fever comes with lurking security threats / Photo: © AFP/File

AI 'agent' fever comes with lurking security threats

Artificial intelligence "agents" promise to save users time and energy by automating tasks, but the growing power of systems like OpenClaw is setting cybersecurity experts on edge.

Text size:

Powered by a wave of hype, OpenClaw today claims more than three million users worldwide.

The system allows users to create so-called agents, tools based on a large language model (LLM) like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Anthropic's Claude that can carry out online tasks.

"We've moved from an AI you could talk with via a chatbot to an agentic AI, which can take action... the threat and the risks are definitely much greater," said Yazid Akadiri, principal solutions architect at Elastic France, an IT security company.

In an article titled "Agents of Chaos" that has yet to be peer-reviewed, a 20-strong team of researchers studied the behaviour of six AI agents created with OpenClaw.

They spotted a dozen potentially dangerous actions executed by the systems, from deleting an email inbox to sharing personal information.

Many users have posted similar stories of OpenClaw mishaps online.

"When you deploy agents, you have no control over what they'll do, and when you try to look at what they're doing, you'll find them going far beyond the limits you set," said Adrien Merveille, an expert at the Check Point cybersecurity agency.

And the security gaps are not limited to the agents' own mistaken actions.

To carry out useful work, the tools need access to personal accounts for email, calendars or search engines -- drawing the attention of cyberattackers.

- 'Delete your database' -

AI agents are likely to become top targets for hackers as their use spreads, said Wendi Whitmore, chief security intelligence officer at cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks.

"As soon as (attackers) are inside an environment, (they're) immediately going to the internal LLM (agent) that's being used and using that then to interrogate the systems for more information."

Palo Alto's Unit 42 research division said in early March that it had found traces of attempted attacks in the form of hidden instructions for agents added to websites.

One such command ordered any agent who might read it to "delete your database".

Other cybersecurity firms and researchers have warned that attackers could gain access to agents via so-called skills -- downloadable files that users can add to their systems to give them new abilities.

Among such files freely available for download, some include hidden instructions for malicious actions like exfiltrating data.

OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger says he is well aware of the risks.

"I purposefully didn't make it simpler so people would stop and read and understand: what is AI, that AI can make mistakes, what is prompt injection -- some basics that you really should understand when you use that technology," he told AFP in March.

Whitmore argued that expecting users to create their own guardrails for agents is "pretty unrealistic".

"People are going to adopt innovation and really see what it's capable of before they ask the questions about, 'how do I secure my own data?'," she predicted.

"That's going to cause some significant challenges in terms of data breaches in 2026."

A.Zhang--ThChM