The China Mail - 'Natural' birth control risks unwanted pregnancy, experts warn

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 65.000085
ALL 80.969857
AMD 361.202166
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.99994
ARS 1517.770275
AUD 1.431465
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.697857
BAM 1.74212
BBD 2.012426
BDT 123.598208
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377416
BIF 2999.585803
BMD 1
BND 1.278237
BOB 11.675159
BRL 5.044397
BSD 0.999132
BTN 94.798398
BWP 13.69985
BYN 2.981094
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009486
CAD 1.40746
CDF 2313.501384
CHF 0.82493
CLF 0.02496
CLP 982.370214
CNY 6.691203
CNH 6.68043
COP 3177.26
CRC 453.826798
CUC 1
CUP 23.980333
CVE 98.217189
CZK 21.684396
DJF 177.929603
DKK 6.65824
DOP 61.451444
DZD 134.431561
EGP 53.996599
ERN 15
ETB 163.206182
EUR 0.89079
FJD 2.25945
FKP 0.750648
GBP 0.750085
GEL 2.589735
GGP 0.750648
GHS 11.676049
GIP 0.750648
GMD 73.504011
GNF 8844.094881
GTQ 7.639034
GYD 209.00734
HKD 7.848225
HNL 26.820882
HRK 6.712503
HTG 130.705681
HUF 323.743499
IDR 18042.25
ILS 3.108555
IMP 0.750648
INR 94.902601
IQD 1514.774979
IRR 1795877.501265
ISK 121.501546
JEP 0.750648
JMD 158.78431
JOD 0.709022
JPY 158.241497
KES 129.860163
KGS 87.449893
KHR 4068.089503
KMF 439.999816
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1329.945003
KWD 0.31076
KYD 0.83268
KZT 451.722955
LAK 22482.018394
LBP 89478.016105
LKR 331.122819
LRD 170.366279
LSL 16.42449
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.412478
MAD 9.77184
MDL 17.816041
MGA 4529.360679
MKD 54.914955
MMK 2099.513869
MNT 3596.411813
MOP 8.077478
MRU 40.003029
MUR 47.249721
MVR 15.460101
MWK 1732.62013
MXN 18.487535
MYR 4.0825
MZN 63.896828
NAD 16.424417
NGN 1333.580338
NIO 36.770142
NOK 9.403595
NPR 151.676406
NZD 1.763245
OMR 0.38451
PAB 0.999132
PEN 3.447023
PGK 4.544503
PHP 62.999989
PKR 276.59385
PLN 3.893715
PYG 5763.047022
QAR 3.642032
RON 4.744801
RSD 104.598965
RUB 82.653667
RWF 1476.78686
SAR 3.763551
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.894729
SDG 601.503045
SEK 9.89174
SGD 1.27907
SHP 0.754745
SLE 24.680197
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.064633
SRD 37.794503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.822878
SVC 8.742551
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.419114
THB 33.5625
TJS 9.202594
TMT 3.51
TND 2.982711
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.55262
TTD 6.778453
TWD 32.462604
TZS 2644.967981
UAH 45.052265
UGX 4156.255985
UYU 40.119539
UZS 12034.649387
VES 878.910601
VND 25894.5
VUV 118.97233
WST 2.787823
XAF 584.319798
XAG 0.01734
XAU 0.000239871141
XCD 2.702549
XCG 1.80082
XDR 0.707052
XOF 584.319798
XPF 106.228901
YER 236.149836
ZAR 16.43589
ZMK 9001.200838
ZMW 19.959203
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5750.775019
MXV 2.087054
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

'Natural' birth control risks unwanted pregnancy, experts warn
'Natural' birth control risks unwanted pregnancy, experts warn / Photo: © AFP/File

'Natural' birth control risks unwanted pregnancy, experts warn

After taking the pill for a decade, Elodie Monnier Legrand decided to try "natural" birth control, an increasingly popular trend that requires tracking fertility to avoid becoming pregnant.

Text size:

"I wanted my body to return to its natural state," the French 30-year-old business owner told AFP.

However after getting two abortions within six months, she discovered the app she was using had slightly miscalculated her fertility cycle.

"It's not an exact science," Legrand said.

She is one of a rising number of women who are abandoning hormonal contraception such as the pill.

In France, 7.5 percent of women used natural contraceptive methods in 2023, rising from 4.6 percent in 2016, according to the INSERM institute.

Helping drive this trend are influencers on social media, who often promote natural birth control as a way for women to "liberate" themselves from the hormonal effects of the pill.

However experts warn that some common claims about the pill's side effects represent misinformation -- and that methods based on tracking fertility require strict adherence to be effective.

Geoffroy Robin, a gynaecologist at the University Hospital of Lille in France, told AFP that the interest in natural methods was fuelled by "a climate of hormone-phobia".

He also pointed out that the pill had long been seen as a "tool of women's emancipation".

- Different methods -

Louise, a 26-year-old in France who did not want to give her surname, told AFP that "hormonal contraception was a complete disaster" for her.

When she was 18, her body rejected a hormonal IUD. After getting an implant, she said she suffered from side effects including weight gain, mood swings and depression.

For the last six years, she has been using the calendar method of natural birth control.

This requires calculating the window when women are fertile -- which is around 10 days a month -- and abstaining from sex during this period.

The temperature method involves daily checks to detect if women's bodies have gotten a little warmer, which happens during ovulation.

For the "Billings" method, women must inspect their vagina daily to see if there is a build-up of cervical mucus. The "sympto-thermal" method combines the latter two techniques.

The embrace of natural contraception -- also called fertility awareness -- comes as the use of the pill has declined in many countries.

A study published last year in BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health estimated that hormonal contraception in England and Wales fell from 19 percent in 2018 to 11 percent in 2023.

The research also suggested there was a link between the increasing use of natural birth control and a rising number of abortions.

According to the experts AFP spoke to, natural techniques are significantly less effective than traditional methods.

INSERM said they should only be considered by women "who accept a risk of pregnancy".

A review conducted by INSERM in 2022 found that less than 20 percent of around 100 fertility apps it analysed made correct predictions about fertility cycles. Most apps also shared users' data with third parties, often without their knowledge, the review found.

- 'Just another business?' -

Robin warned that "natural methods are absolutely ineffective" for those with irregular cycles -- roughly one out of every five women.

And there are several factors that can skew measurements.

For example, yeast infection or medication such as antihistamines can disrupt the secretion of vaginal mucus. Paracetamol, antibiotics or even a change in work schedule can alter a woman's temperature.

This means that natural methods are not suitable for everyone, the experts stressed, recommending that women considering a change consult their gynaecologist.

French sociologist Cecile Thome said the rise of natural contraceptive methods, driven by promises of "taking control of one's body," is part of the booming wellness industry.

These arguments were compelling for Legrand, who paid seven euros a month for a fertility app and bought a "smart ring" for over 200 euros to monitor her temperature.

After getting two abortions, she contacted the app's customer service.

"Their responses were very cold, it wasn't very humane," she said.

The abortions were "hard on her body, hard psychologically," she emphasised.

While Legrand still finds the subject "super interesting," she wondered if "ultimately, it is just another business."

C.Fong--ThChM