The China Mail - Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 64.000202
ALL 80.906293
AMD 358.057859
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.00003
ARS 1550.781701
AUD 1.431854
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.705836
BAM 1.740036
BBD 2.003559
BDT 123.852313
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.375489
BIF 2986.971974
BMD 1
BND 1.274158
BOB 12.010284
BRL 5.488702
BSD 0.994627
BTN 94.291535
BWP 13.758962
BYN 2.955771
BYR 19600
BZD 2.000463
CAD 1.396899
CDF 2312.501901
CHF 0.81723
CLF 0.024951
CLP 981.999904
CNY 6.680903
CNH 6.67941
COP 3247.87
CRC 451.369275
CUC 1
CUP 23.871582
CVE 98.090062
CZK 21.67665
DJF 177.122067
DKK 6.654245
DOP 59.93942
DZD 135.789296
EGP 55.342098
ERN 15
ETB 163.249788
EUR 0.890299
FJD 2.24775
FKP 0.745268
GBP 0.743006
GEL 2.598106
GGP 0.745268
GHS 11.593068
GIP 0.745268
GMD 73.999861
GNF 8810.408095
GTQ 7.60417
GYD 208.500872
HKD 7.845765
HNL 26.733444
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.391459
HUF 324.5335
IDR 18139.8
ILS 3.165515
IMP 0.745268
INR 94.836702
IQD 1507.908268
IRR 1883408.50203
ISK 121.259715
JEP 0.745268
JMD 157.767152
JOD 0.709041
JPY 158.058501
KES 129.940004
KGS 87.449898
KHR 4062.751587
KMF 440.999851
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1340.964993
KWD 0.311199
KYD 0.8289
KZT 450.213523
LAK 22401.124415
LBP 89543.21849
LKR 330.928532
LRD 169.096028
LSL 16.579341
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.382657
MAD 9.775113
MDL 17.99331
MGA 4515.451812
MKD 54.771175
MMK 2099.52083
MNT 3598.087189
MOP 8.038145
MRU 40.373975
MUR 47.059726
MVR 15.455022
MWK 1724.696212
MXN 18.767501
MYR 4.070804
MZN 63.909942
NAD 16.579341
NGN 1343.380255
NIO 36.606575
NOK 9.264765
NPR 150.864442
NZD 1.78471
OMR 0.384492
PAB 0.994823
PEN 3.447319
PGK 4.462633
PHP 63.460053
PKR 275.144822
PLN 3.92885
PYG 5942.170819
QAR 3.625947
RON 4.755101
RSD 104.748008
RUB 81.67462
RWF 1471.080115
SAR 3.762939
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.890446
SDG 601.510318
SEK 9.75791
SGD 1.279675
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.910099
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 568.442122
SRD 37.542004
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.797153
SVC 8.703542
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.563773
THB 33.713498
TJS 9.14122
TMT 3.51
TND 2.972103
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.019603
TTD 6.742932
TWD 32.837496
TZS 2646.995027
UAH 45.412048
UGX 4202.39832
UYU 39.987723
UZS 11861.722948
VES 890.036599
VND 25736
VUV 119.472328
WST 2.779309
XAF 583.99803
XAG 0.019433
XAU 0.000249574164
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.79257
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.99803
XPF 106.091876
YER 236.174961
ZAR 16.558398
ZMK 9001.196279
ZMW 20.156742
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.96484
MXV 2.112498
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study
Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study / Photo: © AFP/File

Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study

Plastic recycling rates are declining even as production shoots up, according to a Greenpeace USA report out Monday that blasted industry claims of creating an efficient, circular economy as "fiction."

Text size:

Titled "Circular Claims Fall Flat Again," the study found that of 51 million tons of plastic waste generated by US households in 2021, only 2.4 million tons were recycled, or around five percent.

After peaking in 2014 at 10 percent, the trend has been decreasing, especially since China stopped accepting the West's plastic waste in 2018.

Virgin production -- of non-recycled plastic, that is -- meanwhile is rapidly rising as the petrochemical industry expands, lowering costs.

"Industry groups and big corporations have been pushing for recycling as a solution," Greenpeace USA campaigner Lisa Ramsden told AFP.

"By doing that, they have shirked all responsibility" for ensuring that recycling actually works, she added. She named Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Unilever and Nestle as prime offenders.

According to Greenpeace USA's survey, only two types of plastic are widely accepted at the nation's 375 material recovery facilities.

The first is polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is commonly used in water and soda bottles; and the second is high density polyethylene (HDPE), seen in milk jugs, shampoo bottles and cleaning product containers.

These are numbered "1" and "2" according to a standardized system in which there are seven plastic types.

But being recyclable in theory doesn't mean products are being recycled in practice.

The report found that PET and HDPE products had actual reprocessing rates of 20.9 percent and 10.3 percent, respectively -- both down slightly from Greenpeace USA's last survey in 2020.

Plastic types "3" through "7" -- including children's toys, plastic bags, produce wrappings, yogurt and margarine tubs, coffee cups and to-go food containers -- were reprocessed at rates of less than five percent.

Despite often carrying the recycling symbol on their labels, products that use plastic types "3" through "7" fail to meet the Federal Trade Commission classification of recyclable.

This is because recycling facilities for these types aren't available to a "substantial majority" of the population, defined as 60 percent, and because the collected products are not being used in the manufacturing or assembly of new items.

According to the report, there were five main reasons why plastic recycling is a "failed concept."

- Economically unfeasible -

First, plastic waste is generated in vast quantities and is extremely difficult to collect -- as becomes clear during what the report called ineffective "volunteer cleanup stunts" funded by nonprofits such as "Keep America Beautiful."

Second, even if it were all collected, mixed plastic waste cannot be recycled together, and it would be "functionally impossible to sort the trillions of pieces of consumer plastic waste produced each year," the report said.

Third, the recycling process itself is environmentally harmful, exposing workers to toxic chemicals and itself generating microplastics.

Fourth, recycled plastic carries toxicity risks through contamination with other plastic types in collection bins, preventing it from becoming food-grade material again.

Fifth and finally, the process of recycling is prohibitively expensive.

"New plastic directly competes with recycled plastic, and it's far cheaper to produce and of higher quality," said the report.

Ramsden called on corporations to support a Global Plastics Treaty, which United Nations members agreed to create in February, and move toward refill and reuse strategies.

"This isn't actually a new concept -- it's how the milkman used to be, it's how Coca-Cola used to get its beverages to people. They would drink their beverage, give the glass bottle back, and it would be sanitized and reused," she said.

Some countries are leading the way, including India, which recently banned 19 single-use plastic items. Austria has set reuse targets of 25 percent by 2025 and at least 30 percent by 2030 for beverage packaging, while Portugal has also set the 30 percent by 2030 goal.

Chile is moving to phase out single-use cutlery and mandating refillable bottles.

H.Au--ThChM