The China Mail - Alabama lawmakers vote to protect IVF in wake of court ruling

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 63.503463
ALL 83.463315
AMD 376.986282
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999701
ARS 1385.5001
AUD 1.455519
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697717
BAM 1.699513
BBD 2.014051
BDT 122.697254
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377509
BIF 2970.416618
BMD 1
BND 1.287696
BOB 6.935386
BRL 5.249203
BSD 0.999996
BTN 94.787611
BWP 13.787859
BYN 2.976638
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011105
CAD 1.38957
CDF 2282.497331
CHF 0.79815
CLF 0.023381
CLP 923.220134
CNY 6.91185
CNH 6.910575
COP 3675.3
CRC 464.366558
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.823032
CZK 21.287398
DJF 178.063563
DKK 6.487585
DOP 59.522516
DZD 133.12557
EGP 53.60199
ERN 15
ETB 154.582495
EUR 0.868195
FJD 2.24025
FKP 0.752712
GBP 0.753015
GEL 2.679845
GGP 0.752712
GHS 10.957154
GIP 0.752712
GMD 73.496975
GNF 8767.699413
GTQ 7.653569
GYD 209.330315
HKD 7.83265
HNL 26.549649
HRK 6.542699
HTG 131.078738
HUF 337.827038
IDR 16992
ILS 3.13965
IMP 0.752712
INR 94.54595
IQD 1309.975365
IRR 1313250.000126
ISK 124.680163
JEP 0.752712
JMD 157.400126
JOD 0.709001
JPY 159.638505
KES 130.050221
KGS 87.450178
KHR 4004.935568
KMF 427.999997
KPW 900.00296
KRW 1515.180048
KWD 0.308023
KYD 0.833344
KZT 483.44391
LAK 21749.12344
LBP 89547.486737
LKR 314.996893
LRD 183.502503
LSL 17.171359
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.383247
MAD 9.346391
MDL 17.564303
MGA 4167.481307
MKD 53.547773
MMK 2098.832611
MNT 3571.142668
MOP 8.068492
MRU 39.926487
MUR 46.9159
MVR 15.449664
MWK 1733.901626
MXN 18.05465
MYR 4.019496
MZN 63.949773
NAD 17.171583
NGN 1382.179868
NIO 36.800007
NOK 9.73768
NPR 151.645993
NZD 1.74163
OMR 0.384435
PAB 1.000013
PEN 3.483403
PGK 4.321285
PHP 60.756974
PKR 279.086043
PLN 3.715515
PYG 6537.91845
QAR 3.646009
RON 4.4255
RSD 101.931978
RUB 81.502485
RWF 1460.256772
SAR 3.752499
SBD 8.042037
SCR 14.901688
SDG 600.999691
SEK 9.45515
SGD 1.28755
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550138
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.503052
SRD 37.600996
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.28926
SVC 8.74968
SYP 110.527654
SZL 17.169497
THB 32.779898
TJS 9.555322
TMT 3.5
TND 2.948402
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.41694
TTD 6.794374
TWD 32.0145
TZS 2584.999806
UAH 43.831285
UGX 3725.347921
UYU 40.479004
UZS 12195.153743
VES 467.928355
VND 26335
VUV 119.385423
WST 2.775484
XAF 569.988487
XAG 0.014146
XAU 0.000221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802248
XDR 0.708991
XOF 569.988487
XPF 103.633607
YER 238.59797
ZAR 17.06745
ZMK 9001.197652
ZMW 18.824133
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    3.3000

    92.12

    +3.58%

  • CMSC

    0.0272

    22.33

    +0.12%

  • BTI

    0.4700

    58.73

    +0.8%

  • BCE

    0.0510

    25.286

    +0.2%

  • BCC

    0.9300

    75.9

    +1.23%

  • CMSD

    0.0500

    22.55

    +0.22%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • RYCEF

    0.2100

    14.5

    +1.45%

  • GSK

    0.8770

    55.107

    +1.59%

  • VOD

    0.3500

    15.05

    +2.33%

  • JRI

    0.2250

    12.145

    +1.85%

  • NGG

    0.7300

    84.42

    +0.86%

  • AZN

    2.6700

    196.55

    +1.36%

  • BP

    0.5550

    47.905

    +1.16%

  • RELX

    0.3100

    33.06

    +0.94%

Alabama lawmakers vote to protect IVF in wake of court ruling
Alabama lawmakers vote to protect IVF in wake of court ruling / Photo: © Getty Images North America/Getty Images/AFP/File

Alabama lawmakers vote to protect IVF in wake of court ruling

Lawmakers in Alabama passed legislation Thursday to protect health workers at IVF clinics from legal liability after the southern US state's supreme court ruled frozen embryos are children, in an issue that has threatened to become an election flashpoint.

Text size:

Bills "to provide civil and criminal immunity" to people and entities providing such care in case an embryo is damaged or destroyed cleared both Republican-controlled chambers, the legislature's official webpage showed.

The conservative state's Republican governor, Kay Ivey, who has also voiced support for protecting in vitro fertilization, is expected to sign the legislation into law.

The move comes after a wave of Republicans including likely presidential candidate Donald Trump distanced themselves from the Alabama Supreme Court ruling, wary of its political repercussions.

Democrats led by President Joe Biden have made the preservation of reproductive rights a central part of their 2024 election campaign, as women in conservative states that have strict abortion bans have at times faced problems accessing emergency care for life-threatening pregnancies.

The conservative-majority US Supreme Court overturned the national right to abortion in 2022, paving the way for states to wade in on questions of how personhood is defined.

Earlier this month, the Alabama Supreme Court sided with plaintiffs in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by three couples against a fertility clinic after a patient entered a cryogenic nursery and dropped several frozen embryos, destroying them.

A lower court ruled the frozen embryos could not be considered a "person" or "child" and dismissed the claim, but the top court disagreed, in a 7-2 decision sprinkled with quotes from the Bible.

Fertility clinics throughout the state quickly announced they were pausing IVF treatments in light of the new legal risks.

- Temporary fix? -

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision had pointed to a 2018 update to state's constitution that "acknowledges, declares, and affirms that it is the public policy of this state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life" -- meaning legislation may only provide a temporary fix without a state constitution amendment.

Alabama Democrats proposed such an amendment "to provide that an extrauterine embryo is not an 'unborn life' or 'unborn child,'" but the amendment remains pending.

Representative Chris England, a Democrat from Tuscaloosa, said on social media that "it looks like the plan is to go back in time, give temporary immunity, and try to forget that this ever happened."

"Meanwhile, use the next year or so to try and figure out all of the messy issues associated with personhood and defining what life is and when it begins."

The Alabama IVF controversy is just the latest downstream effect of the US Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v Wade, the case dating from 1973 that protected the right to an abortion.

A group of Texas women who were unable to terminate pregnancies despite in some cases life-threatening complications sued the state to clarify the health exemptions in its strict abortion ban, arguing they had proven to be unworkable in practice.

Texas resident Kate Cox was forced to leave the state to have an emergency abortion amid a drawn out legal battle seeking permission to end her risky pregnancy.

Z.Ma--ThChM