The China Mail - Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 63.503463
ALL 83.463315
AMD 376.986282
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999701
ARS 1385.5001
AUD 1.455519
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697717
BAM 1.699513
BBD 2.014051
BDT 122.697254
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377509
BIF 2970.416618
BMD 1
BND 1.287696
BOB 6.935386
BRL 5.249203
BSD 0.999996
BTN 94.787611
BWP 13.787859
BYN 2.976638
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011105
CAD 1.38957
CDF 2282.497331
CHF 0.79815
CLF 0.023381
CLP 923.220134
CNY 6.91185
CNH 6.910575
COP 3675.3
CRC 464.366558
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.823032
CZK 21.287398
DJF 178.063563
DKK 6.487585
DOP 59.522516
DZD 133.12557
EGP 53.60199
ERN 15
ETB 154.582495
EUR 0.868195
FJD 2.24025
FKP 0.752712
GBP 0.753015
GEL 2.679845
GGP 0.752712
GHS 10.957154
GIP 0.752712
GMD 73.496975
GNF 8767.699413
GTQ 7.653569
GYD 209.330315
HKD 7.83265
HNL 26.549649
HRK 6.542699
HTG 131.078738
HUF 337.827038
IDR 16992
ILS 3.13965
IMP 0.752712
INR 94.54595
IQD 1309.975365
IRR 1313250.000126
ISK 124.680163
JEP 0.752712
JMD 157.400126
JOD 0.709001
JPY 159.638505
KES 130.050221
KGS 87.450178
KHR 4004.935568
KMF 427.999997
KPW 900.00296
KRW 1515.180048
KWD 0.308023
KYD 0.833344
KZT 483.44391
LAK 21749.12344
LBP 89547.486737
LKR 314.996893
LRD 183.502503
LSL 17.171359
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.383247
MAD 9.346391
MDL 17.564303
MGA 4167.481307
MKD 53.547773
MMK 2098.832611
MNT 3571.142668
MOP 8.068492
MRU 39.926487
MUR 46.9159
MVR 15.449664
MWK 1733.901626
MXN 18.05465
MYR 4.019496
MZN 63.949773
NAD 17.171583
NGN 1382.179868
NIO 36.800007
NOK 9.73768
NPR 151.645993
NZD 1.74163
OMR 0.384435
PAB 1.000013
PEN 3.483403
PGK 4.321285
PHP 60.756974
PKR 279.086043
PLN 3.715515
PYG 6537.91845
QAR 3.646009
RON 4.4255
RSD 101.931978
RUB 81.502485
RWF 1460.256772
SAR 3.752499
SBD 8.042037
SCR 14.901688
SDG 600.999691
SEK 9.45515
SGD 1.28755
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550138
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.503052
SRD 37.600996
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.28926
SVC 8.74968
SYP 110.527654
SZL 17.169497
THB 32.779898
TJS 9.555322
TMT 3.5
TND 2.948402
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.41694
TTD 6.794374
TWD 32.0145
TZS 2584.999806
UAH 43.831285
UGX 3725.347921
UYU 40.479004
UZS 12195.153743
VES 467.928355
VND 26335
VUV 119.385423
WST 2.775484
XAF 569.988487
XAG 0.014146
XAU 0.000221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802248
XDR 0.708991
XOF 569.988487
XPF 103.633607
YER 238.59797
ZAR 17.06745
ZMK 9001.197652
ZMW 18.824133
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    14.65

    -4.03%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    25.25

    -0.87%

  • RELX

    -0.1000

    31.97

    -0.31%

  • RIO

    0.8500

    86.64

    +0.98%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.77

    -0.22%

  • BP

    0.5100

    46.68

    +1.09%

  • BTI

    0.3749

    57.8

    +0.65%

  • NGG

    -0.4800

    81.92

    -0.59%

  • GSK

    -0.1000

    53.84

    -0.19%

  • VOD

    -0.1400

    14.49

    -0.97%

  • BCC

    0.1400

    74.43

    +0.19%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    11.8

    -2.29%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    22.66

    -0.4%

  • AZN

    5.0200

    188.42

    +2.66%

Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?
Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover? / Photo: © AFP/File

Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?

Whether Covid-19 was unleashed by a laboratory mishap or spilled over from animals remains an enduring, fiercely contested mystery.

Text size:

Here are the leading arguments that fuel both sides of this debate, as AFP reflects on the virus's impact five years after it reshaped the world.

- The case for lab leak -

Proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis highlight that the earliest known Covid-19 cases emerged in Wuhan, China -- home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a major hub for coronavirus research -- located roughly 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from the nearest bat populations carrying similar SARS-like viruses.

"Wuhan labs performed research that placed them on a trajectory to obtain SARS viruses having high pandemic potential," Richard Ebright, a microbiologist and professor at Rutgers University, told AFP.

"One year before the outbreak, Wuhan labs proposed research to obtain SARS viruses having even higher pandemic potential and features that match, in detail, the features of SARS CoV-2," he added.

This research proposal included engineering a structure called a "furin cleavage site," which increases viral growth and transmissibility but is absent in other SARS viruses.

Lab-leak advocates also cite concerns over biosafety standards at the Wuhan lab, where personnel reportedly only wore lab coats and gloves.

"There is sufficient evidence to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a research-related incident," Ebright concluded.

- The case for natural spillover -

On the other side, researchers like Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, argue that real-world "hard evidence" consistently points to a wholesale seafood market in Wuhan.

"We've actually been looking at an evidence base that is hard evidence. It's evidence that can be measured," she told AFP, including genomic, geographic and environmental sampling data.

She contends that the case for a lab origin, by contrast, is built on "what ifs" and speculation. That would include claims that proposals for research on ways to greatly increase virus transmissibility were publicly rejected but secretly carried out.

This perspective is supported by multiple studies, including one published in the prestigious journal Science that analyzed the geographic pattern of Covid-19 cases during December 2019. The study showed cases were tightly clustered around Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.

Another study, which examined genomic data from the earliest cases, concluded that the virus likely did not circulate widely in humans before November 2019.

More recently, in September 2024, a study published in Cell identified raccoon dogs, palm civets, Amur hedgehogs, and bamboo rats at the market.

Notably, raccoon dogs, which are closely related to foxes, are known to carry and transmit viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting they could have acted as intermediaries between bats and humans.

For Rasmussen, the appeal of the lab-leak theory reflects a desire for straightforward answers. If the blame lies with wayward scientists or China, she argues, people will believe in the possibility of straightforward fixes.

- Where things stand now -

One thing is certain: the lab-leak theory, once dismissed as a conspiracy theory, has gained mainstream traction. For now, the debate remains unresolved -- scientifically and politically.

Some US agencies, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Energy, support the lab-leak theory, albeit with varying levels of confidence, while most elements of the intelligence community lean toward natural origins.

Lab-leak proponents, such as Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute and author of "Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19," continue to advocate for the full declassification of intelligence data and an independent investigation in China beyond the 2021 World Health Organization probe.

"There are many aspects of the pandemic that have damaged public trust in science and health institutions," Chan told AFP. "The origin of the pandemic is one of these."

Z.Ma--ThChM