The China Mail - US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 65.498106
ALL 81.051571
AMD 375.859332
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.497158
ARS 1416.446495
AUD 1.413497
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695264
BAM 1.642701
BBD 2.007895
BDT 121.837729
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376981
BIF 2949.857215
BMD 1
BND 1.265076
BOB 6.903242
BRL 5.194898
BSD 0.996892
BTN 90.375901
BWP 13.137914
BYN 2.873173
BYR 19600
BZD 2.004955
CAD 1.356445
CDF 2215.000232
CHF 0.766405
CLF 0.021628
CLP 853.970006
CNY 6.9225
CNH 6.91111
COP 3673.08
CRC 494.204603
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 92.612579
CZK 20.361605
DJF 177.523938
DKK 6.275825
DOP 62.758273
DZD 129.497006
EGP 46.881699
ERN 15
ETB 155.496052
EUR 0.83996
FJD 2.192099
FKP 0.731721
GBP 0.73155
GEL 2.690096
GGP 0.731721
GHS 10.970939
GIP 0.731721
GMD 73.501083
GNF 8751.926558
GTQ 7.647373
GYD 208.567109
HKD 7.81758
HNL 26.333781
HRK 6.329797
HTG 130.732404
HUF 317.258982
IDR 16798
ILS 3.084801
IMP 0.731721
INR 90.52085
IQD 1305.980178
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 121.802706
JEP 0.731721
JMD 155.929783
JOD 0.708991
JPY 155.210977
KES 128.896279
KGS 87.450406
KHR 4020.661851
KMF 413.999932
KPW 900.003053
KRW 1462.055014
KWD 0.30709
KYD 0.830758
KZT 492.323198
LAK 21424.491853
LBP 89570.078396
LKR 308.550311
LRD 185.426737
LSL 15.97833
LTL 2.952739
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.302705
MAD 9.117504
MDL 16.932639
MGA 4376.784814
MKD 51.774104
MMK 2100.147418
MNT 3570.525201
MOP 8.025869
MRU 39.586763
MUR 45.679579
MVR 15.459738
MWK 1728.624223
MXN 17.194145
MYR 3.923498
MZN 63.76003
NAD 15.97833
NGN 1354.939889
NIO 36.687385
NOK 9.517145
NPR 144.601881
NZD 1.654635
OMR 0.384497
PAB 0.996892
PEN 3.348144
PGK 4.337309
PHP 58.522499
PKR 278.761885
PLN 3.53947
PYG 6573.156392
QAR 3.634035
RON 4.276802
RSD 98.549011
RUB 77.251007
RWF 1455.48463
SAR 3.75074
SBD 8.054878
SCR 13.836531
SDG 601.500203
SEK 8.92498
SGD 1.26597
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.524979
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 568.704855
SRD 37.971496
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.57786
SVC 8.723333
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.970939
THB 31.168005
TJS 9.336094
TMT 3.5
TND 2.879712
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.633798
TTD 6.753738
TWD 31.523799
TZS 2586.096953
UAH 42.973963
UGX 3548.630942
UYU 38.224264
UZS 12265.141398
VES 384.79041
VND 25885
VUV 119.800563
WST 2.713692
XAF 550.946582
XAG 0.012177
XAU 0.000198
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796657
XDR 0.685201
XOF 550.946582
XPF 100.167141
YER 238.349504
ZAR 15.926345
ZMK 9001.203383
ZMW 18.8468
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    23.97

    +0.08%

  • CMSC

    0.0750

    23.585

    +0.32%

  • RIO

    3.4400

    96.85

    +3.55%

  • GSK

    -1.2200

    59.01

    -2.07%

  • BTI

    -1.6500

    61.15

    -2.7%

  • AZN

    -5.0200

    188.01

    -2.67%

  • RYCEF

    0.5300

    17.41

    +3.04%

  • RELX

    0.1000

    29.48

    +0.34%

  • BCE

    0.5400

    25.62

    +2.11%

  • BCC

    -2.0100

    89.02

    -2.26%

  • JRI

    -0.1600

    12.81

    -1.25%

  • NGG

    0.3300

    88.39

    +0.37%

  • VOD

    0.3700

    15.48

    +2.39%

  • BP

    0.2100

    39.22

    +0.54%

US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors / Photo: © AFP

US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors -– an issue at the heart of the American culture wars.

Text size:

The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18.

The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented.

Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country.

"This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion.

"The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees," Roberts said.

"It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process."

The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others.

Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19.

While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures.

Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it "sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine."

"Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus," the AAP said.

"Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity."

- 'Must end' -

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a "huge win for children" and a "step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids."

During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to "protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions" with "often irreversible and life-altering consequences."

Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering."

"What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment," said Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court.

Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognize two genders -- male and female -- and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors.

"Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," the executive order said. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end."

Trump's order said it would now be US policy that it would "not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another."

The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defense Department health insurance that covers some two million children.

According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender.

N.Lo--ThChM