The China Mail - US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 68.18705
ALL 82.654845
AMD 382.36924
ANG 1.790403
AOA 916.99971
ARS 1451.445104
AUD 1.504019
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.707273
BAM 1.66742
BBD 2.014834
BDT 121.74432
BGN 1.666425
BHD 0.377083
BIF 2985.464001
BMD 1
BND 1.283345
BOB 6.912486
BRL 5.353103
BSD 1.000384
BTN 88.242466
BWP 13.326229
BYN 3.38838
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011936
CAD 1.384195
CDF 2835.00015
CHF 0.796785
CLF 0.02426
CLP 951.728548
CNY 7.124701
CNH 7.12354
COP 3893.772113
CRC 503.94305
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.006565
CZK 20.74715
DJF 178.140586
DKK 6.36682
DOP 63.421288
DZD 129.420691
EGP 48.067104
ERN 15
ETB 143.637069
EUR 0.852961
FJD 2.238696
FKP 0.737679
GBP 0.737905
GEL 2.689777
GGP 0.737679
GHS 12.204271
GIP 0.737679
GMD 71.500902
GNF 8676.414169
GTQ 7.669551
GYD 209.292809
HKD 7.779923
HNL 26.209131
HRK 6.425297
HTG 130.90072
HUF 332.879926
IDR 16408
ILS 3.335965
IMP 0.737679
INR 88.277501
IQD 1310.541796
IRR 42075.000562
ISK 122.030058
JEP 0.737679
JMD 160.475724
JOD 0.709006
JPY 147.662503
KES 129.249972
KGS 87.449795
KHR 4009.548574
KMF 419.506512
KPW 900.03427
KRW 1392.339996
KWD 0.30537
KYD 0.83371
KZT 540.935249
LAK 21691.461699
LBP 89584.381261
LKR 301.837248
LRD 177.569376
LSL 17.362036
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.401765
MAD 9.008824
MDL 16.616224
MGA 4433.26655
MKD 52.466005
MMK 2099.833626
MNT 3596.020755
MOP 8.019268
MRU 39.935206
MUR 45.479981
MVR 15.310197
MWK 1734.600793
MXN 18.45195
MYR 4.204976
MZN 63.910518
NAD 17.362036
NGN 1500.850375
NIO 36.813163
NOK 9.86678
NPR 141.187604
NZD 1.679699
OMR 0.383563
PAB 1.000384
PEN 3.486338
PGK 4.239737
PHP 57.207001
PKR 284.023957
PLN 3.629555
PYG 7148.642312
QAR 3.651903
RON 4.317099
RSD 99.867855
RUB 83.397664
RWF 1449.592907
SAR 3.750597
SBD 8.206879
SCR 14.26498
SDG 601.502513
SEK 9.331397
SGD 1.282535
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.37501
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.720875
SRD 39.375022
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.887506
SVC 8.753144
SYP 13001.951397
SZL 17.345155
THB 31.749595
TJS 9.413615
TMT 3.51
TND 2.912145
TOP 2.3421
TRY 41.336799
TTD 6.801654
TWD 30.299901
TZS 2460.974466
UAH 41.241911
UGX 3515.921395
UYU 40.069909
UZS 12452.363698
VES 158.73035
VND 26385
VUV 118.929522
WST 2.747698
XAF 559.236967
XAG 0.023712
XAU 0.000275
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802975
XDR 0.695511
XOF 559.236967
XPF 101.675263
YER 239.550483
ZAR 17.359398
ZMK 9001.202571
ZMW 23.734175
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    77.27

    0%

  • NGG

    0.5300

    71.6

    +0.74%

  • BTI

    -0.7200

    56.59

    -1.27%

  • VOD

    -0.0100

    11.85

    -0.08%

  • RYCEF

    0.1800

    15.37

    +1.17%

  • RELX

    0.1700

    46.5

    +0.37%

  • CMSC

    -0.0200

    24.36

    -0.08%

  • GSK

    -0.6500

    40.83

    -1.59%

  • BP

    -0.5800

    33.89

    -1.71%

  • SCS

    -0.1900

    16.81

    -1.13%

  • RIO

    -0.1000

    62.44

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    24.4

    +0.04%

  • AZN

    -1.5400

    79.56

    -1.94%

  • BCC

    -3.3300

    85.68

    -3.89%

  • JRI

    0.1100

    14.23

    +0.77%

  • BCE

    -0.1400

    24.16

    -0.58%

US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors / Photo: © AFP

US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors -– an issue at the heart of the American culture wars.

Text size:

The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18.

The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented.

Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country.

"This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion.

"The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees," Roberts said.

"It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process."

The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others.

Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19.

While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures.

Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it "sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine."

"Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus," the AAP said.

"Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity."

- 'Must end' -

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a "huge win for children" and a "step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids."

During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to "protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions" with "often irreversible and life-altering consequences."

Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering."

"What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment," said Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court.

Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognize two genders -- male and female -- and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors.

"Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," the executive order said. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end."

Trump's order said it would now be US policy that it would "not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another."

The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defense Department health insurance that covers some two million children.

According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender.

N.Lo--ThChM