The China Mail - Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets

USD -
AED 3.673049
AFN 64.502307
ALL 80.999854
AMD 377.510038
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.999872
ARS 1404.502223
AUD 1.401925
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701691
BAM 1.642722
BBD 2.014547
BDT 122.351617
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376984
BIF 2955
BMD 1
BND 1.262741
BOB 6.911728
BRL 5.199598
BSD 1.000176
BTN 90.647035
BWP 13.104482
BYN 2.868926
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011608
CAD 1.355915
CDF 2225.000142
CHF 0.769895
CLF 0.021648
CLP 854.803684
CNY 6.91325
CNH 6.90889
COP 3672.83
CRC 494.712705
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 92.899369
CZK 20.41165
DJF 177.72007
DKK 6.28765
DOP 62.624975
DZD 129.532956
EGP 46.773897
ERN 15
ETB 155.35043
EUR 0.841479
FJD 2.18395
FKP 0.731875
GBP 0.732625
GEL 2.690035
GGP 0.731875
GHS 11.000154
GIP 0.731875
GMD 73.999988
GNF 8774.999872
GTQ 7.671019
GYD 209.257595
HKD 7.81735
HNL 26.515054
HRK 6.339398
HTG 131.086819
HUF 319.339026
IDR 16789
ILS 3.077095
IMP 0.731875
INR 90.68435
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.179971
JEP 0.731875
JMD 156.494496
JOD 0.708969
JPY 152.91899
KES 128.999836
KGS 87.449774
KHR 4029.999935
KMF 414.402826
KPW 899.999067
KRW 1444.73992
KWD 0.30685
KYD 0.83354
KZT 493.505294
LAK 21474.999899
LBP 85549.999692
LKR 309.394121
LRD 186.625007
LSL 15.959764
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.295038
MAD 9.116981
MDL 16.898415
MGA 4436.000038
MKD 51.834101
MMK 2099.913606
MNT 3568.190929
MOP 8.053234
MRU 39.905864
MUR 45.679866
MVR 15.449857
MWK 1736.000379
MXN 17.19915
MYR 3.915031
MZN 63.942625
NAD 15.959777
NGN 1351.75941
NIO 36.719984
NOK 9.472815
NPR 145.034815
NZD 1.65094
OMR 0.384507
PAB 1.000181
PEN 3.357498
PGK 4.285011
PHP 58.271971
PKR 279.749752
PLN 3.54825
PYG 6605.156289
QAR 3.64125
RON 4.280186
RSD 98.754039
RUB 77.100352
RWF 1454
SAR 3.750405
SBD 8.058149
SCR 14.11527
SDG 601.497015
SEK 8.882715
SGD 1.261295
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.350471
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 571.500677
SRD 37.777062
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.9
SVC 8.752
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.959698
THB 31.053002
TJS 9.391982
TMT 3.51
TND 2.845977
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.6333
TTD 6.783192
TWD 31.344803
TZS 2590.154021
UAH 43.034895
UGX 3536.076803
UYU 38.350895
UZS 12305.000194
VES 384.79041
VND 26000
VUV 119.366255
WST 2.707053
XAF 550.953523
XAG 0.011886
XAU 0.000197
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802643
XDR 0.685659
XOF 550.503104
XPF 100.67497
YER 238.325029
ZAR 15.87164
ZMK 9001.198967
ZMW 19.029301
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4300

    16.98

    -2.53%

  • NGG

    1.8900

    90.65

    +2.08%

  • CMSC

    -0.0704

    23.6212

    -0.3%

  • VOD

    0.3650

    15.615

    +2.34%

  • RELX

    -1.5250

    27.765

    -5.49%

  • BP

    1.7700

    38.74

    +4.57%

  • BTI

    0.6600

    60.85

    +1.08%

  • GSK

    -0.2750

    58.545

    -0.47%

  • CMSD

    -0.0150

    24.065

    -0.06%

  • RIO

    2.0900

    99.33

    +2.1%

  • BCC

    -0.9900

    88.74

    -1.12%

  • AZN

    8.9600

    202.36

    +4.43%

  • JRI

    0.2600

    13.04

    +1.99%

  • BCE

    -0.1800

    25.65

    -0.7%

Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets
Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets / Photo: © AFP/File

Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets

Eating fruits and vegetables is better for the planet than eating meat and cheese, but a new study by scientists released Monday showed chips and sugary drinks also have a very low environmental impact.

Text size:

Scientists analyzed some 57,000 products sold in supermarkets in Britain and Ireland, in a large study published by the scientific journal PNAS.

The researchers, who hope that their study may allow consumers to shop more sustainably without sacrificing anything to their health, also compared the results with the nutritional qualities of these foods.

They found that juice concentrates, sodas or other fruit juices are among the products sold with the lowest environmental impact -- because they are mostly composed of water -- but their nutritional quality is poor.

Researchers believe that in general, the more sustainable a food is, the better it is from a nutritional point of view.

The study confirms what other previous reports had already advanced by analyzing single ingredients, such as fruits or red meat.

The novelty of the latest report is that its analysis relates to products made up of multiple ingredients, such as sauces, prepared meals, and others.

That task was complicated by the fact that the quantity of each ingredient is considered a trade secret, and therefore no real details are disclosed: Only about three percent of the more than 57,000 products sold by eight food retailers had their composition fully disclosed.

Scientists responded by developing an algorithm based on the few known pieces of information to evaluate the missing products -- in Britain and Ireland, ingredients are notably listed in order of quantity used.

To assess the environmental impact, four factors were considered: greenhouse gas emissions, use of limited water resources, land use, and eutrophication, which is when waterways are enriched with minerals and nutrients, mostly from fertilizers.

Bread, but also certain cereals and prepared meals or desserts, have a relatively low or intermediate environmental impact.

On the other hand, fish, cheese and meat -- especially red meat -- have a high impact.

"Replacing meat, dairy, and eggs with plant-based alternatives could have large environmental and health benefits," the study notes.

But "smaller" transitions can also help. For example, beef lasagna, with a high environmental impact, could be replaced by chicken or pork lasagna, or vegetarian.

In the future, better knowing the proportions and origin of different ingredients would help to determine more precisely their impact on the environment, the researchers said.

I.Ko--ThChM