The China Mail - Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 63.000221
ALL 82.696296
AMD 376.858962
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000048
ARS 1391.743998
AUD 1.455943
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.68207
BAM 1.686609
BBD 2.014599
BDT 123.041898
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377522
BIF 2972.081492
BMD 1
BND 1.28326
BOB 6.911836
BRL 5.160703
BSD 1.000289
BTN 92.840973
BWP 13.603929
BYN 2.974652
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011667
CAD 1.39211
CDF 2294.999663
CHF 0.799825
CLF 0.023121
CLP 912.959749
CNY 6.872026
CNH 6.90029
COP 3672.91
CRC 465.054111
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.090054
CZK 21.290498
DJF 178.120405
DKK 6.484145
DOP 60.181951
DZD 133.075058
EGP 54.330603
ERN 15
ETB 156.185056
EUR 0.867699
FJD 2.253803
FKP 0.750158
GBP 0.757655
GEL 2.689431
GGP 0.750158
GHS 11.003842
GIP 0.750158
GMD 73.500523
GNF 8772.625751
GTQ 7.652738
GYD 209.355772
HKD 7.8372
HNL 26.571696
HRK 6.536904
HTG 131.299369
HUF 333.327498
IDR 17001
ILS 3.146465
IMP 0.750158
INR 92.8756
IQD 1310.292196
IRR 1318875.000049
ISK 125.303045
JEP 0.750158
JMD 158.20086
JOD 0.70899
JPY 159.704498
KES 130.10094
KGS 87.450066
KHR 4002.104101
KMF 426.749785
KPW 899.994443
KRW 1515.719751
KWD 0.30931
KYD 0.833603
KZT 475.533883
LAK 22044.107185
LBP 89572.937012
LKR 315.333805
LRD 183.557048
LSL 16.799852
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.380291
MAD 9.344475
MDL 17.619744
MGA 4232.256729
MKD 53.487373
MMK 2099.621061
MNT 3572.314592
MOP 8.076125
MRU 39.906696
MUR 46.949982
MVR 15.449836
MWK 1734.466419
MXN 17.93787
MYR 4.039032
MZN 63.96016
NAD 16.799852
NGN 1381.897825
NIO 36.813625
NOK 9.751825
NPR 148.537059
NZD 1.75148
OMR 0.38449
PAB 1.000341
PEN 3.480496
PGK 4.326343
PHP 60.641499
PKR 279.096549
PLN 3.721525
PYG 6496.591747
QAR 3.647426
RON 4.423599
RSD 101.875991
RUB 80.378485
RWF 1463.871032
SAR 3.754213
SBD 8.009975
SCR 13.604279
SDG 600.999802
SEK 9.507225
SGD 1.287435
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.595114
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.6306
SRD 37.364016
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.127246
SVC 8.752528
SYP 110.548921
SZL 16.793643
THB 32.748017
TJS 9.565577
TMT 3.5
TND 2.936568
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.49955
TTD 6.789059
TWD 31.982025
TZS 2597.496688
UAH 43.772124
UGX 3726.268859
UYU 40.661099
UZS 12151.342029
VES 473.325198
VND 26334.5
VUV 120.132513
WST 2.770875
XAF 565.643526
XAG 0.014063
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802676
XDR 0.703479
XOF 565.643526
XPF 102.845809
YER 238.625035
ZAR 16.987399
ZMK 9001.200113
ZMW 19.279373
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    0.0900

    21.99

    +0.41%

  • CMSD

    0.0500

    22.15

    +0.23%

  • NGG

    2.2400

    86.84

    +2.58%

  • BP

    -0.8300

    46.17

    -1.8%

  • RELX

    0.0800

    33.23

    +0.24%

  • GSK

    0.8000

    55.99

    +1.43%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    57.89

    -1%

  • BCC

    -0.7700

    75.08

    -1.03%

  • BCE

    0.1400

    25.38

    +0.55%

  • RIO

    1.5200

    94.81

    +1.6%

  • JRI

    0.2200

    12.52

    +1.76%

  • RYCEF

    0.5500

    15.64

    +3.52%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    15.13

    +0.73%

  • AZN

    3.5100

    200.73

    +1.75%

Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets
Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets / Photo: © AFP/File

Study shows environmental impact of 57,000 products sold in supermarkets

Eating fruits and vegetables is better for the planet than eating meat and cheese, but a new study by scientists released Monday showed chips and sugary drinks also have a very low environmental impact.

Text size:

Scientists analyzed some 57,000 products sold in supermarkets in Britain and Ireland, in a large study published by the scientific journal PNAS.

The researchers, who hope that their study may allow consumers to shop more sustainably without sacrificing anything to their health, also compared the results with the nutritional qualities of these foods.

They found that juice concentrates, sodas or other fruit juices are among the products sold with the lowest environmental impact -- because they are mostly composed of water -- but their nutritional quality is poor.

Researchers believe that in general, the more sustainable a food is, the better it is from a nutritional point of view.

The study confirms what other previous reports had already advanced by analyzing single ingredients, such as fruits or red meat.

The novelty of the latest report is that its analysis relates to products made up of multiple ingredients, such as sauces, prepared meals, and others.

That task was complicated by the fact that the quantity of each ingredient is considered a trade secret, and therefore no real details are disclosed: Only about three percent of the more than 57,000 products sold by eight food retailers had their composition fully disclosed.

Scientists responded by developing an algorithm based on the few known pieces of information to evaluate the missing products -- in Britain and Ireland, ingredients are notably listed in order of quantity used.

To assess the environmental impact, four factors were considered: greenhouse gas emissions, use of limited water resources, land use, and eutrophication, which is when waterways are enriched with minerals and nutrients, mostly from fertilizers.

Bread, but also certain cereals and prepared meals or desserts, have a relatively low or intermediate environmental impact.

On the other hand, fish, cheese and meat -- especially red meat -- have a high impact.

"Replacing meat, dairy, and eggs with plant-based alternatives could have large environmental and health benefits," the study notes.

But "smaller" transitions can also help. For example, beef lasagna, with a high environmental impact, could be replaced by chicken or pork lasagna, or vegetarian.

In the future, better knowing the proportions and origin of different ingredients would help to determine more precisely their impact on the environment, the researchers said.

I.Ko--ThChM