The China Mail - Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 63.50433
ALL 83.192586
AMD 375.730804
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999997
ARS 1390.101098
AUD 1.460771
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.696439
BAM 1.693993
BBD 2.007535
BDT 122.298731
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.376597
BIF 2960.807241
BMD 1
BND 1.28353
BOB 6.91265
BRL 5.240403
BSD 0.996752
BTN 94.473171
BWP 13.741284
BYN 2.966957
BYR 19600
BZD 2.004591
CAD 1.390035
CDF 2282.50088
CHF 0.799635
CLF 0.023381
CLP 923.219739
CNY 6.91185
CNH 6.92254
COP 3674.03
CRC 462.864319
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.504742
CZK 21.333972
DJF 177.489065
DKK 6.500845
DOP 59.330475
DZD 133.010264
EGP 52.874602
ERN 15
ETB 154.083756
EUR 0.869898
FJD 2.257398
FKP 0.752712
GBP 0.755403
GEL 2.679573
GGP 0.752712
GHS 10.921138
GIP 0.752712
GMD 73.50089
GNF 8739.335672
GTQ 7.62808
GYD 208.64406
HKD 7.83245
HNL 26.46399
HRK 6.557007
HTG 130.656966
HUF 339.504022
IDR 16965
ILS 3.137619
IMP 0.752712
INR 94.78205
IQD 1305.703521
IRR 1313249.999923
ISK 124.940227
JEP 0.752712
JMD 156.892296
JOD 0.708969
JPY 160.0815
KES 129.650234
KGS 87.449953
KHR 3992.031527
KMF 428.000223
KPW 900.00296
KRW 1511.290246
KWD 0.30791
KYD 0.830627
KZT 481.867394
LAK 21678.576069
LBP 89256.247023
LKR 313.975142
LRD 182.893768
LSL 17.115586
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.362652
MAD 9.315751
MDL 17.507254
MGA 4153.999394
MKD 53.388766
MMK 2098.832611
MNT 3571.142668
MOP 8.042181
MRU 39.797324
MUR 46.770112
MVR 15.450254
MWK 1728.292408
MXN 18.156455
MYR 4.022502
MZN 63.950186
NAD 17.115586
NGN 1378.509666
NIO 36.680958
NOK 9.74951
NPR 151.156728
NZD 1.74604
OMR 0.38408
PAB 0.996752
PEN 3.472089
PGK 4.307306
PHP 60.530976
PKR 278.184401
PLN 3.72839
PYG 6516.824737
QAR 3.634057
RON 4.435203
RSD 101.684639
RUB 81.655379
RWF 1455.545451
SAR 3.752751
SBD 8.042037
SCR 15.03876
SDG 601.000304
SEK 9.478605
SGD 1.28959
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550052
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 569.659175
SRD 37.60102
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.220389
SVC 8.721147
SYP 110.527654
SZL 17.114027
THB 32.960288
TJS 9.523624
TMT 3.5
TND 2.938634
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.461899
TTD 6.772336
TWD 31.991979
TZS 2579.99977
UAH 43.689489
UGX 3713.134988
UYU 40.344723
UZS 12155.385215
VES 467.928355
VND 26337.5
VUV 119.385423
WST 2.775484
XAF 568.149495
XAG 0.014713
XAU 0.000226
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796371
XDR 0.706596
XOF 568.149495
XPF 103.295656
YER 238.600239
ZAR 17.166203
ZMK 9001.208457
ZMW 18.763154
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • BCC

    0.1400

    74.43

    +0.19%

  • NGG

    -0.4800

    81.92

    -0.59%

  • GSK

    -0.1000

    53.84

    -0.19%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    25.25

    -0.87%

  • BTI

    0.3749

    57.8

    +0.65%

  • RIO

    0.8500

    86.64

    +0.98%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    14.65

    -4.03%

  • RELX

    -0.1000

    31.97

    -0.31%

  • BP

    0.5100

    46.68

    +1.09%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    11.8

    -2.29%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.77

    -0.22%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    22.66

    -0.4%

  • VOD

    -0.1400

    14.49

    -0.97%

  • AZN

    5.0200

    188.42

    +2.66%

Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study
Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

An Obama-era sex education program that was criticized by conservatives succeeded in reducing teen birth rates in parts of the US that implemented it, a large study said Monday.

Text size:

Teen births are higher in the United States than in any other G7 country, and the topic of whether to teach adolescents about the use of contraceptives has remained heated among academics, politicians and the public.

A 1996 law allocated federal funding to abstinence-only education, but in 2010 then-president Barack Obama initiated two more comprehensive sex-education programs: Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program (TPP).

These programs provided more information about sex, contraception, and reproductive health compared to abstinence-only education, which research has shown has no effect on teen birth rates.

"We looked at 'Where did this funding go? And what happens to teen birth rates in the places that it went?'" Nicholas Mark, a researcher at New York University (NYU) and lead author of the study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) told AFP.

Mark and his co-author, NYU professor Lawrence Wu focused on TPP, because this program's funding was allocated at the county rather than state level. This made it possible to draw comparisons between counties of similar income and poverty levels.

The researchers had access to public data on which counties received TPP funding, and a restricted birth certificate database that gave them birth rates in counties, as well as allowing them to capture the age of mothers at the time of birth and where they lived.

They examined teenage birth rates in 55 US counties from 1996-2009, the years before they received TPP funding, and during the years they received this funding, 2010-2016.

They also compared the birth rates in those 55 counties to more than 2,800 counties without the funding in the years before and after TPP was implemented.

This method allowed them to make the truest comparison possible, by disentangling the specific impact of the sex education program from an overall trend of declining teen birth rates in recent years.

Birth rates among 14 to 19 year olds in counties that received TPP funding dropped by approximately three percent in the years studied -- both compared to the period before they received funding, and compared to unfunded counties.

The paper is the first national effort to study the question, and its methods demonstrated cause-and-effect, rather than simply correlation, according to the authors.

Support for comprehensive sex education versus abstinence-only teaching remains a fault line in the country's ongoing culture wars.

The administration of former president Donald Trump attempted to reallocate funding back towards abstinence programs, but faced opposition in court by the reproductive health group Planned Parenthood.

Many teen pregnancies and subsequent births are unwanted by the mothers, and therefore can be affected by access to abortion.

The conservative-majority Supreme Court may soon be poised to overturn the ruling that made abortion a constitutional right in the United States 50 years ago, paving the way for state-level bans.

M.Chau--ThChM