The China Mail - Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

USD -
AED 3.673096
AFN 62.501853
ALL 81.576868
AMD 368.780043
ANG 1.79046
AOA 917.999857
ARS 1391.583196
AUD 1.384572
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.698524
BAM 1.670681
BBD 2.014496
BDT 122.776371
BGN 1.66992
BHD 0.377303
BIF 2975
BMD 1
BND 1.273528
BOB 6.911397
BRL 5.002099
BSD 1.000201
BTN 95.835344
BWP 14.087599
BYN 2.794335
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011549
CAD 1.37274
CDF 2244.999557
CHF 0.783415
CLF 0.022712
CLP 893.879859
CNY 6.78515
CNH 6.78631
COP 3791.42
CRC 454.512452
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.714208
CZK 20.82465
DJF 177.720507
DKK 6.40006
DOP 59.701874
DZD 132.610989
EGP 52.874495
ERN 15
ETB 156.163199
EUR 0.85643
FJD 2.189701
FKP 0.739691
GBP 0.746185
GEL 2.679725
GGP 0.739691
GHS 11.410232
GIP 0.739691
GMD 72.502255
GNF 8779.999938
GTQ 7.630738
GYD 209.246802
HKD 7.832595
HNL 26.599525
HRK 6.454603
HTG 130.972363
HUF 306.388025
IDR 17545.5
ILS 2.902602
IMP 0.739691
INR 95.69355
IQD 1310.201083
IRR 1315000.000029
ISK 122.979764
JEP 0.739691
JMD 158.141561
JOD 0.708988
JPY 158.191499
KES 129.250067
KGS 87.450391
KHR 4012.000269
KMF 422.00025
KPW 899.97066
KRW 1492.530257
KWD 0.30842
KYD 0.833543
KZT 473.448852
LAK 21954.999541
LBP 89550.000072
LKR 325.320759
LRD 183.250012
LSL 16.418345
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.348556
MAD 9.176212
MDL 17.192645
MGA 4189.000457
MKD 52.78458
MMK 2099.865061
MNT 3580.130218
MOP 8.069362
MRU 39.968052
MUR 46.899865
MVR 15.410136
MWK 1733.971717
MXN 17.220704
MYR 3.931498
MZN 63.901853
NAD 16.418345
NGN 1371.039687
NIO 36.808139
NOK 9.229603
NPR 153.332792
NZD 1.690095
OMR 0.384499
PAB 1.000184
PEN 3.418655
PGK 4.357259
PHP 61.590076
PKR 278.576188
PLN 3.633385
PYG 6094.852476
QAR 3.645884
RON 4.453802
RSD 100.543734
RUB 73.248122
RWF 1462.916693
SAR 3.759074
SBD 8.032258
SCR 14.650317
SDG 600.501765
SEK 9.34834
SGD 1.275345
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.607781
SLL 20969.502105
SOS 571.616491
SRD 37.207019
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.928276
SVC 8.751249
SYP 110.528733
SZL 16.40606
THB 32.372497
TJS 9.346574
TMT 3.51
TND 2.914168
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.435598
TTD 6.790867
TWD 31.526502
TZS 2594.999679
UAH 43.968225
UGX 3740.52909
UYU 39.831211
UZS 11992.073051
VES 508.06467
VND 26345
VUV 118.077659
WST 2.708521
XAF 560.318959
XAG 0.01183
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802565
XDR 0.694969
XOF 560.316565
XPF 101.873721
YER 238.625029
ZAR 16.48058
ZMK 9001.203062
ZMW 18.82781
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.2100

    60.79

    -0.35%

  • CMSC

    0.0515

    23.1017

    +0.22%

  • JRI

    -0.0050

    13.125

    -0.04%

  • BCC

    3.1250

    70.105

    +4.46%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    16.1

    +0.62%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    31.58

    -0.13%

  • BCE

    -0.0100

    24.38

    -0.04%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    23.52

    -0.17%

  • RIO

    -2.2400

    109.8

    -2.04%

  • GSK

    -0.1850

    50.805

    -0.36%

  • NGG

    0.3500

    87.33

    +0.4%

  • VOD

    0.0400

    15.55

    +0.26%

  • AZN

    -2.5000

    185.22

    -1.35%

  • BTI

    1.7330

    67.083

    +2.58%

  • BP

    0.0950

    44.235

    +0.21%

Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study
Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

An Obama-era sex education program that was criticized by conservatives succeeded in reducing teen birth rates in parts of the US that implemented it, a large study said Monday.

Text size:

Teen births are higher in the United States than in any other G7 country, and the topic of whether to teach adolescents about the use of contraceptives has remained heated among academics, politicians and the public.

A 1996 law allocated federal funding to abstinence-only education, but in 2010 then-president Barack Obama initiated two more comprehensive sex-education programs: Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program (TPP).

These programs provided more information about sex, contraception, and reproductive health compared to abstinence-only education, which research has shown has no effect on teen birth rates.

"We looked at 'Where did this funding go? And what happens to teen birth rates in the places that it went?'" Nicholas Mark, a researcher at New York University (NYU) and lead author of the study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) told AFP.

Mark and his co-author, NYU professor Lawrence Wu focused on TPP, because this program's funding was allocated at the county rather than state level. This made it possible to draw comparisons between counties of similar income and poverty levels.

The researchers had access to public data on which counties received TPP funding, and a restricted birth certificate database that gave them birth rates in counties, as well as allowing them to capture the age of mothers at the time of birth and where they lived.

They examined teenage birth rates in 55 US counties from 1996-2009, the years before they received TPP funding, and during the years they received this funding, 2010-2016.

They also compared the birth rates in those 55 counties to more than 2,800 counties without the funding in the years before and after TPP was implemented.

This method allowed them to make the truest comparison possible, by disentangling the specific impact of the sex education program from an overall trend of declining teen birth rates in recent years.

Birth rates among 14 to 19 year olds in counties that received TPP funding dropped by approximately three percent in the years studied -- both compared to the period before they received funding, and compared to unfunded counties.

The paper is the first national effort to study the question, and its methods demonstrated cause-and-effect, rather than simply correlation, according to the authors.

Support for comprehensive sex education versus abstinence-only teaching remains a fault line in the country's ongoing culture wars.

The administration of former president Donald Trump attempted to reallocate funding back towards abstinence programs, but faced opposition in court by the reproductive health group Planned Parenthood.

Many teen pregnancies and subsequent births are unwanted by the mothers, and therefore can be affected by access to abortion.

The conservative-majority Supreme Court may soon be poised to overturn the ruling that made abortion a constitutional right in the United States 50 years ago, paving the way for state-level bans.

M.Chau--ThChM