The China Mail - Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 68.773892
ALL 85.1919
AMD 383.844121
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000464
ARS 1319.936745
AUD 1.551747
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.702909
BAM 1.708921
BBD 2.018218
BDT 122.195767
BGN 1.709301
BHD 0.377034
BIF 2979.706852
BMD 1
BND 1.297101
BOB 6.907097
BRL 5.583097
BSD 0.999672
BTN 87.54407
BWP 13.649927
BYN 3.271194
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00782
CAD 1.383805
CDF 2889.999756
CHF 0.812105
CLF 0.02487
CLP 975.649832
CNY 7.1769
CNH 7.20375
COP 4180.25
CRC 505.122436
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.345486
CZK 21.465015
DJF 178.003014
DKK 6.52004
DOP 60.892549
DZD 130.832878
EGP 48.650799
ERN 15
ETB 138.526224
EUR 0.873705
FJD 2.26815
FKP 0.753407
GBP 0.75573
GEL 2.649932
GGP 0.753407
GHS 10.495642
GIP 0.753407
GMD 71.999594
GNF 8671.224797
GTQ 7.676882
GYD 209.126455
HKD 7.85002
HNL 26.261823
HRK 6.582797
HTG 131.169313
HUF 349.488983
IDR 16497
ILS 3.38599
IMP 0.753407
INR 87.607651
IQD 1309.42135
IRR 42112.531123
ISK 124.210267
JEP 0.753407
JMD 159.943729
JOD 0.708974
JPY 149.852501
KES 128.939595
KGS 87.450423
KHR 4004.456192
KMF 431.496346
KPW 899.943686
KRW 1394.6201
KWD 0.30597
KYD 0.832958
KZT 539.837043
LAK 21585.443107
LBP 89567.793093
LKR 302.068634
LRD 200.415037
LSL 18.132856
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.461019
MAD 9.136766
MDL 17.212259
MGA 4526.09275
MKD 53.788855
MMK 2099.176207
MNT 3589.345014
MOP 8.082308
MRU 39.91175
MUR 46.750419
MVR 15.396166
MWK 1733.28382
MXN 18.82255
MYR 4.265023
MZN 63.960351
NAD 18.132856
NGN 1532.679903
NIO 36.785747
NOK 10.287025
NPR 140.070338
NZD 1.692778
OMR 0.384495
PAB 0.999585
PEN 3.56705
PGK 4.146006
PHP 58.340994
PKR 283.754123
PLN 3.732297
PYG 7486.402062
QAR 3.644585
RON 4.4335
RSD 102.334058
RUB 80.125349
RWF 1445.378886
SAR 3.751071
SBD 8.244163
SCR 14.684374
SDG 600.528417
SEK 9.747285
SGD 1.296765
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.000101
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 571.266301
SRD 36.670248
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.407195
SVC 8.746368
SYP 13001.531245
SZL 18.127963
THB 32.6645
TJS 9.425981
TMT 3.51
TND 2.967063
TOP 2.342103
TRY 40.59448
TTD 6.786518
TWD 29.926504
TZS 2572.506573
UAH 41.696586
UGX 3583.302388
UYU 40.0886
UZS 12586.557155
VES 123.721575
VND 26199
VUV 119.302744
WST 2.758516
XAF 573.151008
XAG 0.027349
XAU 0.000303
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80154
XDR 0.69341
XOF 573.151008
XPF 104.204985
YER 240.649974
ZAR 18.11785
ZMK 9001.199399
ZMW 22.965115
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCC

    -1.4780

    83.412

    -1.77%

  • RYCEF

    0.9400

    14.04

    +6.7%

  • RIO

    0.0300

    59.52

    +0.05%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • GSK

    -1.1400

    37.83

    -3.01%

  • VOD

    -0.2700

    10.79

    -2.5%

  • JRI

    -0.0150

    13.095

    -0.11%

  • BCE

    -0.1930

    23.337

    -0.83%

  • BTI

    0.3200

    53.48

    +0.6%

  • CMSD

    -0.0060

    23.054

    -0.03%

  • AZN

    -1.5550

    75.035

    -2.07%

  • RELX

    0.1700

    51.95

    +0.33%

  • NGG

    0.0800

    70.27

    +0.11%

  • SCS

    -0.0800

    10.25

    -0.78%

  • BP

    -0.1550

    32.095

    -0.48%

  • RBGPF

    0.3900

    74.42

    +0.52%

  • CMSC

    -0.0060

    22.594

    -0.03%

Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study
Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

Obama sex education program drove lower teen birth rates in US: study

An Obama-era sex education program that was criticized by conservatives succeeded in reducing teen birth rates in parts of the US that implemented it, a large study said Monday.

Text size:

Teen births are higher in the United States than in any other G7 country, and the topic of whether to teach adolescents about the use of contraceptives has remained heated among academics, politicians and the public.

A 1996 law allocated federal funding to abstinence-only education, but in 2010 then-president Barack Obama initiated two more comprehensive sex-education programs: Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program (TPP).

These programs provided more information about sex, contraception, and reproductive health compared to abstinence-only education, which research has shown has no effect on teen birth rates.

"We looked at 'Where did this funding go? And what happens to teen birth rates in the places that it went?'" Nicholas Mark, a researcher at New York University (NYU) and lead author of the study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) told AFP.

Mark and his co-author, NYU professor Lawrence Wu focused on TPP, because this program's funding was allocated at the county rather than state level. This made it possible to draw comparisons between counties of similar income and poverty levels.

The researchers had access to public data on which counties received TPP funding, and a restricted birth certificate database that gave them birth rates in counties, as well as allowing them to capture the age of mothers at the time of birth and where they lived.

They examined teenage birth rates in 55 US counties from 1996-2009, the years before they received TPP funding, and during the years they received this funding, 2010-2016.

They also compared the birth rates in those 55 counties to more than 2,800 counties without the funding in the years before and after TPP was implemented.

This method allowed them to make the truest comparison possible, by disentangling the specific impact of the sex education program from an overall trend of declining teen birth rates in recent years.

Birth rates among 14 to 19 year olds in counties that received TPP funding dropped by approximately three percent in the years studied -- both compared to the period before they received funding, and compared to unfunded counties.

The paper is the first national effort to study the question, and its methods demonstrated cause-and-effect, rather than simply correlation, according to the authors.

Support for comprehensive sex education versus abstinence-only teaching remains a fault line in the country's ongoing culture wars.

The administration of former president Donald Trump attempted to reallocate funding back towards abstinence programs, but faced opposition in court by the reproductive health group Planned Parenthood.

Many teen pregnancies and subsequent births are unwanted by the mothers, and therefore can be affected by access to abortion.

The conservative-majority Supreme Court may soon be poised to overturn the ruling that made abortion a constitutional right in the United States 50 years ago, paving the way for state-level bans.

M.Chau--ThChM