The China Mail - Leading ozone scientist says more climate surprises likely

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 63.999576
ALL 80.977186
AMD 362.829809
ANG 1.790365
AOA 918.000184
ARS 1524.997501
AUD 1.43976
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.69885
BAM 1.722428
BBD 2.015086
BDT 123.012972
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.376997
BIF 2995
BMD 1
BND 1.277405
BOB 12.040458
BRL 5.181501
BSD 1.000454
BTN 95.892522
BWP 14.09417
BYN 3.010995
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012171
CAD 1.423715
CDF 2309.999986
CHF 0.835405
CLF 0.024646
CLP 973.179852
CNY 6.704751
CNH 6.709685
COP 3314.79
CRC 456.985341
CUC 1
CUP 24.01166
CVE 97.750138
CZK 21.561986
DJF 177.719945
DKK 6.598698
DOP 59.697254
DZD 133.911021
EGP 51.938599
ERN 15
ETB 163.421342
EUR 0.88272
FJD 2.24775
FKP 0.756991
GBP 0.754035
GEL 2.60498
GGP 0.756991
GHS 11.699323
GIP 0.756991
GMD 73.5159
GNF 8798.844552
GTQ 7.643396
GYD 209.328131
HKD 7.84663
HNL 26.859007
HRK 6.650974
HTG 130.939066
HUF 323.646983
IDR 17897.45
ILS 3.07365
IMP 0.756991
INR 95.93015
IQD 1310.606294
IRR 1693792.500038
ISK 120.930408
JEP 0.756991
JMD 158.336929
JOD 0.709025
JPY 157.684016
KES 129.709357
KGS 87.448698
KHR 4057.22564
KMF 435.00025
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1358.609932
KWD 0.30894
KYD 0.833726
KZT 440.074329
LAK 22455.503791
LBP 89592.031739
LKR 330.60617
LRD 171.583824
LSL 16.385613
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.399
MAD 9.71296
MDL 17.763022
MGA 4394.578552
MKD 54.34255
MMK 2099.600314
MNT 3599.1704
MOP 8.086624
MRU 40.069045
MUR 47.760183
MVR 15.450398
MWK 1734.754084
MXN 18.076375
MYR 4.083989
MZN 63.909674
NAD 16.385685
NGN 1327.250222
NIO 36.821108
NOK 9.626335
NPR 153.428035
NZD 1.77508
OMR 0.384499
PAB 1.000449
PEN 3.44424
PGK 4.528402
PHP 62.740501
PKR 277.158584
PLN 3.85239
PYG 5852.979771
QAR 3.647324
RON 4.6567
RSD 103.766003
RUB 83.375789
RWF 1477.228194
SAR 3.755513
SBD 8.032647
SCR 13.871342
SDG 601.495377
SEK 10.00818
SGD 1.27803
SHP 0.755829
SLE 24.649652
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.727998
SRD 37.6215
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.576683
SVC 8.75393
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.377071
THB 33.619691
TJS 9.214436
TMT 3.51
TND 2.978703
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.036597
TTD 6.787408
TWD 31.882899
TZS 2640.003023
UAH 44.690709
UGX 3921.672237
UYU 40.308767
UZS 11835.41907
VES 857.98905
VND 25962
VUV 119.008285
WST 2.76852
XAF 579.026255
XAG 0.016607
XAU 0.000240904065
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803098
XDR 0.707052
XOF 579.026255
XPF 105.029547
YER 236.402537
ZAR 16.43561
ZMK 9001.197648
ZMW 19.559579
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.591902
MXV 2.046206
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Leading ozone scientist says more climate surprises likely
Leading ozone scientist says more climate surprises likely / Photo: © Susan SOLOMON/AFP/File

Leading ozone scientist says more climate surprises likely

Susan Solomon, a leading scientist in the fight to tackle the Antarctic ozone hole, says people are now getting worried enough to spur climate action.

Text size:

The former expert for the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the organisation's final instalment of a major series of reports, released Monday, would not be the "last word" on warming.

IPCC warned that climate change impacts are hitting faster than expected and the key 1.5 degree-Celsius warming limit could be reached in the early 2030s.

Solomon, a professor at MIT, said in an interview that more surprises were likely in store.

Her own research had delivered a recent "shocker" that Australia's massive 2019-20 wildfires combined with lingering remnants of the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) still in the atmosphere to erode the ozone layer -- Earth's protective shield from damaging ultraviolet radiation.

The following interview has been edited for length and flow:

Q: Did it feel like a crisis when the ozone hole was discovered?

A: It was a huge moment. The only thing you could compare it to would be if a piece of Greenland suddenly fell off into the sea and people were waiting for the three metres of sea level rise to show up on their doorstep.

All of a sudden you had 50 percent less ozone over Antarctica at certain times of year. And we did not know why.

I was 29 years old when the British Antarctic Survey discovered the ozone hole in 1985.

In 1986, I led the national ozone expedition to Antarctica. We made measurements of everything that we could think of: ozone itself, but also chlorine monoxide, chlorine dioxide, all of the ozone eating molecules and we were able to show that they were completely out of whack.

My idea was that maybe the reason this was happening was because of polar stratospheric clouds and surface chemistry. That turned out to be right.

Q: The Montreal Protocol (phasing out CFCs and other ozone depleting molecules) was signed in 1987. What enabled governments to act so quickly?

A: Three P's -- It was personal to people, because skin cancer and cataracts are scary. And it was perceptible because you could see these dramatic images on TV. It could easily be explained. And practical solutions were found pretty quickly.

Had we not stopped making these molecules, you would have massive ozone depletion worldwide. Overall, it has been a remarkable science, policy, and public success story.

Q: Why has climate change not had the same urgency?

A: People are beginning to get concerned enough about climate change, particularly the young. That is a tremendous spur to politicians.

The biggest problem is that people believe the solutions are not practical, but it's not at all true. People have to recognise how much more it's going to cost us if we don't do anything.

It's also too easy to tie climate change up with the culture wars, or whatever your social issue of the moment is.

We didn't have that with the ozone.

I was once in an IPCC meeting about chlorofluorocarbons with a delegate from a Middle Eastern country that produces a lot of oil. I asked him if his government had any concerns and he said: "No, we don't really care what's in the air conditioner, as long as it makes it cold".

The chemical companies could make other compounds. The problem with the fossil fuel companies is they're not going to be the ones to make solar panels.

Q: What are the key unanswered questions on climate change?

A: There's a lot of work going on now on understanding how storm tracks are going to change. Are we going to have more extreme Arctic air cold snaps? It might not be the issue you expected, but it's an issue.

Melting of the polar ice sheets -- how fast is that going to happen? There's a lot of uncertainty. It affects people on coastlines and island states all around the world.

The impact on the food and water supply -- there are open questions on both.

Things that involve the crossover between biology and physics are often the most difficult to understand. There's a 30 percent decline in the insect population worldwide going on right now. We really don't know why.

It's a great time to be a climate scientist, but on the other hand, it seems to me that every year something important and scary is happening.

Z.Huang--ThChM