The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 65.999741
ALL 81.749978
AMD 377.657389
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.50233
ARS 1447.7684
AUD 1.43542
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.704736
BAM 1.656847
BBD 2.015105
BDT 122.260014
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.377013
BIF 2953.091775
BMD 1
BND 1.272884
BOB 6.913553
BRL 5.239695
BSD 1.000479
BTN 90.561067
BWP 13.175651
BYN 2.857082
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012224
CAD 1.36883
CDF 2224.999953
CHF 0.77793
CLF 0.021805
CLP 860.999848
CNY 7.97075
CNH 6.94469
COP 3642
CRC 496.003592
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.41048
CZK 20.68325
DJF 178.163135
DKK 6.33544
DOP 63.049753
DZD 129.999028
EGP 46.891297
ERN 15
ETB 154.976835
EUR 0.848335
FJD 2.208987
FKP 0.729917
GBP 0.733985
GEL 2.689736
GGP 0.729917
GHS 10.985781
GIP 0.729917
GMD 73.502583
GNF 8780.996111
GTQ 7.67429
GYD 209.32114
HKD 7.808645
HNL 26.428662
HRK 6.385498
HTG 131.143652
HUF 321.920429
IDR 16818.3
ILS 3.094805
IMP 0.729917
INR 90.493349
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.739414
JEP 0.729917
JMD 156.862745
JOD 0.709041
JPY 156.859642
KES 129.170211
KGS 87.449587
KHR 4030.000239
KMF 417.000221
KPW 899.945137
KRW 1464.280435
KWD 0.30738
KYD 0.83376
KZT 497.113352
LAK 21520.880015
LBP 86150.000188
LKR 309.665505
LRD 185.901857
LSL 16.059936
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.323093
MAD 9.174496
MDL 16.928505
MGA 4431.457248
MKD 52.254146
MMK 2099.936125
MNT 3569.846682
MOP 8.051354
MRU 39.72959
MUR 45.879791
MVR 15.459409
MWK 1737.999994
MXN 17.36365
MYR 3.944005
MZN 63.759784
NAD 16.059961
NGN 1371.402396
NIO 36.81834
NOK 9.707645
NPR 144.897432
NZD 1.67173
OMR 0.384499
PAB 1.000479
PEN 3.362504
PGK 4.286719
PHP 58.840151
PKR 279.84277
PLN 3.577895
PYG 6622.13506
QAR 3.64125
RON 4.3222
RSD 99.574537
RUB 76.24746
RWF 1459.958497
SAR 3.75018
SBD 8.064647
SCR 14.780283
SDG 601.500712
SEK 9.00173
SGD 1.274295
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550143
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 570.224434
SRD 37.89403
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.755852
SVC 8.7544
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.060355
THB 31.805499
TJS 9.349774
TMT 3.505
TND 2.845503
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.53032
TTD 6.777163
TWD 31.689501
TZS 2572.500108
UAH 43.151654
UGX 3562.246121
UYU 38.562056
UZS 12264.970117
VES 377.98435
VND 25954.5
VUV 119.556789
WST 2.72617
XAF 555.589718
XAG 0.013059
XAU 0.000206
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803149
XDR 0.691101
XOF 555.690911
XPF 101.549983
YER 238.324985
ZAR 16.164855
ZMK 9001.189062
ZMW 19.585153
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    13.15

    +0.23%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    23.87

    -0.29%

  • BCE

    0.2400

    26.34

    +0.91%

  • BCC

    5.3000

    90.23

    +5.87%

  • NGG

    1.5600

    87.79

    +1.78%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3100

    16.62

    -1.87%

  • CMSC

    -0.1400

    23.52

    -0.6%

  • RBGPF

    4.4200

    86.52

    +5.11%

  • RIO

    0.1100

    96.48

    +0.11%

  • GSK

    3.8900

    57.23

    +6.8%

  • BTI

    -0.2400

    61.63

    -0.39%

  • AZN

    3.1300

    187.45

    +1.67%

  • RELX

    -0.7300

    29.78

    -2.45%

  • VOD

    0.4600

    15.71

    +2.93%

  • BP

    0.3800

    39.2

    +0.97%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM