The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 66.000229
ALL 83.900451
AMD 382.570291
ANG 1.789982
AOA 917.000333
ARS 1450.749912
AUD 1.535886
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.699023
BAM 1.701894
BBD 2.013462
BDT 121.860805
BGN 1.699695
BHD 0.376993
BIF 2951
BMD 1
BND 1.306514
BOB 6.907654
BRL 5.361199
BSD 0.999682
BTN 88.718716
BWP 13.495075
BYN 3.407518
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010599
CAD 1.410025
CDF 2221.000229
CHF 0.80905
CLF 0.024076
CLP 944.499783
CNY 7.12675
CNH 7.127075
COP 3834.5
CRC 501.842642
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.375062
CZK 21.167017
DJF 177.720385
DKK 6.48429
DOP 64.297478
DZD 130.73859
EGP 47.410897
ERN 15
ETB 153.125038
EUR 0.86864
FJD 2.280599
FKP 0.766694
GBP 0.765295
GEL 2.714999
GGP 0.766694
GHS 10.924996
GIP 0.766694
GMD 73.500254
GNF 8690.999499
GTQ 7.661048
GYD 209.152772
HKD 7.774095
HNL 26.359678
HRK 6.547599
HTG 130.911876
HUF 335.9575
IDR 16709.4
ILS 3.261085
IMP 0.766694
INR 88.5796
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.494963
ISK 127.690319
JEP 0.766694
JMD 160.956848
JOD 0.709021
JPY 153.851993
KES 129.249938
KGS 87.450058
KHR 4026.999755
KMF 428.000397
KPW 899.974506
KRW 1447.345034
KWD 0.307151
KYD 0.83313
KZT 525.140102
LAK 21712.501945
LBP 89550.000328
LKR 304.599802
LRD 182.625047
LSL 17.379511
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.455036
MAD 9.301994
MDL 17.135125
MGA 4500.000477
MKD 53.533982
MMK 2099.235133
MNT 3586.705847
MOP 8.006805
MRU 38.249656
MUR 45.999806
MVR 15.40497
MWK 1736.000135
MXN 18.590735
MYR 4.182985
MZN 63.960089
NAD 17.380183
NGN 1442.505713
NIO 36.770126
NOK 10.20405
NPR 141.949154
NZD 1.766192
OMR 0.384503
PAB 0.999687
PEN 3.376503
PGK 4.216022
PHP 58.971497
PKR 280.850034
PLN 3.697112
PYG 7077.158694
QAR 3.641027
RON 4.416302
RSD 101.82802
RUB 81.356695
RWF 1450
SAR 3.75044
SBD 8.223823
SCR 13.741692
SDG 600.496025
SEK 9.55345
SGD 1.30536
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.202463
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.509811
SRD 38.558003
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.45
SVC 8.747031
SYP 11058.728905
SZL 17.379793
THB 32.4545
TJS 9.257197
TMT 3.5
TND 2.960222
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.10654
TTD 6.775354
TWD 30.925504
TZS 2459.806991
UAH 42.064759
UGX 3491.230589
UYU 39.758439
UZS 11987.501438
VES 227.27225
VND 26322.5
VUV 121.938877
WST 2.805824
XAF 570.814334
XAG 0.020681
XAU 0.000251
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801656
XDR 0.70875
XOF 570.497705
XPF 104.149552
YER 238.497171
ZAR 17.39149
ZMK 9001.177898
ZMW 22.392878
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0600

    15.93

    +0.38%

  • RIO

    1.1700

    69.06

    +1.69%

  • NGG

    0.2300

    75.37

    +0.31%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    76

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    24.01

    +0.79%

  • CMSC

    0.2400

    23.83

    +1.01%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    15.1

    +0.99%

  • GSK

    -0.1300

    46.69

    -0.28%

  • BCE

    0.1000

    22.39

    +0.45%

  • BCC

    0.9700

    71.38

    +1.36%

  • JRI

    0.0700

    13.77

    +0.51%

  • BTI

    0.9000

    53.88

    +1.67%

  • AZN

    -0.8800

    81.15

    -1.08%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    44.58

    +0.63%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    11.27

    +0.62%

  • BP

    0.5600

    35.68

    +1.57%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM