The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 63.502642
ALL 82.257093
AMD 368.06994
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.999742
ARS 1461.519193
AUD 1.428194
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695732
BAM 1.707839
BBD 2.014862
BDT 122.896637
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37695
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.293759
BOB 6.91239
BRL 5.157899
BSD 1.000358
BTN 94.655909
BWP 13.576786
BYN 2.799012
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011981
CAD 1.41612
CDF 2265.000306
CHF 0.80895
CLF 0.023033
CLP 906.530329
CNY 6.769596
CNH 6.77754
COP 3446.13
CRC 453.811158
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.285333
CZK 21.169006
DJF 177.720283
DKK 6.53933
DOP 58.479379
DZD 133.523192
EGP 49.7701
ERN 15
ETB 161.283979
EUR 0.87491
FJD 2.24775
FKP 0.755695
GBP 0.755005
GEL 2.650427
GGP 0.755695
GHS 11.229578
GIP 0.755695
GMD 73.495715
GNF 8765.357714
GTQ 7.628428
GYD 209.275317
HKD 7.83985
HNL 26.762371
HRK 6.591987
HTG 130.677006
HUF 308.224498
IDR 17843
ILS 2.97135
IMP 0.755695
INR 94.58075
IQD 1310.524891
IRR 1374999.999926
ISK 125.989821
JEP 0.755695
JMD 158.06984
JOD 0.708999
JPY 161.517022
KES 129.439758
KGS 87.449795
KHR 4016.800706
KMF 429.499605
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1537.02501
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.833661
KZT 487.587213
LAK 22093.277098
LBP 89584.959701
LKR 334.503445
LRD 182.07459
LSL 16.436923
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.386739
MAD 9.325876
MDL 17.591841
MGA 4219.387176
MKD 53.934521
MMK 2099.917974
MNT 3579.231668
MOP 8.077961
MRU 40.000349
MUR 47.809814
MVR 15.459635
MWK 1736.000081
MXN 17.35533
MYR 4.149699
MZN 63.899865
NAD 16.436923
NGN 1366.730165
NIO 36.814852
NOK 9.695201
NPR 151.449105
NZD 1.75035
OMR 0.384503
PAB 1.000358
PEN 3.385028
PGK 4.456902
PHP 61.1365
PKR 278.233656
PLN 3.74035
PYG 6098.551332
QAR 3.646906
RON 4.582895
RSD 102.696018
RUB 74.250968
RWF 1465.171718
SAR 3.753791
SBD 8.061424
SCR 13.674406
SDG 600.500641
SEK 9.61687
SGD 1.29338
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.749989
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.695527
SRD 37.430496
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.39383
SVC 8.753133
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.433081
THB 32.939705
TJS 9.278635
TMT 3.5
TND 2.957937
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.4577
TTD 6.784027
TWD 31.642501
TZS 2628.232027
UAH 44.991835
UGX 3651.795772
UYU 40.002096
UZS 11989.276889
VES 606.63266
VND 26320
VUV 118.352303
WST 2.751796
XAF 572.793161
XAG 0.015293
XAU 0.000239
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802932
XDR 0.71169
XOF 571.999786
XPF 104.139924
YER 238.60233
ZAR 16.394101
ZMK 9001.201015
ZMW 17.731555
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.3600

    61.5

    +0.59%

  • RYCEF

    0.1900

    18.45

    +1.03%

  • CMSC

    -0.1600

    22.21

    -0.72%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.7

    +0.24%

  • BCC

    -1.3800

    73.28

    -1.88%

  • BCE

    -0.4250

    22.855

    -1.86%

  • RELX

    -0.3900

    30.79

    -1.27%

  • RIO

    -0.7600

    99.32

    -0.77%

  • NGG

    1.8000

    81.24

    +2.22%

  • GSK

    0.2750

    50.945

    +0.54%

  • VOD

    -0.1400

    14.16

    -0.99%

  • CMSD

    -0.2700

    22.02

    -1.23%

  • AZN

    1.9950

    176.925

    +1.13%

  • BTI

    0.1320

    59.042

    +0.22%

  • BP

    0.6400

    39.74

    +1.61%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM