The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 63.000213
ALL 83.045552
AMD 377.608336
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.99993
ARS 1391.475899
AUD 1.436555
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.702097
BAM 1.692703
BBD 2.017085
BDT 122.889314
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377678
BIF 2964.437482
BMD 1
BND 1.280822
BOB 6.920277
BRL 5.343438
BSD 1.001532
BTN 93.628346
BWP 13.656801
BYN 3.038457
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014228
CAD 1.37385
CDF 2274.999924
CHF 0.791335
CLF 0.023505
CLP 928.093911
CNY 6.886396
CNH 6.91253
COP 3696.54
CRC 467.791212
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.432004
CZK 21.28799
DJF 178.340531
DKK 6.48348
DOP 59.449729
DZD 132.432632
EGP 52.233671
ERN 15
ETB 157.836062
EUR 0.86771
FJD 2.227199
FKP 0.749521
GBP 0.751565
GEL 2.714963
GGP 0.749521
GHS 10.917148
GIP 0.749521
GMD 73.497588
GNF 8778.549977
GTQ 7.671603
GYD 209.529662
HKD 7.828115
HNL 26.509205
HRK 6.533006
HTG 131.388314
HUF 342.017982
IDR 16993
ILS 3.139598
IMP 0.749521
INR 93.938501
IQD 1311.97909
IRR 1315625.000003
ISK 124.779797
JEP 0.749521
JMD 157.346743
JOD 0.708989
JPY 159.455972
KES 129.598158
KGS 87.4479
KHR 4001.973291
KMF 427.000057
KPW 900.003974
KRW 1512.965024
KWD 0.30679
KYD 0.834581
KZT 481.491739
LAK 21506.092917
LBP 89692.06536
LKR 312.41778
LRD 183.27376
LSL 16.894603
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411466
MAD 9.358386
MDL 17.440975
MGA 4176.061001
MKD 53.425388
MMK 2099.452431
MNT 3566.950214
MOP 8.084003
MRU 40.089837
MUR 46.570151
MVR 15.46035
MWK 1736.722073
MXN 18.02175
MYR 3.939504
MZN 63.899678
NAD 16.894749
NGN 1362.960126
NIO 36.852081
NOK 9.669101
NPR 149.804404
NZD 1.726235
OMR 0.384479
PAB 1.001519
PEN 3.46252
PGK 4.323066
PHP 60.289868
PKR 279.628351
PLN 3.71807
PYG 6541.287659
QAR 3.662273
RON 4.422399
RSD 101.958019
RUB 82.166009
RWF 1457.231632
SAR 3.754935
SBD 8.05166
SCR 13.925407
SDG 600.999925
SEK 9.43335
SGD 1.28433
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.574953
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 572.35094
SRD 37.487497
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.204227
SVC 8.762971
SYP 110.564047
SZL 16.900787
THB 32.947502
TJS 9.619362
TMT 3.51
TND 2.95786
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.330501
TTD 6.794814
TWD 32.098502
TZS 2594.999914
UAH 43.875212
UGX 3785.603628
UYU 40.356396
UZS 12210.172836
VES 454.69063
VND 26341
VUV 119.226095
WST 2.727792
XAF 567.726608
XAG 0.015629
XAU 0.000235
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80494
XDR 0.706079
XOF 567.716781
XPF 103.216984
YER 238.601849
ZAR 17.185098
ZMK 9001.201832
ZMW 19.554625
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.2000

    22.65

    -0.88%

  • CMSD

    -0.2420

    22.658

    -1.07%

  • GSK

    -0.5300

    51.84

    -1.02%

  • RIO

    -2.5000

    83.15

    -3.01%

  • NGG

    -3.5400

    81.99

    -4.32%

  • AZN

    -5.3300

    183.6

    -2.9%

  • BP

    -1.0800

    44.78

    -2.41%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    68.3

    -2.28%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.79

    +0.23%

  • BTI

    -1.3500

    57.37

    -2.35%

  • RYCEF

    -1.2600

    15.34

    -8.21%

  • JRI

    -0.3900

    11.77

    -3.31%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.33

    -0.63%

  • RELX

    -0.4600

    33.36

    -1.38%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM