The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.672984
AFN 63.999698
ALL 80.977186
AMD 362.830125
ANG 1.790365
AOA 917.99975
ARS 1522.824962
AUD 1.439232
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700271
BAM 1.722428
BBD 2.015086
BDT 123.012972
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377003
BIF 2995
BMD 1
BND 1.277405
BOB 12.040458
BRL 5.1702
BSD 1.000454
BTN 95.892522
BWP 14.09417
BYN 3.010995
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012171
CAD 1.422375
CDF 2309.999922
CHF 0.83543
CLF 0.024662
CLP 973.780211
CNY 6.70475
CNH 6.709205
COP 3319.17
CRC 456.985341
CUC 1
CUP 24.01166
CVE 97.750209
CZK 21.552505
DJF 177.720292
DKK 6.594725
DOP 59.48895
DZD 133.867992
EGP 51.941799
ERN 15
ETB 163.421342
EUR 0.882129
FJD 2.24725
FKP 0.756991
GBP 0.75395
GEL 2.605011
GGP 0.756991
GHS 11.743978
GIP 0.756991
GMD 73.501138
GNF 8798.844552
GTQ 7.643396
GYD 209.328131
HKD 7.84715
HNL 26.859007
HRK 6.646198
HTG 130.939066
HUF 323.268496
IDR 17933
ILS 3.07365
IMP 0.756991
INR 95.98395
IQD 1310.606294
IRR 1693792.497294
ISK 120.849935
JEP 0.756991
JMD 158.336929
JOD 0.70903
JPY 157.34008
KES 129.6597
KGS 87.448702
KHR 4057.22564
KMF 434.999712
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1355.549791
KWD 0.30888
KYD 0.833726
KZT 440.074329
LAK 22455.503791
LBP 89592.031739
LKR 330.60617
LRD 171.583824
LSL 16.385613
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.399
MAD 9.713019
MDL 17.763022
MGA 4394.578552
MKD 54.223526
MMK 2099.600314
MNT 3599.1704
MOP 8.086624
MRU 40.069045
MUR 47.690165
MVR 15.449751
MWK 1734.754084
MXN 18.069545
MYR 4.080597
MZN 63.909822
NAD 16.385685
NGN 1327.250239
NIO 36.821108
NOK 9.61761
NPR 153.428035
NZD 1.77502
OMR 0.384501
PAB 1.000449
PEN 3.44424
PGK 4.528402
PHP 62.7685
PKR 277.158584
PLN 3.84925
PYG 5852.979771
QAR 3.647324
RON 4.651102
RSD 103.696974
RUB 83.375398
RWF 1477.228194
SAR 3.755513
SBD 8.032647
SCR 13.837787
SDG 601.499865
SEK 10.00663
SGD 1.277635
SHP 0.755829
SLE 24.650049
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.727998
SRD 37.621498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.576683
SVC 8.75393
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.377071
THB 33.6035
TJS 9.214436
TMT 3.51
TND 2.978697
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.015799
TTD 6.787408
TWD 31.877403
TZS 2640.002997
UAH 44.690709
UGX 3921.672237
UYU 40.308767
UZS 11835.41907
VES 857.98905
VND 25962
VUV 119.008285
WST 2.76852
XAF 578.638992
XAG 0.016618
XAU 0.000240947889
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803098
XDR 0.707052
XOF 578.638992
XPF 105.029547
YER 236.39594
ZAR 16.42399
ZMK 9001.19938
ZMW 19.559579
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.591899
MXV 2.045433
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM