The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 68.773892
ALL 85.1919
AMD 383.844121
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000464
ARS 1319.936745
AUD 1.551747
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.702909
BAM 1.708921
BBD 2.018218
BDT 122.195767
BGN 1.709301
BHD 0.377034
BIF 2979.706852
BMD 1
BND 1.297101
BOB 6.907097
BRL 5.583097
BSD 0.999672
BTN 87.54407
BWP 13.649927
BYN 3.271194
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00782
CAD 1.383805
CDF 2889.999756
CHF 0.812105
CLF 0.02487
CLP 975.649832
CNY 7.1769
CNH 7.20375
COP 4180.25
CRC 505.122436
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.345486
CZK 21.465015
DJF 178.003014
DKK 6.52004
DOP 60.892549
DZD 130.832878
EGP 48.650799
ERN 15
ETB 138.526224
EUR 0.873705
FJD 2.26815
FKP 0.753407
GBP 0.75573
GEL 2.649932
GGP 0.753407
GHS 10.495642
GIP 0.753407
GMD 71.999594
GNF 8671.224797
GTQ 7.676882
GYD 209.126455
HKD 7.85002
HNL 26.261823
HRK 6.582797
HTG 131.169313
HUF 349.488983
IDR 16497
ILS 3.38599
IMP 0.753407
INR 87.607651
IQD 1309.42135
IRR 42112.531123
ISK 124.210267
JEP 0.753407
JMD 159.943729
JOD 0.708974
JPY 149.852501
KES 128.939595
KGS 87.450423
KHR 4004.456192
KMF 431.496346
KPW 899.943686
KRW 1394.6201
KWD 0.30597
KYD 0.832958
KZT 539.837043
LAK 21585.443107
LBP 89567.793093
LKR 302.068634
LRD 200.415037
LSL 18.132856
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.461019
MAD 9.136766
MDL 17.212259
MGA 4526.09275
MKD 53.788855
MMK 2099.176207
MNT 3589.345014
MOP 8.082308
MRU 39.91175
MUR 46.750419
MVR 15.396166
MWK 1733.28382
MXN 18.82255
MYR 4.265023
MZN 63.960351
NAD 18.132856
NGN 1532.679903
NIO 36.785747
NOK 10.287025
NPR 140.070338
NZD 1.692778
OMR 0.384495
PAB 0.999585
PEN 3.56705
PGK 4.146006
PHP 58.340994
PKR 283.754123
PLN 3.732297
PYG 7486.402062
QAR 3.644585
RON 4.4335
RSD 102.334058
RUB 80.125349
RWF 1445.378886
SAR 3.751071
SBD 8.244163
SCR 14.684374
SDG 600.528417
SEK 9.747285
SGD 1.296765
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.000101
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 571.266301
SRD 36.670248
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.407195
SVC 8.746368
SYP 13001.531245
SZL 18.127963
THB 32.6645
TJS 9.425981
TMT 3.51
TND 2.967063
TOP 2.342103
TRY 40.59448
TTD 6.786518
TWD 29.926504
TZS 2572.506573
UAH 41.696586
UGX 3583.302388
UYU 40.0886
UZS 12586.557155
VES 123.721575
VND 26199
VUV 119.302744
WST 2.758516
XAF 573.151008
XAG 0.027349
XAU 0.000303
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80154
XDR 0.69341
XOF 573.151008
XPF 104.204985
YER 240.649974
ZAR 18.11785
ZMK 9001.199399
ZMW 22.965115
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.3900

    74.42

    +0.52%

  • BCC

    -1.2500

    84.89

    -1.47%

  • BTI

    0.3900

    53.16

    +0.73%

  • GSK

    1.3000

    38.97

    +3.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    22.6

    -0.04%

  • AZN

    2.6100

    76.59

    +3.41%

  • RIO

    -2.7800

    59.49

    -4.67%

  • SCS

    -0.1800

    10.33

    -1.74%

  • RELX

    -0.1400

    51.78

    -0.27%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • NGG

    -0.3300

    70.19

    -0.47%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    13.11

    +0.38%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4000

    13.1

    -3.05%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    11.06

    -0.45%

  • BP

    -0.7100

    32.25

    -2.2%

  • BCE

    -0.1300

    23.53

    -0.55%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    23.06

    -0.26%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM