The China Mail - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 64.501308
ALL 81.091764
AMD 369.248031
ANG 1.789884
AOA 917.999814
ARS 1395.523747
AUD 1.382485
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698555
BAM 1.662466
BBD 2.013854
BDT 122.689218
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.377545
BIF 2976.339735
BMD 1
BND 1.267973
BOB 6.9098
BRL 4.914103
BSD 0.999873
BTN 94.420977
BWP 13.425192
BYN 2.825886
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010964
CAD 1.36575
CDF 2316.000248
CHF 0.778435
CLF 0.022607
CLP 889.770183
CNY 6.80505
CNH 6.80103
COP 3738.9
CRC 459.648974
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.718924
CZK 20.662698
DJF 178.070373
DKK 6.35355
DOP 59.467293
DZD 132.269335
EGP 52.717905
ERN 15
ETB 156.137601
EUR 0.85023
FJD 2.184898
FKP 0.734821
GBP 0.734715
GEL 2.679792
GGP 0.734821
GHS 11.264445
GIP 0.734821
GMD 72.999787
GNF 8773.107815
GTQ 7.634866
GYD 209.223551
HKD 7.82816
HNL 26.583478
HRK 6.404025
HTG 130.919848
HUF 302.820499
IDR 17368.9
ILS 2.90496
IMP 0.734821
INR 94.478103
IQD 1309.963492
IRR 1312900.000029
ISK 122.270146
JEP 0.734821
JMD 157.601928
JOD 0.708974
JPY 156.754504
KES 129.130063
KGS 87.420497
KHR 4012.087263
KMF 419.000313
KPW 899.950939
KRW 1466.68497
KWD 0.30763
KYD 0.833358
KZT 462.122307
LAK 21929.626969
LBP 89547.492658
LKR 321.915771
LRD 183.493491
LSL 16.405102
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.322723
MAD 9.144703
MDL 17.099822
MGA 4176.618078
MKD 52.401617
MMK 2099.606786
MNT 3578.902576
MOP 8.06268
MRU 39.968719
MUR 46.820195
MVR 15.454972
MWK 1733.612706
MXN 17.23635
MYR 3.920978
MZN 63.900189
NAD 16.405102
NGN 1359.689667
NIO 36.794016
NOK 9.20175
NPR 151.087386
NZD 1.67806
OMR 0.384529
PAB 0.999962
PEN 3.457057
PGK 4.415452
PHP 60.485968
PKR 278.66746
PLN 3.598017
PYG 6107.687731
QAR 3.654753
RON 4.440951
RSD 99.791978
RUB 74.148427
RWF 1465.941884
SAR 3.780624
SBD 8.032258
SCR 14.326153
SDG 600.498337
SEK 9.218875
SGD 1.267885
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.600677
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 571.467429
SRD 37.43097
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.823594
SVC 8.749309
SYP 110.543945
SZL 16.394307
THB 32.224021
TJS 9.329718
TMT 3.51
TND 2.904513
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.36475
TTD 6.776593
TWD 31.394497
TZS 2604.644023
UAH 43.92104
UGX 3746.547108
UYU 39.879308
UZS 12128.681314
VES 496.20906
VND 26308
VUV 118.026144
WST 2.704092
XAF 557.575577
XAG 0.012389
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802048
XDR 0.695511
XOF 557.525817
XPF 101.364158
YER 238.601522
ZAR 16.42005
ZMK 9001.201083
ZMW 19.037864
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    63.18

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    22.97

    -0.17%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    17.45

    -0.29%

  • BCC

    -1.4800

    72.76

    -2.03%

  • RIO

    -2.4000

    103.11

    -2.33%

  • NGG

    -1.9400

    85.91

    -2.26%

  • GSK

    -0.0300

    50.5

    -0.06%

  • BTI

    -1.4800

    58.08

    -2.55%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    24.57

    +1.38%

  • BP

    -0.8200

    43.81

    -1.87%

  • RELX

    -1.5900

    34.16

    -4.65%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    23.42

    0%

  • VOD

    -0.4400

    15.69

    -2.8%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.15

    -0.15%

  • AZN

    -2.4000

    182.52

    -1.31%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

H.Ng--ThChM