The China Mail - Nations warn of deadlock at landmark plastic pollution talks

USD -
AED 3.672535
AFN 70.497632
ALL 85.297857
AMD 383.759759
ANG 1.789623
AOA 917.000241
ARS 1182.244905
AUD 1.531253
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.699831
BAM 1.688822
BBD 2.018142
BDT 122.249135
BGN 1.691255
BHD 0.377078
BIF 2942
BMD 1
BND 1.27971
BOB 6.921831
BRL 5.492802
BSD 0.999486
BTN 85.958163
BWP 13.345422
BYN 3.271062
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007728
CAD 1.357815
CDF 2877.000014
CHF 0.813696
CLF 0.024399
CLP 936.298835
CNY 7.17975
CNH 7.181295
COP 4100.5
CRC 503.844676
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.624998
CZK 21.458964
DJF 177.719494
DKK 6.45345
DOP 59.249829
DZD 130.201989
EGP 50.217601
ERN 15
ETB 134.296802
EUR 0.86526
FJD 2.24075
FKP 0.735417
GBP 0.73716
GEL 2.72501
GGP 0.735417
GHS 10.274996
GIP 0.735417
GMD 71.501
GNF 8655.999827
GTQ 7.681581
GYD 209.114263
HKD 7.84964
HNL 26.149742
HRK 6.519499
HTG 130.801014
HUF 347.946502
IDR 16271.2
ILS 3.50085
IMP 0.735417
INR 86.086503
IQD 1310
IRR 42109.999907
ISK 124.239985
JEP 0.735417
JMD 159.534737
JOD 0.709017
JPY 144.787051
KES 129.19855
KGS 87.450009
KHR 4019.999763
KMF 425.499483
KPW 900.005137
KRW 1362.389917
KWD 0.30603
KYD 0.832934
KZT 512.565895
LAK 21677.502829
LBP 89600.000374
LKR 300.951131
LRD 199.650259
LSL 17.820162
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.425002
MAD 9.122495
MDL 17.092157
MGA 4434.999787
MKD 53.255616
MMK 2098.952839
MNT 3582.467491
MOP 8.081774
MRU 39.669888
MUR 45.398309
MVR 15.405013
MWK 1736.000133
MXN 18.936903
MYR 4.241503
MZN 63.949763
NAD 17.819783
NGN 1543.549863
NIO 36.304652
NOK 9.909735
NPR 137.533407
NZD 1.649501
OMR 0.384495
PAB 0.999503
PEN 3.602499
PGK 4.1219
PHP 56.652498
PKR 283.102594
PLN 3.69776
PYG 7973.439139
QAR 3.640499
RON 4.3456
RSD 101.434165
RUB 78.500361
RWF 1425
SAR 3.751806
SBD 8.347391
SCR 14.673619
SDG 600.498295
SEK 9.486805
SGD 1.281225
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.224972
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.497429
SRD 38.740987
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745774
SYP 13001.896779
SZL 17.819934
THB 32.501154
TJS 10.125468
TMT 3.5
TND 2.922499
TOP 2.3421
TRY 39.379199
TTD 6.785398
TWD 29.451503
TZS 2589.181949
UAH 41.557366
UGX 3603.362447
UYU 40.870605
UZS 12730.000048
VES 102.167008
VND 26060
VUV 119.91429
WST 2.751779
XAF 566.420137
XAG 0.02744
XAU 0.000295
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.70726
XOF 564.999778
XPF 103.593826
YER 242.949872
ZAR 17.827017
ZMK 9001.202368
ZMW 24.238499
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

Nations warn of deadlock at landmark plastic pollution talks
Nations warn of deadlock at landmark plastic pollution talks / Photo: © AFP

Nations warn of deadlock at landmark plastic pollution talks

Diplomats warned Saturday that a majority of countries could walk away from talks on the world's first plastic pollution agreement if a handful of delegations continue resisting calls to compromise.

Text size:

Nearly 200 countries are in South Korea's Busan for negotiations on a deal to curb plastic pollution.

But efforts to reach the landmark agreement are locked over several key sticking points, particularly reducing production and phasing out chemicals believed or known to harm human health.

Over 100 countries back those measures, and insist a treaty without them will fail to solve the pollution crisis.

But around a dozen nations -- mostly producers of plastic precursors derived from fossil fuels -- are strongly opposed.

As a result, just a day before talks are supposed to end, the draft text remains full of opposing views and contradictory language.

And frustration is growing.

"The overwhelming majority of delegates here demand an ambitious treaty," said Panama's delegation head Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez.

"If the reduction of production is not there, there is no treaty."

"We cannot let a few loud voices derail the process," he added.

- 'Ready to walk away' -

A diplomat from the High Ambition Coalition, which groups dozens of countries seeking a strong deal, echoed that sentiment.

"We are a large group uniting around key effective elements, and getting ready to walk away," he told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss closed-door deliberations.

He warned that "some countries" were actively considering calling a vote, which would circumvent the UN's traditional approach of agreement by consensus and could "raise a lot of eyebrows."

It was a possibility being increasingly discussed as a "last resort," said the Democratic Republic of Congo's J.M. Bope Bope Lapwong.

"I think that if we can't reach an agreement, we'll be obliged to go to a vote. We cannot come all this way, all these kilometres, to fail," he told AFP.

"True, it's not the usual way at UN meetings, and we will do it to our shame -- because when you negotiate, you don't expect to win it all."

More than 90 percent of plastic is not recycled, while plastic production is expected to triple by 2060.

Environmental groups have pushed ambitious countries to move to a vote if progress stalls, arguing that countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia have not offered any compromises during talks.

Neither delegation responded to repeated requests by AFP for comment.

"A handful of governments... are looking backwards and refusing to take the steps necessary for us all to advance," said Greenpeace's Graham Forbes.

"I think we are at a very risky moment right now of being sold out, and that would be an absolute catastrophe."

But observers warned that calling a vote would be a risky strategy that could alienate even some countries in favour of a strong treaty.

Another option would be for the diplomat chairing the talks to simply gavel through an agreement over the objections of a handful of holdouts, they said.

But that too holds risks, potentially embittering the remaining diplomatic process and jeopardising adoption of a treaty down the road.

"We don't want to move outside the framework of the United Nations," said an official from the French environment ministry.

"We hope we will find agreement between now and tomorrow and that's the option that we're focused on," he added.

"A lot can happen in 24 hours."

G.Fung--ThChM