The China Mail - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 65.504736
ALL 82.012423
AMD 377.773158
ANG 1.79008
AOA 917.000047
ARS 1442.262801
AUD 1.431516
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698448
BAM 1.659595
BBD 2.015639
BDT 122.394949
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376973
BIF 2965.596535
BMD 1
BND 1.27457
BOB 6.91481
BRL 5.303402
BSD 1.000776
BTN 90.44239
BWP 13.24927
BYN 2.866659
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012669
CAD 1.36738
CDF 2229.99993
CHF 0.777898
CLF 0.021857
CLP 863.079882
CNY 6.93805
CNH 6.936665
COP 3704.17
CRC 496.14758
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.565043
CZK 20.54795
DJF 178.211857
DKK 6.332197
DOP 63.157627
DZD 129.926302
EGP 46.854801
ERN 15
ETB 155.932472
EUR 0.848035
FJD 2.209501
FKP 0.738005
GBP 0.73584
GEL 2.695038
GGP 0.738005
GHS 10.987836
GIP 0.738005
GMD 73.000256
GNF 8783.310776
GTQ 7.675957
GYD 209.370505
HKD 7.813225
HNL 26.434899
HRK 6.390402
HTG 131.283861
HUF 320.478501
IDR 16876.7
ILS 3.129102
IMP 0.738005
INR 90.66105
IQD 1311.010794
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.959832
JEP 0.738005
JMD 156.523658
JOD 0.709008
JPY 157.044949
KES 129.000287
KGS 87.449435
KHR 4038.98126
KMF 418.999668
KPW 900.002243
KRW 1467.470252
KWD 0.307361
KYD 0.833956
KZT 493.576471
LAK 21509.911072
LBP 89638.030929
LKR 309.69554
LRD 186.137286
LSL 16.167606
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.339495
MAD 9.185352
MDL 17.007501
MGA 4427.737424
MKD 52.293597
MMK 2100.00747
MNT 3580.70414
MOP 8.05317
MRU 39.920067
MUR 46.059462
MVR 15.45012
MWK 1735.286131
MXN 17.347575
MYR 3.947502
MZN 63.749726
NAD 16.167606
NGN 1368.195506
NIO 36.826006
NOK 9.71805
NPR 144.708438
NZD 1.668345
OMR 0.384495
PAB 1.000776
PEN 3.36398
PGK 4.350519
PHP 58.562992
PKR 280.209677
PLN 3.57626
PYG 6608.484622
QAR 3.647395
RON 4.318502
RSD 99.548986
RUB 76.997104
RWF 1460.610278
SAR 3.750238
SBD 8.058149
SCR 13.889902
SDG 601.498432
SEK 9.04498
SGD 1.273275
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.45004
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 570.904894
SRD 37.869637
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.789492
SVC 8.756194
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.159799
THB 31.611501
TJS 9.366941
TMT 3.505
TND 2.899825
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.615017
TTD 6.776526
TWD 31.678202
TZS 2585.000013
UAH 43.184356
UGX 3572.383187
UYU 38.617377
UZS 12275.134071
VES 377.985125
VND 25950
VUV 119.988021
WST 2.726314
XAF 556.612755
XAG 0.013379
XAU 0.000204
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803594
XDR 0.692248
XOF 556.610394
XPF 101.198154
YER 238.400271
ZAR 16.12955
ZMK 9001.195865
ZMW 18.589121
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    23.55

    +0.13%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    23.89

    +0.08%

  • BCE

    -0.7700

    25.57

    -3.01%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • GSK

    1.9400

    59.17

    +3.28%

  • NGG

    -0.9000

    86.89

    -1.04%

  • BCC

    -1.0700

    89.16

    -1.2%

  • RIO

    -5.3600

    91.12

    -5.88%

  • BTI

    0.3300

    61.96

    +0.53%

  • BP

    -1.0300

    38.17

    -2.7%

  • AZN

    -0.2900

    187.16

    -0.15%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2000

    16.42

    -1.22%

  • RELX

    0.3100

    30.09

    +1.03%

  • VOD

    -1.0900

    14.62

    -7.46%

  • JRI

    -0.1500

    13

    -1.15%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

L.Johnson--ThChM