The China Mail - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 82.324126
AMD 360.540403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1546.131265
AUD 1.468645
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.769883
BBD 2.014669
BDT 124.715381
BGN 1.77347
BHD 0.378283
BIF 3011.021908
BMD 1
BND 1.291151
BOB 11.678099
BRL 5.666304
BSD 1.000231
BTN 94.44641
BWP 14.015512
BYN 3.004037
BYR 19600
BZD 2.016692
CAD 1.42705
CDF 2315.000362
CHF 0.837483
CLF 0.025469
CLP 1002.376741
CNY 6.67175
CNH 6.676604
COP 3319.97
CRC 449.312832
CUC 1
CUP 24.064952
CVE 100.150394
CZK 22.139304
DJF 178.554905
DKK 6.782304
DOP 60.996961
DZD 137.215041
EGP 53.502064
ERN 15
ETB 164.576405
EUR 0.90715
FJD 2.27435
FKP 0.756884
GBP 0.755715
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.756884
GHS 11.72504
GIP 0.756884
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8883.748356
GTQ 7.646644
GYD 209.264655
HKD 7.845704
HNL 26.963306
HRK 6.831965
HTG 131.491813
HUF 331.003504
IDR 18235.4
ILS 3.216704
IMP 0.756884
INR 94.245504
IQD 1520.116116
IRR 1913737.503816
ISK 123.930386
JEP 0.756884
JMD 158.434254
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.73504
KES 130.050385
KGS 87.435504
KHR 4080.00035
KMF 447.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1335.320383
KWD 0.31147
KYD 0.835579
KZT 446.945163
LAK 22570.87132
LBP 89792.715562
LKR 333.505692
LRD 170.463102
LSL 16.951422
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.463464
MAD 9.936862
MDL 18.213816
MGA 4555.721867
MKD 55.830725
MMK 2099.848767
MNT 3604.365716
MOP 8.103688
MRU 40.552456
MUR 47.620378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1738.739965
MXN 18.536504
MYR 4.086104
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.951422
NGN 1343.570377
NIO 36.90298
NOK 9.57248
NPR 151.114437
NZD 1.809464
OMR 0.385095
PAB 1.000231
PEN 3.411802
PGK 4.575679
PHP 63.960375
PKR 277.274459
PLN 3.996535
PYG 6207.891986
QAR 3.64425
RON 4.851904
RSD 106.559038
RUB 82.829047
RWF 1483.467138
SAR 3.82571
SBD 8.097697
SCR 13.874904
SDG 601.503676
SEK 10.075038
SGD 1.287304
SHP 0.752984
SLE 23.050371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 573.048487
SRD 37.49037
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.225246
SVC 8.773983
SYP 13002.000337
SZL 16.946523
THB 33.875038
TJS 9.249966
TMT 3.5
TND 3.008504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.333804
TTD 6.806368
TWD 32.891404
TZS 2655.145825
UAH 45.588969
UGX 4131.053487
UYU 40.541335
UZS 12057.876355
VES 912.87925
VND 25725.5
VUV 120.638016
WST 2.81058
XAF 595.051667
XAG 0.020459
XAU 0.00025782798
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.807139
XDR 0.707052
XOF 595.051667
XPF 108.325037
YER 236.550363
ZAR 16.976255
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.500748
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5946.454122
MXV 2.081672
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

L.Johnson--ThChM