The China Mail - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.672503
AFN 63.999633
ALL 81.13116
AMD 364.066319
ANG 1.790365
AOA 917.999554
ARS 1524.997501
AUD 1.439429
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.699887
BAM 1.725719
BBD 2.018882
BDT 123.247965
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377906
BIF 3005.722202
BMD 1
BND 1.279885
BOB 12.063778
BRL 5.184055
BSD 1.002338
BTN 96.076978
BWP 14.120969
BYN 3.01672
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01597
CAD 1.42459
CDF 2310.000003
CHF 0.836205
CLF 0.024656
CLP 973.539878
CNY 6.70475
CNH 6.71436
COP 3314.79
CRC 457.846208
CUC 1
CUP 24.056893
CVE 97.29465
CZK 21.580966
DJF 178.497375
DKK 6.601103
DOP 59.602065
DZD 133.919964
EGP 51.941199
ERN 15
ETB 163.729916
EUR 0.88295
FJD 2.24875
FKP 0.756991
GBP 0.75445
GEL 2.60498
GGP 0.756991
GHS 11.732889
GIP 0.756991
GMD 74.000372
GNF 8750.000468
GTQ 7.658099
GYD 209.730789
HKD 7.84665
HNL 26.909604
HRK 6.6528
HTG 131.186306
HUF 323.419643
IDR 17937
ILS 3.07365
IMP 0.756991
INR 95.96915
IQD 1313.138889
IRR 1693792.502544
ISK 120.969796
JEP 0.756991
JMD 158.635902
JOD 0.708994
JPY 158.143502
KES 129.719972
KGS 87.4487
KHR 4065.101628
KMF 435.000056
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1360.175049
KWD 0.30903
KYD 0.835337
KZT 440.918897
LAK 22497.408184
LBP 89762.385847
LKR 331.231884
LRD 171.912363
LSL 16.416191
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411082
MAD 9.723465
MDL 17.796797
MGA 4402.876428
MKD 54.331282
MMK 2099.600314
MNT 3599.1704
MOP 8.102072
MRU 40.144704
MUR 47.75987
MVR 15.449965
MWK 1738.121498
MXN 18.08776
MYR 4.086498
MZN 63.909596
NAD 16.41706
NGN 1326.860227
NIO 36.892099
NOK 9.633325
NPR 153.717739
NZD 1.77802
OMR 0.384505
PAB 1.002374
PEN 3.450819
PGK 4.536992
PHP 62.741981
PKR 277.681916
PLN 3.85205
PYG 5864.031411
QAR 3.65434
RON 4.657014
RSD 103.796978
RUB 83.375041
RWF 1480.037058
SAR 3.759293
SBD 8.032647
SCR 13.836223
SDG 601.505977
SEK 10.01845
SGD 1.27922
SHP 0.755829
SLE 24.649875
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 572.815106
SRD 37.621502
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.617329
SVC 8.77073
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.407994
THB 33.620498
TJS 9.232161
TMT 3.51
TND 2.97262
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.032203
TTD 6.800164
TWD 31.937496
TZS 2640.002984
UAH 44.775489
UGX 3929.198542
UYU 40.386126
UZS 11858.028368
VES 857.98905
VND 25966
VUV 119.008285
WST 2.76852
XAF 579.17706
XAG 0.016353
XAU 0.000240041575
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.806559
XDR 0.707052
XOF 579.17706
XPF 105.230186
YER 236.396786
ZAR 16.44243
ZMK 9001.20083
ZMW 19.596771
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.591896
MXV 2.047495
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

L.Johnson--ThChM