The China Mail - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.673013
AFN 67.701997
ALL 84.120616
AMD 376.86036
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000149
ARS 1351.296604
AUD 1.54457
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.698788
BAM 1.687416
BBD 1.988007
BDT 120.374445
BGN 1.687416
BHD 0.374445
BIF 2935.507528
BMD 1
BND 1.278461
BOB 6.803848
BRL 5.538499
BSD 0.984686
BTN 86.116216
BWP 13.508477
BYN 3.222208
BYR 19600
BZD 1.977827
CAD 1.377865
CDF 2890.000056
CHF 0.804605
CLF 0.024446
CLP 958.992278
CNY 7.211797
CNH 7.18591
COP 4124.17
CRC 497.476382
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.133946
CZK 21.2141
DJF 175.333247
DKK 6.44252
DOP 59.842112
DZD 130.120357
EGP 48.371487
ERN 15
ETB 135.820974
EUR 0.86337
FJD 2.2615
FKP 0.753274
GBP 0.75295
GEL 2.699662
GGP 0.753274
GHS 10.338639
GIP 0.753274
GMD 72.502932
GNF 8539.752383
GTQ 7.557051
GYD 205.99629
HKD 7.849725
HNL 25.874639
HRK 6.502502
HTG 128.898667
HUF 343.3797
IDR 16490
ILS 3.41787
IMP 0.753274
INR 87.245498
IQD 1289.849446
IRR 42112.497456
ISK 123.029776
JEP 0.753274
JMD 157.939692
JOD 0.708967
JPY 147.320055
KES 127.21011
KGS 87.449875
KHR 3945.472585
KMF 427.505074
KPW 899.999999
KRW 1389.47041
KWD 0.30527
KYD 0.8205
KZT 534.360036
LAK 21292.437772
LBP 88226.909969
LKR 296.665373
LRD 197.411673
LSL 18.03615
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.379406
MAD 9.016608
MDL 16.955265
MGA 4469.177344
MKD 53.112463
MMK 2099.252476
MNT 3592.88442
MOP 7.960657
MRU 39.275269
MUR 46.75011
MVR 15.400748
MWK 1707.346534
MXN 18.86903
MYR 4.244973
MZN 63.960123
NAD 18.03615
NGN 1509.02995
NIO 36.236573
NOK 10.254665
NPR 137.786118
NZD 1.691132
OMR 0.381882
PAB 0.984599
PEN 3.537207
PGK 4.147362
PHP 57.719922
PKR 279.383202
PLN 3.683748
PYG 7375.005392
QAR 3.580087
RON 4.378697
RSD 101.065528
RUB 79.134269
RWF 1422.285492
SAR 3.751201
SBD 8.264604
SCR 14.458134
SDG 600.501945
SEK 9.651605
SGD 1.288255
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.99965
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 562.702213
SRD 36.840283
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.138001
SVC 8.615677
SYP 13001.78415
SZL 18.031146
THB 32.467499
TJS 9.289763
TMT 3.51
TND 2.92895
TOP 2.342102
TRY 40.68151
TTD 6.673569
TWD 29.829872
TZS 2520.545956
UAH 41.159484
UGX 3529.614771
UYU 39.558259
UZS 12497.303826
VES 123.49336
VND 26220
VUV 120.586812
WST 2.775482
XAF 565.943661
XAG 0.027038
XAU 0.000298
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.774557
XDR 0.703852
XOF 565.943661
XPF 102.894612
YER 240.589851
ZAR 18.02738
ZMK 9001.199493
ZMW 22.522756
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0800

    23.35

    +0.34%

  • NGG

    1.4300

    71.82

    +1.99%

  • SCS

    -0.1500

    10.18

    -1.47%

  • GSK

    0.4100

    37.56

    +1.09%

  • BTI

    0.6700

    54.35

    +1.23%

  • CMSC

    0.0200

    22.87

    +0.09%

  • RIO

    -0.1200

    59.65

    -0.2%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    74.94

    0%

  • AZN

    0.8600

    73.95

    +1.16%

  • BCC

    -0.4600

    83.35

    -0.55%

  • BP

    -0.4000

    31.75

    -1.26%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.1

    -0.23%

  • RELX

    -0.3000

    51.59

    -0.58%

  • VOD

    0.1500

    10.96

    +1.37%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    14.19

    +0.07%

  • BCE

    0.2400

    23.57

    +1.02%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

L.Johnson--ThChM