The China Mail - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 66.402915
ALL 83.761965
AMD 382.480202
ANG 1.789982
AOA 917.000194
ARS 1450.756293
AUD 1.542091
AWG 1.805
AZN 1.698291
BAM 1.695014
BBD 2.010894
BDT 121.852399
BGN 1.694035
BHD 0.376991
BIF 2945.49189
BMD 1
BND 1.302665
BOB 6.907594
BRL 5.348601
BSD 0.998384
BTN 88.558647
BWP 13.433114
BYN 3.402651
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007947
CAD 1.41098
CDF 2149.999774
CHF 0.806025
CLF 0.024037
CLP 942.980351
CNY 7.11935
CNH 7.12292
COP 3784.2
CRC 501.791804
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.850381
CZK 21.047298
DJF 177.785096
DKK 6.460045
DOP 64.236284
DZD 130.521976
EGP 47.344197
ERN 15
ETB 153.291763
EUR 0.86522
FJD 2.285805
FKP 0.763092
GBP 0.76205
GEL 2.705016
GGP 0.763092
GHS 10.945019
GIP 0.763092
GMD 72.999686
GNF 8666.525113
GTQ 7.6608
GYD 209.15339
HKD 7.77677
HNL 26.251771
HRK 6.517801
HTG 130.6554
HUF 333.370986
IDR 16699.6
ILS 3.258255
IMP 0.763092
INR 88.669199
IQD 1310
IRR 42099.999596
ISK 126.319638
JEP 0.763092
JMD 160.148718
JOD 0.708991
JPY 153.142022
KES 129.150287
KGS 87.450086
KHR 4025.000091
KMF 420.99978
KPW 899.97951
KRW 1459.149494
KWD 0.30692
KYD 0.832073
KZT 525.442751
LAK 21695.000246
LBP 89549.999977
LKR 304.463694
LRD 183.250131
LSL 17.410437
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.468973
MAD 9.334026
MDL 17.092121
MGA 4502.259796
MKD 53.325591
MMK 2099.259581
MNT 3583.067197
MOP 7.994609
MRU 39.945401
MUR 45.910118
MVR 15.404988
MWK 1731.225057
MXN 18.53935
MYR 4.176005
MZN 63.950068
NAD 17.410383
NGN 1438.309535
NIO 36.7374
NOK 10.20085
NPR 141.508755
NZD 1.778995
OMR 0.38451
PAB 0.999779
PEN 3.378751
PGK 4.273464
PHP 59.114983
PKR 280.850188
PLN 3.67534
PYG 7072.751145
QAR 3.640502
RON 4.399603
RSD 101.419625
RUB 81.120752
RWF 1450
SAR 3.75066
SBD 8.230592
SCR 13.722063
SDG 600.498004
SEK 9.56025
SGD 1.302105
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.203347
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 570.604013
SRD 38.503503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.232987
SVC 8.735857
SYP 11055.784093
SZL 17.336517
THB 32.339002
TJS 9.227278
TMT 3.51
TND 2.950503
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.20938
TTD 6.76509
TWD 30.983801
TZS 2455.000192
UAH 42.011587
UGX 3491.096532
UYU 39.813947
UZS 11951.241707
VES 228.193989
VND 26310
VUV 122.098254
WST 2.816104
XAF 568.486781
XAG 0.020497
XAU 0.00025
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799344
XDR 0.707015
XOF 568.486781
XPF 103.887821
YER 238.501579
ZAR 17.32807
ZMK 9001.204398
ZMW 22.588431
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    76

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    23.7

    -0.34%

  • NGG

    0.8750

    77.165

    +1.13%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    14.81

    -1.28%

  • SCS

    0.0300

    15.79

    +0.19%

  • BTI

    0.2570

    54.467

    +0.47%

  • RIO

    -0.6650

    68.605

    -0.97%

  • RELX

    -1.1700

    42.22

    -2.77%

  • GSK

    -0.5150

    46.585

    -1.11%

  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    23.9

    -0.46%

  • JRI

    -0.0590

    13.691

    -0.43%

  • BCC

    0.0400

    70.77

    +0.06%

  • BCE

    -0.0470

    23.123

    -0.2%

  • VOD

    0.2600

    11.6

    +2.24%

  • BP

    0.4600

    36.28

    +1.27%

  • AZN

    1.0450

    84.815

    +1.23%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

L.Johnson--ThChM