The China Mail - TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case

USD -
AED 3.672503
AFN 64.497874
ALL 81.380528
AMD 369.184597
ANG 1.789884
AOA 918.000281
ARS 1395.488197
AUD 1.381788
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.703045
BAM 1.667512
BBD 2.020641
BDT 123.098172
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.378875
BIF 2985.894118
BMD 1
BND 1.270084
BOB 6.932419
BRL 4.925799
BSD 1.003253
BTN 94.565375
BWP 13.432689
BYN 2.835207
BYR 19600
BZD 2.017742
CAD 1.364775
CDF 2316.000054
CHF 0.777795
CLF 0.022638
CLP 890.969785
CNY 6.80505
CNH 6.800405
COP 3738.9
CRC 460.209132
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.012576
CZK 20.648299
DJF 178.651968
DKK 6.3499
DOP 59.661791
DZD 132.259755
EGP 52.725899
ERN 15
ETB 156.643406
EUR 0.84978
FJD 2.18395
FKP 0.734821
GBP 0.734295
GEL 2.679834
GGP 0.734821
GHS 11.286699
GIP 0.734821
GMD 72.999831
GNF 8804.55958
GTQ 7.660794
GYD 209.901226
HKD 7.83002
HNL 26.670759
HRK 6.405899
HTG 131.399121
HUF 301.720968
IDR 17354.2
ILS 2.905215
IMP 0.734821
INR 94.417203
IQD 1314.280599
IRR 1312899.999963
ISK 122.193911
JEP 0.734821
JMD 158.020607
JOD 0.708961
JPY 156.666043
KES 129.150164
KGS 87.420494
KHR 4024.093407
KMF 418.999917
KPW 899.950939
KRW 1466.210049
KWD 0.307599
KYD 0.836058
KZT 464.61503
LAK 22016.463537
LBP 89533.723815
LKR 323.055346
LRD 184.10709
LSL 16.368643
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.345837
MAD 9.195197
MDL 17.26071
MGA 4165.565455
MKD 52.36663
MMK 2099.606786
MNT 3578.902576
MOP 8.092183
MRU 40.138456
MUR 46.81999
MVR 15.454979
MWK 1739.54559
MXN 17.230296
MYR 3.918397
MZN 63.892811
NAD 16.368783
NGN 1361.259834
NIO 36.917043
NOK 9.23621
NPR 151.292686
NZD 1.67593
OMR 0.384501
PAB 1.003253
PEN 3.475021
PGK 4.365952
PHP 60.517979
PKR 279.534225
PLN 3.593095
PYG 6140.362095
QAR 3.656974
RON 4.452016
RSD 99.746014
RUB 74.299966
RWF 1470.817685
SAR 3.780174
SBD 8.032258
SCR 13.772608
SDG 600.55751
SEK 9.21375
SGD 1.26732
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.597771
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 573.372496
SRD 37.431021
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.887684
SVC 8.778354
SYP 110.543945
SZL 16.363923
THB 32.185992
TJS 9.375794
TMT 3.51
TND 2.910164
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.364802
TTD 6.786684
TWD 31.356503
TZS 2604.644023
UAH 43.928641
UGX 3752.28603
UYU 40.11647
UZS 12157.202113
VES 496.20906
VND 26309.5
VUV 118.026144
WST 2.704092
XAF 559.236967
XAG 0.012456
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.808106
XDR 0.695511
XOF 559.267959
XPF 101.680898
YER 238.601874
ZAR 16.395013
ZMK 9001.20103
ZMW 19.111685
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    63.18

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    22.97

    -0.17%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    17.45

    -0.29%

  • GSK

    -0.0300

    50.5

    -0.06%

  • NGG

    -1.9400

    85.91

    -2.26%

  • BTI

    -1.4800

    58.08

    -2.55%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    24.57

    +1.38%

  • RIO

    -2.4000

    103.11

    -2.33%

  • VOD

    -0.4400

    15.69

    -2.8%

  • BP

    -0.8200

    43.81

    -1.87%

  • RELX

    -1.5900

    34.16

    -4.65%

  • BCC

    -1.4800

    72.76

    -2.03%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.15

    -0.15%

  • AZN

    -2.4000

    182.52

    -1.31%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    23.42

    0%

TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case
TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case / Photo: © AFP

TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case

A Belgian judge will rule Wednesday in a closely watched case pitting French oil giant TotalEnergies against a farmer seeking compensation for damage to his farm caused by climate change.

Text size:

Hugues Falys, a farmer from Belgium's western Hainaut region, was backed by environmental groups including Greenpeace in the David-versus-Goliath case they hope could prove a turning point in the climate fight.

Together they took TotalEnergies to court on the grounds the French group is Belgium's leading refiner and distributor of petroleum products, launching the country's first climate case brought against a multinational company.

The plaintiffs argue the firm can be held liable for global warming because of emissions generated when its products are burned -- a claim rejected by TotalEnergies which accuses pressure groups of "instrumentalising the judiciary."

The lawsuit was filed in 2024 before the Tournai business court in western Belgium, and argued over a series of hearings between November and January, with a verdict due at 2:00 pm (1300 GMT) on Wednesday.

"The judges have everything they need to make the right decision," Falys told AFP.

"But it won't be black and white, given the number of issues to be decided," added the farmer, who also serves as spokesman for an agricultural union.

Contacted by AFP, TotalEnergies declined to comment ahead of the ruling.

Falys is seeking 130,000 euros ($150,000) in damages for four extreme weather events that struck his farm between 2016 and 2020.

First a storm destroyed his strawberry and potato crops, then three periods of drought hurt fodder production, affecting cattle in turn.

But the farmer and his backers are also seeking much broader action from TotalEnergies on countering climate change -- notably for it to stop investing in new fossil-fuel projects.

- Frequent target -

The goals of the lawsuit are "reparation and transformation", said Belgium's human rights league (LDH), which is backing the complaint alongside Greenpeace and food‑rights organisation FIAN.

Making its case in court, the company called it "absurd" to single out a particular firm over the pace of the energy transition -- arguing that it accounts for less than two percent of the oil and gas sector.

"It's a bit easy to blame energy producers for pollution and warming," argued company lawyer Francoise Labrousse back in December, stressing the overarching role of governments in steering climate policy.

"TotalEnergies doesn't sell tractors, cars or boilers," Labrousse argued, describing the group's strategy to meet the EU's goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 as "ambitious and effective".

TotalEnergies is a frequent target of climate and human rights activists, along with other oil giants.

In 2021, Dutch courts issued a landmark ruling ordering Anglo‑Dutch giant Shell to cut its net carbon emissions, finding they contributed to global warming and its harmful effects.

But the judgement was overturned three years later, when an appeals court found that an NGO and individual citizens could not make such demands.

The case, known as "People vs. Shell", is now before the Dutch Supreme Court.

D.Peng--ThChM