The China Mail - TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 82.324126
AMD 360.540403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1546.131265
AUD 1.468645
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.769883
BBD 2.014669
BDT 124.715381
BGN 1.77347
BHD 0.378283
BIF 3011.021908
BMD 1
BND 1.291151
BOB 11.678099
BRL 5.666304
BSD 1.000231
BTN 94.44641
BWP 14.015512
BYN 3.004037
BYR 19600
BZD 2.016692
CAD 1.42705
CDF 2315.000362
CHF 0.837483
CLF 0.025469
CLP 1002.376741
CNY 6.67175
CNH 6.676604
COP 3319.97
CRC 449.312832
CUC 1
CUP 24.064952
CVE 100.150394
CZK 22.139304
DJF 178.554905
DKK 6.782304
DOP 60.996961
DZD 137.215041
EGP 53.502064
ERN 15
ETB 164.576405
EUR 0.90715
FJD 2.27435
FKP 0.756884
GBP 0.755715
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.756884
GHS 11.72504
GIP 0.756884
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8883.748356
GTQ 7.646644
GYD 209.264655
HKD 7.845704
HNL 26.963306
HRK 6.831965
HTG 131.491813
HUF 331.003504
IDR 18235.4
ILS 3.216704
IMP 0.756884
INR 94.245504
IQD 1520.116116
IRR 1913737.503816
ISK 123.930386
JEP 0.756884
JMD 158.434254
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.73504
KES 130.050385
KGS 87.435504
KHR 4080.00035
KMF 447.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1335.320383
KWD 0.31147
KYD 0.835579
KZT 446.945163
LAK 22570.87132
LBP 89792.715562
LKR 333.505692
LRD 170.463102
LSL 16.951422
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.463464
MAD 9.936862
MDL 18.213816
MGA 4555.721867
MKD 55.830725
MMK 2099.848767
MNT 3604.365716
MOP 8.103688
MRU 40.552456
MUR 47.620378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1738.739965
MXN 18.536504
MYR 4.086104
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.951422
NGN 1343.570377
NIO 36.90298
NOK 9.57248
NPR 151.114437
NZD 1.809464
OMR 0.385095
PAB 1.000231
PEN 3.411802
PGK 4.575679
PHP 63.960375
PKR 277.274459
PLN 3.996535
PYG 6207.891986
QAR 3.64425
RON 4.851904
RSD 106.559038
RUB 82.829047
RWF 1483.467138
SAR 3.82571
SBD 8.097697
SCR 13.874904
SDG 601.503676
SEK 10.075038
SGD 1.287304
SHP 0.752984
SLE 23.050371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 573.048487
SRD 37.49037
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.225246
SVC 8.773983
SYP 13002.000337
SZL 16.946523
THB 33.875038
TJS 9.249966
TMT 3.5
TND 3.008504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.333804
TTD 6.806368
TWD 32.891404
TZS 2655.145825
UAH 45.588969
UGX 4131.053487
UYU 40.541335
UZS 12057.876355
VES 912.87925
VND 25725.5
VUV 120.638016
WST 2.81058
XAF 595.051667
XAG 0.020459
XAU 0.00025782798
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.807139
XDR 0.707052
XOF 595.051667
XPF 108.325037
YER 236.550363
ZAR 16.976255
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.500748
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5946.454122
MXV 2.081672
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case
TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case / Photo: © AFP

TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case

A Belgian judge will rule Wednesday in a closely watched case pitting French oil giant TotalEnergies against a farmer seeking compensation for damage to his farm caused by climate change.

Text size:

Hugues Falys, a farmer from Belgium's western Hainaut region, was backed by environmental groups including Greenpeace in the David-versus-Goliath case they hope could prove a turning point in the climate fight.

Together they took TotalEnergies to court on the grounds the French group is Belgium's leading refiner and distributor of petroleum products, launching the country's first climate case brought against a multinational company.

The plaintiffs argue the firm can be held liable for global warming because of emissions generated when its products are burned -- a claim rejected by TotalEnergies which accuses pressure groups of "instrumentalising the judiciary."

The lawsuit was filed in 2024 before the Tournai business court in western Belgium, and argued over a series of hearings between November and January, with a verdict due at 2:00 pm (1300 GMT) on Wednesday.

"The judges have everything they need to make the right decision," Falys told AFP.

"But it won't be black and white, given the number of issues to be decided," added the farmer, who also serves as spokesman for an agricultural union.

Contacted by AFP, TotalEnergies declined to comment ahead of the ruling.

Falys is seeking 130,000 euros ($150,000) in damages for four extreme weather events that struck his farm between 2016 and 2020.

First a storm destroyed his strawberry and potato crops, then three periods of drought hurt fodder production, affecting cattle in turn.

But the farmer and his backers are also seeking much broader action from TotalEnergies on countering climate change -- notably for it to stop investing in new fossil-fuel projects.

- Frequent target -

The goals of the lawsuit are "reparation and transformation", said Belgium's human rights league (LDH), which is backing the complaint alongside Greenpeace and food‑rights organisation FIAN.

Making its case in court, the company called it "absurd" to single out a particular firm over the pace of the energy transition -- arguing that it accounts for less than two percent of the oil and gas sector.

"It's a bit easy to blame energy producers for pollution and warming," argued company lawyer Francoise Labrousse back in December, stressing the overarching role of governments in steering climate policy.

"TotalEnergies doesn't sell tractors, cars or boilers," Labrousse argued, describing the group's strategy to meet the EU's goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 as "ambitious and effective".

TotalEnergies is a frequent target of climate and human rights activists, along with other oil giants.

In 2021, Dutch courts issued a landmark ruling ordering Anglo‑Dutch giant Shell to cut its net carbon emissions, finding they contributed to global warming and its harmful effects.

But the judgement was overturned three years later, when an appeals court found that an NGO and individual citizens could not make such demands.

The case, known as "People vs. Shell", is now before the Dutch Supreme Court.

D.Peng--ThChM