The China Mail - TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case

USD -
AED 3.67295
AFN 66.503991
ALL 80.603989
AMD 366.170403
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1491.937904
AUD 1.414627
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.696506
BBD 2.013896
BDT 123.776354
BHD 0.377104
BIF 2987.5
BMD 1
BND 1.281271
BOB 11.884005
BRL 5.083304
BSD 0.999879
BTN 95.145572
BWP 13.496235
BYN 2.977343
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010921
CAD 1.39555
CDF 2262.50392
CHF 0.80802
CLF 0.023137
CLP 913.560396
CNY 6.747604
CNH 6.743285
COP 3157.16
CRC 454.53954
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.703894
CZK 20.982104
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.46804
DOP 58.250393
DZD 132.93304
EGP 49.555853
ERN 15
ETB 160.000358
EUR 0.86495
FJD 2.20855
FKP 0.743241
GBP 0.741235
GEL 2.610391
GGP 0.743241
GHS 11.76039
GIP 0.743241
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8775.000355
GTQ 7.628986
GYD 209.187745
HKD 7.84315
HNL 26.880388
HRK 6.518804
HTG 130.738004
HUF 314.060388
IDR 17801
ILS 2.99985
IMP 0.743241
INR 95.13785
IQD 1310.5
IRR 1375550.000352
ISK 123.340386
JEP 0.743241
JMD 158.790465
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.80604
KES 128.780385
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4052.503796
KMF 426.00035
KRW 1407.890383
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.833247
KZT 468.616634
LAK 22582.503779
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 335.380452
LRD 181.550382
LSL 16.130381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.365039
MAD 9.305039
MDL 17.387495
MGA 4310.000347
MKD 53.374161
MMK 2099.552715
MNT 3596.040078
MOP 8.079926
MRU 40.090379
MUR 47.050378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.136204
MYR 4.090104
MZN 63.905039
NAD 16.250377
NGN 1364.860377
NIO 36.795607
NOK 9.51237
NPR 152.232915
NZD 1.696641
OMR 0.382792
PAB 0.999866
PEN 3.385039
PGK 4.42225
PHP 60.705038
PKR 277.803701
PLN 3.719205
PYG 5945.498155
QAR 3.644504
RON 4.536304
RSD 102.024038
RUB 81.892834
RWF 1465
SAR 3.780227
SBD 8.065696
SCR 14.475038
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.480804
SGD 1.278204
SLE 24.603667
SOS 600.503662
SRD 37.866504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.375
SVC 8.749095
SZL 16.245038
THB 33.050369
TJS 9.223917
TMT 3.51
TND 2.912038
TRY 47.697504
TTD 6.777323
TWD 32.250604
TZS 2647.503038
UAH 44.783463
UGX 3724.827703
UYU 40.249652
UZS 11950.000334
VES 755.762404
VND 26204.5
VUV 119.010387
WST 2.728415
XAF 568.992228
XAG 0.015756
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802071
XDR 0.708194
XOF 568.000332
XPF 103.350363
YER 238.403589
ZAR 16.14632
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.872278
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • RBGPF

    0.6500

    70.6

    +0.92%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    21

    +0.24%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case
TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case / Photo: © AFP

TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case

A Belgian judge will rule Wednesday in a closely watched case pitting French oil giant TotalEnergies against a farmer seeking compensation for damage to his farm caused by climate change.

Text size:

Hugues Falys, a farmer from Belgium's western Hainaut region, was backed by environmental groups including Greenpeace in the David-versus-Goliath case they hope could prove a turning point in the climate fight.

Together they took TotalEnergies to court on the grounds the French group is Belgium's leading refiner and distributor of petroleum products, launching the country's first climate case brought against a multinational company.

The plaintiffs argue the firm can be held liable for global warming because of emissions generated when its products are burned -- a claim rejected by TotalEnergies which accuses pressure groups of "instrumentalising the judiciary."

The lawsuit was filed in 2024 before the Tournai business court in western Belgium, and argued over a series of hearings between November and January, with a verdict due at 2:00 pm (1300 GMT) on Wednesday.

"The judges have everything they need to make the right decision," Falys told AFP.

"But it won't be black and white, given the number of issues to be decided," added the farmer, who also serves as spokesman for an agricultural union.

Contacted by AFP, TotalEnergies declined to comment ahead of the ruling.

Falys is seeking 130,000 euros ($150,000) in damages for four extreme weather events that struck his farm between 2016 and 2020.

First a storm destroyed his strawberry and potato crops, then three periods of drought hurt fodder production, affecting cattle in turn.

But the farmer and his backers are also seeking much broader action from TotalEnergies on countering climate change -- notably for it to stop investing in new fossil-fuel projects.

- Frequent target -

The goals of the lawsuit are "reparation and transformation", said Belgium's human rights league (LDH), which is backing the complaint alongside Greenpeace and food‑rights organisation FIAN.

Making its case in court, the company called it "absurd" to single out a particular firm over the pace of the energy transition -- arguing that it accounts for less than two percent of the oil and gas sector.

"It's a bit easy to blame energy producers for pollution and warming," argued company lawyer Francoise Labrousse back in December, stressing the overarching role of governments in steering climate policy.

"TotalEnergies doesn't sell tractors, cars or boilers," Labrousse argued, describing the group's strategy to meet the EU's goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 as "ambitious and effective".

TotalEnergies is a frequent target of climate and human rights activists, along with other oil giants.

In 2021, Dutch courts issued a landmark ruling ordering Anglo‑Dutch giant Shell to cut its net carbon emissions, finding they contributed to global warming and its harmful effects.

But the judgement was overturned three years later, when an appeals court found that an NGO and individual citizens could not make such demands.

The case, known as "People vs. Shell", is now before the Dutch Supreme Court.

D.Peng--ThChM