The China Mail - Net-zero in fashion, but clothing giants struggle to cut emissions

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 82.324126
AMD 360.540403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1546.131265
AUD 1.468645
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.769883
BBD 2.014669
BDT 124.715381
BGN 1.77347
BHD 0.378283
BIF 3011.021908
BMD 1
BND 1.291151
BOB 11.678099
BRL 5.666304
BSD 1.000231
BTN 94.44641
BWP 14.015512
BYN 3.004037
BYR 19600
BZD 2.016692
CAD 1.42705
CDF 2315.000362
CHF 0.837483
CLF 0.025469
CLP 1002.376741
CNY 6.67175
CNH 6.676604
COP 3319.97
CRC 449.312832
CUC 1
CUP 24.064952
CVE 100.150394
CZK 22.139304
DJF 178.554905
DKK 6.782304
DOP 60.996961
DZD 137.215041
EGP 53.502064
ERN 15
ETB 164.576405
EUR 0.90715
FJD 2.27435
FKP 0.756884
GBP 0.755715
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.756884
GHS 11.72504
GIP 0.756884
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8883.748356
GTQ 7.646644
GYD 209.264655
HKD 7.845704
HNL 26.963306
HRK 6.831965
HTG 131.491813
HUF 331.003504
IDR 18235.4
ILS 3.216704
IMP 0.756884
INR 94.245504
IQD 1520.116116
IRR 1913737.503816
ISK 123.930386
JEP 0.756884
JMD 158.434254
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.73504
KES 130.050385
KGS 87.435504
KHR 4080.00035
KMF 447.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1335.320383
KWD 0.31147
KYD 0.835579
KZT 446.945163
LAK 22570.87132
LBP 89792.715562
LKR 333.505692
LRD 170.463102
LSL 16.951422
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.463464
MAD 9.936862
MDL 18.213816
MGA 4555.721867
MKD 55.830725
MMK 2099.848767
MNT 3604.365716
MOP 8.103688
MRU 40.552456
MUR 47.620378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1738.739965
MXN 18.536504
MYR 4.086104
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.951422
NGN 1343.570377
NIO 36.90298
NOK 9.57248
NPR 151.114437
NZD 1.809464
OMR 0.385095
PAB 1.000231
PEN 3.411802
PGK 4.575679
PHP 63.960375
PKR 277.274459
PLN 3.996535
PYG 6207.891986
QAR 3.64425
RON 4.851904
RSD 106.559038
RUB 82.829047
RWF 1483.467138
SAR 3.82571
SBD 8.097697
SCR 13.874904
SDG 601.503676
SEK 10.075038
SGD 1.287304
SHP 0.752984
SLE 23.050371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 573.048487
SRD 37.49037
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.225246
SVC 8.773983
SYP 13002.000337
SZL 16.946523
THB 33.875038
TJS 9.249966
TMT 3.5
TND 3.008504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.333804
TTD 6.806368
TWD 32.891404
TZS 2655.145825
UAH 45.588969
UGX 4131.053487
UYU 40.541335
UZS 12057.876355
VES 912.87925
VND 25725.5
VUV 120.638016
WST 2.81058
XAF 595.051667
XAG 0.020459
XAU 0.00025782798
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.807139
XDR 0.707052
XOF 595.051667
XPF 108.325037
YER 236.550363
ZAR 16.976255
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.500748
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5946.454122
MXV 2.081672
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Net-zero in fashion, but clothing giants struggle to cut emissions
Net-zero in fashion, but clothing giants struggle to cut emissions / Photo: © AFP/File

Net-zero in fashion, but clothing giants struggle to cut emissions

The world's fashion giants have pledged to trim their carbon footprint but that goal remains elusive at a time "fast fashion" is all the rage -- a topic in the spotlight at the UN climate summit.

Text size:

With a chance to strut their climate commitments at COP27 talks, clothing brands and manufacturers discussed global warming -- but some admitted that their pledge to halve emissions by 2030 and reach net-zero by mid-century may be a stretch.

"Are we there yet? Of course not. Are we on track? I would say ... maybe," Stefan Seidel, senior head of sustainability at Puma, told a panel at the COP27 in the Egyptian seaside resort of Sharm el-Sheikh.

Greenpeace and other groups have urged the sector -- already under fire for often exploitative labour practices -- to slow down or end the wasteful trend of mass-producing low-cost clothes that are quickly thrown away.

Fast fashion, they charge, uses up massive amounts of water, produces hazardous chemicals and clogs up landfills in poor countries with textile waste, while also generating greenhouse gases in production, transport and disposal.

The fashion sector was responsible for four percent of global emissions in 2018 -- about the same as Britain, France and Germany combined -- according to the McKinsey consultancy firm.

Some 30 firms -- from retail giants H&M and Zara owner Inditex to sports apparel rivals Adidas and Nike -- signed up to the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action at the COP24 summit in Poland in 2018.

At the time they pledged to cut emissions by 30 percent by 2030 and to be net-zero emitters by mid-century.

A year ago they set the new, more ambitious goal of slashing their CO2 emissions by half by the end of the decade, with more than 100 companies now signatories to the pledge.

But meeting the target is a major challenge for an industry with long and complex supply chains that span the globe, industry insiders admit.

- 'Difficult and costly' -

Industry figures at COP27 barely mentioned the "fast fashion" business model, which critics say is at the heart of the problem, focussing instead on ideas around the use of renewable energy in factories and regulation.

But greening the entire supply chain and introducing climate-friendly standards among suppliers of raw materials and factories is a monumental task.

Leyla Ertur, head of sustainability at H&M, said the Swedish firm has more than 800 suppliers.

And Marie-Claire Daveu, sustainability chief at Kering Group, which owns luxury brands Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent, said: "Even us, we're not big enough to change all the supplies chains. That's why collaboration is key."

Ali Nouira, an Egyptian manufacturer, told another COP27 panel that certification bodies do not even exist in the region.

"When we manufacture, we need to have all the right certifications and the carbon footprints and all that, and for a small brand coming out from Egypt that is extremely difficult and also costly," Nouira said.

"We also manufacture for other brands, in Europe and other places," he said. "And we're pressured to have the certifications and also to go down with our prices, so they can continue to make the profits they make."

- 'Leap of faith' -

Nicholas Mazzei, head of environmental sustainability at online retailer Zalando, said there had been a culture change in developed countries, with banks offering lower interest rates to companies that commit to a net-zero target.

"If you make that transformation, you may end up paying nothing because the loans are so low the costs are basically free," Mazzei said.

But suppliers face big costs as sewing clothes in factories requires more energy than that used by retail stores at the end of the supply chain.

"We need, at a far bigger scale, more renewable energy than brands do," said Catherine Chiu, vice president of corporate quality and sustainability at Kong Kong firm Crystal International Group.

"Even if we install solar panels in all of our 20 plants, that would only represent 17 percent of the energy consumption of the group," she said.

Delman Lee, vice chair for sustainability at TAL Apparel, another Hong Kong garment manufacturer, said it has been decarbonising its operations for a decade.

But with subsidiaries in countries including Vietnam and Ethiopia, it is complicated to navigate the different regulations, Lee said.

Aiming to become a net-zero business "is a leap of faith commitment," Lee said. "You commit to something you don't know how to achieve."

D.Pan--ThChM