The China Mail - How Chinese diplomacy helped seal historic nature deal

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.503991
ALL 81.046102
AMD 360.780113
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1523.143125
AUD 1.422273
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.745704
BBD 2.012675
BDT 123.586379
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377114
BIF 2995.403222
BMD 1
BND 1.277279
BOB 11.766859
BRL 4.965204
BSD 0.999331
BTN 94.818583
BWP 13.766234
BYN 2.934172
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009729
CAD 1.40025
CDF 2316.000362
CHF 0.825078
CLF 0.025294
CLP 995.510396
CNY 6.67805
CNH 6.670604
COP 3150.41
CRC 456.018209
CUC 1
CUP 23.982684
CVE 98.420137
CZK 21.719504
DJF 177.944392
DKK 6.67165
DOP 61.293346
DZD 134.335699
EGP 55.079216
ERN 15
ETB 162.538225
EUR 0.89267
FJD 2.237204
FKP 0.74735
GBP 0.747692
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.74735
GHS 11.586558
GIP 0.74735
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8843.664926
GTQ 7.638684
GYD 209.291739
HKD 7.84235
HNL 26.828223
HRK 6.728204
HTG 130.968001
HUF 327.370388
IDR 18093.85
ILS 3.10555
IMP 0.74735
INR 94.945504
IQD 1514.883742
IRR 1832375.000352
ISK 121.780386
JEP 0.74735
JMD 158.593297
JOD 0.70904
JPY 156.860385
KES 129.754095
KGS 87.448604
KHR 4082.652742
KMF 439.503794
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1323.525039
KWD 0.31069
KYD 0.832775
KZT 453.715357
LAK 22486.722899
LBP 89486.053465
LKR 331.81595
LRD 170.375329
LSL 16.556076
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.399786
MAD 9.815504
MDL 18.037221
MGA 4519.123488
MKD 54.987281
MMK 2100.348965
MNT 3600.056668
MOP 8.073191
MRU 39.936627
MUR 47.160378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1732.762083
MXN 18.668404
MYR 4.085304
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.556076
NGN 1332.060377
NIO 36.774222
NOK 9.35739
NPR 151.709734
NZD 1.750854
OMR 0.38297
PAB 0.999241
PEN 3.431874
PGK 4.475387
PHP 63.618038
PKR 276.527424
PLN 3.92999
PYG 5779.443924
QAR 3.642612
RON 4.779804
RSD 105.321038
RUB 80.331771
RWF 1476.413621
SAR 3.751558
SBD 8.07458
SCR 13.982238
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.931804
SGD 1.276904
SHP 0.7473
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.07154
SRD 37.628038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.868166
SVC 8.743696
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.555541
THB 33.770369
TJS 9.208462
TMT 3.51
TND 2.983978
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.703804
TTD 6.789842
TWD 32.585804
TZS 2645.601821
UAH 45.239791
UGX 4402.195742
UYU 40.076762
UZS 11958.762887
VES 879.788904
VND 25842.5
VUV 118.928057
WST 2.764707
XAF 585.553409
XAG 0.018551
XAU 0.000250266221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800955
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.553409
XPF 106.448878
YER 236.103589
ZAR 16.57373
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.091043
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.817056
MXV 2.106972
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

How Chinese diplomacy helped seal historic nature deal
How Chinese diplomacy helped seal historic nature deal / Photo: © AFP

How Chinese diplomacy helped seal historic nature deal

Expectations heading into a UN biodiversity conference in Montreal were about as low as they could be.

Text size:

But a broad recognition that it was now or never for nature -- and a flurry of late diplomacy by China -- helped seal a "historic" deal on a night of high drama.

Dubbed the "ugly duckling" of global policy, the COP15 negotiations were snubbed by world leaders who had just attended a far higher-profile climate summit in Egypt.

Beijing, which held the presidency of the talks, at first appeared to have a hands-off approach, and the defining issue -- whether the rich world would pledge enough money so their developing counterparts could protect vanishing species and habitats -- seemed too great to surmount.

"For months, there was the question: Where is China?" a high-level source close to the matter told AFP.

What's more, relations between China and Canada, which had to step in to host the event because of China's strict Covid rules, have deteriorated in recent years.

Canada's 2018 arrest of Chinese telecommunications executive Meng Wanzhou at the request of the United States was followed quickly by China arresting two Canadians.

Just last month, Chinese leader Xi Jinping was caught on camera scolding Canada's Justin Trudeau over a sleight.

What's more, "it's strange to have a Chinese presidency on North American soil," said the high-level source -- and early signs did nothing to dispel assumptions that China in charge would mean a weakening of ambition.

In the first week, China let Canada run the show shepherding talks on the key issues, from finance to the cornerstone target of protecting 30 percent of land and oceans by 2030.

But as the clock ticked down, it was China that took charge of the text, in an approach described as "gentle" diplomacy: having subject experts and political representatives work in a calm, even environment, according to another diplomatic source.

"China closed out the deal and cornered the developing countries with the $30 billion financing pledge by 2030," said a third source, a European negotiator.

When countries of the Global North sought more ambitious targets from the South, China responded by telling them they'd need to up their financing. And Beijing acted as a neutral arbiter, not aligning itself with the Group of 77 as it normally does.

"They've taken the risk of putting their own reputation on the line for something many thought they weren't the natural leaders of," said Lee White, a British-Gabonese conservationist and minister of water, forests and environment of Gabon.

Nor is China a natural champion of environmental issues, having badly polluted its air and waters and degraded much of its land through agricultural production -- a process it is trying to reverse through a greenification campaign.

"Countries that destroy their biodiversity end up regretting it -- I think the Chinese probably got to that point and are now trying to put things right," said White.

- High drama -

The passage of China's compromise text wasn't smooth sailing.

A plenary session to ratify the text was postponed Sunday several times to accommodate last minute holdouts, though delegates were eventually asked to take their seats by around 9:00 pm, and wait. And wait, and wait, and wait.

Some left the main hall to take naps, with several Western delegates expressing irritation that the session was not being adjourned until the next day.

It was around 3:00 am that the session finally began. A new text had been uploaded, and participants were once more buzzing at the prospect of a "peace pact for nature." When delegates gathered in the vast plenary hall, drama struck.

A delegate from Democratic Republic of Congo refused to back the accord, demanding more funds.

The conference chair, China's environment minister Huang Runqui, brushed this off, declaring the deal "approved" and whacking down his gavel to loud applause. DRC's ally Uganda branded it a "fraud" and a "coup," but the accord passed.

An exultant Steven Guilbeault, Canada's environment minister, downplayed the drama -- insisting the process was upheld by the United Nations and disagreements on this scale were commonplace at such summits which he had been attending for 25 years.

"I've never seen a presidency text tabled and have so much support for it from the get-go," with the vast majority of countries signing up right away, he enthused.

On cooperation with China, he told AFP: "We both decided to set aside our differences... to focus on what unites us," adding: "What China and Canada have accomplished together in our relationship is symbolic of what we've accomplished here together, more than 196 countries."

While China took center stage, the United States participated only in a supporting role.

President Joe Biden supports the pact's goals and announced his own "30x30" plan domestically -- but political opposition by Republicans prevents the US from signing on to the convention on biological diversity.

B.Clarke--ThChM