The China Mail - Hong Kong demands online platforms remove banned protest song

USD -
AED 3.672505
AFN 64.000311
ALL 81.698693
AMD 361.829238
ANG 1.790365
AOA 917.999709
ARS 1520.660203
AUD 1.433836
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.697509
BAM 1.738736
BBD 2.013113
BDT 122.835248
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.376859
BIF 3004.049555
BMD 1
BND 1.277988
BOB 12.018598
BRL 4.982903
BSD 0.999498
BTN 96.321255
BWP 13.74945
BYN 3.070529
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010126
CAD 1.422275
CDF 2317.501567
CHF 0.833205
CLF 0.024665
CLP 973.898872
CNY 6.7046
CNH 6.704405
COP 3241.73
CRC 457.582291
CUC 1
CUP 23.987767
CVE 98.027275
CZK 21.716974
DJF 177.992132
DKK 6.6516
DOP 60.267153
DZD 134.593999
EGP 52.2783
ERN 15
ETB 161.642656
EUR 0.88983
FJD 2.24775
FKP 0.756613
GBP 0.754485
GEL 2.594987
GGP 0.756613
GHS 11.76434
GIP 0.756613
GMD 74.0001
GNF 8793.367857
GTQ 7.633975
GYD 209.114185
HKD 7.84788
HNL 26.829951
HRK 6.705604
HTG 130.883745
HUF 325.117498
IDR 17892
ILS 3.04465
IMP 0.756613
INR 96.45675
IQD 1310
IRR 1732150.000161
ISK 122.090035
JEP 0.756613
JMD 158.833596
JOD 0.709036
JPY 158.4305
KES 130.020487
KGS 87.450564
KHR 4048.665781
KMF 438.00003
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1338.925038
KWD 0.309611
KYD 0.832918
KZT 451.086377
LAK 22414.053679
LBP 89503.802712
LKR 330.430763
LRD 170.913197
LSL 16.554679
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.424999
MAD 9.967462
MDL 17.836473
MGA 4427.276647
MKD 54.741119
MMK 2099.06815
MNT 3597.6832
MOP 8.079585
MRU 40.020448
MUR 47.409715
MVR 15.410118
MWK 1733.127675
MXN 18.00673
MYR 4.087096
MZN 63.904285
NAD 16.56984
NGN 1323.550069
NIO 36.779055
NOK 9.564402
NPR 154.116418
NZD 1.78201
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.99952
PEN 3.441808
PGK 4.462027
PHP 62.743499
PKR 276.829753
PLN 3.891385
PYG 5856.022048
QAR 3.643399
RON 4.759498
RSD 104.470705
RUB 84.75112
RWF 1476.318538
SAR 3.74761
SBD 8.058541
SCR 13.989755
SDG 601.496955
SEK 10.015255
SGD 1.27874
SHP 0.75643
SLE 24.649682
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.503576
SRD 37.650243
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.781166
SVC 8.745283
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.548352
THB 33.66047
TJS 9.215355
TMT 3.5
TND 2.98158
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.191204
TTD 6.775035
TWD 31.863897
TZS 2630.003016
UAH 44.895875
UGX 4032.573522
UYU 40.334805
UZS 11774.171323
VES 872.77465
VND 25979.5
VUV 120.275684
WST 2.783099
XAF 583.69007
XAG 0.016443
XAU 0.000241351763
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801331
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.69007
XPF 106.589581
YER 236.22495
ZAR 16.569445
ZMK 9001.196617
ZMW 19.765214
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5720.889873
MXV 2.035645
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Hong Kong demands online platforms remove banned protest song
Hong Kong demands online platforms remove banned protest song / Photo: © AFP

Hong Kong demands online platforms remove banned protest song

Hong Kong demanded Wednesday a protest song popular during pro-democracy demonstrations be removed from the internet after a court banned it, judging it was a "weapon" to incite violent protests in 2019.

Text size:

The case has been closely watched for how it would affect tech firms and internet platform operators -- a concern that has been raised internationally over the free flow of information in Hong Kong.

Wednesday's ban comes after a campaign by the city's authorities against the song, which has seen them demand it be removed from Google's internet search results and other content-sharing platforms -- a request that has been largely rebuffed.

"The government, in the next step, will communicate with relevant internet service providers, request or demand them to remove relevant content in accordance with the injunction order," said Paul Lam, the semi-autonomous city's Secretary for Justice.

"The effect is to persuade the internet service providers not to provide the convenience and not to facilitate the commission of unlawful acts," Lam told reporters.

"Glory to Hong Kong" is the first song to be banned in the former British colony since it was handed over to China in 1997.

The song grew popular during the protests, and was also secretly recorded by an anonymous orchestra. Its defiant lyrics incorporate the key protest slogan "Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times".

The Hong Kong government's first attempt to get an official injunction was refused by the High Court last year in a surprise ruling, which said a ban could have a "chilling effect" on innocent third parties.

Angering the city's government, the song has in recent years been played at several international sporting events, with event organisers mistaking it for the Chinese territory's anthem.

Hong Kong is a semi-autonomous territory with no anthem of its own, and uses China's "March of the Volunteers".

Reversing a lower court's decision last year, appeal judge Jeremy Poon wrote in a judgement that the composer of the song had "intended it to be a 'weapon' and so it had become".

"It had been used as an impetus to propel the violent protests plaguing Hong Kong since 2019. It is powerful in arousing emotions among certain fractions of the society," he said.

The order would also stop a range of acts including broadcasting and performing the song "with criminal intent".

The song can also no longer be disseminated or reproduced on internet-based platforms, though the injunction contained exceptions for "academic activity and news activity" -- a tweak the government made after earlier questioning by judges.

The judgement said an injunction order was "necessary" because internet platform operators "indicated that they are ready to accede to the Government's request if there is a court order".

The Asia Internet Coalition -- an industry group that includes tech giants like Google, Apple, Spotify, and X -- said it was assessing the implications of the decision "to determine its impact on businesses".

"We believe that a free and open internet is fundamental to the city's ambitions to become an international technology and innovation hub," said the group's managing director Jeff Paine.

Soon after the judgement was handed down, Beijing authorities said the ban was a "necessary measure by (Hong Kong) to fulfil its responsibility of safeguarding national security".

- 'Policing the internet' -

Hong Kong-based cybersecurity expert Anthony Lai explained that if a platform was to comply with the ban, they would have to make sure the song cannot have a Hong Kong IP address or Hong Kong users cannot access the song.

But both ways would be as difficult as "pulling a cow to climb up a tree", he said.

"I understand the government's need to defend national security, but I worry it would take up too much of their resources to police the whole internet," Lai told AFP.

After the ban was announced, a couple of YouTube links of the song -- listed in Wednesday's judgement document -- appeared to be inaccessible, though many others remained up.

"This video isn't available anymore," said one link.

Lam insisted the ban did not hurt the city's free speech.

"Free flow of information is of crucial importance to Hong Kong," he said, adding "we are concerned with very specific unlawful behaviours".

In 2020, after the protests were quashed and Beijing's national security law enacted, public dissent has largely been absent, and the bulk of pro-democracy activists and opposition politicians have either been arrested, silenced, or fled Hong Kong.

The "Liberate Hong Kong" slogan -- embedded in the song -- was deemed secessionist by the city's courts in 2021, and since then authorities have targeted musicians who performed it.

The city enacted a second national security law this year -- targeting major crimes including treason and insurrection -- which foreign governments like the United States and Britain say would further undermine rights and freedoms.

Y.Parker--ThChM