The China Mail - Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 64.00006
ALL 82.459567
AMD 376.320011
AOA 916.999912
ARS 1387.000328
AUD 1.422242
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.700244
BAM 1.671981
BBD 2.012823
BDT 122.815341
BHD 0.377462
BIF 2970.5
BMD 1
BND 1.273995
BOB 6.905365
BRL 5.100702
BSD 0.999316
BTN 92.260676
BWP 13.408103
BYN 2.916946
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009908
CAD 1.38545
CDF 2300.99984
CHF 0.79179
CLF 0.02281
CLP 897.729738
CNY 6.8301
CNH 6.836971
COP 3647.05
CRC 464.865789
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.850432
CZK 20.92605
DJF 177.720232
DKK 6.411705
DOP 60.649978
DZD 132.470986
EGP 53.241904
ERN 15
ETB 155.624997
EUR 0.85798
FJD 2.214901
FKP 0.755232
GBP 0.746965
GEL 2.685007
GGP 0.755232
GHS 11.015022
GIP 0.755232
GMD 73.00007
GNF 8779.999696
GTQ 7.645223
GYD 209.079369
HKD 7.83295
HNL 26.620439
HRK 6.462041
HTG 131.013289
HUF 323.342983
IDR 17015.15
ILS 3.08836
IMP 0.755232
INR 92.2827
IQD 1310
IRR 1315000.000203
ISK 123.390025
JEP 0.755232
JMD 157.315666
JOD 0.708965
JPY 158.734023
KES 129.399023
KGS 87.450299
KHR 4013.999549
KMF 424.496037
KPW 899.988897
KRW 1483.397158
KWD 0.30921
KYD 0.832781
KZT 477.797202
LAK 21962.501654
LBP 89550.000262
LKR 315.00748
LRD 184.201804
LSL 16.614985
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.345004
MAD 9.305009
MDL 17.208704
MGA 4137.500254
MKD 52.868821
MMK 2100.006416
MNT 3571.582477
MOP 8.062591
MRU 40.087009
MUR 46.520124
MVR 15.459682
MWK 1737.000346
MXN 17.46145
MYR 3.984987
MZN 63.95985
NAD 16.609901
NGN 1378.97997
NIO 36.729947
NOK 9.58317
NPR 147.619434
NZD 1.71858
OMR 0.38449
PAB 0.999308
PEN 3.40375
PGK 4.310031
PHP 59.532055
PKR 279.000048
PLN 3.65087
PYG 6482.581748
QAR 3.646026
RON 4.370105
RSD 100.684987
RUB 78.547319
RWF 1460.5
SAR 3.752621
SBD 8.04851
SCR 14.880128
SDG 600.999697
SEK 9.330385
SGD 1.275375
SLE 24.650254
SOS 571.499242
SRD 37.553982
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.44
SVC 8.744604
SYP 110.549356
SZL 16.615035
THB 32.09942
TJS 9.498763
TMT 3.5
TND 2.892016
TRY 44.501894
TTD 6.778082
TWD 31.735403
TZS 2587.503915
UAH 43.307786
UGX 3697.197396
UYU 40.598418
UZS 12230.000204
VES 474.4169
VND 26332.5
VUV 119.420937
WST 2.770913
XAF 560.735672
XAG 0.0136
XAU 0.000213
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.8011
XDR 0.698977
XOF 564.000179
XPF 102.549508
YER 238.575002
ZAR 16.445497
ZMK 9001.195399
ZMW 19.112505
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    0.1500

    22.29

    +0.67%

  • RELX

    0.5700

    33.93

    +1.68%

  • GSK

    1.5300

    57.37

    +2.67%

  • NGG

    2.4400

    89.96

    +2.71%

  • RIO

    3.7900

    98.45

    +3.85%

  • BCE

    0.2900

    24.12

    +1.2%

  • BTI

    1.1500

    59.95

    +1.92%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5000

    15.25

    -3.28%

  • CMSD

    0.2100

    22.5

    +0.93%

  • AZN

    3.4600

    204.27

    +1.69%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.85

    +1.25%

  • BCC

    4.5200

    79.23

    +5.7%

  • VOD

    0.4600

    15.77

    +2.92%

  • BP

    -1.3500

    45.89

    -2.94%

Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change
Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change / Photo: © AFP

Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change

When European lawmaker Giusi Princi learnt she was sought by Belgian authorities over a graft investigation linked to Chinese tech giant Huawei in May, she was "dumbfounded".

Text size:

It soon turned out she had nothing to do with it -- in a mix-up that has undermined confidence in the probe and pushed the European Parliament to review its rules to better shield lawmakers from unfounded accusations.

"To this day I cannot understand how they could have made such a blatant mistake," Princi told AFP of Belgian prosecutors.

The Brussels prosecutor office did not reply to a request for comment.

Princi, 52, a member of late Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's Forza Italia party, was targeted by a request to lift her parliamentary immunity in mid-May, along with four other lawmakers.

Prosecutors alleged she attended a Brussels dinner with Huawei representatives seeking to curry favour among parliamentarians in June last year.

But on the day in question the Italian politician was yet to be formally appointed to the 27-nation bloc's assembly following European elections that month. She secured a seat only after another lawmaker renounced his.

Also, she was not in Belgium but in her native southern Calabria region, attending her daughter's Alice-in-Wonderland-themed end-of-year school play.

- No more 'tarnishing' -

Describing herself as "stubborn and pig-headed", Princi lawyered up, compiled an "almost 100-page long" dossier including geo-tagged photos of her daughter in a princess dress, and sent it to prosecutors.

Yet, her bid to get exonerated before things became public failed.

On May 21 EU parliament president Roberta Metsola named Princi among lawmakers targeted by authorities before a plenary sitting.

That was a step required by parliamentary procedure before the case could be passed to the committee on legal affairs, which is tasked to assess immunity waivers.

But the rules have since been revised, for, in an embarrassing about-face, prosecutors withdrew the request targeting Princi a day after she was publicly named.

"I will not accept the targeting and tarnishing of MEPs without a solid basis," Metsola told a press conference in late June, announcing the changes.

Her office said that going forward parliament will require requests to lift a lawmaker's immunity to include "essential elements" such as a clear description of the facts and the crime the accused is alleged to have committed.

"If the requests do not meet the minimum elements, the requesting authority will be asked to complement it" before any announcement is made, Metsola's office said.

Although brief, Princi said her involvement in the affair caused her a fair amount of stress during a few "days of hell" -- and dirty looks from colleagues.

- 'Question marks' -

The fiasco has fuelled a debate on whether Belgian authorities are best placed to investigate EU corruption.

Daniel Freund, a transparency campaigner turned lawmaker for Europe's Greens, is among those who would like the European Public Prosecutor's Office, which already probes the misuse of EU funds, to be tasked with such cases.

"I guess the Belgian taxpayer doesn't have a particular interest to dedicate a lot of resources to making sure that EU institutions are clean. But since EU institutions are located in Belgium, it somehow falls into their remit," he told AFP.

An earlier scandal over alleged bribery involving Qatar and Morocco, which erupted in 2022 when police raids in Brussels uncovered 1.5 million euros in cash at the homes of several lawmakers, is still weighed down in legal challenges with no trial in sight.

Were that to collapse, it "would seriously put into question the role of the Belgian judiciary," Freund said, adding "some question marks" also hung over the Huawei probe.

The Huawei scandal burst into the public in March when police staged raids in Belgium and Portugal.

Investigators suspect Huawei lobbyists of offering gifts, including meals and invitations to football matches to lawmakers who would defend its interests in Brussels.

Eight people have been charged on counts including corruption, money laundering and participating in a criminal organisation.

The four EU lawmakers named besides Princi have denied any wrongdoing.

F.Jackson--ThChM