The China Mail - Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 66.240603
ALL 83.177072
AMD 382.120536
ANG 1.790055
AOA 916.999657
ARS 1406.024298
AUD 1.5311
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698478
BAM 1.682293
BBD 2.013023
BDT 122.133531
BGN 1.68091
BHD 0.377076
BIF 2949.904523
BMD 1
BND 1.30133
BOB 6.906191
BRL 5.288986
BSD 0.999415
BTN 88.626159
BWP 14.228698
BYN 3.409228
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010098
CAD 1.40289
CDF 2137.510825
CHF 0.792404
CLF 0.023765
CLP 932.280175
CNY 7.11275
CNH 7.09747
COP 3763.8
CRC 500.954773
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.845086
CZK 20.825999
DJF 177.974849
DKK 6.42812
DOP 64.374065
DZD 130.133521
EGP 47.198502
ERN 15
ETB 154.851967
EUR 0.86078
FJD 2.27535
FKP 0.757017
GBP 0.76063
GEL 2.702208
GGP 0.757017
GHS 10.942163
GIP 0.757017
GMD 72.999677
GNF 8675.532006
GTQ 7.660548
GYD 209.038916
HKD 7.771365
HNL 26.293244
HRK 6.484697
HTG 130.932925
HUF 331.4225
IDR 16723.25
ILS 3.229575
IMP 0.757017
INR 88.691503
IQD 1309.32925
IRR 42112.502587
ISK 126.709866
JEP 0.757017
JMD 160.523667
JOD 0.708999
JPY 154.371502
KES 129.249793
KGS 87.450205
KHR 4008.600301
KMF 425.000207
KPW 900.02171
KRW 1452.589763
KWD 0.30659
KYD 0.832889
KZT 523.891035
LAK 21687.96986
LBP 89501.453663
LKR 306.559549
LRD 181.398269
LSL 17.1411
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.452575
MAD 9.241164
MDL 16.871097
MGA 4468.509694
MKD 52.917244
MMK 2099.568332
MNT 3578.06314
MOP 8.000774
MRU 39.575771
MUR 45.650112
MVR 15.40503
MWK 1733.042027
MXN 18.34866
MYR 4.132498
MZN 63.960137
NAD 17.1411
NGN 1441.890154
NIO 36.780265
NOK 10.080255
NPR 141.801854
NZD 1.760205
OMR 0.384511
PAB 0.999415
PEN 3.370349
PGK 4.225982
PHP 59.00804
PKR 282.521891
PLN 3.637201
PYG 7042.096028
QAR 3.643135
RON 4.377298
RSD 100.870996
RUB 80.891687
RWF 1452.717232
SAR 3.749984
SBD 8.237372
SCR 13.656496
SDG 601.497242
SEK 9.44298
SGD 1.29873
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.374976
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 570.19732
SRD 38.589499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.073819
SVC 8.745205
SYP 11058.869089
SZL 17.134452
THB 32.4305
TJS 9.225
TMT 3.5
TND 2.938809
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.330005
TTD 6.777226
TWD 30.733982
TZS 2439.999946
UAH 42.001858
UGX 3567.926508
UYU 39.765005
UZS 12032.720329
VES 233.26555
VND 26350
VUV 121.860911
WST 2.809778
XAF 564.142765
XAG 0.019592
XAU 0.000245
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801252
XDR 0.704774
XOF 564.230111
XPF 102.582188
YER 238.496025
ZAR 17.112702
ZMK 9001.194587
ZMW 22.46297
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -2.8200

    75.65

    -3.73%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5000

    14.5

    -3.45%

  • CMSD

    0.0872

    23.93

    +0.36%

  • SCS

    -0.0650

    15.555

    -0.42%

  • CMSC

    -0.0450

    23.785

    -0.19%

  • RIO

    -0.0100

    71.03

    -0.01%

  • NGG

    -0.7000

    77.39

    -0.9%

  • GSK

    -0.2830

    47.4399

    -0.6%

  • AZN

    0.4700

    89.08

    +0.53%

  • BCC

    -0.2100

    68.97

    -0.3%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    41.23

    -0.46%

  • JRI

    -0.0435

    13.593

    -0.32%

  • VOD

    -0.0950

    12.315

    -0.77%

  • BCE

    -0.3150

    22.795

    -1.38%

  • BTI

    -0.7400

    53.74

    -1.38%

  • BP

    0.3642

    36.355

    +1%

Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change
Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change / Photo: © AFP

Huawei probe blunder sparks EU parliament rules change

When European lawmaker Giusi Princi learnt she was sought by Belgian authorities over a graft investigation linked to Chinese tech giant Huawei in May, she was "dumbfounded".

Text size:

It soon turned out she had nothing to do with it -- in a mix-up that has undermined confidence in the probe and pushed the European Parliament to review its rules to better shield lawmakers from unfounded accusations.

"To this day I cannot understand how they could have made such a blatant mistake," Princi told AFP of Belgian prosecutors.

The Brussels prosecutor office did not reply to a request for comment.

Princi, 52, a member of late Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's Forza Italia party, was targeted by a request to lift her parliamentary immunity in mid-May, along with four other lawmakers.

Prosecutors alleged she attended a Brussels dinner with Huawei representatives seeking to curry favour among parliamentarians in June last year.

But on the day in question the Italian politician was yet to be formally appointed to the 27-nation bloc's assembly following European elections that month. She secured a seat only after another lawmaker renounced his.

Also, she was not in Belgium but in her native southern Calabria region, attending her daughter's Alice-in-Wonderland-themed end-of-year school play.

- No more 'tarnishing' -

Describing herself as "stubborn and pig-headed", Princi lawyered up, compiled an "almost 100-page long" dossier including geo-tagged photos of her daughter in a princess dress, and sent it to prosecutors.

Yet, her bid to get exonerated before things became public failed.

On May 21 EU parliament president Roberta Metsola named Princi among lawmakers targeted by authorities before a plenary sitting.

That was a step required by parliamentary procedure before the case could be passed to the committee on legal affairs, which is tasked to assess immunity waivers.

But the rules have since been revised, for, in an embarrassing about-face, prosecutors withdrew the request targeting Princi a day after she was publicly named.

"I will not accept the targeting and tarnishing of MEPs without a solid basis," Metsola told a press conference in late June, announcing the changes.

Her office said that going forward parliament will require requests to lift a lawmaker's immunity to include "essential elements" such as a clear description of the facts and the crime the accused is alleged to have committed.

"If the requests do not meet the minimum elements, the requesting authority will be asked to complement it" before any announcement is made, Metsola's office said.

Although brief, Princi said her involvement in the affair caused her a fair amount of stress during a few "days of hell" -- and dirty looks from colleagues.

- 'Question marks' -

The fiasco has fuelled a debate on whether Belgian authorities are best placed to investigate EU corruption.

Daniel Freund, a transparency campaigner turned lawmaker for Europe's Greens, is among those who would like the European Public Prosecutor's Office, which already probes the misuse of EU funds, to be tasked with such cases.

"I guess the Belgian taxpayer doesn't have a particular interest to dedicate a lot of resources to making sure that EU institutions are clean. But since EU institutions are located in Belgium, it somehow falls into their remit," he told AFP.

An earlier scandal over alleged bribery involving Qatar and Morocco, which erupted in 2022 when police raids in Brussels uncovered 1.5 million euros in cash at the homes of several lawmakers, is still weighed down in legal challenges with no trial in sight.

Were that to collapse, it "would seriously put into question the role of the Belgian judiciary," Freund said, adding "some question marks" also hung over the Huawei probe.

The Huawei scandal burst into the public in March when police staged raids in Belgium and Portugal.

Investigators suspect Huawei lobbyists of offering gifts, including meals and invitations to football matches to lawmakers who would defend its interests in Brussels.

Eight people have been charged on counts including corruption, money laundering and participating in a criminal organisation.

The four EU lawmakers named besides Princi have denied any wrongdoing.

F.Jackson--ThChM