The China Mail - Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 63.52571
ALL 82.649738
AMD 368.050422
ANG 1.790403
AOA 916.99993
ARS 1489.493967
AUD 1.448551
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.703214
BAM 1.716457
BBD 2.014726
BDT 123.242589
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.377025
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.296755
BOB 6.937497
BRL 5.203097
BSD 1.000298
BTN 95.33551
BWP 14.280449
BYN 2.914275
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01183
CAD 1.41965
CDF 2274.99986
CHF 0.804975
CLF 0.023516
CLP 925.520175
CNY 6.79445
CNH 6.792445
COP 3388.99
CRC 455.303389
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.125002
CZK 21.210505
DJF 177.719434
DKK 6.55036
DOP 59.450026
DZD 133.314068
EGP 49.089903
ERN 15
ETB 159.15019
EUR 0.87628
FJD 2.26665
FKP 0.753127
GBP 0.749295
GEL 2.640153
GGP 0.753127
GHS 11.36503
GIP 0.753127
GMD 73.499721
GNF 8770.000082
GTQ 7.629052
GYD 209.24824
HKD 7.84405
HNL 26.249737
HRK 6.602399
HTG 130.790023
HUF 311.296498
IDR 18016.9
ILS 2.99885
IMP 0.753127
INR 95.305203
IQD 1310.5
IRR 1375999.999857
ISK 126.009994
JEP 0.753127
JMD 157.314119
JOD 0.70895
JPY 161.291498
KES 129.319799
KGS 87.449805
KHR 4012.500277
KMF 433.000162
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1549.514969
KWD 0.30928
KYD 0.83364
KZT 479.437628
LAK 22500.000232
LBP 89730.684978
LKR 336.036368
LRD 181.875026
LSL 16.399408
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.414968
MAD 9.4075
MDL 17.690836
MGA 4287.491881
MKD 53.977721
MMK 2099.256901
MNT 3584.189705
MOP 8.081898
MRU 40.129638
MUR 47.270263
MVR 15.449774
MWK 1736.000256
MXN 17.53845
MYR 4.075033
MZN 63.922327
NAD 16.414885
NGN 1374.120468
NIO 36.605042
NOK 9.876904
NPR 152.537167
NZD 1.758135
OMR 0.384465
PAB 1.000298
PEN 3.417995
PGK 4.377981
PHP 61.567979
PKR 278.25009
PLN 3.7597
PYG 6080.073017
QAR 3.6455
RON 4.585054
RSD 102.849004
RUB 78.070548
RWF 1466
SAR 3.754201
SBD 8.049104
SCR 13.793466
SDG 600.529093
SEK 9.70357
SGD 1.29338
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.375013
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.500145
SRD 37.504501
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.9
SVC 8.752391
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.398901
THB 33.295499
TJS 9.252979
TMT 3.5
TND 2.93875
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.694665
TTD 6.790936
TWD 31.897798
TZS 2629.998025
UAH 44.843589
UGX 3665.771506
UYU 40.21203
UZS 11932.501395
VES 632.57269
VND 26291
VUV 119.997124
WST 2.769645
XAF 575.673565
XAG 0.016649
XAU 0.000246
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802784
XDR 0.715018
XOF 574.478349
XPF 105.125022
YER 238.60624
ZAR 16.372503
ZMK 9001.206089
ZMW 18.211258
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65.61

    0%

  • CMSC

    0.3100

    21.95

    +1.41%

  • NGG

    -2.6900

    80.18

    -3.35%

  • BCC

    -2.1500

    75.48

    -2.85%

  • BP

    -0.8000

    36.15

    -2.21%

  • BCE

    -0.4900

    21.02

    -2.33%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.94

    -0.15%

  • GSK

    -1.1200

    51.3

    -2.18%

  • BTI

    -1.2000

    60.56

    -1.98%

  • RYCEF

    0.0400

    19.14

    +0.21%

  • RIO

    -1.5800

    93.35

    -1.69%

  • VOD

    -0.2150

    13.01

    -1.65%

  • RELX

    -0.2900

    31.38

    -0.92%

  • AZN

    -5.7600

    183.86

    -3.13%

  • CMSD

    0.2800

    22.18

    +1.26%

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?
Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO? / Photo: © POOL/AFP/File

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

The White House has said President Donald Trump is discussing options including military action to take Greenland -- despite a warning from Denmark that an attack would spell the end of NATO.

Text size:

But how high really is the risk that Trump's desire for the territory might end up sinking an alliance that has underpinned Western security for over seven decades?

The answer depends on whether Trump is really planning to make a move and if the spectre of military force is just a bluff to exert pressure.

Here's how the situation could break down:

- US ups threats -

In the wake of his military intervention in Venezuela, Trump set off alarm bells in Europe by repeating his insistence that he wants to take control of Greenland.

The mineral-rich semi-autonomous territory -- part of Washington's long-standing NATO ally Denmark and home already to a US military base -- has been in Trump's sights since his first term in office.

But this time around his administration has ramped up its rhetoric by insisting that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority".

"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.

That came despite a warning from Danish premier Mette Frederiksen an attack on a NATO ally would end the alliance -- and a show of support for Copenhagen from key European leaders.

- Military route? -

While Trump was willing to deploy US military might against long-standing foe Venezuela, using force against a close ally like Denmark is a different ball game.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he couldn't "imagine a scenario" under which Washington would violate Danish sovereignty.

Any US military action against Greenland would effectively tear NATO apart.

Its Article Five pledge that members will defend each other if attacked is meant to deter threats from outside -- and the idea of its key power would turn on an ally was seen as inconceivable.

Under an existing agreement with Denmark, the United States could already station more troops Greenland if it wants.

Officials at NATO have repeatedly played down the prospect Trump could invade -- but admit that with the US leader they can never be sure.

"We don't believe he would -- there is no need -- the US can get any access they want from Denmark," a senior NATO diplomat told AFP, speaking as others on condition of anonymity.

"But given the persistent rhetoric, we can't be entirely sure."

So far there has been no sign of the sort of military buildup witnessed around Venezuela and some US officials have been pressing other options.

US media reported Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland rather than attack it -- and the hope from NATO is that diplomacy will win out.

"I hope the Danes, the Greenlanders and the Americans will sit around a fire somewhere and an outcome will be reached," a second NATO diplomat said.

- NATO steers clear -

So far NATO as an organisation has tried to stay out of the Greenland issue.

"I don't think this issue will ever be brought up in a NATO framework in order to avoid any divisions," a third NATO diplomat said.

With Russia's war raging in Ukraine, European members are desperate not to jeopardise US involvement in helping to shield them from Moscow.

Alliance chief Mark Rutte has tried to deflect US interest by emphasising joint efforts to bolster security in the Arctic against threats from Russia and China, a key justification by Trump for wanting Greenland.

"The Danes are totally fine if the US would have a bigger presence than they have now," Rutte told CNN. "We have to make sure that the Arctic stays safe."

While the alliance takes a backseat, some more bullish European members may try to be more assertive.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Paris was talking to Germany and Poland to come up with a plan for a possible response.

There are fears though that just by raising the prospect of attacking an ally -- or pressuring it to cede territory -- the United States may have already damaged NATO.

"No one has any interest in a quarrel within NATO, except our enemies," said Belgian defence minister Theo Francken.

"I'm convinced initiatives will be taken in the coming days, behind the scenes or in the open, to resolve this situation."

G.Fung--ThChM