The China Mail - Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

USD -
AED 3.67315
AFN 63.503991
ALL 83.375041
AMD 377.180403
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1383.990604
AUD 1.452433
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.69972
BBD 2.014322
BDT 122.712716
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377349
BIF 2968.5
BMD 1
BND 1.28787
BOB 6.936019
BRL 5.255304
BSD 1.000117
BTN 94.794201
BWP 13.787919
BYN 2.976987
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011341
CAD 1.38995
CDF 2282.50392
CHF 0.798523
CLF 0.023433
CLP 925.260396
CNY 6.91185
CNH 6.92017
COP 3680.29
CRC 464.427092
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.12504
CZK 21.309304
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.492704
DOP 59.72504
DZD 133.275765
EGP 52.642155
ERN 15
ETB 156.62504
EUR 0.866104
FJD 2.260391
FKP 0.749063
GBP 0.75375
GEL 2.680391
GGP 0.749063
GHS 10.97039
GIP 0.749063
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8780.000355
GTQ 7.653901
GYD 209.354875
HKD 7.82605
HNL 26.510388
HRK 6.545204
HTG 131.099243
HUF 338.020388
IDR 16990.8
ILS 3.13762
IMP 0.749063
INR 94.864204
IQD 1310
IRR 1313250.000352
ISK 124.760386
JEP 0.749063
JMD 157.422697
JOD 0.70904
JPY 160.29904
KES 129.903801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4012.00035
KMF 428.00035
KPW 900.088302
KRW 1508.00035
KWD 0.30791
KYD 0.833446
KZT 483.490125
LAK 21900.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 315.037957
LRD 183.625039
LSL 17.160381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.375039
MAD 9.344504
MDL 17.566669
MGA 4175.000347
MKD 53.384435
MMK 2102.538494
MNT 3579.989157
MOP 8.069509
MRU 40.120379
MUR 46.770378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 18.121104
MYR 3.924039
MZN 63.950377
NAD 17.160377
NGN 1383.460377
NIO 36.720377
NOK 9.70286
NPR 151.667079
NZD 1.740645
OMR 0.385081
PAB 1.000109
PEN 3.459504
PGK 4.309039
PHP 60.550375
PKR 279.203701
PLN 3.72275
PYG 6538.855961
QAR 3.65325
RON 4.427304
RSD 101.818038
RUB 81.419514
RWF 1461
SAR 3.752351
SBD 8.042037
SCR 14.429246
SDG 601.000339
SEK 9.47367
SGD 1.292804
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550371
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.601038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.35
SVC 8.75063
SYP 110.526284
SZL 17.160369
THB 32.860369
TJS 9.556069
TMT 3.5
TND 2.926038
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.433404
TTD 6.795201
TWD 32.044404
TZS 2576.487038
UAH 43.837189
UGX 3725.687866
UYU 40.481115
UZS 12205.000334
VES 467.928355
VND 26337.5
VUV 119.707184
WST 2.754834
XAF 570.070221
XAG 0.014291
XAU 0.000222
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802452
XDR 0.706792
XOF 568.000332
XPF 104.103591
YER 238.603589
ZAR 17.119995
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.826586
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • BCC

    0.1400

    74.43

    +0.19%

  • RELX

    -0.1000

    31.97

    -0.31%

  • GSK

    -0.1000

    53.84

    -0.19%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    25.25

    -0.87%

  • RIO

    0.8500

    86.64

    +0.98%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    22.66

    -0.4%

  • BTI

    0.3749

    57.8

    +0.65%

  • AZN

    5.0200

    188.42

    +2.66%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.77

    -0.22%

  • NGG

    -0.4800

    81.92

    -0.59%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    11.8

    -2.29%

  • VOD

    -0.1400

    14.49

    -0.97%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    14.65

    -4.03%

  • BP

    0.5100

    46.68

    +1.09%

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?
Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO? / Photo: © POOL/AFP/File

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

The White House has said President Donald Trump is discussing options including military action to take Greenland -- despite a warning from Denmark that an attack would spell the end of NATO.

Text size:

But how high really is the risk that Trump's desire for the territory might end up sinking an alliance that has underpinned Western security for over seven decades?

The answer depends on whether Trump is really planning to make a move and if the spectre of military force is just a bluff to exert pressure.

Here's how the situation could break down:

- US ups threats -

In the wake of his military intervention in Venezuela, Trump set off alarm bells in Europe by repeating his insistence that he wants to take control of Greenland.

The mineral-rich semi-autonomous territory -- part of Washington's long-standing NATO ally Denmark and home already to a US military base -- has been in Trump's sights since his first term in office.

But this time around his administration has ramped up its rhetoric by insisting that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority".

"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.

That came despite a warning from Danish premier Mette Frederiksen an attack on a NATO ally would end the alliance -- and a show of support for Copenhagen from key European leaders.

- Military route? -

While Trump was willing to deploy US military might against long-standing foe Venezuela, using force against a close ally like Denmark is a different ball game.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he couldn't "imagine a scenario" under which Washington would violate Danish sovereignty.

Any US military action against Greenland would effectively tear NATO apart.

Its Article Five pledge that members will defend each other if attacked is meant to deter threats from outside -- and the idea of its key power would turn on an ally was seen as inconceivable.

Under an existing agreement with Denmark, the United States could already station more troops Greenland if it wants.

Officials at NATO have repeatedly played down the prospect Trump could invade -- but admit that with the US leader they can never be sure.

"We don't believe he would -- there is no need -- the US can get any access they want from Denmark," a senior NATO diplomat told AFP, speaking as others on condition of anonymity.

"But given the persistent rhetoric, we can't be entirely sure."

So far there has been no sign of the sort of military buildup witnessed around Venezuela and some US officials have been pressing other options.

US media reported Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland rather than attack it -- and the hope from NATO is that diplomacy will win out.

"I hope the Danes, the Greenlanders and the Americans will sit around a fire somewhere and an outcome will be reached," a second NATO diplomat said.

- NATO steers clear -

So far NATO as an organisation has tried to stay out of the Greenland issue.

"I don't think this issue will ever be brought up in a NATO framework in order to avoid any divisions," a third NATO diplomat said.

With Russia's war raging in Ukraine, European members are desperate not to jeopardise US involvement in helping to shield them from Moscow.

Alliance chief Mark Rutte has tried to deflect US interest by emphasising joint efforts to bolster security in the Arctic against threats from Russia and China, a key justification by Trump for wanting Greenland.

"The Danes are totally fine if the US would have a bigger presence than they have now," Rutte told CNN. "We have to make sure that the Arctic stays safe."

While the alliance takes a backseat, some more bullish European members may try to be more assertive.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Paris was talking to Germany and Poland to come up with a plan for a possible response.

There are fears though that just by raising the prospect of attacking an ally -- or pressuring it to cede territory -- the United States may have already damaged NATO.

"No one has any interest in a quarrel within NATO, except our enemies," said Belgian defence minister Theo Francken.

"I'm convinced initiatives will be taken in the coming days, behind the scenes or in the open, to resolve this situation."

G.Fung--ThChM