The China Mail - Huge state subsidies give China unfair edge over foreign rivals: OECD

USD -
AED 3.672998
AFN 62.999712
ALL 80.627789
AMD 363.379532
ANG 1.790365
AOA 917.999944
ARS 1519.7392
AUD 1.426116
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695095
BAM 1.71977
BBD 2.014306
BDT 123.289177
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377028
BIF 3012.807267
BMD 1
BND 1.279847
BOB 12.085376
BRL 5.194799
BSD 1.000119
BTN 95.910598
BWP 13.673072
BYN 3.044111
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011325
CAD 1.41407
CDF 2310.000342
CHF 0.82842
CLF 0.024395
CLP 963.230249
CNY 6.71135
CNH 6.71684
COP 3352.38
CRC 454.67135
CUC 1
CUP 24.002321
CVE 96.957999
CZK 21.46965
DJF 177.71987
DKK 6.57683
DOP 59.432581
DZD 133.895063
EGP 51.746697
ERN 15
ETB 163.34979
EUR 0.87974
FJD 2.24975
FKP 0.754629
GBP 0.756885
GEL 2.615034
GGP 0.754629
GHS 11.590355
GIP 0.754629
GMD 73.999974
GNF 8795.817964
GTQ 7.637756
GYD 209.235666
HKD 7.84282
HNL 26.840946
HRK 6.630199
HTG 130.885334
HUF 322.035028
IDR 17992
ILS 3.04725
IMP 0.754629
INR 96.00585
IQD 1310.172301
IRR 1374575.000224
ISK 120.700451
JEP 0.754629
JMD 157.732063
JOD 0.708995
JPY 158.885499
KES 129.45031
KGS 87.449701
KHR 4068.37186
KMF 432.99968
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1369.674965
KWD 0.30892
KYD 0.833348
KZT 441.759759
LAK 22415.75627
LBP 89553.909393
LKR 330.087184
LRD 172.006612
LSL 16.429705
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.396131
MAD 9.575819
MDL 17.795832
MGA 4384.028981
MKD 54.094692
MMK 2099.566963
MNT 3597.939506
MOP 8.078394
MRU 40.034469
MUR 47.780544
MVR 15.449742
MWK 1734.061354
MXN 17.714102
MYR 4.085397
MZN 63.910162
NAD 16.429561
NGN 1326.000231
NIO 36.808252
NOK 9.516295
NPR 153.46825
NZD 1.768145
OMR 0.3845
PAB 1.000066
PEN 3.388188
PGK 4.455485
PHP 62.830135
PKR 277.092073
PLN 3.85416
PYG 5926.499101
QAR 3.6455
RON 4.641898
RSD 103.380959
RUB 84.99923
RWF 1479.504809
SAR 3.756357
SBD 8.000512
SCR 13.826008
SDG 601.49855
SEK 9.933165
SGD 1.280155
SHP 0.755002
SLE 24.649689
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.546649
SRD 37.695016
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.542912
SVC 8.750973
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.42566
THB 33.486502
TJS 9.215477
TMT 3.51
TND 2.958465
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.85422
TTD 6.801985
TWD 31.844797
TZS 2644.997988
UAH 45.026248
UGX 3925.206526
UYU 40.068936
UZS 11810.999389
VES 852.43145
VND 25992
VUV 118.51472
WST 2.751818
XAF 577.071722
XAG 0.01574
XAU 0.000234626123
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802315
XDR 0.707052
XOF 577.071722
XPF 104.867465
YER 236.650277
ZAR 16.4476
ZMK 9001.207865
ZMW 19.450905
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.591861
MXV 2.007522
  • GSK

    -0.0600

    49.65

    -0.12%

  • CMSC

    0.0020

    20.51

    +0.01%

  • NGG

    -0.0200

    75.23

    -0.03%

  • BTI

    0.1700

    56.02

    +0.3%

  • AZN

    1.2300

    164.56

    +0.75%

  • BCC

    -1.6600

    76.1

    -2.18%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.3100

    21.3

    -1.46%

  • RIO

    -0.7800

    94.47

    -0.83%

  • CMSD

    0.0300

    20.37

    +0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.0800

    11.17

    -0.72%

  • RELX

    0.2900

    33.51

    +0.87%

  • BP

    -0.0800

    44.41

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    16.49

    +0.85%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1000

    19.9

    -0.5%

Huge state subsidies give China unfair edge over foreign rivals: OECD
Huge state subsidies give China unfair edge over foreign rivals: OECD / Photo: © CN-STR/AFP

Huge state subsidies give China unfair edge over foreign rivals: OECD

Chinese companies in 15 key industrial sectors received vastly more state support than their international competitors between 2005 and 2024, according to an OECD report released on Monday.

Text size:

The 15 sectors received $108 billion in 2024 alone, according to data compiled by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in its Manufacturing Groups and Industrial Corporations (MAGIC) database.

Between 2005 and 2024, it added, "Chinese firms received on average three to eight times more government support than firms based in the OECD, a conservative estimate."

"These subsidies were also considerably higher than the support received by firms based in non-OECD economies such as Brazil, India and Indonesia."

The Paris-based organisation of 38 member countries said its "conservative" estimate was based on disclosures by the biggest companies in the 15 sectors, which underpin entire segments of the global economy.

It considers direct subsidies, tax breaks and favourable loans from banks and public financial institutions -- at times below their base lending rates -- to be public support.

"For Chinese firms, almost 60 percent of their global market share gains can be explained by the subsidies they received," the OECD said.

Chinese firms have carved out huge market shares over 20 years in sectors such as solar panels, shipbuilding and steel, not because they are better than their US or European competitors but because of their unparallelled state support, it added.

- Effect of subsidies -

With subsidies, they have more financial leeway to invest in new production sites, more time to reach profitability and greater support against economic headwinds, according to the report.

This has led to overcapacity in some sectors, pushing down global prices to the detriment of other international players.

"Just like doping in sports, the risk is that subsidies help less productive players win unfairly at the expense of better, more innovative and more efficient ones," the OECD's Secretary-General Mathias Cormann told a press conference.

"Subsidies increased market share but that did not lead to significant gains in productivity or profitability," Cormann added.

"Firms won market share not by being more efficient or more innovative but by being more heavily subsidised."

The OECD looked at aerospace and defence; aluminium; car manufacturing; cement; chemicals; fertilisers; glass and ceramics; heavy machinery; semiconductors; shipbuilding; photovoltaic panels; steel; telecommunications equipment; rolling stock; and wind turbines.

Worldwide state support in these sectors reached its highest level since the 2008 financial crisis in 2023-24, amounting on average to 1.3 percent of companies' revenues in 2024.

The OECD noted that the peak observed in 2009 coincided with a severe global recession, which was not the case in 2023-24.

That "indicates the recent increase in industrial subsidies to be more structural", it added.

Z.Huang--ThChM