The China Mail - Can Paris 2024 deliver a 'climate positive' Olympics?

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 64.000263
ALL 81.504871
AMD 360.297673
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000218
ARS 1538.500896
AUD 1.423386
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.697903
BAM 1.755348
BBD 2.014118
BDT 124.150744
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3000
BMD 1
BND 1.281553
BOB 11.995315
BRL 5.386897
BSD 1.000013
BTN 95.207367
BWP 13.822349
BYN 2.947868
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01121
CAD 1.39821
CDF 2315.000211
CHF 0.823385
CLF 0.025031
CLP 988.369712
CNY 6.661104
CNH 6.65636
COP 3176.35
CRC 454.76167
CUC 1
CUP 24.000287
CVE 99.19859
CZK 21.769952
DJF 177.719843
DKK 6.68323
DOP 60.650272
DZD 135.268994
EGP 55.998698
ERN 15
ETB 161.150131
EUR 0.89421
FJD 2.24175
FKP 0.751792
GBP 0.747425
GEL 2.597222
GGP 0.751792
GHS 11.649568
GIP 0.751792
GMD 73.999682
GNF 8799.999729
GTQ 7.645879
GYD 209.614159
HKD 7.84575
HNL 26.999638
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.054259
HUF 326.922502
IDR 18137.25
ILS 3.109045
IMP 0.751792
INR 95.152651
IQD 1514
IRR 1868414.999687
ISK 121.430084
JEP 0.751792
JMD 158.760361
JOD 0.709032
JPY 157.775012
KES 129.860282
KGS 87.447968
KHR 4072.999802
KMF 440.999732
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1338.588949
KWD 0.31087
KYD 0.833326
KZT 453.3167
LAK 22534.999988
LBP 89549.999742
LKR 332.450795
LRD 170.449831
LSL 16.629541
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.424994
MAD 9.833504
MDL 18.045072
MGA 4594.999847
MKD 55.021155
MMK 2099.638249
MNT 3597.631144
MOP 8.082337
MRU 40.240023
MUR 47.480231
MVR 15.450146
MWK 1736.00013
MXN 18.86803
MYR 4.057801
MZN 63.910036
NAD 16.630245
NGN 1346.710188
NIO 36.809967
NOK 9.247885
NPR 152.332146
NZD 1.77622
OMR 0.384515
PAB 1.000013
PEN 3.459991
PGK 4.49025
PHP 63.793035
PKR 276.596222
PLN 3.9247
PYG 5858.938516
QAR 3.645501
RON 4.771795
RSD 105.079789
RUB 81.244584
RWF 1475
SAR 3.7541
SBD 8.058206
SCR 13.814101
SDG 601.502571
SEK 9.84487
SGD 1.279775
SHP 0.748335
SLE 22.901
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.504172
SRD 37.644502
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.3
SVC 8.749697
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.630119
THB 33.720149
TJS 9.190174
TMT 3.5
TND 3.020698
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.929201
TTD 6.779691
TWD 32.582301
TZS 2642.007972
UAH 45.55389
UGX 4360.137679
UYU 40.22581
UZS 11995.000078
VES 887.479798
VND 25814
VUV 119.133003
WST 2.76699
XAF 586.563116
XAG 0.019271
XAU 0.00024965828
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802288
XDR 0.707052
XOF 586.563116
XPF 107.300318
YER 236.20406
ZAR 16.62169
ZMK 9001.198139
ZMW 20.200416
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.303054
MXV 2.127074
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Can Paris 2024 deliver a 'climate positive' Olympics?
Can Paris 2024 deliver a 'climate positive' Olympics? / Photo: © AFP

Can Paris 2024 deliver a 'climate positive' Olympics?

Organisers of the 2024 Paris Olympics say they plan to make the Games the world's first 'climate positive' sporting event, a boast experts claim is 'misleading'.

Text size:

"We want to show that we can do these Games with half the emissions," Georgina Grenon, Paris 2024's director of environmental excellence, said with 500 days to go before the world's biggest sporting extravaganza gets underway in the French capital.

"Within the limit of what is technically feasible in 2024, we will have made every effort to cut, cut, cut."

But for Lindsay Otis Nilles of Carbon Market Watch, "to say that an event has a positive impact on the climate is misleading.

"The event itself generates greenhouse gases which are bad for the climate. The financial support of the organisers for external projects does not change this."

Paris organisers say their calculations are based on reducing greenhouse gases and offsetting residual emissions linked to the event, in addition to financing projects to offset the effects of pollution.

Organisers insist they can halve CO2 emissions from the estimated 3.5 million tonnes generated during the 2012 London and 2016 Rio Games.

The construction footprint is limited thanks to 95 percent reliance on existing venues.

Most of the polluting will be linked to travel, with 25 percent of total emissions from spectator transit alone, and operations, including accommodation, security and catering.

- 'Offsetting emissions' -

Organisers have also favoured the use of electricity from renewable energy sources, with most venues near to public transport, and serving spectators "low-carbon" dishes with less meat at venues.

"By offsetting even more CO2 emissions than those we are going to emit, we will become the first major sporting event with a positive contribution to the climate," organisers said.

Environmental compensation includes financing the planting of trees to absorb carbon dioxide, and projects to conserve and restore forests and oceans.

However, these ventures on five continents including providing more efficient cooking equipment in Africa where kindling is still often used, are hard to verify and have been criticised by UN experts.

Sports ecology expert Madeleine Orr, a professor at Britain's Loughborough University, praised the efforts being made but remains cautious on talk of a "sustainable" games.

"All sport events have an impact. The most sustainable sport event is the one that doesn't happen," she said.

"There's also the challenge of travel - for athletes and spectators - which is really out of the organisers' hands.

"We're waiting on the transport sector, mainly airlines, to sort out electric travel options.

"So, for now, offsetting is an acceptable option. I think the Paris 2024 organisers have the right idea here."

Orr added: "My concern is when absolutist language is used, like 'most sustainable event' or even just 'a sustainable Olympics', because even if they do everything right, a big international event cannot be perfectly sustainable, because certain emissions and waste product is unavoidable, and we know that offsetting programmes are imperfect.

"So, there's always a risk of overstating the accomplishments. That said, I'd always rather they try!"

- 'Smaller Games' -

But the question remains how to go further to reduce the carbon footprint at future Olympic Games with Los Angeles hosting the 2028 edition.

In a study published in US magazine Nature in 2021, experts claim three things could make the Games more environmentally friendly; drastically reducing the size of the event, rotating Games between the same cities and implementing independent sustainability standards.

Orr also backs the idea of smaller Games, with fewer spectators travelling by plane.

"In future, it's possible to reduce the size and scope of the event, which also opens the doors to use smaller facilities and fewer hotels, produce less waste, and so on, without eroding the athlete experience or the media spectacle that can be produced and broadcast to televisions around the world," she said.

"The world loved watching Tokyo and Beijing, even without fans. We can operate a more sustainable Games".

E.Lau--ThChM