The China Mail - Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 64.498808
ALL 81.039781
AMD 377.510312
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.999994
ARS 1404.499139
AUD 1.404494
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.687314
BAM 1.642722
BBD 2.014547
BDT 122.351617
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.377025
BIF 2955
BMD 1
BND 1.262741
BOB 6.911728
BRL 5.200898
BSD 1.000176
BTN 90.647035
BWP 13.104482
BYN 2.868926
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011608
CAD 1.35844
CDF 2225.000269
CHF 0.771425
CLF 0.021644
CLP 854.639905
CNY 6.91325
CNH 6.90663
COP 3671.28
CRC 494.712705
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 92.897402
CZK 20.43085
DJF 177.71998
DKK 6.2955
DOP 62.625003
DZD 129.582328
EGP 46.776799
ERN 15
ETB 155.050186
EUR 0.84264
FJD 2.18635
FKP 0.731875
GBP 0.73435
GEL 2.69028
GGP 0.731875
GHS 11.005005
GIP 0.731875
GMD 73.501046
GNF 8779.999882
GTQ 7.671019
GYD 209.257595
HKD 7.81621
HNL 26.505002
HRK 6.344696
HTG 131.086819
HUF 319.663499
IDR 16800.45
ILS 3.077095
IMP 0.731875
INR 90.73605
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.359394
JEP 0.731875
JMD 156.494496
JOD 0.709003
JPY 153.421964
KES 128.999894
KGS 87.450398
KHR 4029.999687
KMF 414.999797
KPW 899.999067
KRW 1449.960032
KWD 0.30697
KYD 0.83354
KZT 493.505294
LAK 21445.000286
LBP 89733.661066
LKR 309.394121
LRD 186.550374
LSL 15.860192
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.288836
MAD 9.13875
MDL 16.898415
MGA 4430.000238
MKD 51.915295
MMK 2099.913606
MNT 3568.190929
MOP 8.053234
MRU 39.905058
MUR 45.679983
MVR 15.4599
MWK 1736.505582
MXN 17.206096
MYR 3.915502
MZN 63.8841
NAD 15.960196
NGN 1351.579862
NIO 36.714983
NOK 9.49152
NPR 145.034815
NZD 1.654135
OMR 0.384495
PAB 1.000181
PEN 3.354986
PGK 4.183501
PHP 58.284977
PKR 279.587483
PLN 3.552305
PYG 6605.156289
QAR 3.64125
RON 4.289598
RSD 98.889046
RUB 77.10069
RWF 1452.5
SAR 3.750395
SBD 8.048395
SCR 13.767722
SDG 601.502932
SEK 8.901904
SGD 1.262605
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.249903
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 571.510487
SRD 37.77701
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.95
SVC 8.752
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.85973
THB 31.110186
TJS 9.391982
TMT 3.5
TND 2.83525
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.637199
TTD 6.783192
TWD 31.350903
TZS 2590.154015
UAH 43.034895
UGX 3536.076803
UYU 38.350895
UZS 12300.000058
VES 388.253525
VND 26000
VUV 119.366255
WST 2.707053
XAF 550.953523
XAG 0.012153
XAU 0.000198
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802643
XDR 0.685659
XOF 549.506089
XPF 100.749968
YER 238.406014
ZAR 15.880545
ZMK 9001.202368
ZMW 19.029301
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • BCC

    -0.3200

    89.41

    -0.36%

  • JRI

    0.3500

    13.13

    +2.67%

  • GSK

    -0.3300

    58.49

    -0.56%

  • CMSC

    0.0084

    23.7

    +0.04%

  • NGG

    1.8800

    90.64

    +2.07%

  • AZN

    11.3600

    204.76

    +5.55%

  • BCE

    -0.1800

    25.65

    -0.7%

  • RELX

    -1.5600

    27.73

    -5.63%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4800

    16.93

    -2.84%

  • RIO

    2.2800

    99.52

    +2.29%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    24.07

    -0.04%

  • VOD

    0.4300

    15.68

    +2.74%

  • BP

    1.5800

    38.55

    +4.1%

  • BTI

    0.1400

    60.33

    +0.23%

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts
Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts / Photo: © AFP/File

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts

Despite warnings, Australia's efforts to save the Great Barrier Reef still fall short of protecting the world's largest coral reef system from pollution and climate change, experts said Monday.

Text size:

Australia had taken unprecedented steps towards the protection of the Great Barrier Reef, which the United Nations has designated a world heritage site, but more was needed to avoid the site being declared "in danger" by UNESCO, the UN agency which compiles and manages a list of heritage sites.

Such a designation puts a government on notice that a site could be removed from the World Heritage list altogether, a very rare event.

"Despite the unparalleled science and management efforts" made by Australia over recent years, the Great Barrier Reef is "significantly impacted by climate change factors", Eleanor Carter at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and UNESCO representative Hans Thulstrup said in a report based on a mission to the Reef.

"The resilience of the property to recover from climate change impacts is substantially compromised," they said.

Carter and Thulstrup recommended that the reef should be added to the "World Heritage in Danger" list.

The Australian government in January announced a billion-dollar package to protect the reef, seven years after its "Reef 2050" plan, already a response to a UN downgrade threat.

The Climate Council pressure group said this latest package of funding was like putting "a Band-Aid on a broken leg".

Monday's report echoed that assessment, saying the reef's ability to recover from climate change impacts was "substantially compromised".

In particular, Australian strategies were "lacking clear climate change targets", while some measures were not fully implemented, especially concerning "water quality and fisheries activities", it said.

Australia reported in May that 91 percent of the reef's coral had been damaged by bleaching after a prolonged summer heatwave, a process that increases the mortality rates of the affected corals.

After intense lobbying, Australia narrowly avoided the Reef being placed on UNESCO's "in danger" list in the summer of 2021.

The then-government of conservative prime minister Scott Morrison was voted out this year in favour of a centre-left government under Anthony Albanese who has promised greener policies.

A UNESCO spokesperson told AFP that "a constructive dialogue is ongoing with the current government".

A source close to the matter called Monday's report "a roadmap submitted to the Australian government which should say what it intends to do with it and produce results".

The source added: "The path to saving the Great Barrier Reef is narrow, but it exists. Strong and rapid action can produce results.".

To be included on UNESCO's world heritage list, a site must have "outstanding universal value".

An spot on the list usually means boosted tourism, and improved access to funds and to scientific expertise.

Those benefits are threatened when a site is declared "in danger" -- which is currently the case of about 50 sites worldwide.

Only three sites have ever been dropped from the heritage list completely.

N.Wan--ThChM