The China Mail - Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts

USD -
AED 3.67325
AFN 64.00012
ALL 83.249902
AMD 377.160266
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999544
ARS 1382.482041
AUD 1.451284
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.690528
BAM 1.70594
BBD 2.013154
BDT 122.637848
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377494
BIF 2964
BMD 1
BND 1.290401
BOB 6.906447
BRL 5.200986
BSD 0.999512
BTN 95.111495
BWP 13.788472
BYN 2.972354
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010179
CAD 1.393425
CDF 2285.000073
CHF 0.800225
CLF 0.023474
CLP 926.870302
CNY 6.894697
CNH 6.892355
COP 3688.49
CRC 464.734923
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.874993
CZK 21.2613
DJF 177.719572
DKK 6.470175
DOP 60.099841
DZD 133.051034
EGP 54.524277
ERN 15
ETB 157.049461
EUR 0.86603
FJD 2.23975
FKP 0.758039
GBP 0.755165
GEL 2.689525
GGP 0.758039
GHS 11.000063
GIP 0.758039
GMD 74.000212
GNF 8774.999808
GTQ 7.64789
GYD 209.174328
HKD 7.84115
HNL 26.59771
HRK 6.525096
HTG 131.185863
HUF 333.154498
IDR 16942
ILS 3.15655
IMP 0.758039
INR 93.611801
IQD 1310
IRR 1315874.999939
ISK 124.179955
JEP 0.758039
JMD 158.129555
JOD 0.708995
JPY 158.866011
KES 130.000338
KGS 87.450064
KHR 4010.000495
KMF 428.49797
KPW 899.974671
KRW 1509.570208
KWD 0.30953
KYD 0.832908
KZT 476.211659
LAK 21950.000494
LBP 89550.000158
LKR 315.318459
LRD 183.67498
LSL 17.069533
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.404992
MAD 9.342498
MDL 17.701369
MGA 4178.000272
MKD 53.370568
MMK 2099.498084
MNT 3571.008867
MOP 8.070843
MRU 40.109977
MUR 47.120075
MVR 15.470276
MWK 1737.000135
MXN 17.94928
MYR 4.048971
MZN 63.949726
NAD 17.070009
NGN 1385.219965
NIO 36.730426
NOK 9.71115
NPR 152.178217
NZD 1.74294
OMR 0.38451
PAB 0.999507
PEN 3.496015
PGK 4.389687
PHP 60.444498
PKR 279.195535
PLN 3.717025
PYG 6474.685228
QAR 3.643974
RON 4.416598
RSD 101.705988
RUB 81.299329
RWF 1460
SAR 3.752979
SBD 8.042037
SCR 13.978839
SDG 601.000217
SEK 9.47405
SGD 1.28686
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.54987
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.477898
SRD 37.374026
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.725
SVC 8.746053
SYP 110.555055
SZL 17.070378
THB 32.635007
TJS 9.580319
TMT 3.51
TND 2.930162
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.444495
TTD 6.790468
TWD 31.952499
TZS 2588.310957
UAH 43.911606
UGX 3762.887497
UYU 40.550736
UZS 12195.498607
VES 473.27785
VND 26340
VUV 120.343344
WST 2.769273
XAF 572.15615
XAG 0.013318
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801363
XDR 0.710952
XOF 570.499053
XPF 104.049712
YER 238.649631
ZAR 16.946501
ZMK 9001.196617
ZMW 19.105686
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    -0.4028

    21.9

    -1.84%

  • CMSD

    -0.4000

    22.1

    -1.81%

  • BCC

    0.9000

    75.85

    +1.19%

  • BCE

    0.0100

    25.24

    +0.04%

  • JRI

    0.3800

    12.3

    +3.09%

  • RIO

    4.4700

    93.29

    +4.79%

  • BTI

    0.2100

    58.47

    +0.36%

  • NGG

    0.9100

    84.6

    +1.08%

  • GSK

    0.9600

    55.19

    +1.74%

  • RYCEF

    0.7600

    15.05

    +5.05%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    33.15

    +1.21%

  • VOD

    0.3200

    15.02

    +2.13%

  • AZN

    3.3400

    197.22

    +1.69%

  • BP

    -0.3500

    47

    -0.74%

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts
Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts / Photo: © AFP/File

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts

Despite warnings, Australia's efforts to save the Great Barrier Reef still fall short of protecting the world's largest coral reef system from pollution and climate change, experts said Monday.

Text size:

Australia had taken unprecedented steps towards the protection of the Great Barrier Reef, which the United Nations has designated a world heritage site, but more was needed to avoid the site being declared "in danger" by UNESCO, the UN agency which compiles and manages a list of heritage sites.

Such a designation puts a government on notice that a site could be removed from the World Heritage list altogether, a very rare event.

"Despite the unparalleled science and management efforts" made by Australia over recent years, the Great Barrier Reef is "significantly impacted by climate change factors", Eleanor Carter at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and UNESCO representative Hans Thulstrup said in a report based on a mission to the Reef.

"The resilience of the property to recover from climate change impacts is substantially compromised," they said.

Carter and Thulstrup recommended that the reef should be added to the "World Heritage in Danger" list.

The Australian government in January announced a billion-dollar package to protect the reef, seven years after its "Reef 2050" plan, already a response to a UN downgrade threat.

The Climate Council pressure group said this latest package of funding was like putting "a Band-Aid on a broken leg".

Monday's report echoed that assessment, saying the reef's ability to recover from climate change impacts was "substantially compromised".

In particular, Australian strategies were "lacking clear climate change targets", while some measures were not fully implemented, especially concerning "water quality and fisheries activities", it said.

Australia reported in May that 91 percent of the reef's coral had been damaged by bleaching after a prolonged summer heatwave, a process that increases the mortality rates of the affected corals.

After intense lobbying, Australia narrowly avoided the Reef being placed on UNESCO's "in danger" list in the summer of 2021.

The then-government of conservative prime minister Scott Morrison was voted out this year in favour of a centre-left government under Anthony Albanese who has promised greener policies.

A UNESCO spokesperson told AFP that "a constructive dialogue is ongoing with the current government".

A source close to the matter called Monday's report "a roadmap submitted to the Australian government which should say what it intends to do with it and produce results".

The source added: "The path to saving the Great Barrier Reef is narrow, but it exists. Strong and rapid action can produce results.".

To be included on UNESCO's world heritage list, a site must have "outstanding universal value".

An spot on the list usually means boosted tourism, and improved access to funds and to scientific expertise.

Those benefits are threatened when a site is declared "in danger" -- which is currently the case of about 50 sites worldwide.

Only three sites have ever been dropped from the heritage list completely.

N.Wan--ThChM