The China Mail - Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 64.501784
ALL 81.582896
AMD 360.987939
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.999892
ARS 1513.250902
AUD 1.437599
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.69594
BAM 1.74671
BBD 2.012735
BDT 123.371781
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377596
BIF 2992.404453
BMD 1
BND 1.281553
BOB 11.707653
BRL 5.047896
BSD 0.999357
BTN 95.144703
BWP 13.728493
BYN 3.0198
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010066
CAD 1.420145
CDF 2312.499459
CHF 0.827967
CLF 0.02504
CLP 985.519711
CNY 6.69275
CNH 6.691875
COP 3197.63
CRC 455.473044
CUC 1
CUP 23.983889
CVE 98.47771
CZK 21.69425
DJF 177.955203
DKK 6.655785
DOP 61.203074
DZD 134.36195
EGP 53.070978
ERN 15
ETB 163.232787
EUR 0.89042
FJD 2.264551
FKP 0.754659
GBP 0.754535
GEL 2.596549
GGP 0.754659
GHS 11.657639
GIP 0.754659
GMD 74.000028
GNF 8791.365814
GTQ 7.636833
GYD 209.011214
HKD 7.84724
HNL 26.830935
HRK 6.7079
HTG 130.869501
HUF 323.918032
IDR 17929.5
ILS 3.0976
IMP 0.754659
INR 94.986803
IQD 1515.08791
IRR 1790500.000031
ISK 121.510005
JEP 0.754659
JMD 158.71669
JOD 0.70901
JPY 157.69198
KES 129.829929
KGS 87.44976
KHR 4060.142989
KMF 441.999885
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1350.595016
KWD 0.31151
KYD 0.832883
KZT 451.509766
LAK 22502.503662
LBP 89549.999843
LKR 330.755285
LRD 170.384164
LSL 16.549612
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.425005
MAD 9.844365
MDL 17.887667
MGA 4500.252296
MKD 54.992163
MMK 2100.02843
MNT 3599.679138
MOP 8.078342
MRU 40.033223
MUR 47.609504
MVR 15.460159
MWK 1733.03028
MXN 18.48065
MYR 4.0815
MZN 63.909741
NAD 16.474534
NGN 1330.130525
NIO 36.776559
NOK 9.48377
NPR 152.229808
NZD 1.77663
OMR 0.384506
PAB 0.999379
PEN 3.440965
PGK 4.535955
PHP 63.045498
PKR 276.68889
PLN 3.89015
PYG 5702.318437
QAR 3.643224
RON 4.751303
RSD 104.544013
RUB 83.626116
RWF 1474.482346
SAR 3.677394
SBD 8.078071
SCR 13.856214
SDG 601.50203
SEK 9.95506
SGD 1.28198
SHP 0.754518
SLE 24.670285
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.137676
SRD 37.712026
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.88047
SVC 8.745048
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.467583
THB 33.538501
TJS 9.223858
TMT 3.5
TND 2.987126
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.411001
TTD 6.796403
TWD 32.31401
TZS 2630.004973
UAH 44.915626
UGX 4037.706697
UYU 40.172371
UZS 11952.148538
VES 875.701598
VND 25878.5
VUV 119.372685
WST 2.788609
XAF 584.07701
XAG 0.01779
XAU 0.00024065738
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80126
XDR 0.707052
XOF 584.07701
XPF 106.509246
YER 236.199682
ZAR 16.550903
ZMK 9001.198289
ZMW 19.863078
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5748.524006
MXV 2.086896
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts
Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts / Photo: © AFP/File

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts

Despite warnings, Australia's efforts to save the Great Barrier Reef still fall short of protecting the world's largest coral reef system from pollution and climate change, experts said Monday.

Text size:

Australia had taken unprecedented steps towards the protection of the Great Barrier Reef, which the United Nations has designated a world heritage site, but more was needed to avoid the site being declared "in danger" by UNESCO, the UN agency which compiles and manages a list of heritage sites.

Such a designation puts a government on notice that a site could be removed from the World Heritage list altogether, a very rare event.

"Despite the unparalleled science and management efforts" made by Australia over recent years, the Great Barrier Reef is "significantly impacted by climate change factors", Eleanor Carter at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and UNESCO representative Hans Thulstrup said in a report based on a mission to the Reef.

"The resilience of the property to recover from climate change impacts is substantially compromised," they said.

Carter and Thulstrup recommended that the reef should be added to the "World Heritage in Danger" list.

The Australian government in January announced a billion-dollar package to protect the reef, seven years after its "Reef 2050" plan, already a response to a UN downgrade threat.

The Climate Council pressure group said this latest package of funding was like putting "a Band-Aid on a broken leg".

Monday's report echoed that assessment, saying the reef's ability to recover from climate change impacts was "substantially compromised".

In particular, Australian strategies were "lacking clear climate change targets", while some measures were not fully implemented, especially concerning "water quality and fisheries activities", it said.

Australia reported in May that 91 percent of the reef's coral had been damaged by bleaching after a prolonged summer heatwave, a process that increases the mortality rates of the affected corals.

After intense lobbying, Australia narrowly avoided the Reef being placed on UNESCO's "in danger" list in the summer of 2021.

The then-government of conservative prime minister Scott Morrison was voted out this year in favour of a centre-left government under Anthony Albanese who has promised greener policies.

A UNESCO spokesperson told AFP that "a constructive dialogue is ongoing with the current government".

A source close to the matter called Monday's report "a roadmap submitted to the Australian government which should say what it intends to do with it and produce results".

The source added: "The path to saving the Great Barrier Reef is narrow, but it exists. Strong and rapid action can produce results.".

To be included on UNESCO's world heritage list, a site must have "outstanding universal value".

An spot on the list usually means boosted tourism, and improved access to funds and to scientific expertise.

Those benefits are threatened when a site is declared "in danger" -- which is currently the case of about 50 sites worldwide.

Only three sites have ever been dropped from the heritage list completely.

N.Wan--ThChM