The China Mail - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

USD -
AED 3.672935
AFN 69.500601
ALL 83.650247
AMD 383.503014
ANG 1.789783
AOA 916.999742
ARS 1298.444399
AUD 1.53977
AWG 1.8015
AZN 1.701663
BAM 1.672875
BBD 2.019801
BDT 121.54389
BGN 1.67927
BHD 0.377004
BIF 2955
BMD 1
BND 1.2813
BOB 6.912007
BRL 5.417703
BSD 1.000321
BTN 87.544103
BWP 13.368973
BYN 3.323768
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009452
CAD 1.38185
CDF 2890.000035
CHF 0.807401
CLF 0.024612
CLP 965.510439
CNY 7.18025
CNH 7.179345
COP 4053.9
CRC 505.848391
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.150282
CZK 21.028202
DJF 177.720077
DKK 6.407598
DOP 61.724357
DZD 129.63203
EGP 48.325803
ERN 15
ETB 140.401654
EUR 0.858201
FJD 2.25845
FKP 0.736821
GBP 0.73885
GEL 2.69502
GGP 0.736821
GHS 10.650245
GIP 0.736821
GMD 72.502706
GNF 8675.000174
GTQ 7.67326
GYD 209.282931
HKD 7.83375
HNL 26.349997
HRK 6.468403
HTG 130.995403
HUF 339.490171
IDR 16176
ILS 3.38188
IMP 0.736821
INR 87.69045
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000101
ISK 122.919715
JEP 0.736821
JMD 160.068427
JOD 0.709043
JPY 147.832985
KES 129.497564
KGS 87.378797
KHR 4007.000141
KMF 422.500162
KPW 899.984127
KRW 1388.969951
KWD 0.305697
KYD 0.833615
KZT 538.462525
LAK 21600.000018
LBP 89550.00016
LKR 301.105528
LRD 201.50203
LSL 17.610247
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.425026
MAD 8.997994
MDL 16.680851
MGA 4440.000246
MKD 52.637656
MMK 2099.271251
MNT 3588.842841
MOP 8.081343
MRU 39.940258
MUR 45.38982
MVR 15.402337
MWK 1736.499098
MXN 18.796925
MYR 4.212499
MZN 63.95965
NAD 17.609887
NGN 1533.140467
NIO 36.749427
NOK 10.217696
NPR 140.070566
NZD 1.690375
OMR 0.384508
PAB 1.000321
PEN 3.562504
PGK 4.147007
PHP 57.01599
PKR 282.249908
PLN 3.66145
PYG 7492.783064
QAR 3.640503
RON 4.3457
RSD 100.588022
RUB 79.743273
RWF 1444
SAR 3.752371
SBD 8.223773
SCR 14.129716
SDG 600.505316
SEK 9.583703
SGD 1.284497
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.20351
SLL 20969.49797
SOS 571.496902
SRD 37.540297
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.75255
SYP 13001.240644
SZL 17.609968
THB 32.479738
TJS 9.318171
TMT 3.51
TND 2.88425
TOP 2.342104
TRY 40.825202
TTD 6.789693
TWD 30.074898
TZS 2620.000168
UAH 41.503372
UGX 3559.071956
UYU 40.030622
UZS 12587.443843
VES 134.31305
VND 26265
VUV 119.406082
WST 2.658145
XAF 561.06661
XAG 0.026305
XAU 0.0003
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802887
XDR 0.702337
XOF 560.000068
XPF 102.750115
YER 240.274984
ZAR 17.61088
ZMK 9001.198502
ZMW 23.033465
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    73.08

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.2500

    14.95

    +1.67%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    23.09

    -0.35%

  • BCC

    -1.5300

    86.62

    -1.77%

  • CMSD

    -0.0530

    23.657

    -0.22%

  • SCS

    -0.1600

    16.2

    -0.99%

  • NGG

    1.0300

    71.56

    +1.44%

  • RIO

    -1.0500

    62.52

    -1.68%

  • BTI

    0.3100

    57.42

    +0.54%

  • GSK

    0.1000

    39.23

    +0.25%

  • RELX

    -0.0800

    47.69

    -0.17%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    13.41

    +0.07%

  • VOD

    -0.0100

    11.64

    -0.09%

  • BCE

    0.2600

    25.37

    +1.02%

  • BP

    0.3300

    34.64

    +0.95%

  • AZN

    0.5300

    78.47

    +0.68%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: © AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

F.Brown--ThChM