The China Mail - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 65.476319
ALL 80.577087
AMD 365.860022
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.000049
ARS 1491.641402
AUD 1.41719
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.697547
BAM 1.696734
BBD 2.015728
BDT 122.843622
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.377075
BIF 2998
BMD 1
BND 1.280933
BOB 11.734342
BRL 5.209199
BSD 1.000794
BTN 95.468406
BWP 13.472141
BYN 3.009929
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012779
CAD 1.393785
CDF 2273.000256
CHF 0.813435
CLF 0.023231
CLP 914.290229
CNY 6.743198
CNH 6.745195
COP 3125.44
CRC 449.393362
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.097828
CZK 21.014198
DJF 178.218681
DKK 6.484485
DOP 58.508892
DZD 132.931669
EGP 50.176501
ERN 15
ETB 161.890385
EUR 0.86745
FJD 2.21445
FKP 0.740201
GBP 0.741685
GEL 2.610218
GGP 0.740201
GHS 11.074982
GIP 0.740201
GMD 73.501678
GNF 8774.999914
GTQ 7.628599
GYD 209.38434
HKD 7.84715
HNL 26.830633
HRK 6.535402
HTG 130.904201
HUF 315.257502
IDR 17864
ILS 2.962965
IMP 0.740201
INR 95.43215
IQD 1311.025996
IRR 1374587.497717
ISK 123.34037
JEP 0.740201
JMD 158.336044
JOD 0.708968
JPY 159.5095
KES 129.495898
KGS 87.449705
KHR 4047.49823
KMF 426.999894
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1418.620493
KWD 0.30861
KYD 0.834053
KZT 465.738688
LAK 22580.225386
LBP 89621.102036
LKR 333.612392
LRD 181.645463
LSL 16.144844
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604889
LYD 6.374682
MAD 9.270009
MDL 17.373275
MGA 4310.91697
MKD 53.37538
MMK 2099.846019
MNT 3597.969266
MOP 8.08894
MRU 40.105493
MUR 47.149798
MVR 15.460087
MWK 1735.471585
MXN 17.04444
MYR 4.086397
MZN 63.900861
NAD 16.144914
NGN 1360.849945
NIO 36.82706
NOK 9.513135
NPR 152.752101
NZD 1.71006
OMR 0.384513
PAB 1.000794
PEN 3.377159
PGK 4.42879
PHP 61.374501
PKR 277.795321
PLN 3.7389
PYG 5973.01084
QAR 3.635016
RON 4.547598
RSD 101.752974
RUB 83.076096
RWF 1474.223003
SAR 3.743113
SBD 8.064941
SCR 14.023536
SDG 600.498289
SEK 9.568698
SGD 1.28072
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.550085
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.973887
SRD 37.722498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.254723
SVC 8.756946
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.149252
THB 33.194033
TJS 9.247366
TMT 3.5
TND 2.934571
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.773796
TTD 6.786763
TWD 32.126993
TZS 2645.502939
UAH 44.737671
UGX 3715.737009
UYU 40.062929
UZS 11954.697077
VES 765.397601
VND 26075
VUV 118.594628
WST 2.730779
XAF 569.073676
XAG 0.015463
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803702
XDR 0.707757
XOF 569.06874
XPF 103.462785
YER 237.149877
ZAR 16.21045
ZMK 9001.20247
ZMW 18.815201
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    72.16

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    21.6

    +0.05%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    21.45

    0%

  • BCE

    0.0250

    23.155

    +0.11%

  • BCC

    -0.4000

    83.85

    -0.48%

  • NGG

    0.3950

    81.075

    +0.49%

  • RIO

    -2.8050

    98.415

    -2.85%

  • JRI

    -0.0210

    12.689

    -0.17%

  • GSK

    0.1850

    50.485

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    -0.5500

    34

    -1.62%

  • AZN

    -0.7600

    157.74

    -0.48%

  • BP

    -0.0750

    42.855

    -0.18%

  • RYCEF

    0.1700

    20.71

    +0.82%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    16.2

    +0.68%

  • BTI

    1.5450

    57.385

    +2.69%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: © AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

F.Brown--ThChM