The China Mail - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

USD -
AED 3.67325
AFN 63.999745
ALL 83.250398
AMD 377.159929
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.9998
ARS 1382.3505
AUD 1.449696
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.695409
BAM 1.70594
BBD 2.013154
BDT 122.637848
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377515
BIF 2964
BMD 1
BND 1.290401
BOB 6.906447
BRL 5.193497
BSD 0.999512
BTN 95.111495
BWP 13.788472
BYN 2.972354
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010179
CAD 1.391525
CDF 2285.000157
CHF 0.799702
CLF 0.023467
CLP 926.610462
CNY 6.894697
CNH 6.887795
COP 3682.63
CRC 464.734923
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.875012
CZK 21.255603
DJF 177.71982
DKK 6.466502
DOP 60.098809
DZD 133.238132
EGP 54.517371
ERN 15
ETB 157.050114
EUR 0.865301
FJD 2.236694
FKP 0.758039
GBP 0.75605
GEL 2.69004
GGP 0.758039
GHS 10.9998
GIP 0.758039
GMD 73.999913
GNF 8775.000005
GTQ 7.64789
GYD 209.174328
HKD 7.84015
HNL 26.604398
HRK 6.521299
HTG 131.185863
HUF 333.98978
IDR 16949.3
ILS 3.15655
IMP 0.758039
INR 93.48455
IQD 1310
IRR 1315874.999986
ISK 124.090168
JEP 0.758039
JMD 158.129555
JOD 0.709037
JPY 158.770105
KES 130.000308
KGS 87.449728
KHR 4009.999698
KMF 428.495038
KPW 899.974671
KRW 1504.669993
KWD 0.30953
KYD 0.832908
KZT 476.211659
LAK 21950.00036
LBP 89509.104995
LKR 315.318459
LRD 183.675007
LSL 17.069667
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.404975
MAD 9.342503
MDL 17.701369
MGA 4177.999863
MKD 53.342853
MMK 2099.498084
MNT 3571.008867
MOP 8.070843
MRU 40.109985
MUR 47.119596
MVR 15.469396
MWK 1737.000313
MXN 17.93386
MYR 4.049001
MZN 63.950207
NAD 17.070162
NGN 1385.730126
NIO 36.729977
NOK 9.688099
NPR 152.178217
NZD 1.741235
OMR 0.384474
PAB 0.999507
PEN 3.495979
PGK 4.389672
PHP 60.393032
PKR 279.191108
PLN 3.71335
PYG 6474.685228
QAR 3.643985
RON 4.413001
RSD 101.656005
RUB 81.298695
RWF 1460
SAR 3.752978
SBD 8.042037
SCR 14.05702
SDG 600.999874
SEK 9.469898
SGD 1.285897
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550373
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.505345
SRD 37.374033
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.725
SVC 8.746053
SYP 110.555055
SZL 17.070278
THB 32.610303
TJS 9.580319
TMT 3.51
TND 2.930302
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.469755
TTD 6.790468
TWD 31.952024
TZS 2588.311
UAH 43.911606
UGX 3762.887497
UYU 40.550736
UZS 12195.499903
VES 473.27785
VND 26340
VUV 120.343344
WST 2.769273
XAF 572.15615
XAG 0.013308
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801363
XDR 0.710952
XOF 570.501861
XPF 104.049913
YER 238.649671
ZAR 16.937302
ZMK 9001.198901
ZMW 19.105686
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    -0.4028

    21.9

    -1.84%

  • AZN

    3.3400

    197.22

    +1.69%

  • GSK

    0.9600

    55.19

    +1.74%

  • NGG

    0.9100

    84.6

    +1.08%

  • BTI

    0.2100

    58.47

    +0.36%

  • RIO

    4.4700

    93.29

    +4.79%

  • CMSD

    -0.4000

    22.1

    -1.81%

  • BCE

    0.0100

    25.24

    +0.04%

  • BCC

    0.9000

    75.85

    +1.19%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    33.15

    +1.21%

  • BP

    -0.3500

    47

    -0.74%

  • RYCEF

    0.7600

    15.05

    +5.05%

  • JRI

    0.3800

    12.3

    +3.09%

  • VOD

    0.3200

    15.02

    +2.13%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: © AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

F.Brown--ThChM