The China Mail - Reducing nitrogen use key to human and planetary health: study

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 65.476319
ALL 80.577087
AMD 365.860022
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.000049
ARS 1491.641402
AUD 1.41719
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.697547
BAM 1.696734
BBD 2.015728
BDT 122.843622
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.377075
BIF 2998
BMD 1
BND 1.280933
BOB 11.734342
BRL 5.209199
BSD 1.000794
BTN 95.468406
BWP 13.472141
BYN 3.009929
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012779
CAD 1.393785
CDF 2273.000256
CHF 0.813435
CLF 0.023231
CLP 914.290229
CNY 6.743198
CNH 6.745195
COP 3125.44
CRC 449.393362
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.097828
CZK 21.014198
DJF 178.218681
DKK 6.484485
DOP 58.508892
DZD 132.931669
EGP 50.176501
ERN 15
ETB 161.890385
EUR 0.86745
FJD 2.21445
FKP 0.740201
GBP 0.741685
GEL 2.610218
GGP 0.740201
GHS 11.074982
GIP 0.740201
GMD 73.501678
GNF 8774.999914
GTQ 7.628599
GYD 209.38434
HKD 7.84715
HNL 26.830633
HRK 6.535402
HTG 130.904201
HUF 315.257502
IDR 17864
ILS 2.962965
IMP 0.740201
INR 95.43215
IQD 1311.025996
IRR 1374587.497717
ISK 123.34037
JEP 0.740201
JMD 158.336044
JOD 0.708968
JPY 159.5095
KES 129.495898
KGS 87.449705
KHR 4047.49823
KMF 426.999894
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1418.620493
KWD 0.30861
KYD 0.834053
KZT 465.738688
LAK 22580.225386
LBP 89621.102036
LKR 333.612392
LRD 181.645463
LSL 16.144844
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604889
LYD 6.374682
MAD 9.270009
MDL 17.373275
MGA 4310.91697
MKD 53.37538
MMK 2099.846019
MNT 3597.969266
MOP 8.08894
MRU 40.105493
MUR 47.149798
MVR 15.460087
MWK 1735.471585
MXN 17.04444
MYR 4.086397
MZN 63.900861
NAD 16.144914
NGN 1360.849945
NIO 36.82706
NOK 9.513135
NPR 152.752101
NZD 1.71006
OMR 0.384513
PAB 1.000794
PEN 3.377159
PGK 4.42879
PHP 61.374501
PKR 277.795321
PLN 3.7389
PYG 5973.01084
QAR 3.635016
RON 4.547598
RSD 101.752974
RUB 83.076096
RWF 1474.223003
SAR 3.743113
SBD 8.064941
SCR 14.023536
SDG 600.498289
SEK 9.568698
SGD 1.28072
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.550085
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.973887
SRD 37.722498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.254723
SVC 8.756946
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.149252
THB 33.194033
TJS 9.247366
TMT 3.5
TND 2.934571
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.773796
TTD 6.786763
TWD 32.126993
TZS 2645.502939
UAH 44.737671
UGX 3715.737009
UYU 40.062929
UZS 11954.697077
VES 765.397601
VND 26075
VUV 118.594628
WST 2.730779
XAF 569.073676
XAG 0.015463
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803702
XDR 0.707757
XOF 569.06874
XPF 103.462785
YER 237.149877
ZAR 16.21045
ZMK 9001.20247
ZMW 18.815201
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    72.16

    0%

  • CMSC

    0.0250

    21.475

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    0.1700

    20.71

    +0.82%

  • NGG

    0.5200

    81.2

    +0.64%

  • RIO

    -3.0200

    98.2

    -3.08%

  • RELX

    0.1200

    34.67

    +0.35%

  • VOD

    0.1300

    16.22

    +0.8%

  • BTI

    1.5100

    57.35

    +2.63%

  • AZN

    -1.2600

    157.24

    -0.8%

  • GSK

    0.1500

    50.45

    +0.3%

  • BP

    -0.1000

    42.83

    -0.23%

  • BCC

    -0.1200

    84.13

    -0.14%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    21.59

    0%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.68

    -0.24%

  • BCE

    0.1900

    23.32

    +0.81%

Reducing nitrogen use key to human and planetary health: study
Reducing nitrogen use key to human and planetary health: study / Photo: © AFP

Reducing nitrogen use key to human and planetary health: study

Better management of nitrogen-rich fertilisers through alternating crops, optimising use and other measures can yield huge environmental and health benefits, but must boost food production at the same time, researchers warned Wednesday.

Text size:

Reducing nitrogen pollution from global croplands is a "grand challenge," the group of international researchers said in a study in Nature outlining a dozen urgently-needed reforms.

The intensive use of chemical fertilisers helped fuel the four-fold expansion of the human population over the last century, and will be crucial for feeding 10 billion people by 2050.

But the bumper crops of what was once called the Green Revolution have come at a terrible cost.

Today, more than half the nitrogen in fertilisers seeps into the air and water, leading to deadly pollution, soil acidification, climate change, ozone depletion and biodiversity loss.

"Given the multiple health, climate and environmental impacts of reactive nitrogen, it has to be reduced in all the mediums such as air and water," lead author Baojing Gu, a professor at Zhejiang University, told AFP.

The benefits of doing so far outstrip the costs, he added.

- Nitrogen cycle -

The world is naturally awash in nitrogen, which is critical for the survival of all life on Earth, especially plants.

Nearly 80 percent of Earth's atmosphere is nitrogen, albeit in a gaseous form (N2) of little direct use to most organisms.

It is made available to plants when microbes that live within plants or soils turn it into ammonia through biological nitrogen fixation.

This process funnels some 200 million tonnes of nitrogen into the soil and oceans every year.

Various forms of the element are eventually transformed and find their way back into the atmosphere with the help of bacteria, especially in wetlands, and after leaching into the oceans or being burned.

But this natural "nitrogen cycle" has been massively imbalanced by the use of some 120 million tonnes of chemical fertiliser each year, according to the study.

Less than half of that input is actually absorbed by plants, with the rest seeping into the environment and causing a constellation of problems.

Researchers led by Gu analysed over 1,500 field observations from croplands around the world and identified 11 key measures to decrease nitrogen losses while still enhancing crop yields.

One such method is crop rotation where a variety of crops are planted on the same plot of land, optimising the flow of nutrients in the soil.

- Benefits outweigh costs -

The benefits of slashing agricultural nitrogen pollution are some 25 times higher than the implementation costs of about $34 billion, they found.

For China and India -– whose extensive and intensive use of fertiliser make them the world's top nitrogen polluters –- that cost would be about $5 and $3 billion, respectively.

Nearly half-a-trillion dollars in avoided costs are spread across reduced premature deaths from air pollution, less damage to ecosystem services and increased crop yields.

But the proposed measure could have a negative impact on the fight against climate change.

"Basically, the impact of nitrogen management on climate change is neutral, or slightly damages the climate due to the reduction of carbon sequestration in ecosystems," Gu told AFP.

Even with outsized benefits, advanced nitrogen management has up-front costs that would be beyond the reach of many smallholder farmers without the backing of strong government policies.

A nitrogen-credit-system, for example, could subsidise farmers who adopt advanced nitrogen management techniques, drawing from the economic benefits of reduced nitrogen pollution and increased food supply.

To initiate this virtuous circle, a financial budget could be secured by taxing food consumers or enterprises that use farming for commercial food production, or by taxing polluting activities and products.

A.Kwok--ThChM