The China Mail - 'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers

USD -
AED 3.673099
AFN 71.025985
ALL 86.949831
AMD 389.450198
ANG 1.80229
AOA 916.000203
ARS 1164.994971
AUD 1.56509
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701759
BAM 1.71838
BBD 2.002943
BDT 121.466383
BGN 1.71689
BHD 0.376938
BIF 2973.281671
BMD 1
BND 1.309998
BOB 6.907549
BRL 5.619785
BSD 0.999671
BTN 85.150724
BWP 13.648225
BYN 3.271568
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008127
CAD 1.382625
CDF 2878.000017
CHF 0.823455
CLF 0.024644
CLP 945.690037
CNY 7.269498
CNH 7.26815
COP 4197
CRC 505.37044
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.14957
CZK 21.893987
DJF 177.719903
DKK 6.552957
DOP 58.850011
DZD 132.28903
EGP 50.803098
ERN 15
ETB 131.849836
EUR 0.87781
FJD 2.290499
FKP 0.746656
GBP 0.74558
GEL 2.745035
GGP 0.746656
GHS 15.297057
GIP 0.746656
GMD 71.500526
GNF 8656.000059
GTQ 7.699235
GYD 209.77442
HKD 7.758725
HNL 25.824996
HRK 6.615497
HTG 130.805895
HUF 354.894502
IDR 16717.55
ILS 3.623935
IMP 0.746656
INR 85.17125
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000123
ISK 128.229838
JEP 0.746656
JMD 158.360167
JOD 0.709201
JPY 142.322502
KES 129.504675
KGS 87.450007
KHR 4002.999591
KMF 432.250165
KPW 900.101764
KRW 1431.070178
KWD 0.30622
KYD 0.833088
KZT 511.373521
LAK 21619.999738
LBP 89549.99972
LKR 299.461858
LRD 199.525007
LSL 18.560047
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.455025
MAD 9.26225
MDL 17.204811
MGA 4510.00033
MKD 54.016924
MMK 2099.785163
MNT 3572.381038
MOP 7.988121
MRU 39.725023
MUR 45.195004
MVR 15.405152
MWK 1735.999776
MXN 19.551245
MYR 4.324002
MZN 64.009864
NAD 18.559961
NGN 1603.189819
NIO 36.702674
NOK 10.376205
NPR 136.24151
NZD 1.684466
OMR 0.384994
PAB 0.999671
PEN 3.666498
PGK 4.030502
PHP 56.070013
PKR 281.049939
PLN 3.74768
PYG 8005.869096
QAR 3.641499
RON 4.368904
RSD 102.971863
RUB 81.998675
RWF 1417
SAR 3.750917
SBD 8.361298
SCR 14.236431
SDG 600.498111
SEK 9.645325
SGD 1.307665
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.75011
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.498004
SRD 36.850246
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747337
SYP 13001.961096
SZL 18.560117
THB 33.448986
TJS 10.556725
TMT 3.51
TND 2.974021
TOP 2.342102
TRY 38.48222
TTD 6.782788
TWD 32.336697
TZS 2689.999794
UAH 41.532203
UGX 3663.759967
UYU 42.093703
UZS 12944.999923
VES 86.54811
VND 26005
VUV 121.306988
WST 2.770092
XAF 576.326032
XAG 0.030331
XAU 0.000301
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.715661
XOF 575.000121
XPF 105.250222
YER 245.049681
ZAR 18.54225
ZMK 9001.195433
ZMW 27.966701
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.1500

    10.01

    +1.5%

  • NGG

    0.1900

    73.04

    +0.26%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    22.35

    -0.58%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    22.24

    -0.36%

  • BCC

    -0.8300

    94.5

    -0.88%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    60.88

    +0.02%

  • AZN

    1.7800

    71.71

    +2.48%

  • GSK

    0.9100

    38.97

    +2.34%

  • BP

    -1.0600

    28.07

    -3.78%

  • BTI

    0.4700

    42.86

    +1.1%

  • JRI

    0.1300

    12.93

    +1.01%

  • BCE

    0.1100

    21.92

    +0.5%

  • RYCEF

    0.0700

    10.25

    +0.68%

  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.58

    +0.1%

  • RELX

    0.4300

    53.79

    +0.8%

'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers
'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers / Photo: © AFP

'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers

Hankering for a chiseled jawline, a male TikTok influencer strikes his cheekbones with a hammer -- highlighting the rise of "looksmaxxing," an online trend pushing unproven and sometimes dangerous techniques to boost sexual appeal.

Text size:

Looksmaxxing influencers -- part of an online ecosystem dubbed the "manosphere" -- have surged in popularity across social media, capitalizing on the insecurities of young men eager to boost their physical attractiveness to women.

In posts across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, they promote pseudoscientific methods to achieve everything from pouty lips to chin extensions and almond-shaped "hunter eyes," often while monetizing their popularity by endorsing a range of consumer products.

In more extreme cases, these influencers advocate taking steroids, undergoing plastic surgery and even "leg-lengthening" procedures to become more attractive.

While women may pay regular visits to aestheticians or buy new beauty products, spurring a global beauty retail market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, the manosphere at times promotes a DIY approach that draws on the nearest toolbox.

"Babe, what's taking you so long in the bathroom?" reads the caption flashing across a viral TikTok video of a man seen hitting his cheeks with the sharp edge of a hammer, in what he calls his "skincare routine."

Underneath the video are dozens of comments warning that "bone smashing," also known as the hammer technique, was "dangerous" while others hailed it as a legitimate way to achieve an angular jawline.

In other videos, British influencer Oscar Patel promoted "mewing," an unproven technique that involves pressing the tongue into the roof of the mouth for improving jaw and facial structure.

Without offering evidence, he told his nearly 188,000 TikTok followers that such tricks would turn them into a "PSL god," an internet slang for exceptionally attractive men, short for Perfectly Symmetrical Looks.

- 'Toxic combination' -

In another video, US-based TikToker Dillon Latham misleadingly told his 1.7 million followers to whiten their teeth by applying hydrogen peroxide to their teeth with a Q tip.

Some dentists warn that regularly using store-bought peroxide could damage tooth enamel and gums.

The looksmaxxing trend is fueling "an industry of influencers who promote 'perfect bodies and perfect faces', often to feather their own nest," Siddharth Venkataramakrishnan, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, told AFP.

"Among men, this is mixed with the misogyny of the manosphere, which often blames women for male insecurities, creating a toxic combination," he added.

Many looksmaxxing influencers appear to have a financial incentive, frequently leveraging their popularity to promote products ranging from skin cleansers to pheromone perfumes, and even Chinese knock-off watches.

Looksmaxxing is rooted in "incel" -- or involuntarily celibate -- communities, an internet subculture rife with misogyny, with men tending to blame women and feminism for their romantic failings.

"The incel ideology is being rebranded to looksmaxxing on TikTok," Anda Solea, a researcher at the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Portsmouth, told AFP.

In a study, Solea found that incel-inspired accounts on TikTok were circumventing a ban on hateful language with a focus on looksmaxxing and more palatable words about self-improvement.

"There are a lot of pressures on men –- we want to protect women from gender-based violence but we should also be careful about young men and boys," Solea said.

- 'Deeply damaging' -

Other related maxxing trends have also gained traction, including "gymmaxxing," which focuses on building muscle, and "moneymaxxing," which centers on improving financial status -- all with the ultimate goal of increasing sexual desirability.

Looksmaxxing influencers –- many of whom idolize male models such as Australian Jordan Barrett and American Sean O'Pry -- have amassed massive followings as algorithms propel their content to millions.

These algorithms can lead to real-world harm, experts warn.

The danger was dramatized in the recent Netflix hit "Adolescence," which follows the case of a 13-year-old boy accused of killing a classmate after consuming misogynistic content online.

The fictional crime drama references the popular but unfounded "80/20" theory that claims 80 percent of women are attracted to 20 percent of men.

In a study last year, researchers at Dublin City University created fake accounts registered as teenage boys. They reported that their TikTok and YouTube feeds were "bombarded" with male supremacy and misogynistic content.

"More widely, this does feed into toxic beauty standards which affect men as well as women," said Venkataramakrishnan, from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.

"The idea that if you don't look like a Hollywood star, you might as well give up trying for a relationship is deeply damaging."

S.Davis--ThChM