The China Mail - 'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.503991
ALL 80.193613
AMD 365.443623
ANG 1.789783
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1475.150612
AUD 1.415829
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.690479
BBD 2.011669
BDT 122.606854
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.37668
BIF 2985.954449
BMD 1
BND 1.277583
BOB 11.640953
BRL 5.222404
BSD 0.998833
BTN 95.261679
BWP 13.45607
BYN 3.037988
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008816
CAD 1.38805
CDF 2273.000362
CHF 0.813662
CLF 0.023213
CLP 913.600415
CNY 6.743204
CNH 6.74452
COP 3115.519253
CRC 449.371191
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.306625
CZK 20.930304
DJF 177.864212
DKK 6.460604
DOP 58.464065
DZD 131.663425
EGP 50.220234
ERN 15
ETB 161.573793
EUR 0.864504
FJD 2.234204
FKP 0.739036
GBP 0.73929
GEL 2.610391
GGP 0.739036
GHS 10.937378
GIP 0.739036
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8773.931458
GTQ 7.6209
GYD 208.928649
HKD 7.846704
HNL 26.775574
HRK 6.512304
HTG 130.645231
HUF 313.830388
IDR 17828.1
ILS 2.955104
IMP 0.739036
INR 95.450504
IQD 1308.440296
IRR 1374587.503816
ISK 122.903814
JEP 0.739036
JMD 158.174511
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.30404
KES 129.09806
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4041.661265
KMF 427.00035
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1416.610383
KWD 0.30868
KYD 0.832361
KZT 463.468603
LAK 22542.892951
LBP 89443.536886
LKR 332.365271
LRD 181.287005
LSL 16.158607
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.359825
MAD 9.264013
MDL 17.319677
MGA 4300.099399
MKD 53.178616
MMK 2099.791609
MNT 3596.010349
MOP 8.073123
MRU 40.112364
MUR 47.103741
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1731.967674
MXN 17.010378
MYR 4.085904
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.158607
NGN 1359.570377
NIO 36.760448
NOK 9.442604
NPR 152.41886
NZD 1.677149
OMR 0.384504
PAB 0.998833
PEN 3.368858
PGK 4.486797
PHP 61.465038
PKR 277.41994
PLN 3.72275
PYG 5995.073253
QAR 3.641125
RON 4.526704
RSD 101.421842
RUB 83.996716
RWF 1468.77566
SAR 3.750032
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.870372
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.527038
SGD 1.279704
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.503667
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 570.811185
SRD 37.974504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.176369
SVC 8.739358
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.156273
THB 33.143038
TJS 9.223994
TMT 3.51
TND 2.928476
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.867504
TTD 6.76693
TWD 32.021604
TZS 2646.873244
UAH 44.681879
UGX 3710.618436
UYU 40.019016
UZS 11890.747223
VES 770.109104
VND 26148.5
VUV 117.940389
WST 2.73449
XAF 566.970915
XAG 0.015456
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800078
XDR 0.707052
XOF 566.970915
XPF 103.081378
YER 237.203589
ZAR 16.130363
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.87722
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0250

    21.45

    -0.12%

  • BCC

    -0.8900

    83.24

    -1.07%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    71.34

    0%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    23.47

    +0.64%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    81.05

    -0.19%

  • RIO

    -0.4100

    95.68

    -0.43%

  • VOD

    0.2000

    16.42

    +1.22%

  • RELX

    -0.2400

    34.43

    -0.7%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    21.58

    -0.05%

  • JRI

    0.0635

    12.61

    +0.5%

  • RYCEF

    0.1300

    20.84

    +0.62%

  • GSK

    -0.4785

    49.52

    -0.97%

  • BTI

    -0.2900

    57.06

    -0.51%

  • AZN

    -0.7900

    156.45

    -0.5%

  • BP

    0.2196

    42.53

    +0.52%

'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers
'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers / Photo: © AFP

'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers

Hankering for a chiseled jawline, a male TikTok influencer strikes his cheekbones with a hammer -- highlighting the rise of "looksmaxxing," an online trend pushing unproven and sometimes dangerous techniques to boost sexual appeal.

Text size:

Looksmaxxing influencers -- part of an online ecosystem dubbed the "manosphere" -- have surged in popularity across social media, capitalizing on the insecurities of young men eager to boost their physical attractiveness to women.

In posts across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, they promote pseudoscientific methods to achieve everything from pouty lips to chin extensions and almond-shaped "hunter eyes," often while monetizing their popularity by endorsing a range of consumer products.

In more extreme cases, these influencers advocate taking steroids, undergoing plastic surgery and even "leg-lengthening" procedures to become more attractive.

While women may pay regular visits to aestheticians or buy new beauty products, spurring a global beauty retail market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, the manosphere at times promotes a DIY approach that draws on the nearest toolbox.

"Babe, what's taking you so long in the bathroom?" reads the caption flashing across a viral TikTok video of a man seen hitting his cheeks with the sharp edge of a hammer, in what he calls his "skincare routine."

Underneath the video are dozens of comments warning that "bone smashing," also known as the hammer technique, was "dangerous" while others hailed it as a legitimate way to achieve an angular jawline.

In other videos, British influencer Oscar Patel promoted "mewing," an unproven technique that involves pressing the tongue into the roof of the mouth for improving jaw and facial structure.

Without offering evidence, he told his nearly 188,000 TikTok followers that such tricks would turn them into a "PSL god," an internet slang for exceptionally attractive men, short for Perfectly Symmetrical Looks.

- 'Toxic combination' -

In another video, US-based TikToker Dillon Latham misleadingly told his 1.7 million followers to whiten their teeth by applying hydrogen peroxide to their teeth with a Q tip.

Some dentists warn that regularly using store-bought peroxide could damage tooth enamel and gums.

The looksmaxxing trend is fueling "an industry of influencers who promote 'perfect bodies and perfect faces', often to feather their own nest," Siddharth Venkataramakrishnan, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, told AFP.

"Among men, this is mixed with the misogyny of the manosphere, which often blames women for male insecurities, creating a toxic combination," he added.

Many looksmaxxing influencers appear to have a financial incentive, frequently leveraging their popularity to promote products ranging from skin cleansers to pheromone perfumes, and even Chinese knock-off watches.

Looksmaxxing is rooted in "incel" -- or involuntarily celibate -- communities, an internet subculture rife with misogyny, with men tending to blame women and feminism for their romantic failings.

"The incel ideology is being rebranded to looksmaxxing on TikTok," Anda Solea, a researcher at the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Portsmouth, told AFP.

In a study, Solea found that incel-inspired accounts on TikTok were circumventing a ban on hateful language with a focus on looksmaxxing and more palatable words about self-improvement.

"There are a lot of pressures on men –- we want to protect women from gender-based violence but we should also be careful about young men and boys," Solea said.

- 'Deeply damaging' -

Other related maxxing trends have also gained traction, including "gymmaxxing," which focuses on building muscle, and "moneymaxxing," which centers on improving financial status -- all with the ultimate goal of increasing sexual desirability.

Looksmaxxing influencers –- many of whom idolize male models such as Australian Jordan Barrett and American Sean O'Pry -- have amassed massive followings as algorithms propel their content to millions.

These algorithms can lead to real-world harm, experts warn.

The danger was dramatized in the recent Netflix hit "Adolescence," which follows the case of a 13-year-old boy accused of killing a classmate after consuming misogynistic content online.

The fictional crime drama references the popular but unfounded "80/20" theory that claims 80 percent of women are attracted to 20 percent of men.

In a study last year, researchers at Dublin City University created fake accounts registered as teenage boys. They reported that their TikTok and YouTube feeds were "bombarded" with male supremacy and misogynistic content.

"More widely, this does feed into toxic beauty standards which affect men as well as women," said Venkataramakrishnan, from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.

"The idea that if you don't look like a Hollywood star, you might as well give up trying for a relationship is deeply damaging."

S.Davis--ThChM