The China Mail - Australia ban offers test on social media harm

USD -
AED 3.672503
AFN 63.000163
ALL 81.2693
AMD 368.114362
ANG 1.789819
AOA 918.000101
ARS 1385.017775
AUD 1.381339
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.698647
BAM 1.666077
BBD 2.014457
BDT 122.941149
BGN 1.666819
BHD 0.377471
BIF 2977.296929
BMD 1
BND 1.273246
BOB 6.911416
BRL 4.894398
BSD 1.000217
BTN 95.599836
BWP 13.500701
BYN 2.796427
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01156
CAD 1.36976
CDF 2225.000249
CHF 0.780699
CLF 0.023209
CLP 913.460237
CNY 6.792102
CNH 6.790655
COP 3788.36
CRC 456.440902
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.93689
CZK 20.749095
DJF 178.103956
DKK 6.369245
DOP 59.027231
DZD 132.402033
EGP 52.9237
ERN 15
ETB 156.17715
EUR 0.852498
FJD 2.18635
FKP 0.732576
GBP 0.738395
GEL 2.669749
GGP 0.732576
GHS 11.291855
GIP 0.732576
GMD 73.499823
GNF 8776.211713
GTQ 7.631494
GYD 209.250717
HKD 7.828365
HNL 26.597149
HRK 6.420198
HTG 130.672573
HUF 304.825497
IDR 17486.1
ILS 2.906503
IMP 0.732576
INR 95.64365
IQD 1310.162706
IRR 1312000.000604
ISK 122.420187
JEP 0.732576
JMD 158.040677
JOD 0.709017
JPY 157.724992
KES 129.102457
KGS 87.449689
KHR 4012.437705
KMF 419.999888
KPW 900.018246
KRW 1491.060229
KWD 0.30817
KYD 0.833461
KZT 463.898117
LAK 21925.486738
LBP 89566.76932
LKR 323.055495
LRD 183.03638
LSL 16.532284
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.327815
MAD 9.128129
MDL 17.117957
MGA 4179.356229
MKD 52.522369
MMK 2098.953745
MNT 3580.85029
MOP 8.064861
MRU 39.897262
MUR 46.810348
MVR 15.398484
MWK 1734.441354
MXN 17.208099
MYR 3.925499
MZN 63.91035
NAD 16.532073
NGN 1370.097429
NIO 36.810495
NOK 9.181565
NPR 152.953704
NZD 1.68306
OMR 0.384494
PAB 1.000175
PEN 3.427819
PGK 4.355862
PHP 61.430996
PKR 278.627173
PLN 3.624798
PYG 6105.472094
QAR 3.645959
RON 4.4348
RSD 100.072026
RUB 73.82814
RWF 1462.859869
SAR 3.754672
SBD 8.029009
SCR 14.151683
SDG 600.497242
SEK 9.290104
SGD 1.27201
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.62501
SLL 20969.511502
SOS 571.611117
SRD 37.254503
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.871402
SVC 8.751171
SYP 110.529423
SZL 16.526884
THB 32.328504
TJS 9.351751
TMT 3.5
TND 2.908879
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.416497
TTD 6.787631
TWD 31.515497
TZS 2608.900639
UAH 43.959484
UGX 3759.408104
UYU 39.772219
UZS 12133.112416
VES 504.28356
VND 26348
VUV 118.32345
WST 2.709295
XAF 558.801055
XAG 0.01155
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802539
XDR 0.694969
XOF 558.801055
XPF 101.593413
YER 238.649397
ZAR 16.47235
ZMK 9001.199405
ZMW 18.8284
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    -0.3900

    16.2

    -2.41%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    61

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    23.11

    -0.04%

  • NGG

    0.0800

    87.24

    +0.09%

  • AZN

    2.6800

    184.54

    +1.45%

  • GSK

    1.0900

    50.9

    +2.14%

  • RELX

    -0.5000

    32.77

    -1.53%

  • VOD

    -1.2250

    15.095

    -8.12%

  • RIO

    1.6000

    109.5

    +1.46%

  • BTI

    3.2000

    63.64

    +5.03%

  • BCE

    0.1900

    24.47

    +0.78%

  • BCC

    -1.2700

    67.93

    -1.87%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    23.6

    -0.04%

  • BP

    0.1800

    44.4

    +0.41%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    13.14

    +0.08%

Australia ban offers test on social media harm
Australia ban offers test on social media harm / Photo: © AFP/File

Australia ban offers test on social media harm

Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory on how best to tackle the technology's impact on young people, experts say.

Text size:

Those in favour of the world-first December 10 ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing.

But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good.

Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.

A "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.

But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.

"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.

"What could change the dial are experimental studies or evaluations of natural experiments. So evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."

- No 'smoking gun' -

To try and shed light on the cause-and-effect relationship, Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.

A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their use of social media.

Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress, such as a 2019 study of US schoolchildren in JAMA Psychiatry that found those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.

So some experts argue the right time to act is now.

"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.

"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.

Evidence of a risk is growing, Heim said -- pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.

"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.

Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.

But the ban was worth trying, he said.

"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."

- 'Too blunt' -

More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.

However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".

"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media'," argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.

Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.

And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.

Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.

"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.

In any case, the political decision has been taken in Australia.

"Social media is doing social harm to our children," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this year.

"There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it."

H.Ng--ThChM