The China Mail - Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say

USD -
AED 3.67315
AFN 62.999414
ALL 82.649762
AMD 368.530203
ANG 1.79046
AOA 917.999749
ARS 1446.511399
AUD 1.417726
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.699493
BAM 1.695616
BBD 2.012363
BDT 122.63971
BGN 1.66992
BHD 0.377125
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.287621
BOB 6.928809
BRL 5.194403
BSD 0.999072
BTN 95.574185
BWP 13.560189
BYN 2.803341
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009415
CAD 1.394675
CDF 2300.000419
CHF 0.797101
CLF 0.023392
CLP 920.650413
CNY 6.76565
CNH 6.783415
COP 3591.14
CRC 461.043634
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.14979
CZK 20.973599
DJF 177.720341
DKK 6.47596
DOP 58.249851
DZD 133.688027
EGP 52.050299
ERN 15
ETB 158.802866
EUR 0.86643
FJD 2.216897
FKP 0.749273
GBP 0.749095
GEL 2.66001
GGP 0.749273
GHS 11.814963
GIP 0.749273
GMD 73.000107
GNF 8777.488724
GTQ 7.617049
GYD 209.033768
HKD 7.83718
HNL 26.670059
HRK 6.529601
HTG 130.632486
HUF 308.161024
IDR 18157.75
ILS 2.92903
IMP 0.749273
INR 95.58755
IQD 1310
IRR 1375124.999901
ISK 124.240227
JEP 0.749273
JMD 157.727503
JOD 0.708997
JPY 160.150995
KES 129.369791
KGS 87.449703
KHR 4012.49346
KMF 427.999794
KPW 899.855249
KRW 1526.580354
KWD 0.309359
KYD 0.832633
KZT 486.594738
LAK 21999.999997
LBP 89550.000535
LKR 336.828599
LRD 182.524951
LSL 16.550121
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.354984
MAD 9.261033
MDL 17.405176
MGA 4199.999453
MKD 53.401318
MMK 2099.299557
MNT 3578.788309
MOP 8.064259
MRU 40.03499
MUR 47.730288
MVR 15.45062
MWK 1736.999637
MXN 17.449299
MYR 4.073202
MZN 63.910115
NAD 16.549675
NGN 1360.670046
NIO 36.609763
NOK 9.464775
NPR 152.920369
NZD 1.71917
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999163
PEN 3.47125
PGK 4.360169
PHP 61.563497
PKR 278.508908
PLN 3.67279
PYG 6148.537642
QAR 3.637498
RON 4.5427
RSD 101.696974
RUB 72.9725
RWF 1463
SAR 3.753798
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.503302
SDG 600.501385
SEK 9.42646
SGD 1.28791
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.601917
SLL 20969.502105
SOS 571.000368
SRD 37.349502
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.5
SVC 8.742317
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.549897
THB 32.800988
TJS 9.346916
TMT 3.5
TND 3.42225
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.099902
TTD 6.767406
TWD 31.550703
TZS 2624.998016
UAH 44.600913
UGX 3766.95999
UYU 40.244833
UZS 11967.490866
VES 562.585085
VND 26345
VUV 118.279585
WST 2.727014
XAF 568.691317
XAG 0.014594
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800654
XDR 0.708406
XOF 564.504476
XPF 103.874996
YER 238.625026
ZAR 16.508975
ZMK 9001.1894
ZMW 17.559572
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    -0.3300

    16.52

    -2%

  • RBGPF

    1.4900

    61.5

    +2.42%

  • GSK

    -0.8800

    50.64

    -1.74%

  • RELX

    -0.6300

    34.52

    -1.83%

  • BCC

    -0.1100

    67.97

    -0.16%

  • BCE

    -0.2300

    24.18

    -0.95%

  • BTI

    -0.0300

    59.69

    -0.05%

  • CMSC

    -0.1100

    22.36

    -0.49%

  • RIO

    0.2400

    100.93

    +0.24%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    14.81

    +0.74%

  • JRI

    -0.1400

    12.46

    -1.12%

  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    22.41

    -0.49%

  • AZN

    -4.4000

    181.55

    -2.42%

  • BP

    0.7500

    43.72

    +1.72%

  • NGG

    -1.6900

    80.17

    -2.11%

Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say
Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say / Photo: © AFP

Killing the mood: smartphones reduce birth rate, studies say

As governments around the world struggle with ways to reverse plunging birth rates, new US studies suggest they have ignored a key culprit -- the smartphone.

Text size:

"Is the iPhone Birth Control?" asked a paper published Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, delving into why US fertility rates have fallen by 22 percent since 2007.

For a while, experts linked the decline to the recession that struck in 2008 when the global financial system nearly imploded, driving millions of people into hardship. But when the economy picked up, a rebound in births never came.

Myriad other reasons have been posited, such as increased use of contraception, more female education, and growing housing or childcare costs. However, no clear cause has been established.

So Middlebury College economist Caitlin Myers and her student Ezekiel Hooper tested a hypothesis that smartphones -- which emerged with the arrival of the first iPhone in 2007 -- might have something to do with it.

Until 2011, iPhones were available from a single US cellular network, AT&T, so they compared US counties that had near-universal AT&T coverage with those that had little or none during those years.

And they found that access to the iPhone correlated with reductions in births by 4.5–8.0 percent at ages 15–19 and by 3.2–6.6 percent at ages 20–24.

There were also statistically significant but smaller declines among older women.

While they stress that iPhones are not the "sole cause," the introduction of the smartphone "played a sizable role in the decline in US births" after 2007 as it shaped people's behavior with less in-person contact.

"As modern smartphones diffused, time spent with friends in person and sexual activity fell sharply alongside rising consumption of pornography, a possible substitute for partnered sex," they concluded.

- 'Technology shock' -

Another study published in May by University of Cincinnati economists Nathan Hudson and Hernan Moscoso Boedo found evidence of similar trends and on a global scale since 2007.

They analyzed World Bank data measuring smartphone penetration and teenage fertility rates in 128 countries.

They found that the decline in birth rates accelerated once smartphones became widely available -- a phenomenon found across countries "with fundamentally different healthcare, welfare, economic, and cultural environments."

This, they concluded, points to "a common global technology shock."

Some academics remain skeptical. For example, teenage births in the United States have been falling since the early 1990s, long before the dawn of the smartphone.

Neither study examines how governments might utilize their findings.

Both rich and poorer countries are grappling with declining birth rates which lead to aging societies and a shrinking workforce -- putting strain on social security systems and potentially dampening economic growth and productivity.

The Centers for Disease Control says US fertility rates are at an all-time low, while leading Asian economies all face the prospect of shrinking populations in the coming years.

China's communist government abandoned its decades-long one-child policy in 2016, while Japan and South Korea have invested heavily in pro-natal policies with little impact.

The world's poorest countries, such as in sub-Saharan Africa, often still have high birth rates, but middle-income countries like India and Brazil also face a fast-dropping fertility rates.

Q.Moore--ThChM