The China Mail - Beijing Court Orders Hospital to Resume Embryo Transfer for Widow

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.000368
ALL 80.660025
AMD 364.155001
ANG 1.790365
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1524.750402
AUD 1.417435
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.716593
BBD 2.014833
BDT 123.096502
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377145
BIF 3013.033747
BMD 1
BND 1.278097
BOB 12.259622
BRL 5.188104
BSD 1.000307
BTN 95.794093
BWP 13.621802
BYN 3.022425
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011937
CAD 1.41495
CDF 2340.000362
CHF 0.828271
CLF 0.024357
CLP 961.770396
CNY 6.71325
CNH 6.734304
COP 3348.488173
CRC 454.820731
CUC 1
CUP 24.008426
CVE 96.778865
CZK 21.384404
DJF 178.136657
DKK 6.562804
DOP 59.49006
DZD 133.78604
EGP 51.914688
ERN 15
ETB 162.282003
EUR 0.87791
FJD 2.24725
FKP 0.754991
GBP 0.754689
GEL 2.61504
GGP 0.754991
GHS 11.618906
GIP 0.754991
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8797.998859
GTQ 7.639444
GYD 209.30355
HKD 7.84345
HNL 26.849519
HRK 6.613804
HTG 130.916751
HUF 320.61504
IDR 17914.1
ILS 3.04806
IMP 0.754991
INR 95.817504
IQD 1310.484048
IRR 1374575.000352
ISK 120.260386
JEP 0.754991
JMD 158.265678
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.28504
KES 129.644095
KGS 87.448204
KHR 4068.10901
KMF 433.00035
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1355.185039
KWD 0.30864
KYD 0.833633
KZT 443.156186
LAK 22438.232325
LBP 89581.428007
LKR 330.293588
LRD 172.063018
LSL 16.32106
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.395752
MAD 9.599596
MDL 17.756616
MGA 4416.553298
MKD 54.043972
MMK 2099.795344
MNT 3598.18988
MOP 8.082152
MRU 40.243999
MUR 47.530378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1734.585509
MXN 17.679204
MYR 4.074104
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.32106
NGN 1326.380377
NIO 36.810462
NOK 9.50785
NPR 153.270725
NZD 1.749629
OMR 0.385571
PAB 1.000307
PEN 3.395971
PGK 4.456927
PHP 62.347038
PKR 277.197262
PLN 3.83775
PYG 5896.344407
QAR 3.646377
RON 4.629204
RSD 103.085092
RUB 84.346338
RWF 1478.474569
SAR 3.752852
SBD 8.000512
SCR 13.902664
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.91775
SGD 1.277904
SHP 0.755002
SLE 24.650371
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.729495
SRD 37.667504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.503489
SVC 8.753236
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.317198
THB 33.375038
TJS 9.228244
TMT 3.51
TND 2.961425
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.942504
TTD 6.803879
TWD 31.728704
TZS 2654.934831
UAH 44.794751
UGX 3918.023434
UYU 40.075482
UZS 11839.206565
VES 852.43145
VND 25976
VUV 118.485868
WST 2.745655
XAF 575.871484
XAG 0.015553
XAU 0.000233347179
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80287
XDR 0.707052
XOF 575.871484
XPF 104.673717
YER 236.650363
ZAR 16.304245
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 19.513758
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.5919
MXV 2.00344
  • RELX

    0.0100

    33.52

    +0.03%

  • BCC

    1.0400

    77.14

    +1.35%

  • NGG

    0.2600

    75.49

    +0.34%

  • GSK

    -0.4100

    49.24

    -0.83%

  • CMSC

    -0.1100

    20.4

    -0.54%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5900

    65.4

    -0.9%

  • BCE

    -0.3300

    20.97

    -1.57%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3600

    19.31

    -1.86%

  • RIO

    0.0900

    94.56

    +0.1%

  • JRI

    -0.1500

    11.02

    -1.36%

  • BTI

    -0.3900

    55.63

    -0.7%

  • VOD

    0.1300

    16.62

    +0.78%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    166.58

    +1.21%

  • BP

    -0.2600

    44.15

    -0.59%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    20.3

    -0.34%

Beijing Court Orders Hospital to Resume Embryo Transfer for Widow
Beijing Court Orders Hospital to Resume Embryo Transfer for Widow

Beijing Court Orders Hospital to Resume Embryo Transfer for Widow

A Beijing court ordered a hospital to resume treatment for a widow seeking to use two embryos created with her husband before his death, finding that her request breached no law, agreement, or ethical principle.

Text size:

A Beijing court has ordered a hospital to resume embryo-transfer treatment for a widow who wants to use two frozen embryos created with her husband before his death.

The Chaoyang District People’s Court disclosed the case on Sept. 22 while publishing its annual white paper on medical disputes. It ruled for the woman, surnamed Zhang, and said she would bear the treatment costs. The judges found that her request violated neither the law nor the couple’s agreement and did not conflict with ethical principles.

Zhang married her husband, surnamed Li, in 2016. After Zhang experienced repeated miscarriages and Li was diagnosed with secondary infertility, they sought treatment at a Beijing hospital’s reproductive center. Three embryos were frozen in 2019.

Li died from a brainstem hemorrhage in July 2019. Zhang subsequently used one embryo and gave birth to a daughter. Two embryos remained in storage.

When Zhang later asked to use the remaining embryos, the hospital refused. It said consent could not be obtained from Li, raised concerns about a possible inheritance dispute, cited a contract clause permitting destruction of the embryos if either spouse died, and noted that its ethics committee had not approved the procedure.

Zhang told the court that she was prepared to assume the legal, ethical, and moral responsibilities associated with the transfer and any resulting birth. Her mother-in-law supported the request. Zhang then sued the hospital.

Chinese rules on human assisted reproductive technology, issued in the early 2000s, generally limit access to married couples and exclude single women. The hospital argued that Zhang no longer met the marital requirement after Li’s death. Zhang maintained that the embryos were created while they were married and that she should be allowed to use them.

The court found no outstanding inheritance conflict because Li’s estate had already been settled through notarization and a settlement agreement. It also found that Zhang and Li had formed a clear and shared intention to have children before his death.

The judges distinguished Zhang’s circumstances from those of an unmarried woman seeking assisted reproductive treatment. The embryos had been created during her marriage, and the hospital had already carried out one successful transfer for her. It therefore could not subsequently rely on restrictions concerning single women to deny access to the remaining embryos, the court said.

The ruling identified Zhang as an independent rights holder under the embryo-transfer service contract and directed the hospital to continue treatment at her expense. The court said disputes arising from assisted reproductive technology require consideration of legal restrictions, ethical issues, family consensus, and contractual obligations.

The case was included in the court’s medical-disputes white paper as an example of emerging legal questions created by advances in assisted reproductive technology.

C.Mak--ThChM