The China Mail - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 66.344071
ALL 83.58702
AMD 382.869053
ANG 1.789982
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1405.057166
AUD 1.540832
AWG 1.805
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.691481
BBD 2.013336
BDT 122.007014
BGN 1.69079
BHD 0.374011
BIF 2943.839757
BMD 1
BND 1.3018
BOB 6.91701
BRL 5.332404
BSD 0.999615
BTN 88.59887
BWP 13.420625
BYN 3.406804
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010326
CAD 1.40485
CDF 2150.000362
CHF 0.80538
CLF 0.024066
CLP 944.120396
CNY 7.11935
CNH 7.12515
COP 3780
CRC 501.883251
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.363087
CZK 21.009504
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.457204
DOP 64.223754
DZD 129.411663
EGP 46.950698
ERN 15
ETB 154.306137
EUR 0.86435
FJD 2.28425
FKP 0.760233
GBP 0.759936
GEL 2.70504
GGP 0.760233
GHS 10.930743
GIP 0.760233
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8677.076622
GTQ 7.659909
GYD 209.133877
HKD 7.78025
HNL 26.282902
HRK 6.514104
HTG 133.048509
HUF 332.660388
IDR 16685.5
ILS 3.26205
IMP 0.760233
INR 88.639504
IQD 1309.474904
IRR 42100.000352
ISK 126.580386
JEP 0.760233
JMD 160.439
JOD 0.70904
JPY 153.43504
KES 129.203801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4023.264362
KMF 421.00035
KPW 900.018268
KRW 1455.990383
KWD 0.306904
KYD 0.83302
KZT 524.767675
LAK 21703.220673
LBP 89512.834262
LKR 304.684561
LRD 182.526573
LSL 17.315523
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.458091
MAD 9.265955
MDL 17.042585
MGA 4492.856402
MKD 53.206947
MMK 2099.87471
MNT 3580.787673
MOP 8.007472
MRU 39.595594
MUR 45.910378
MVR 15.405039
MWK 1733.369658
MXN 18.451604
MYR 4.176039
MZN 63.950377
NAD 17.315148
NGN 1436.000344
NIO 36.782862
NOK 10.160376
NPR 141.758018
NZD 1.776515
OMR 0.38142
PAB 0.999671
PEN 3.37342
PGK 4.220486
PHP 58.805504
PKR 282.656184
PLN 3.665615
PYG 7072.77311
QAR 3.643196
RON 4.398804
RSD 102.170373
RUB 80.869377
RWF 1452.42265
SAR 3.750713
SBD 8.230592
SCR 13.652393
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.529804
SGD 1.301038
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.203667
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.228422
SRD 38.599038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.189281
SVC 8.746265
SYP 11056.858374
SZL 17.321588
THB 32.395038
TJS 9.226139
TMT 3.51
TND 2.954772
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.209038
TTD 6.77604
TWD 30.981804
TZS 2455.000335
UAH 41.915651
UGX 3498.408635
UYU 39.809213
UZS 12055.19496
VES 228.194038
VND 26310
VUV 122.303025
WST 2.820887
XAF 567.301896
XAG 0.020684
XAU 0.00025
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801521
XDR 0.707015
XOF 567.306803
XPF 103.14423
YER 238.503589
ZAR 17.303704
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 22.615629
ZWL 321.999592
  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.74

    -0.07%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    24.1

    +0.37%

  • SCS

    0.0000

    15.76

    0%

  • RIO

    0.0600

    69.33

    +0.09%

  • NGG

    1.4600

    77.75

    +1.88%

  • BCE

    0.0200

    23.19

    +0.09%

  • BCC

    -0.0900

    70.64

    -0.13%

  • RYCEF

    0.0800

    14.88

    +0.54%

  • CMSC

    0.0700

    23.85

    +0.29%

  • RBGPF

    -0.7800

    75.22

    -1.04%

  • VOD

    0.2400

    11.58

    +2.07%

  • RELX

    -1.1200

    42.27

    -2.65%

  • GSK

    -0.4700

    46.63

    -1.01%

  • BTI

    0.3800

    54.59

    +0.7%

  • AZN

    0.8100

    84.58

    +0.96%

  • BP

    0.7600

    36.58

    +2.08%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: © AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

T.Wu--ThChM