The China Mail - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 61.999828
ALL 81.755494
AMD 371.398295
ANG 1.789884
AOA 918.00019
ARS 1407.292099
AUD 1.395041
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.698985
BAM 1.672231
BBD 2.013706
BDT 122.949593
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.377323
BIF 2978.419604
BMD 1
BND 1.276607
BOB 6.908463
BRL 5.022699
BSD 0.999756
BTN 94.471971
BWP 13.52189
BYN 2.82083
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010807
CAD 1.36855
CDF 2325.000101
CHF 0.78982
CLF 0.022823
CLP 898.370098
CNY 6.82315
CNH 6.839635
COP 3626.4
CRC 454.776694
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.27703
CZK 20.8094
DJF 178.039031
DKK 6.38417
DOP 59.397137
DZD 132.589333
EGP 52.829157
ERN 15
ETB 156.109544
EUR 0.85436
FJD 2.199801
FKP 0.737964
GBP 0.740805
GEL 2.684991
GGP 0.737964
GHS 11.098001
GIP 0.737964
GMD 73.000082
GNF 8773.197331
GTQ 7.638607
GYD 209.169998
HKD 7.836315
HNL 26.576093
HRK 6.442095
HTG 130.969532
HUF 310.816035
IDR 17258
ILS 2.955998
IMP 0.737964
INR 94.676803
IQD 1309.695319
IRR 1315000.000115
ISK 122.35002
JEP 0.737964
JMD 157.527307
JOD 0.708995
JPY 159.680957
KES 129.150447
KGS 87.429599
KHR 4006.549332
KMF 419.999582
KPW 899.995813
KRW 1474.25501
KWD 0.30767
KYD 0.833202
KZT 458.273661
LAK 21948.049727
LBP 89581.388191
LKR 318.685688
LRD 183.459019
LSL 16.586995
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.344185
MAD 9.253795
MDL 17.291603
MGA 4156.192821
MKD 52.697943
MMK 2100.039346
MNT 3596.354975
MOP 8.070247
MRU 39.761967
MUR 46.779648
MVR 15.459689
MWK 1733.606365
MXN 17.41201
MYR 3.952015
MZN 63.89841
NAD 16.586995
NGN 1370.330309
NIO 36.790828
NOK 9.337165
NPR 151.155324
NZD 1.701095
OMR 0.384483
PAB 0.999761
PEN 3.504747
PGK 4.343421
PHP 61.172984
PKR 278.626715
PLN 3.63186
PYG 6267.180239
QAR 3.634568
RON 4.353204
RSD 100.298961
RUB 75.324975
RWF 1461.458552
SAR 3.750843
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.692965
SDG 600.495565
SEK 9.283499
SGD 1.27686
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.586806
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 571.399257
SRD 37.465038
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.947601
SVC 8.748402
SYP 110.549271
SZL 16.5734
THB 32.532496
TJS 9.378107
TMT 3.505
TND 2.915516
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.053225
TTD 6.798138
TWD 31.5305
TZS 2607.622977
UAH 44.060757
UGX 3719.267945
UYU 39.45844
UZS 12027.343032
VES 483.93447
VND 26348
VUV 118.225603
WST 2.727813
XAF 560.845941
XAG 0.013753
XAU 0.000219
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801836
XDR 0.697718
XOF 560.850736
XPF 101.967792
YER 238.60116
ZAR 16.566698
ZMK 9001.200977
ZMW 18.969203
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    -1.2900

    98.66

    -1.31%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    64

    0%

  • RELX

    -0.3100

    36.08

    -0.86%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.9

    +0.17%

  • VOD

    -0.0550

    15.455

    -0.36%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2000

    15.2

    -1.32%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.56

    0%

  • GSK

    -0.0100

    54.21

    -0.02%

  • BCC

    -0.5800

    83.28

    -0.7%

  • BTI

    0.8950

    58.215

    +1.54%

  • NGG

    0.1700

    87.4

    +0.19%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    23.27

    +0.04%

  • JRI

    -0.0600

    12.77

    -0.47%

  • AZN

    -1.4700

    186.04

    -0.79%

  • BP

    0.5500

    46.52

    +1.18%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: © AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

T.Wu--ThChM