The China Mail - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 64.999885
ALL 80.716215
AMD 378.656912
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.999848
ARS 1440.542198
AUD 1.432625
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.701767
BAM 1.633386
BBD 2.013103
BDT 122.138616
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376981
BIF 2960.735925
BMD 1
BND 1.261227
BOB 6.906746
BRL 5.196404
BSD 0.999495
BTN 91.809686
BWP 13.078391
BYN 2.841896
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010222
CAD 1.35842
CDF 2239.999841
CHF 0.771095
CLF 0.021749
CLP 859.380213
CNY 6.95465
CNH 6.945825
COP 3666.43
CRC 496.072757
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 92.086637
CZK 20.36705
DJF 177.987122
DKK 6.259135
DOP 62.885991
DZD 129.180081
EGP 46.892601
ERN 15
ETB 155.421337
EUR 0.83834
FJD 2.20125
FKP 0.725629
GBP 0.726865
GEL 2.694962
GGP 0.725629
GHS 10.924686
GIP 0.725629
GMD 73.000092
GNF 8770.633161
GTQ 7.668217
GYD 209.112281
HKD 7.801975
HNL 26.37704
HRK 6.309603
HTG 130.891386
HUF 319.680971
IDR 16756.25
ILS 3.100565
IMP 0.725629
INR 92.044026
IQD 1309.331429
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 121.350207
JEP 0.725629
JMD 156.680488
JOD 0.709
JPY 153.326991
KES 128.999585
KGS 87.449948
KHR 4017.905611
KMF 411.999978
KPW 899.941848
KRW 1433.604947
KWD 0.30649
KYD 0.832978
KZT 503.603671
LAK 21533.681872
LBP 89506.589387
LKR 309.494281
LRD 184.910514
LSL 15.892551
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.276907
MAD 9.037126
MDL 16.761456
MGA 4459.737093
MKD 51.557515
MMK 2099.981308
MNT 3572.641598
MOP 8.032705
MRU 39.899616
MUR 45.090064
MVR 15.459618
MWK 1733.186347
MXN 17.24511
MYR 3.918956
MZN 63.759621
NAD 15.892618
NGN 1395.159713
NIO 36.779996
NOK 9.651375
NPR 146.893491
NZD 1.661995
OMR 0.384424
PAB 0.999516
PEN 3.344329
PGK 4.278419
PHP 58.832501
PKR 279.608654
PLN 3.52537
PYG 6712.014732
QAR 3.634154
RON 4.264398
RSD 98.384965
RUB 76.284955
RWF 1458.255038
SAR 3.750513
SBD 8.077676
SCR 13.75701
SDG 601.497903
SEK 8.86898
SGD 1.264015
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.309359
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 570.233129
SRD 38.092018
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.460913
SVC 8.745579
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.88602
THB 31.190072
TJS 9.34036
TMT 3.5
TND 2.858467
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.413965
TTD 6.783978
TWD 31.404229
TZS 2559.999957
UAH 42.724642
UGX 3578.571995
UYU 37.82346
UZS 12092.817384
VES 358.47615
VND 26065
VUV 119.671185
WST 2.725359
XAF 547.815484
XAG 0.008854
XAU 0.000191
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801312
XDR 0.68021
XOF 547.813197
XPF 99.5983
YER 238.410149
ZAR 15.9709
ZMK 9001.196097
ZMW 19.865039
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0700

    23.73

    -0.29%

  • GSK

    -0.6000

    50.2

    -1.2%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4500

    16.7

    -2.69%

  • BTI

    -0.4950

    59.845

    -0.83%

  • NGG

    0.5100

    84.82

    +0.6%

  • RELX

    -0.9350

    37.425

    -2.5%

  • RIO

    0.2100

    93.12

    +0.23%

  • AZN

    -2.2200

    93.38

    -2.38%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • BP

    0.0950

    37.715

    +0.25%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    82.4

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.0400

    80.7

    -1.29%

  • VOD

    0.0680

    14.568

    +0.47%

  • CMSD

    0.0035

    24.1

    +0.01%

  • JRI

    -0.6500

    13.03

    -4.99%

  • BCE

    0.0690

    25.589

    +0.27%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: © AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

T.Wu--ThChM