The China Mail - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 64.00048
ALL 81.504398
AMD 360.298689
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.999713
ARS 1538.470898
AUD 1.42204
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.697771
BAM 1.755348
BBD 2.014118
BDT 124.150744
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3000
BMD 1
BND 1.281553
BOB 11.995315
BRL 5.383597
BSD 1.000013
BTN 95.207367
BWP 13.822349
BYN 2.947868
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01121
CAD 1.39666
CDF 2315.000407
CHF 0.82214
CLF 0.025025
CLP 988.119907
CNY 6.661101
CNH 6.650235
COP 3178.99
CRC 454.76167
CUC 1
CUP 24.000287
CVE 99.200381
CZK 21.73985
DJF 177.720056
DKK 6.67711
DOP 60.6498
DZD 135.623978
EGP 56.001699
ERN 15
ETB 161.150082
EUR 0.89339
FJD 2.23975
FKP 0.747647
GBP 0.745245
GEL 2.597895
GGP 0.747647
GHS 11.6502
GIP 0.747647
GMD 73.999729
GNF 8799.999881
GTQ 7.645879
GYD 209.614159
HKD 7.84573
HNL 27.000196
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.054259
HUF 326.679498
IDR 18147
ILS 3.11845
IMP 0.747647
INR 95.06795
IQD 1514
IRR 1868414.999853
ISK 121.350106
JEP 0.747647
JMD 158.760361
JOD 0.708988
JPY 157.3625
KES 129.859676
KGS 87.447982
KHR 4072.999908
KMF 440.999978
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1335.419747
KWD 0.31102
KYD 0.833326
KZT 453.3167
LAK 22534.999848
LBP 89549.999477
LKR 332.450795
LRD 170.449927
LSL 16.629918
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.425035
MAD 9.833501
MDL 18.045072
MGA 4594.999963
MKD 55.021155
MMK 2099.909661
MNT 3597.883233
MOP 8.082337
MRU 40.239993
MUR 47.289754
MVR 15.449808
MWK 1736.000078
MXN 18.853803
MYR 4.055698
MZN 63.91004
NAD 16.629848
NGN 1346.850215
NIO 36.809636
NOK 9.203802
NPR 152.332146
NZD 1.771275
OMR 0.384477
PAB 1.000013
PEN 3.459867
PGK 4.49025
PHP 63.746027
PKR 276.601353
PLN 3.92392
PYG 5858.938516
QAR 3.645503
RON 4.775017
RSD 105.014997
RUB 80.621784
RWF 1475
SAR 3.7541
SBD 8.058206
SCR 13.76549
SDG 601.504543
SEK 9.81755
SGD 1.277545
SHP 0.748335
SLE 22.896424
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.513194
SRD 37.644503
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.3
SVC 8.749697
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.629837
THB 33.687018
TJS 9.190174
TMT 3.5
TND 3.020696
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.945696
TTD 6.779691
TWD 32.598399
TZS 2648.258012
UAH 45.55389
UGX 4360.137679
UYU 40.22581
UZS 11994.999855
VES 887.479797
VND 25800.5
VUV 119.217464
WST 2.773901
XAF 586.025246
XAG 0.019665
XAU 0.000250560002
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802288
XDR 0.707052
XOF 586.025246
XPF 107.302545
YER 236.198462
ZAR 16.62641
ZMK 9001.196467
ZMW 20.200416
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.199062
MXV 2.124926
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: © AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

T.Wu--ThChM